1 1 D. Hitlin Super B Factory Trigger Workshop Dec. 2/3, 2004 David Hitlin Caltech December 3, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sharpening the Physics case for Charm at SuperB D. Asner, G. Batignani, I. Bigi, F. Martinez-Vidal, N. Neri, A. Oyanguren, A. Palano, G. Simi Charm AWG.
Advertisements

MSSM Precision tests of the flavours in the SM Model Indep. Analysis in  B=2 MFV, mainly high tan  scenarios Achille Stocchi (LAL-IN2P3/CNRS)
Charm results overview1 Charm...the issues Lifetime Rare decays Mixing Semileptonic sector Hadronic decays (Dalitz plot) Leptonic decays Multi-body channels.
1 1 D. Hitlin SLAC B-Day March 20, 2003 David Hitlin Caltech March 20, 2003.
Title Gabriella Sciolla Massachusetts Institute of Technology Representing the BaBar Collaboration Beauty Assisi, June 20-24, 2005 Searching for.
Radiative B Decays (an Experimental Overview) E.H. Thorndike University of Rochester CLEO Collaboration FPCP May 18, 2002.
Current Methods of determining V ub I. Endpoint of the inclusive lepton spectrum II. Exclusive decays Methods of determining V ub with small theoretical.
16 May 2002Paul Dauncey - BaBar1 Measurements of CP asymmetries and branching fractions in B 0   +  ,  K +  ,  K + K  Paul Dauncey Imperial College,
Oct.,  Overview of the CLEO experiment  D and D S leptonic decays to  and  : Measurements of absolute branching fractions Measurements of absolute.
Search for B s oscillations at D  Constraining the CKM matrix Large uncertainty Precise measurement of V td  properly constrain the CKM matrix yield.
1 1 Babar TM and © Nelvana David Hitlin DOE Review Caltech July 21, 2004.
1 David Hitlin Snowmass July 17, e + e -  (4S) -  (5S) Collider Subgroup Report DRAFT.
.. Gabriella Sciolla Massachusetts Institute of Technology On behalf of the BaBar Collaboration APS/DPF Meeting Philadelphia, April 5 - 8, 2003 Cracking.
1 1 D. Hitlin Super B Factory Trigger Workshop Dec. 2/3, 2004 David Hitlin Caltech December 3, 2004.
The physics of b s l + l - : 2004 and beyond Jeffrey Berryhill University of California, Santa Barbara January 19, 2004 Super B Factory Workshop University.
1 Measurement of f D + via D +   + Sheldon Stone, Syracuse University  D o D o, D o  K -  + K-K- K+K+ ++  K-K- K+K+ “I charm you, by my once-commended.
Measurements of Radiative Penguin B Decays at BaBar Jeffrey Berryhill University of California, Santa Barbara For the BaBar Collaboration 32 nd International.
The new Silicon detector at RunIIb Tevatron II: the world’s highest energy collider What’s new?  Data will be collected from 5 to 15 fb -1 at  s=1.96.
CHARM 2007, Cornell University, Aug. 5-8, 20071Steven Blusk, Syracuse University D Leptonic Decays near Production Threshold Steven Blusk Syracuse University.
Search for B     with SemiExclusive reconstruction C.Cartaro, G. De Nardo, F. Fabozzi, L. Lista Università & INFN - Sezione di Napoli.
Physics reach of a Super B-Factory Riccardo Faccini Universita’ “La Sapienza” e INFN Roma CSNI, 4 Febbraio 2003.
June-10 th, 2005 WIN05 Super B factories Shoji Uno ( KEK) Super B factories Shoji Uno ( KEK) June-10 th, 2005 WIN05 Delphi, Greece Contents 1. Physics.
1 1 Babar TM and © Nelvana David Hitlin Caltech SLUO Annual Meeting July 6, 2004.
Takeo Higuchi Institute of Particle and Nuclear Studies, KEK Jan 21, 2004 Hawaii, USA Super B Factory Workshop Charged Higgs Search with B  D   
Radiative and Rare B-Decays at BaBar All results are preliminary unless journal ref. is given limit values are 90% CL unless otherwise specified Carsten.
1 BaBar Collaboration Randall Sobie Institute for Particle Physics University of Victoria.
Preliminary Measurement of the BF(   → K -  0  ) using the B A B AR Detector Fabrizio Salvatore Royal Holloway University of London for the B A B AR.
The BaBarians are coming Neil Geddes Standard Model CP violation BaBar Sin2  The future.
Wolfgang Menges, Queen Mary Measuring |V ub | from Semileptonic B Decays Wolfgang Menges Queen Mary, University of London, UK Institute of Physics: Particle.
CMD-2 and SND results on the  and  International Workshop «e+e- Collisions from  to  » February 27 – March 2, 2006, BINP, Novosibirsk, Russia.
SuperKEKB to search for new sources of flavor mixing and CP violation - Introduction - Introduction - Motivation for L= Motivation for L=
Philip J. Clark University of Edinburgh Rare B decays The Royal Society of Edinburgh 4th February 2004.
Status and Physics Prospects of the SuperKEKB Project Y. Horii Tohoku Univ. (Japan) 1 5th March 2011, La Thuile 2011.
SuperKEKB to search for new sources of flavor mixing and CP violation - Introduction - Introduction - Motivation for L= Motivation for L=
Rare Charm Decays Adrian Bevan IHEP, Beijing, 22 nd October 2011
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
June 28, 2002BEACH2002 B Physics at the Tevatron B Physics at the Tevatron Jack Cranshaw Texas Tech University For the CDF and D0 Collaborations.
To SuperB or not to SuperB ? Francesco Forti INFN-Pisa IFAE, Torino, Aprile 2004 Babar TM and © Nelvana.
BaBar physics, recent highlights and future prospects Owen Long, BaBar physics analysis coordinator U. C. Riverside & SLAC December 5, 2008.
Charm Physics at Super B Factories after BESIII, Belle and B A B AR David Hitlin The Future of Heavy Flavor Physics ITEP, Moscow July 24, 2006.
1 Multi-body B-decays studies in BaBar Ben Lau (Princeton University) On behalf of the B A B AR collaboration The XLIrst Rencontres de Moriond QCD and.
Physical Program of Tau-charm Factory V.P.Druzhinin, Budker INP, Novosibirsk.
C. K. MackayEPS 2003 Electroweak Physics and the Top Quark Mass at the LHC Kate Mackay University of Bristol On behalf of the Atlas & CMS Collaborations.
1 Highlights from Belle Jolanta Brodzicka (NO1, Department of Leptonic Interactions) SAB 2009.
Rare B Decays with “Missing Energy” Tom Browder (University of Hawaii) Will discuss experimental results from Belle on B   ν (BELLE-CONF-0671) and B.
1 BaBar & Belle: Results and Prospects Claudio Campagnari University of California Santa Barbara.
Working Group 3 Summary: V td, V ts, and Friends Jeffrey Berryhill Laurent Lellouch Mikolaj Misiak Christoph Paus CKM Workshop, UCSD March 18, 2005 K BsBs.
Charm Physics Potential at BESIII Kanglin He Jan. 2004, Beijing
LHCb: Xmas 2010 Tara Shears, On behalf of the LHCb group.
3/13/2005Sergey Burdin Moriond QCD1 Sergey Burdin (Fermilab) XXXXth Moriond QCD 3/13/05 Bs Mixing, Lifetime Difference and Rare Decays at Tevatron.
Maria Różańska, INP Kraków HEP2003 Europhysics Conference –Aachen, July 18th 1 CPV in B → D (*) K (*) (and B → D K  ) in BaBar and Belle Outline: CPV.
BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 1 Antonio Limosani JSPS Fellow (KEK-IPNS JAPAN) BMN
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
1 Absolute Hadronic D 0 and D + Branching Fractions at CLEO-c Werner Sun, Cornell University for the CLEO-c Collaboration Particles and Nuclei International.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
Update on Measurement of the angles and sides of the Unitarity Triangle at BaBar Martin Simard Université de Montréal For the B A B AR Collaboration 12/20/2008.
Calibration of energies at the photon collider Valery Telnov Budker INP, Novosibirsk TILC09, Tsukuba April 18, 2009.
DØ Beauty Physics in Run II Rick Jesik Imperial College BEACH 2002 V International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons Vancouver, BC, June.
1 Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Fergus Wilson, RAL 1.Introduction & Accelerators 2.Particle Interactions and Detectors (2) 3.Collider Experiments.
David Hitlin Frascati SuperB Workshop March 16/17, 2006 An EMC for Super B  With the likely time structure of SuperB, backgrounds and radiation damage.
Belle and Belle II Akimasa Ishikawa (Tohoku University)
12/15/06 B. Casey 1  s and  s at the Tevatron Gernot Weber Mainz University On behalf of Brendan Casey Brown University and the DØ and CDF collaborations.
K. Holubyev HEP2007, Manchester, UK, July 2007 CP asymmetries at D0 Kostyantyn Holubyev (Lancaster University) representing D0 collaboration HEP2007,
David B. MacFarlane SLAC EPAC Meeting January 25, 2006
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 6th May 2009 Fergus Wilson, RAL.
Calorimeter Backgrounds
Study of e+e- pp process using initial state radiation with BaBar
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 28th April 2008 Fergus Wilson. RAL.
Search for Lepton Flavour Violation in the decay  → BaBar
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Presentation transcript:

1 1 D. Hitlin Super B Factory Trigger Workshop Dec. 2/3, 2004 David Hitlin Caltech December 3, 2004

2 2 D. Hitlin Super B Factory Trigger Workshop Dec. 2/3, 2004 Physics objectives of a Super B Factory The physics objectives of an experiment at a Super B Factory revolve around the search for New Physics. The specific approaches fall into several distinct categories Improvements in the classic unitarity triangle-related measurements to the “ultimate” precision [a balance of theoretical, statistical and systematic uncertainties] UT angles measure asymmetries with minimum systematic error lepton tag has smallest systematics Measure branching ratios of rare modes for g UT sides use the recoil method to reduce backgrounds and theoretical uncertainties Maximum sensitivity for very rare decays – B, D, t Branching fractions A CP, A FB Kinematic distributions

3 3 D. Hitlin Super B Factory Trigger Workshop Dec. 2/3, 2004 The recoil physics method at the ¡ (4S) Fully reconstruct one of the two B’ s in hadronic modes (for some topics, in semileptonic modes as well) …and do it with “high” efficiency The rest of the event is the other B, whose four-momentum is known ub You have a single B beam, with reduced systematics in V cb, V ub studies, and reduced backgrounds for rare decays, especially those involving neutrinos or photons e-e- D*D*D*D* p e+e+ B reco B recoil XuXu n Semileptonic decays B  D (*) n, B  ( p,r ) n, B  X c,u n …… ( ) B  D (*) tn ( sensitive to New Physics ) B  D (*) tn Purely leptonic decays B  tn, …. B  K nn B  invisible B  X s g

4 4 D. Hitlin Super B Factory Trigger Workshop Dec. 2/3, 2004 Measurement precision – angles of the Unitarity Triangle Unitarity Triangle - Angles e + e - Precision1 Year Precision Measurement3/ab10/ab50/abLHCbBTeV a (pp) ( S pp, B  pp BR’s + isospin) 6.7  3.9  2.1  a ( rp ) (Isospin, Dalitz) (syst  3  ) 3, 2.3  1.6, 1.3  1, 0.6  2.5  -5  44 a ( rr ) (penguin, isospin) (stat+syst) 2.9  1.5  0.72  b (J/  K S ) (all modes) 0.3  0.17  0.09  0.57  0.49  g (B  D (*) K) (ADS) 2-3  ~10  <13  g (all methods)  Theory: a ~5%, b ~ 1%, g ~0.1%

5 5 D. Hitlin Super B Factory Trigger Workshop Dec. 2/3, 2004 Probes of new physics - I 1)Measure the CP asymmetry in modes other than that measure sin2 b in the Standard Model Precision of benchmark sin2 b in can improve to the  1% level Expect the same value for “sin2 b ” in “, but different SUSY models can produce different asymmetries A great deal of luminosity is required to make these measurements to meaningful precision

6 6 D. Hitlin Super B Factory Trigger Workshop Dec. 2/3, 2004 Extrapolated statistical errors on CP asymmetries 10 to 50 ab -1 are required for a meaningful comparison Current precision B A B AR measurement errors

7 7 D. Hitlin Super B Factory Trigger Workshop Dec. 2/3, 2004 Measurement precision – rare decays Rare Decays – New Physics e + e - Precision1 Year Precision MeasurementGoal3/ab10/ab50/abLHCbBTeV G( b  d  / G (b  s  -- B( B  D ( * ) tn )SM: B : 8x %5.6%2.5%-- B( B  s nn ) (K -,0, K* -,0 ) 1 exclusive mode: ~4x10 -6 ~3 s -- B( B  invisible) <2x10 -6 <1x10 -6 <4x B( B d  mm ) B( B d  tt ) ---- B(t  mg ) <

8 8 D. Hitlin Super B Factory Trigger Workshop Dec. 2/3, 2004 Rare Decays – New Physics – CPV e + e - Precision1 Year Precision MeasurementGoal3/ab10/ab50/abLHCbBTeV S(B0fKS)S(B0fKS) SM: <0.25%16%8.7%3.9%16 ??7 ?? S(B0fKS+fKL)S(B0fKS+fKL) SM: <0.25%-- S(Bh'Ks )S(Bh'Ks ) SM: <0.3%5.7%3%1%-- S(BKsp0)S(BKsp0) SM: <0.2%8.2%5%4% (?) -- S(BKsp0g)S(BKsp0g) SM: <0.1%11.4%6%4% (?) -- A CP (b  s g) SM: <0.5%2.4%1%0.5% (?) -- A CP (B  K* g ) SM: <0.5%0.59%0.32%0.14%-- CPV in mixing (|q/p|) <0.6% -- Measurement precision - rare B decays

9 9 D. Hitlin Super B Factory Trigger Workshop Dec. 2/3, 2004 Rare Decays – New Physics e + e - Precision1 Year Precision MeasurementGoal3/ab10/ab50/abLHCbBTeV G( b  d  / G (b  s  -- B( B  D ( * ) tn )SM: B : 8x %5.6%2.5%-- B( B  s nn ) (K -,0, K* -,0 ) 1 exclusive mode: ~4x10 -6 ~3 s -- B( B  invisible) <2x10 -6 <1x10 -6 <4x B( B d  mm ) B( B d  tt ) ---- B(t  mg ) < Measurement precision – rare decays Masiero, Vempati, Vives t  mg is sensitive to 23 generation mass insertions, (analogous to b  ss s ) but in the lepton sector

10 10 D. Hitlin Super B Factory Trigger Workshop Dec. 2/3, 2004 Mass insertion approximation: model-independent f K S B A B AR (now) f K S 30 ab -1 The scale of New Physics Ciuchini, Franco, Martinelli, Masiero, & Silvestrini f 23 mass insertion f 13 mass insertion D A CP (J/  K S - p 0 K S ) D A CP (J/  K S - f K S )

11 11 D. Hitlin Super B Factory Trigger Workshop Dec. 2/3, 2004 Physics demands an open trigger In the face of the impressive rates and amounts of data that will be encountered at a Super B Factory, the first reaction is usually to think about a restrictive trigger This is unlikely to work, since the physics requires A large, unbiased sample of fully reconstructed B decays Recoil studies, A CP, B to invisible, etc. Sensitivity to rare t decays A trigger that can do this will manifestly provide a large sample of D decays as well

12 12 D. Hitlin Super B Factory Trigger Workshop Dec. 2/3, 2004 The “Snowmass Year” was defined in 1988, based on data from CESR/CLEO: 1 Snowmass Year = 10 7 s The Snowmass Year factor is meant to account for The difference between peak and average luminosity Accelerator and detector uptime Deadtime ……………………….. PEP-II performance April 2003-April 2004 (Dec 03 Trickle LER, Feb 04 Trickle HER) Given the excellent performance of PEP-II/B A B AR and KEK-B/Belle, and the advent of trickle injection, the modern B factory Snowmass Year constant is 1.4 x 10 7 Thus we can integrate 10 ab -1 /year with 7 x cm -2 s -1, instead of with cm -2 s -1 The New Snowmass Year

13 13 D. Hitlin Super B Factory Trigger Workshop Dec. 2/3, 2004 Occupancy extrapolations are uncertain, but sobering 2x x % 2x x Now: 8 physics clusters

14 14 D. Hitlin Super B Factory Trigger Workshop Dec. 2/3, 2004 Tracking will have to be done with silicon, not gas We will have to develop a silicon tracking trigger

15 15 D. Hitlin Super B Factory Trigger Workshop Dec. 2/3, 2004 Top module

16 16 D. Hitlin Super B Factory Trigger Workshop Dec. 2/3, 2004 Bottom module

17 17 D. Hitlin Super B Factory Trigger Workshop Dec. 2/3, 2004 Midplane module 574%

18 18 D. Hitlin Super B Factory Trigger Workshop Dec. 2/3, 2004 There will be pixels, (striplets) and DSSD layers Pixel or striplets (2 layers) Intermediate DSSD (3 layers) Central Silicon Tracker(4 layers) R(outer) = 60 cm

19 19 D. Hitlin Super B Factory Trigger Workshop Dec. 2/3, 2004 There is a fast, rad hard replacement crystal for CsI(Tl)

20 20 D. Hitlin Super B Factory Trigger Workshop Dec. 2/3, 2004 Comparison of CsI(Tl), LSO, Liquid Xe CsI(Tl)LSOLXe Atomic number Z54 effective65 effective54 Atomic weight A131 Density (g/cc) Radiation length (cm) Molière radius (cm) l scint (nm) t scint (ns) 680, , 22, 45 Light yield (photons/MeV)56,000 (64:36)27,00075,000 Refractive index Liquid/gas density ratio519 Boiling point at 1 atmosphere (K) 165 Radiation hardness (Mrad) Cost/cc3.2>7 (50 ???)2.5

21 21 D. Hitlin Super B Factory Trigger Workshop Dec. 2/3, 2004

22 22 D. Hitlin Super B Factory Trigger Workshop Dec. 2/3, 2004 An upgrade path from B A B AR to Super B A B AR BABAR SuperBABAR SVT  5 layers of double-sided striplets  2 layers of thin pixels + 3 layers of thin pixels Tracker  4 layers of thin double-sided Si EMC  Liquid Xe scintillation or fast, rad-hard crystals (LYSO) + New trigger and DAQ system DIRC  Faster, pixelated readout

23 23 D. Hitlin Super B Factory Trigger Workshop Dec. 2/3, 2004 Projections depend heavily on the luminosity term Cross sections: B B : 1 nb  B B pairs/year uds : 1.6 nb, c : 1 nb leptons (  ): 0.78 each recognizable Bhabhas: ~50nb The Level 1 trigger rate: BABAR /PEP-II projections show that the hardware trigger rate will be dominated by luminosity-related interactions at luminosities above At 7x10 35, this gives a rate for a BABAR -like hardware trigger of about 50K events per second. Half of these are scaled Bhabhas. There are ~ 6K beam background-like events per second. Unless we are clever we might have to cope with a ~100K/second L1 rate ! Event size ~50K (~2X BABAR ) How well must we know the efficiency of each trigger line? Precise absolute branching ratios may not be of extreme importance Scaled from GPDF in Hawaii

24 24 D. Hitlin Super B Factory Trigger Workshop Dec. 2/3, 2004 The challenge Design a trigger D/A system with a silicon tracking plus fast calorimeter trigger which has all the virtues of a classical e + e - trigger in a much more challenging environment Store and analyze the data efficiently Find New Physics