Team Mejor – The Spyder Critical Design Review -12/7/04.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sophomore Design Class Automated Highway Simulation Group 2: Jeremy Sletten Patrick Murphy Michael Olson Randa Ibrahim.
Advertisements

Add and Use a Sensor & Autonomous For FIRST Robotics
FIRE FIGHTING ROBOT ELECTRO-MECHANICAL SYSTEMS TERM PROJECT 1
Syringe Pumps. Topics  Diagrams  Principles of Operation  Applications  Safety  Operation  Preventive Maintenance  Common Failure Modes  Troubleshooting.
EML 2023 – Motor Control Lecture 4 – DAQ and Motor Controller.
Design of new speed and acceleration measurement device for wheelchair testing Caitlyn Corey 1, Zachary Mason 2 1 Department of Mechanical Engineering,
P11511 Project Review. Project Team, Faculty, and Customer Project Team: – Project Lead: Kevin Argabright (ME) – Team Members: John Fitch Dean (ME) Mike.
Intelligent Ground Vehicle Competition 2006 Brigham Young University.
1 Autonomous Parallel Parking Alex Braun & Sergey Katsev.
Development of Laser Fuser Test Bed Project Number: P07501 Justin McMillan.
Critical Design Review 12/7/04 Team Uno Bunker Curnes Shawn Houlahan Stephanie Rohrs Steve Schwall Chuck Smith.
Team Mejor Team Concepts and Their Key Issues. Positioning  Line and Spool System  Immovable Post  Encoder on Spool  Tangle Free System  Compass.
A S S I S T R E K Michael Elpers Kyle Fleege Kevin Mason Mary Phillips Theresa Polowski Megan Schroeder AMBULATORY ASSISTANCE SYSTEM Critical Concept Design.
Team GPS Rover Alex Waskiewicz Andrew Bousky Baird McKevitt Dan Regelson Zach Hornback.
Team HazardHawk Team HazardHawk The HazardHawk Team HazardHawk 2008.
Team Paragon Team Concept and Key Issues Presented by: Andy Pfister Brian Masse.
Autonomous Dual Navigation System Vehicle Dmitriy Bekker Sergei Kunsevich Computer Engineering Rochester Institute of Technology December 1, 2005 Advisor:
Team Mejor – The Spyder Controls and Logic – 10/5/04 Brian Shula Perry Smith.
Team P.A.C.K men EE 296 Project. Chris Mcleod Hardware Specialist.
Team Mejor Mobility. Wheels  3 Wheels  2 Front Driven Wheels  Smaller Caster Wheel Drags Behind  Large Front Wheels Centered on Chassis.
Team Mejor – The Spyder Power Requirements and Distributions Dave Millar Brian Shula - 10/12/04.
Team P.A.C.K men EE 296 Project. Chris Mcleod Hardware specialist.
Team Migliore Controls and Interface Presented by: Matt Burkhardt Brendan Crotty.
12/7/2004 AME470 Ltd. - Team Pratham 1Open-Aid TEAM PRATHAM Team Leader: Matt Ryan Chief Engineer: Nick Martin Fabrication: Reed Langton CADCAM: Fraterno.
Design and Implementation of Metallic Waste Collection Robot
June 12, 2001 Jeong-Su Han An Autonomous Vehicle for People with Motor Disabilities by G. Bourhis, O.Horn, O.Habert and A. Pruski Paper Review.
Sponsor/Customer: Dr. Ferat Sahin Multi Agent Bio-Robotics Lab Faculty Guide: Prof. George Slack Team Members: Matthew LeStrange – Electrical Engineering.
Concept Design Review THE DUKES OF HAZARD CAMILLE LEGAULT, NEIL KENNEDY, OMAR ROJAS, FERNANDO QUIJANO, AND JIMMY BUFFI April 24, 2008.
Team Spot A Cooperative Robotics Problem A Robotics Academy Project: Laurel Hesch Emily Mower Addie Sutphen.
Athletic Field Marking Device Anthony Cortese, Ryan Crump, Matthew Lawler, Patrick Shaughnessy (Team Leader), John Sudia.
Team HazardHawk Team HazardHawk 2008 April 24, 2008.
Localisation & Navigation
Servo Motor Control Demonstration.
Sci 701 Unit 6 As learned in Unit 5: Speed, Power, Torque, and DC Motors, a motor can generate a set amount of power. Introduction to Gears Since there.
Servo Motor Control. EML 2023 Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Design Project You are to design a mechanical device that can tilt a.
Programming Concepts (Part B) ENGR 10 Introduction to Engineering 1 Hsu/Youssefi.
Servo Motor Control Demonstration. EML 2023 Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering motor with gear reducer flex coupling incremental optical.
Critical Design Review Group A3: HMS “Bloodhound” Matt Morris Matt Prygoski Jay Slaggert Fred Thwaites Dan Zibton Tuesday, April 22, 2008 Thursday, April.
Electronic Engineering Final Year Project Switched-Controlled Turntable Name: Dean McDonnell Supervisor: Dr. Maeve Duffy.
Robotic Sensor Network: Wireless Sensor Platform for Autonomous Topology Formation Project: Sponsored By: Advisor: Dr. S. Jay Yang, CEManager: Steven.
7.2 V battery pack and charger Put the battery in the charger station at the end of the lab. period. Red light indicates charging. Ken Youssefi Introduction.
Robot sensors MVRT 2010 – 2011 season. Analog versus Digital Analog Goes from 0 to 254 Numerous values Similar to making waves because there are not sudden.
Hardware Sponsors National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies.
Individual Design Concepts Senior Design: Team Burja __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Lecture 23 Dimitar Stefanov. Wheelchair kinematics Recapping Rolling wheels Instantaneous Centre of Curvature (ICC) motion must be consistent Nonholonomic.
P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer Problem Definition Review.
PDR Computer Aided Design AME 470: Senior Design ASME Bulk Material Transporter Matt Bertke, Paul DeMott, Patrick Hertzke, Will Sirokman 11 November 2004.
Servo Motor Control.
Precision Robotics R. M. Satterthwaite R. Shockency Advised By: Dr. B. D. Huggins Mr. C. Mattus.
Mid-Semester Presentation Design II March 4, 2014.
GROUP NINE Cross-Slope Compensation for Wheelchairs Alexander A. Abraham David Dar Marc C. Moore Advisor: Dr. Mark Richter.
Team Mejor – The Spyder User Interface and Troubleshooting Mike Ryan Ryan Sienko- 11/16/04.
Automotive Differential
ROBOTC for VEX Online Professional Development. Homework Questions Thoughts? Questions?
Different Types of Robots
Steering Systems Topics covered in this presentation:
ECE445 Presentation Smart Umbrella Group 35 : Dominic Antonacci, Jonathan Buie, Martin Miller TA: Cara Yang.
Programming Concepts (Part B) ENGR 10 Introduction to Engineering
VEX IQ Curriculum Smart Machines Lesson 09 Lesson Materials:
ROBOTC for VEX Online Professional Development
TATVA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGICAL STUDIES, MODASA (GTU)
ROBOTC for VEX On-Site Professional Development
ROBOTC for VEX Online Professional Development
Motion Stage for Optical Coherence Tomography
Programming Concepts (Part B) ENGR 10 Introduction to Engineering
CAD Trainings LEGOOO!!!!.
The “Yarn Bully” Transport Cart
Programming Concepts (Part B) ENGR 10 Introduction to Engineering
Check out the Stand BiMEE website here:
Combination Lock Opener
Presentation transcript:

Team Mejor – The Spyder Critical Design Review -12/7/04

Team Mejor  Perry Smith - CAD Supervisor/Machinist  Mike Ryan - Fabrication Supervisor  Brian Shula - Electronics/Controls Engineer  Dave Millar - Chief Engineer/Controls Specialist  Ryan Sienko - Team Leader/Machinist

Special Thanks  Dr. Stanisic  Dr. Batill  Mr. Brownell  Dr. Schafer  Mr. Craig Goehler

Opportunity  DOD interested in detecting live mines  Computer images of 20’x 20’ areas give locations of “hotspots”  Sniffer technology has been developed to confirm or deny the true identity of “hotspots”  Team Mejor has been charged with creating a device that can autonomously use the sniffer to check “hotspots”

Requirements  Device locates 4 hotspots, reports hot mines  Must not set off mines  Must find the mines autonomously  Back Portable  Weatherproof  Budget: goal $400, maximum $500  Time constraint: 14 weeks

Design Issues  Greatest problem - autonomous position sensing  Compasses and shaft encoders too inaccurate for dead reckoning  Considered infrared and ultrasonic rangefinders but cost vs. accuracy made ideas unfeasible  Cheaper, more mechanical solution provides sufficient accuracy

Spool System  Encoder used on spool measures distance from post at origin  Radius and angle to each mine is given  Rotations of spool correspond to radial position of “Spyder”  Torsion spring in the spool keeps the line taught and off the ground with minimum 0.5 lb tension

Spool System  Turntable bearing allows the top portion to rotate and always be facing the origin  Potentiometer attached with chassis measures rotation of spool system  This information along with heading from compass on the chassis gives angle from post  The deviation angle or error for this system was modelled to be only 1.5 degrees String direction θrθr Chassis heading, direction of travel N

Spool System

Mobility Design  2 front wheels driven by two 12V motors  Caster is dragged behind  Motors are mounted on bottom of chassis Mounted with Aluminum braces Encased in Lexan Connected to shaft with vertical spring pin  Shafts supported by bearings are connected directly to the 8” wheels with horizontal pins

Mobility

Features and Capabilities  Uses input from keypad to move toward mine  Able detect heading with compass  Detect distance from origin post with encoder  Can drive an arc at specified radius from post  Drives to live mine and stops when mine is detected  Video Video

Strengths  With better sensors the system will be very accurate and consistent  Mobility Zero degree turning Appropriate speed with high torque Simplicity and quality of motor connections  Three sniffers stop motors before an accident could occur  No error propagation

Strengths  Aesthetically pleasing Symmetric layout of parts  Under budget: $  Quality manufacturing of parts for low cost Acquired from Physics Lab Excellent functionality of machined parts  Easy user interface  Only minesweeper to reach hotspot without human assistance

Shortcomings  Complicated assembly 220 fasteners 88 parts excluding fasteners  Motor magnets interfere with compass  Steering and driving are coupled, better to separate  Electronics difficult to access in small box

Outstanding Concerns  MiniMax microcontroller Floating point operations not available Insufficient memory Little documentation/example code available  Original control logic depended on arctan function, not available Less efficient control was adopted  Consistency of encoder was unacceptable  Accuracy of compass was less than expected

Spyder

Q & A  Thank you for your time.  We will now take your questions.