A comprehensive clinical impact classification of Adult Scoliosis

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
When to operate on Adult Scoliosis patients and when to say ‘No’
Advertisements

Impact of sagittal plane spinal deformity on the spino-pelvic relationship and gravity line position in adults Virginie Lafage, Frank Schwab, Francisco.
Intraobserver and Interobserver Reliability of the Classification of Thoracic Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis*† by LAWRENCE G. LENKE, RANDAL R. BETZ, KEITH.
SPINAL DEFORMITIES Dr. ABDULMONEM ALSIDDIKY, MD, SSC-Orth. Consultant ped. Ortho., ped. Spine & spinal deformities KKUH Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Does vertebral level of Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy correlate with degree of spino- pelvic parameter correction? Schwab Frank; Lafage Virginie; Patel.
Glenn R. Buttermann, MD XLIF vs ALIF Combined with PSF Results in a Community Practice 1.
Degenerative scoliosis requires full deformity correction The argument against Evan Davies.
Postural Considerations HS 349L. Level Landmarks Shoulders Shoulders Hips Hips Finger tips Finger tips Inferior angle of scapulae Inferior angle of scapulae.
Objective Measurement for Lumbar Spinal Angels Submitted To Prof. Dr. Maher El-keblawy Professor of Basic Science Department Faculty of Physical Therapy.
Orthotic Management of the Geriatric Spine
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
F Schwab 1,2, JP Farcy 1,2, K Bridwell 2, S Berven 2, S Glassman 2,
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
Britspine Debate Degenerative scoliosis requires full deformity correction The case for..... Ian Harding and Sean Molloy Wednesday 4.15pm 2 nd April 2014.
Surgical treatment analysis of 809 thoracolumbar and lumbar major adult deformity cases by a new adult scoliosis classification system Zorab Symposium.
Imaging of degenerative scoliosis: A review of current literature S.Saipriya, J.Howard, C.J.Miranda, R. Siripurapu, A. Herwadkar Department of Neuroradiology,
Schroth Method A 3-D Treatment Approach to Treating Scoliosis According to the Principles of C.L. Schroth Michelle Dwyer, DPT Schroth and SEAS Certified.
Scoliosis Curves. thoracolumbar Is longer than most and extends from the upper to the lower spine. It may curve either to the right or the left. Small.
胸腰椎疾病治疗原则 高振兴 Chief, Spine Surgery, CHI-MEI Hospital, Taiwan Honor President, TMISS Chairman, SAS Taiwan Chapter.
By Dr Jeb McAviney BSc., MChiro., MPainMed., FCBP.
Results of Preoperative Pulmonary Function Testing of Adolescents with Idiopathic Scoliosis by Peter O. Newton, Frances D. Faro, Sohrab Gollogly, Randal.
SPINAL DEFORMITIES.
Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis by Lawrence G. Lenke, Randal R. Betz, Jürgen Harms, Keith H. Bridwell, David H. Clements, Thomas G. Lowe, and Kathy Blanke.
A Proven Non-Invasive Rehabilitation Program for people with FM. Dr. Cory Kingston.
SPINE EXERCISE AND MANIPULATION INTERVENTIONS
INTEROBSERVER AND INTRAOBSERVER VARIABILITY IN THE C-EOS. COMPARISON BETWEEN EXPERIENCED SPINE SURGEONS AND TRAINEES. María del Mar Pozo-Balado, PhD José.
Physical Examination in Occupational Medicine
Sagittal balance in thoracolumbar or lumbar congenital kyphoscoliosis and kyphosis at a minimum of 10 years after surgery : A case series Sagittal balance.
Growth Preserving Spinal Surgery for Scoliosis in Children with Osteogenesis Imperfecta Lawrence Karlin, MD, Amer Samdani, MD, Anna McClung, BSN, RN, Michael.
Reliability and validity of the adapted Spanish version of the Early Onset Scoliosis-24 questionnaire María del Mar Pozo-Balado, PhD Hiroko Matsumoto PhD.
A minimum of 2 year follow up of 22 EOS patients who were treated with 2 nd generation MCGR Karsten Ridderbusch, Christian Hagemann, Ralf Stücker Childrens.
John T. Wilkinson m. d. , Chad E. Songy m. d. , Frances l
Correlation between Head Position and Trunk Shift in Congenital Cervicothoracic Junctional Deformities Michael Ruf, Attallah Hassanain, Lynn Letko, Tobias.
Does posterior fusion prevent parasol deformity of the chest in inmature patients (Risser sign 0 and open triradiate cartilage of pelvis) with MSA type.
Clinical Implications from Rear Impact Investigations of a Wheelchair & Occupant Presenter: John Tiernan CEng 1 Co-Authors: Jennifer Walsh 2, Ciaran Simms.
Spinal orthosis.
MRI IMAGING OF THE LUMBAR SPINE USING A LOW-FIELD DEDICATED TILTING SCANNER: COMPUTED ASSISTED MORPHOMETRIC EVALUATION OF POSITIONAL CHANGES (1) Institute.
Master Meeting: Spinal Deformities
Dr. ABDULMONEM ALSIDDIKY , MD , SSCO.
OUTCOME OF SPINE SURGERY IN ELDORET
Magnetic resonance imaging of spondylolysis and isthmic spondylolisthesis Pascal Niggemann – Johannes Kuchta –Dieter Grosskurth– Hans-Konrad Beyer Janine.
Physician determines eligibility
Understanding Adult Scoliosis
Matt Neal, MD Wed AM Conference 1/28/15
GEOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE 3D SPINE CURVE
Objective Measurement for Lumbar Spinal Angels
Scoliosis: More Than Just Cobb Angles
Spinal Deformity and Degeneration
DR. Jamlick Micheni Muthuuri
Retrospective Review of Shoulder Balance Comparing Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) to Early Onset Scoliosis (EOS) Patrick J. Cahill William Lavelle.
Date of download: 10/16/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
John A. Heydemann, MD; Oussama Abousamra, MD;
Key measurements for understanding spinal deformity
Clinical correlation of SRS-Schwab Classification with HRQOL measures in a prospective non-US cohort of ASD patients Dennis H. Nielsen, MD; Lars V. Hansen,
Supplemental PowerPoint Slides
The Effect of the Fixed Sagittal Plane caused by Spinal Instrumentation at an Early Age on the Natural Evolution of Pelvic Incidence During Growth Bekmez.
Scoliosis Idiopathic Scoliosis In Adolescents NEJM Feb 28, 2013: 368:9
Richard Schwend, MD Robert Tung, BS Division of Orthopedic Surgery
R. Vazquez B.Ing. C.E. Aubin Ph.D., H. Labelle M.D.
Tyler Kreitz MD Oussama Abousamra MD John Heydemann MD
O C Shirley, A Field, A Barrie, J Ferguson
A 3D Analysis of Scoliosis Progression in Non-Idiopathic Scoliosis: Is it similar to Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis? Keith R. Bachmann, MD; Burt Yaszay,
Sara K. Fuhrhop, BS Mark J. McElroy, MS Harry C. Dietz, MD
Garrido E†, Bermejo F†, Tucker SK†‡, Noordeen HNN†‡, Morley TR‡
John A Heflin, MD John T. Smith, MD
Long-term results in surgical management of congenital scoliosis (CS): A minimum 10 years follow-up study Debnath UK Harshavardhana NS Hegarty J Grevitt.
Reliability analysis for Cobb angle measurements of congenital scoliosis using X ray and 3D-CT Ryoji Tauchi1), Taichi Tsuji2) , Toshiki Saito2) , Ayato.
Sagittal alignment of the spine is changing!
ICEOS 2013 At What Levels Are Free-Hand Pedicle Screws More Frequently Malpositioned in Children? Mark Heidenreich, BS Yaser M.K. Baghdadi, MD Amy L. McIntosh,
Anterior or posterior release for severe rigid neuromuscular scoliosis: which is safer and more effective? Zhen Liu, Yong Qiu, Ze-zhang Zhu, Bang-ping.
Presentation transcript:

A comprehensive clinical impact classification of Adult Scoliosis F. Schwab K. Bridwell S. Berven J-P Farcy S. Glassman J. Harrast W. Horton M. Ferguson Spine Deformity Study Group, San Diego 2005

Why a classification ? Must develop a common language: exchange of information comparison of data Correlation with clinical impact treatment algorithms surgical guidelines

Scoliosis Prevalence AIS 2-4% of screened pediatric population Adult >60% of screened elderly population Demographic : Life expectancy, birth rates…. Significant growth of aging population segment

Adult Scoliosis Classification: Chicago 2002 Arizona 2003 Chicago 2003 Miami 2004 IMAST Worldspine SRS NASS

Adult Scoliosis Classification: Clinical impact Significant Spondylolisthesis Frontal plane subluxation Lumbar lordosis Thoracolumbar alignment Apical level +/- Global alignment Not significant Coronal Cobb AISA vs DDS Age

The Classification Simple Basic structure 3 parameters Lumbar lordosis T12-S1 Maximal intervertebral subluxation (frontal/sagittal) Apical level of deformity (lumbar dominant) Selected for high clinical impact: SRS-22, ODI

The Classification Apical Level…curve Type Type I : thoracic-only scoliosis Type II: upper thoracic major curve, apex T4-8 (with a thoracolumbar or lumbar curve) Type III: lower thoracic major curve, apex T9-T10 (with thoracolumbar or lumbar curve) Type IV: thoracolumbar major curve, apex T11-L1 (with any other minor curve) Type V: lumbar major curve, apex L2-L4

The Classification Lordosis Modifier (T12-S1) A: marked lordosis >400 B: moderate lordosis 0-400 C: no lordosis present Cobb >00

The Classification Subluxation modifier Maximal intervertebral subluxation Frontal or sagittal plane 0 : no subluxation + : subluxation 1-6mm ++: subluxation >7mm

Adult Scoliosis Classification Intra-, inter-observer variability study 20 cases full-length films AP and Lateral 13 one-time readers 6 repeat readers

Adult Scoliosis Classification Inter-observer analysis Disagreements on thoracic levels (Type II, III) thoracolumbar vs. lumbar

Adult Scoliosis Classification Intra-observer analysis

SDSG data set 1/05 Primary curve apex

Adult Scoliosis Classification Type I curves (thoracic only) 17 subjects (12F, 5 M) Coronal Cobb mean 43 (SD17) Mean SRS pain 67 (SD 19) Mean SRS function 66 (SD 23) Mean ODI 27 (SD 20) Surgical rate 41%

Adult Scoliosis Classification Type II curves (upper thoracic major, apex T4-7) 48 subjects (43F, 5 M) Coronal Cobb mean 47 (SD 22) Mean SRS pain 65 (SD 20) Mean SRS function 69 (SD 18) Mean ODI 28 (SD 22) Surgical rate 35%

Adult Scoliosis Classification Type III curves (lower thoracic major, apex T8-10) 260 subjects (215 F, 44 M) Coronal Cobb mean 50 (SD 20) Mean SRS pain 65 (SD 21) Mean SRS function 72 (SD 17) Mean ODI 24 (SD 20) Surgical rate 39%

Adult Scoliosis Classification Type IV curves (thoracolumbar major apex T11-L1) 343 subjects (302 F, 40 M) Coronal Cobb mean 47 (SD 19) Mean SRS pain 60 (SD 19) Mean SRS function 65 (SD 17) Mean ODI 31 (SD 19) Surgical rate 48%

Adult Scoliosis Classification Type V curves (lumbar major, apex L2-L4) 279 subjects (242 F, 37 M) Coronal Cobb mean 42 (SD 19) Mean SRS pain 61 (SD 19) Mean SRS function 63 (SD 17) Mean ODI 34 (SD 19) Surgical rate 37%

Adult Scoliosis Classification Lordosis Modifier (T12-S1) A B C

Adult Scoliosis Classification Subluxation Modifier (maximal, in mm)

Adult Scoliosis Classification

Adult Scoliosis A valid Classification Simple approach possible High clinical impact Frontal and sagittal plane considerations Validated through largest database available Reliable system Intra- and inter-observer

Adult Scoliosis Classification The Classification – clinical impact Apex Lumbar Lordosis Intervertebral subluxation Do we need descriptive parameters ? exact number/patterns of curves Cobb angles Levels of instability, DJD Other parameters ?

Adult Scoliosis Classification Next Steps: Refine group definitions Combine with Surgical Classification T-L junction L-S junction Longitudinal analysis Ongoing review as database grows