NORM BASED APPROACHES FOR INTEGRATED DESIGN OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS Multiobjective problem considering f 1,f 22 and f 24 : Comparison of weights.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
استاد محترم : دکتر توحيدخواه ارائه دهنده : فاطمه جهانگيري.
Advertisements

Modeling Suspended Growth Systems – see Grady, Daigger & Lim Environmental Biotechnology CE421/521 Tim Ellis (originally prepared by Dr. Eric Evans) October.
Optimization of the Pulp Mill Economical Efficiency; study on the behavior effect of the economically significant variables Alexey Zakharov, Sirkka-Liisa.
Chapter 3 Dynamic Modeling.
Optimization-based design of multisine signals for “plant-friendly” identification of highly interactive systems Hans D. Mittelmann*, Gautam Pendse Department.
Dave Stropky, Paul Nowak, Suqin Dong Process Simulations Ltd. Konstantin Pougatch, Martha Salcudean University of British Columbia P.S. Pagoria, W.A. Barkley,
Wastewater Processes.
Environmental Technology ChimH409 (2-0-1) Michel Verbanck 2012 Universite Libre de Bruxelles Bruface Dept Water Pollution.
PROCESS INTEGRATED DESIGN WITHIN A MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL FRAMEWORK Mario Francisco, Pastora Vega, Omar Pérez University of Salamanca – Spain University.
D Nagesh Kumar, IIScOptimization Methods: M1L1 1 Introduction and Basic Concepts (i) Historical Development and Model Building.
280 SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION The System Identification Problem is to estimate a model of a system based on input-output data. Basic Configuration continuous.
INTEGRATED DESIGN OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PROCESSES USING MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL Mario Francisco, Pastora Vega University of Salamanca – Spain European.
A COMPUTER BASED TOOL FOR THE SIMULATION, INTEGRATED DESIGN, AND CONTROL OF WASTEWATER TREAMENT PROCESSES By P. Vega, F. Alawneh, L. González, M. Francisco,
NORM BASED APPROACHES FOR AUTOMATIC TUNING OF MODEL BASED PREDICTIVE CONTROL Pastora Vega, Mario Francisco, Eladio Sanz University of Salamanca – Spain.
A Comparative Study Of Deterministic And Stochastic Optimization Methods For Integrated Design Of Processes Mario Francisco a, Silvana Revollar b, Pastora.
Supply Chain Design Problem Tuukka Puranen Postgraduate Seminar in Information Technology Wednesday, March 26, 2009.
Comparative survey on non linear filtering methods : the quantization and the particle filtering approaches Afef SELLAMI Chang Young Kim.
Certifying the robustness of model predictive controllers W. P. Heath and B. Lennox Control Systems Centre The University of Manchester.
Introduction to API Process Simulation
Chapter 8. The PID Controller Copyright © Thomas Marlin 2013
1 IV. Wastewater Treatment technologies Topic IV. 9. Wastewater Treatment Facilities with Suspended Biomass - Aerated Tanks: Kinds, Structures, Basic Technological.
1 Approaches to increase the range of use of Model predictive control Miguel Rodriguez Advisor: Cesar De Prada Systems Engineering and Automatic Control.
BsysE595 Lecture Basic modeling approaches for engineering systems – Summary and Review Shulin Chen January 10, 2013.
A Framework for Distributed Model Predictive Control
Two schemes for feedback scheduling on hybrid control systems Chen Xi.
Illustrations Course Synopsis Provides a background of control principles in various engineering applications. Basic mathematical tools such as Laplace.
Chapter 6 Model Predictive Control Prof. Shi-Shang Jang National Tsing-Hua University Chemical Engineering Department.
Jean-François Collard Paul Fisette 24 May 2006 Optimization of Multibody Systems.
Professor: Chu, Ta Chung Student: Nguyen Quang Tung Student’s ID: M977Z235 Fuzzy multiobjective linear model for supplier selection in a supply chain.
DESIGN OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
EWEC 2007, MilanoMartin Geyler 1 Individual Blade Pitch Control Design for Load Reduction on Large Wind Turbines EWEC 2007 Milano, 7-10 May 2007 Martin.
September Bound Computation for Adaptive Systems V&V Giampiero Campa September 2008 West Virginia University.
Optimal Operation of a Wastewater Treatment Unit Using Advanced Control Strategy Emad Ali Chemical Engineering Department King Saud University.
Decentralized MPC applied on BCN Drinking Water Network Trends, Issues and Tools Carlos Ocampo-Martinez Valentina Fambrini WIDE Meeting – Eindhoven (NL)
Chapter 20 1 Overall Objectives of Model Predictive Control 1.Prevent violations of input and output constraints. 2.Drive some output variables to their.
Lecture 25: Implementation Complicating factors Control design without a model Implementation of control algorithms ME 431, Lecture 25.
Motivation For analytical design of control systems,
PROCESS MODELLING AND MODEL ANALYSIS © CAPE Centre, The University of Queensland Hungarian Academy of Sciences A Model Building Framework.
Chapter 2-OPTIMIZATION
Controllability Analysis for Process and Control System Design
2/25/2001Industrial Process Control1 Dynamic Matrix Control - Introduction Developed at Shell in the mid 1970’s Evolved from representing process dynamics.
Robust Nonlinear Model Predictive Control using Volterra Models and the Structured Singular Value (  ) Rosendo Díaz-Mendoza and Hector Budman ADCHEM 2009.
دانشگاه صنعتي اميركبير دانشكده مهندسي پزشكي استاد درس دكتر فرزاد توحيدخواه بهمن 1389 کنترل پيش بين-دکتر توحيدخواه MPC Stability-2.
1 II. Bottom-up Determine secondary controlled variables and structure (configuration) of control system (pairing) A good control configuration is insensitive.
Higher Computing Science 2016 Prelim Revision. Topics to revise Computational Constructs parameter passing (value and reference, formal and actual) sub-programs/routines,
BioWin3 ® – An Introduction Michael D. Doran, P. E. DEE Adjunct Professor of Civil & Environmental Engineering CEE 426.
Tier 2Modulo 15NAMP Process Control and Process Integration 1 Created at Universidad de Guanajuato & École Polytechnique de Montréal Module 15: Process.
PERIODIC CONTROL OF A WASTEWATER TREATMENT PROCESS TO IMPROVE PRODUCTIVITY MUHAMMAD RIZWAN AZHAR KING SAUD UNIVERSITY Saudi Arabia.
Control Structure Design: New Developments and Future Directions Vinay Kariwala and Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering NTNU, Trondheim,
A Simpler Approach for Determining Biodegradation of SOCs in Wastewater Treatment Tim Ellis Associate Professor Dept. of Civil and Construction Engineering.
Amir Yavariabdi Introduction to the Calculus of Variations and Optical Flow.
Membrane Bioreactors for Wastewater Treatment.
Energy Efficiency and Competitiveness with Advanced Wastewater Treatment How a wastewater treatment plant can be more efficient and achieve better results?
Basic Process Design Parameters Food to mass ratio (F/M) = Q x BOD MLSS x V Where Q = average daily sewage flow to aeration (Ml/d) BOD = Average settled.
SOFTWARE: A SOLUTION FOR MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL SOFTWARE: A SOLUTION FOR MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL Laboratoire.
Review/Theory on Kinetics and Reactors
Automatic Control Theory
CEC Conference, July 10, 2017 Comparison of different cryogenic control strategies via simulation applied to a superconducting magnet test bench at CERN.
Presentation at NI Day April 2010 Lillestrøm, Norway
Decomposed optimization-control problem
Introduction to Control Systems Objectives
ENERGY SAVING & SUSTAINABLE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS
Overall Objectives of Model Predictive Control
Linear Programming Wyndor Glass Co. 3 plants 2 new products
Two-level strategy Vertical decomposition Optimal process operation
Automatic Control System
Model-based Predictive Control (MPC)
Digital Control Systems Waseem Gulsher
Nordic Process Control workshop, Telemark, 2009
Outline Control structure design (plantwide control)
Presentation transcript:

NORM BASED APPROACHES FOR INTEGRATED DESIGN OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS Multiobjective problem considering f 1,f 22 and f 24 : Comparison of weights Wp Weights considered and parameters of the MPC controllers automatically tuned: W u =[ ] H p =10, H c =4 Numerical results: W u =[0.0027] H p =10, H c =2 Wp 1 less restrictive than Wp 2 Integrated Design results Multiobjective problem considering f 1,f 22 and f 24 : Comparison of different objectives for costs Substrate and flow qr 1 comparison for two cost objectives (dashed dotted line – 0.3; solid line – 1.6) Numerical results: Desired value for f WuWu HpHp 710 HcHc 422 V1V A Max(s 1 ) Max(qr 1 ) Plant cost = f Computational time Substrate (s 1 ) Recycling flow (qr 1 ) Step for MPC automatic tuning: Mixed sensitivity problem where are suitable weights Constraints: Over disturbance rejection and based on l1 norms to avoid actuator saturation Multiobjective approach: M’= control sensitivity S’= output sensitivity where f i * is the desired value for each objective function Method “Goal Attainment” (MATLAB) Mario Francisco, Pastora Vega ECCE-6 Copenhagen (Denmark, September 2007) PLANT Wp 1 Wp 2 V1V A1857 S 1r 70 Max(s 1 ) Max(qr 1 ) Plant cost= f 1 (x) Computational time  Study and develop an Integrated Design method including a model based predictive controller (MPC), to tune controller parameters (both real and integers) and plant parameters (dimensions, working point, etc.)  Apply this method to the Integrated Design of the activated sludge process in a wastewater treatment plant, particularizing for a linear MPC, in order to minimize substrate variations at the output General objectives INTEGRATED DESIGN Designed plants are more controllable because plant and controller are designed at the same time considering controllability aspects, and not sequentially as in classical design EFFLUENT SETTLERREACTORINFFLUENT RECYCLING Benchmark global configuration (COST project 624) (substrate, oxygen and nitrate control) Particular case considered: substrate control purge EFFLUENT INFFLUENT Biological reactors Unaerated Aerated Settler Recycling sludge Nitrate internal recycling 1 aerated reactor + 1 settler Substrate (s 1 ) and oxygen (c 1 ) controlled variables biomass (x1) limited Recycling flow (qr 1 ), purge flow (q p ), and aeration factor (fk 1 ) manipulated variables Multivariable linear predictive controller, using a state space model for prediction (MPC Toolbox MATLAB) Predictive controller index Substrate comparison for two weights (dashed dotted line – Wp 1 ; solid line – Wp 2 ) Particular formulation: Transfer functions used for Integrated Design: output sensitivity (S’), control sensitivity (M’) Block diagram: Tuning parameters: H p : Prediction horizon H c : Control horizon W u : Weight for control efforts MPC general structure for the linear case without constraints An iterative two steps optimization algorithm has been proposed due to the problem complexity and the existence of real and integer parameters Construction costs (reactor volume and settler area) Plant controllability for perfect control Objective function: M’= Control sensitivity Activated sludge process General algorithm for Integrated Design Step for MPC tuning N= mixed sensitivity Step for plant design: multiobjective approach x=(s 1,x 1,c 1,x d,x b,x r,,fk 1,qr 1,q p,V 1,A) Over the non linear differential equations of the process Controllability constraints residence timessludge age Process constraints flow relationships Constraints: etc. University of Salamanca (Spain)