1.5 -1.5 6.0-6.0 2100 Depth (m) Time (s) Raw Seismograms 0 2100 Four-Layer Sand Channel Model 0 0 0.8 Midpoint (m)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Well-Seismic Ties Lecture 7 Depth Time Synthetic Trace SLIDE 1
Advertisements

Time-Lapse Monitoring of CO2 Injection with Vertical Seismic Profiles (VSP) at the Frio Project T.M. Daley, L.R. Myer*, G.M. Hoversten and E.L. Majer.
Geological Model Depth(km) X(km) 2001 Year.
Using 3D Seismic Imaging for Mine and Mineral Exploration G. Schuster University of Utah.
First Arrival Traveltime and Waveform Inversion of Refraction Data Jianming Sheng and Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah October, 2002.
Local Reverse Time Migration with VSP Green’s Functions Xiang Xiao UTAM, Univ. of Utah May 1, 2008 PhD Defense 99 pages.
Closure Phase Statics Correction Closure Phase Statics Correction University of Utah Jianhua Yu.
Prestack Migration Deconvolution Jianxing Hu and Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Depth (m) Time (s) Raw Seismograms Four-Layer Sand Channel Model Midpoint (m)
Reduced-Time Migration of Converted Waves David Sheley University of Utah.
Wavepath Migration versus Kirchhoff Migration: 3-D Prestack Examples H. Sun and G. T. Schuster University of Utah.
Overview of Some Coherent Noise Filtering Methods Overview of Some Coherent Noise Filtering Methods Jianhua Yue, Yue Wang, Gerard Schuster University.
Reduced-Time Migration of Converted Waves David Sheley and Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Wave-Equation Interferometric Migration of VSP Data Ruiqing He Dept. of Geology & Geophysics University of Utah.
Wave-Equation Interferometric Migration of VSP Data Ruiqing He Dept. of Geology & Geophysics University of Utah.
Salt Boundary Delineation by Transmitted PS Waves David Sheley.
Primary-Only Imaging Condition Yue Wang. Outline Objective Objective POIC Methodology POIC Methodology Synthetic Data Tests Synthetic Data Tests 5-layer.
Solving Illumination Problems Solving Illumination Problems in Imaging:Efficient RTM & in Imaging:Efficient RTM & Migration Deconvolution Migration Deconvolution.
CROSSWELL IMAGING BY 2-D PRESTACK WAVEPATH MIGRATION
Joint Migration of Primary and Multiple Reflections in RVSP Data Jianhua Yu, Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Bedrock Delineation by a Seismic Reflection/Refraction Survey at TEAD Utah David Sheley and Jianhua Yu.
Overview of Utah Tomography and Modeling/Migration (UTAM) Chaiwoot B., T. Crosby, G. Jiang, R. He, G. Schuster, Chaiwoot B., T. Crosby, G. Jiang, R. He,
Migration and Attenuation of Surface-Related and Interbed Multiple Reflections Zhiyong Jiang University of Utah April 21, 2006.
Salt Flank Delineation by Interferometric Imaging of Transmitted P-to-S Waves Xiang Xiao Advisor: Gerard T. Schuster Committee: Michael Zhdanov Bob Smith.
Kirchhoff vs Crosscorrelation
Autocorrelogram Migration of Drill-Bit Data Jianhua Yu, Lew Katz, Fred Followill, and Gerard T. Schuster.
Depth (m) Time (s) Raw Seismograms Four-Layer Sand Channel Model Midpoint (m)
Depth (m) Time (s) Raw Seismograms Four-Layer Sand Channel Model Midpoint (m)
Midyear Overview of Year 2001 UTAM Results T. Crosby, Y. Liu, G. Schuster, D. Sheley, J. Sheng, H. Sun, J. Yu and M. Zhou J. Yu and M. Zhou.
3-D PRESTACK WAVEPATH MIGRATION H. Sun Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
Applications of Time-Domain Multiscale Waveform Tomography to Marine and Land Data C. Boonyasiriwat 1, J. Sheng 3, P. Valasek 2, P. Routh 2, B. Macy 2,
Crosscorrelation Migration of Free-Surface Multiples in CDP Data Jianming Sheng University of Utah February, 2001.
MD + AVO Inversion Jianhua Yu, University of Utah Jianxing Hu GXT.
Virtual Source Imaging vs Interferometric Imaging Gerard T. Schuster, Andrey Bakulin and Rodney Calvert.
Interferometric Multiple Migration of UPRC Data
1 Local Reverse Time Migration: P-to-S Converted Wave Case Xiang Xiao and Scott Leaney UTAM, Univ. of Utah Feb. 7, 2008.
Autocorrelogram Migration for Field Data Generated by A Horizontal Drill-bit Source Jianhua Yu, Lew Katz Fred Followill and Gerard T. Schuster.
Crosscorrelation Migration of Free-Surface Multiples in RVSP Data Jianming Sheng University of Utah February, 2001.
4C Mahogony Data Processing and Imaging by LSMF Method Jianhua Yu and Yue Wang.
Multisource Least-squares Reverse Time Migration Wei Dai.
3D Wave-equation Interferometric Migration of VSP Free-surface Multiples Ruiqing He University of Utah Feb., 2006.
Seeing the Invisible with Seismic Interferometry: Datuming and Migration Gerard T. Schuster, Jianhua Yu, Xiao Xiang and Jianming Sheng University of Utah.
Coherence-weighted Wavepath Migration for Teleseismic Data Coherence-weighted Wavepath Migration for Teleseismic Data J. Sheng, G. T. Schuster, K. L. Pankow,
Impact of MD on AVO Inversion
EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS. EARTH MODEL NORMAL-INCIDENCE REFLECTION AND TRANSMISSION COEFFICIENTS WHERE:  1 = DENSITY OF LAYER 1 V 1 = VELOCITY OF LAYER.
1 Local Reverse Time Migration: Salt Flank Imaging by PS Waves Xiang Xiao and Scott Leaney 1 1 Schlumberger UTAM, Univ. of Utah Feb. 8, 2008.
Review of Coherent Noise Suppression Methods Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Multisource Least-squares Migration of Marine Data Xin Wang & Gerard Schuster Nov 7, 2012.
Reverse Time Migration of Prism Waves for Salt Flank Delineation
LEAST SQUARES DATUMING AND SURFACE WAVES PREDICTION WITH INTERFEROMETRY Yanwei Xue Department of Geology & Geophysics University of Utah 1.
Super-virtual Interferometric Diffractions as Guide Stars Wei Dai 1, Tong Fei 2, Yi Luo 2 and Gerard T. Schuster 1 1 KAUST 2 Saudi Aramco Feb 9, 2012.
Interferometric Traveltime Tomography M. Zhou & G.T. Schuster Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
G. Schuster, S. Hanafy, and Y. Huang, Extracting 200 Hz Information from 50 Hz Data KAUST Rayleigh Resolution ProfileSuperresolution Profile Sinc function.
Wave-Equation Waveform Inversion for Crosswell Data M. Zhou and Yue Wang Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
Migration Velocity Analysis of Multi-source Data Xin Wang January 7,
Benefits & Limitations of Least Squares Migration W.Dai,D.Zhang,X.Wang,GTSKAUST RTM Least Squares RTM GOM RTM GOM LSRTM.
Fast Least Squares Migration with a Deblurring Filter 30 October 2008 Naoshi Aoki 1.
The Earth’s Near Surface as a Vibroseis Signal Generator Zhiyong Jiang University of Utah.
Jianhua Yu University of Utah Robust Imaging for RVSP Data with Static Errors.
Shuqian Dong and Sherif M. Hanafy February 2009 Interpolation and Extrapolation of 2D OBS Data Using Interferometry.
MD+AVO Inversion: Real Examples University of Utah Jianhua Yu.
Interpolating and Extrapolating Marine Data with Interferometry
Primary-Only Imaging Condition And Interferometric Migration
Modeling of free-surface multiples - 2
4C Mahogony Data Processing and Imaging by LSMF Method
Modeling of free-surface multiples
Overview of Multisource and Multiscale Seismic Inversion
Overview of Multisource and Multiscale Seismic Inversion
Review of Coherent Noise Suppression Methods
—Based on 2018 Field School Seismic Data
Presentation transcript:

Depth (m) Time (s) Raw Seismograms Four-Layer Sand Channel Model Midpoint (m)

Interferometric Seismic Imaging of the Moho J. Sheng, D. Sheley, J. Pechmann, G. Schuster, R. Nowack

Outline PP Imaging: Alaska Earthquake PS Imaging: Crosswell Data Interferometric Principle: Interferometric Principle: Time Diff. between Arrivals Structure Diff. Interferometric Imaging Applications: Interferometric Imaging Applications:

Interference Pattern Optical Lens LASER t

Interference Pattern Optical Lens ss t LASER Lens Deformation Time Differences

Outline Passive data for IVSP while Drilling Interferometric Principle: Interferometric Principle: Time Diff. between Arrivals Structure Diff. Interferometric Imaging Applications: Interferometric Imaging Applications:

Seismic Ghost Reflection Direct Ghost ? Find R(x,z) but not know source location

Direct Ghost 12Directx Directx Master Seismic Ghost Reflection Seismic Interferogram: Correlate Traces t }M m(x) = (g, t + t ) gx g MxMxMxMxgx M Kirchhoff Migrate pseudo-shot gathers Kirchhoff Migrate pseudo-shot gathers Ghost Direct has kinematics of primary reflection x M BONUS: Reduced Sensitivity to V(r) Sensitivity to V(r)

Migrate s(x,t) s(x,t) rather than s(x,t) Migrate s(x,t) s(x,t) rather than s(x,t) No need to know source location, wavelet No need to know source location, wavelet Reduced sensitivity to velocity errors Reduced sensitivity to velocity errors Problem: Virtual multiples Problem: Virtual multiples Summary

Outline PP Imaging: Alaska Earthquake PS Imaging: Crosswell Data Interferometric Principle: Interferometric Principle: Time Diff. between Arrivals Structure Diff. Interferometric Imaging Applications: Interferometric Imaging Applications:

0 km 200 km 0 s 1.6 s UTAH 0 50 km

Denali Earthquake 0 km 200 km 0 km 48 km Reflectivity Model 4 km/s 5.9 km/s 6.5 km/s 8.0 km/s

Denali Earthquake 0 km 200 km 0 s 40 s Z-Component Seismograms Time (s)

Denali Earthquake 0 km 200 km 0 km 48 km Z-Comp. Migration Image

Denali Earthquake

0 km 200 km 0 s 1.6 s Utah Stations 0 50 km

Vertical Component Vertical Component(Bandpass) Time (s) 0 km 150 km p pp

Vertical Component Vertical Component(Bandpass+PEF) Time (s) 0 km 150 km

Vertical Component Vertical Component(Bandpass+PEF+FX) Time (s) 0 km 150 km

#1 #40 300s 460 s Z-Componentp pp

1 150 km 0 km 40 km Migration Image 

Vertical Comp. (Synthetic) traces (1 km evenly) Time (sec.)

Xmig (Synthetic) Xmig (Synthetic) Depth (km) Distances (km)

Colima, Mexico UU Strong Motion Network

Colima, Mexico Earthquake Colima, Mexico Earthquake(Vertical) Time (sec.)

Colima, Mexico Earthquake Colima, Mexico Earthquake (Vertical, Bandpass) Time (sec.)

Colima, Mexico Earthquake Colima, Mexico Earthquake (Vertical, Deconed)

Crosscorrelogram Crosscorrelogram Time (sec.)

Xmig (P, P Ghost) Xmig (P, P Ghost) Depth (km) 150 Distances (km)

Outline PP Imaging: Alaska Earthquake PS Imaging: Crosswell Data Interferometric Principle: Interferometric Principle: Time Diff. between Arrivals Structure Diff. Interferometric Imaging Applications: Interferometric Imaging Applications:

Seismic P and PS Transmission S P P S ? Find R(x,z)

S P P S MasterS*S P*S Seismic P and PS Transmission P and PS Transmission Interferograms P and PS Transmission Interferograms x12 t } m(x) = (g, t - t ) gx g MxMxMxMx M Kirchhoff Migrate psuedo-shot gathers Kirchhoff Migrate psuedo-shot gathers Difference between Paths

Crosswell Model (D. Sheley) Depth (m) Offset (m) V p /V s = 1.5 Well Separation = 100 m = 100 m Source = 1500 Hz ds = 2 m dg = 2 m 5000 m/s 5500 m/s

Synthetic Data Depth (m) Time (ms) Original Data Depth (m) Time (ms) Shifted Muted Data SPPS PPS S SP

Depth (m) Offset (m) Conventional PS Comparison +10% Velocity Interferometric PS Offset (m) 0100

km/sec Kidd Creek Crosswell Well Receiver Well Source Depth (m) Offset (m)

6 Time (ms) Depth (m) 0 Time Shifted CRG

Conventional PS Offset (m) 50 0Reduced-Time Depth (m)

2. Possible Applications: Horizontal Drill Bit Imaging, CDP Mult. Earth, Mars/Sun Seismology 2 4. Limitations: 4. Limitations: Virtual Multiples Out-of-plane events, Common Inage Gath. N Traces N Correlograms Coherent Noise Summary m(x) = (g, t + t ) g gx MxMxMxMx M 1. New Passive Seismic Imaging Capability: Valid for V(x,y,z) Arbitrary Sources PP, PS, PSP,… 3. Opportunities: Interfer. Tomo., Red. error

2. Possible Applications: Horizontal Drill Bit Imaging, CDP Mult. Reservoir Monitoring, Mars/Sun Seismology 2 3. Limitations: 3. Limitations: Virtual Multiples Reflectivity Imaging > Source Imaging N Traces N Correlograms Coherent Noise Summary m(x) = (g, t + t ) g gx MxMxMxMx M 1. New Passive Seismic Imaging Capability: Valid for V(x,y,z) Arbitrary Sources Src & R Images Poststack & Prestack

Thanks to UTAM sponsors and DOE. and DOE. Thanks to Lew Katz and Fred Followill.

Primary Ghost 12 Free-Surface Multiple

Primary Ghost 12 x PrimaryxPrimary Seismic Interferogram: Correlate Traces Caution: Ghostx Primary = R 3 t } m(x) = (g, t + t ) gx g MxMxMxMxgx M Kirchhoff Migrate psuedo-shot gathers Kirchhoff Migrate psuedo-shot gathers Ghost Primary has kinematics of primary ref. x

Nine-Layered Model (J. Sheng) Depth (km) 2.4 Model Crosscorrelogram image Distance (km) Distance (km) artifacts Kirchhoff Image

Nine-Layered Model Kirchhoff Image Product Image =Kirch*correl Depth (km) 2.4 Distance (km) Distance (km) artifacts

SEG/EAGE Salt Model Depth (km) Distance (km)

Time (s) X (km) X (km) With only primaryJoint auto. migration Time Migration Results (39 CSGs) Source

Crosscorrelogram Image Crosscorrelogram Image Depth (km) Distance (km)

Kirchhoff Image Depth (km) Distance (km)

Product Image Depth (km) Distance (km)

Overview of Univ. Utah Tomography and Modeling/Migration (UTAM) M. Budenseik, T. Crosby, M. Budenseik, T. Crosby, C. Cheng, R. He, G. Schuster, J. Sheng, J. Yu and M. Zhou

UTAM Goals Develop Innovative Tomography, Develop Innovative Tomography, Migration & Modeling Software Migration & Modeling Software Tomography: First successful visco/elastic acoustic waveform inversion of xwell data acoustic waveform inversion of xwell data Migration: Originators migration decon, wavepath migration, least squares migration wavepath migration, least squares migration filtering, seismic interferometry, POIC filtering, seismic interferometry, POIC Modeling: Numerical Recipes Book

Source Geophone Bit Position? Problems in RVSPWD Pilot signal? Wavelet ?

Problems with Drill-bit and RVSP Data No source wavelet No source initiation time Not easy to get pilot signal in deviated well Not easy to get pilot signal in deviated well and horizontal well

Static shift errors may exist Difficulty for separating primary and ghost waves from deviated or horizontal well Problems with Drill-bit and RVSP Data

Solution Cross- or Auto-correlogram Migration Why do we use autocorrelation of seismic data rather than the seismogram ???

Strengths of Autocorrelogram Migration No need to know initial time No limits to deviated well Reduce Static errors influence No need to know source wavelet

Weakness of Correlogram Migration Virtual Multiples & Loss of Resolution

Well Drill bit Receiver Primary Direct Wave Ghost What is Joint Migration

Final migration image Ghost migration Primary migration Seismic Data

Horizontal Well Model 0 Depth (m) 3 40 X (m) V1 V2 V4 V3 V5 V6

Shot Gather Time (s) CSG Time (s) Traces Autocorrelogram

Depth (km) X (km) X (km) Standard migration Joint migration Standard Migration with Joint Migration (3 CSGs) Source

East (kft) North (kft) Well Rig 10 Depth (kft) ft Offset= ft Recording Length: 20 s Sample Interval: 2 ms Main Acquisition Parameters

Claerbout, Katz, 70’s xx Earthquake 1900’s xx Utah+LLNL 1997 Migrate Claerbout, Rickett 1999 xyxyxyxy xyxyxyxyMigrate Arbitrary Unknown Src V(z) V(x,y,z) W(t) Location W(t) Location NOYESYESYES NO YESYESYES YES/NO YESNO? NOYESYES YESNO YES YES YES SELECTIVE HISTORY PASSIVE IMAGING Validity

Main Processing Steps Trace editing and static shift Trace editing and static shift Frequency panel analysis and noise elimination Frequency panel analysis and noise elimination Velocity analysis Velocity analysis Amplitude balance and energy normalization Autocorrelograms, vertical stacking utocorelograms Joint migrating autocorelograms

Acquisition Survey Map Well Rig 3C Receivers Drill bit East (ft) North (ft) C Line AC4

Time (s) SP Drill hole Joint Migration ( insert) and CDP Section

Time (s) SP Primary Migration ( insert) and CDP Section Drill hole

Time (s) SP Drilling hole Joint Migration ( insert) and CDP Section JOINT

Time (s) SP Primary Migration ( insert) and CDP Section Drilling hole Primary

SUMMARY Need separating primary and multiple? NO Work for deviated or horizontal well ? YES Reduce the influence of static errors ? YES Need pilot signal ? NO Need source wavelet and initial time ? NO Suppress coherent noise ? YES Amplitude fidelity ? NO Virtual Multiple ? YES

Primary Ghost 12 Free-Surface Multiple

Primary Ghost 12 x PrimaryxPrimary Seismic Interferogram: Correlate Traces Caution: Ghostx Primary = R 3 t } m(x) = (g, t + t ) gx g MxMxMxMxgx M Kirchhoff Migrate psuedo-shot gathers Kirchhoff Migrate psuedo-shot gathers

SEG/EAGE Salt Model Depth (m) Distance (m) 320 shots 176 traces per shot

Kirchhoff Image Depth (m) Distance (m)

XcorM Depth (m) Distance (m)

Depth (m) Distance (m) KMXcorM

Kirchhoff Image Depth (m) Distance (m)

Outline Passive data for IVSP while Drilling Imaging of Free Surface CDP Multiples Imaging of Hydo-Frac Location Interferometric Principle: Interferometric Principle: Time Diff. between Arrivals Structure Diff. Interferometric Imaging Applications: Interferometric Imaging Applications:

Hydro-Fracturing=Unknown Source ? P P P P x12?

P S P P MasterP*P P*P x12 Hydro-Fracturing=Unknown Source t } m(x) = (g, t - t ) gx g MxMxMxMxgx M Kirchhoff Migrate psuedo-shot gathers Kirchhoff Migrate psuedo-shot gathers Difference between Paths

m 70 Ringy 30 Hz Seismograms Time (s) m Kirchhoff Migration Image Correlogram Migration Image Midpoint (m)

Migration Image: 1-s Stack Migration Image: 40-s Stack m 70 Raw Seismograms Time (s) m 0 Migration Image: 40-s Stack Migration Image: 1-s Stack

Outline Passive data for IVSP while Drilling Imaging of Free Surface CDP Multiples Imaging of Hydo-Frac Location Transmission PS Migration Interferometric Principle: Interferometric Principle: Time Diff. between Arrivals Structure Diff. Interferometric Imaging Applications: Interferometric Imaging Applications:

Xmig (Bandpass) Xmig (Bandpass) Depth (km) X (km)

Xmig (Bandpass+PEF+FX) Xmig (Bandpass+PEF+FX) Depth (km) 150 Distances (km)

Denali Earthquake

Conventional PS Transmission Migration Depth (m) Offset (m) True Velocity + 10 % Velocity Offset (m) 0100

Depth (m) Offset (m) True Velocity Reduced-Time PS Migration + 10 % Velocity Offset (m) 0100

Time Delay = 3 ms ?Time Delay = 3 ms ? Well LocationWell Location Velocity ModelVelocity Model Data Problems

Conventional PS Offset (m) Depth (m)