ARIES Review, PPPL L. M. Waganer, 4-5 Oct 2006 Summary of Low Cost Fabrication of Integrated Coil Structure L. M. Waganer With Support from Kevin Slattery.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ERT 216 HEAT & MASS TRANSFER Sem 2/
Advertisements

TAREK A. TUTUNJI Rapid Prototyping. Prototype A prototype can be defined as a model that represents a product or system. This model is usually used for.
High Performance Divertor Target Plate, a Combination of Plate and Finger Concepts S. Malang, X.R. Wang ARIES-Pathway Meeting Georgia Institute of Technology,
Ciemat Mechanical Workshop and test of the Stainless steel plate machining for the CALICE-HCAL. Enrique Calvo/Mary Cruz Fouz Lyon
Update on ARIES-CS Coil Structural Analysis X.R. Wang and A.R. Raffray ARIES Meeting PPPL, NJ October 4-5, 2006.
ARIES Meeting, UCSD L. M. Waganer, June 2006 Maintenance and Building Conceptual Approach L. M. Waganer The Boeing Company ARIES Meeting University.
Spectrometer Solenoid Design and Procurement Review Steve Virostek Mike Green Mike Zisman Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting October.
September 3-4, 2003/ARR 1 Initial Assessment of Maintenance Scheme for 2- Field Period Configuration A. R. Raffray X. Wang University of California, San.
Mechanical Status of ECAL Marc Anduze – 30/10/06.
Status of the Modular and Field- Period Replacement Maintenance Presented by X.R. Wang Contributors: S. Malang, A.R. Raffray and L. El-Guebaly ARIES Meeting.
ARIES-CS Page 1 Summary of ARIES Power Core Unit Costs L. Waganer The Boeing Company 16 September 2004 ARIES Meeting at Madison, WI.
June 14-15, 2007/ARR 1 Trade-Off Studies and Engineering Input to System Code Presented by A. René Raffray University of California, San Diego With contribution.
ARIES-CS Page 1 Low Cost Fabrication Approach for ARIES-CS Coil Structure L. Waganer The Boeing Company November 2005 ARIES Meeting at UCSD, San.
Update of the ARIES-CS Power Core Configuration and Maintenance Presented by X.R. Wang Contributors: S. Malang, A.R. Raffray and the ARIES Team ARIES.
Magnet System Definition L. Bromberg P. Titus MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center ARIES meeting November 4-5, 2004.
ARIES -ST Study L.M. Waganer US/JA Workshop 3/17/2000/Pg.1 By L. M. Waganer The Boeing Company With support from D. A. Deuser, K. T. Slattery, and G. W.
Status of the Coil Structure Design and Magnetic-Structural Analysis Presented by X.R. Wang Contributors: UCSD: S. Malang, A.R. Raffray PPPL: H.M. Fan.
Status of Coil Structural Design and Magnetic-Structural Analysis Presented by X.R. Wang Contributors: ORNL: D. Williamson UCSD: S. Malang, A.R. Raffray.
Status of 3-D Analysis, Neutron Streaming through Penetrations, and LOCA/LOFA Analysis L. El-Guebaly, M. Sawan, P. Wilson, D. Henderson, A. Ibrahim, G.
ARIES Meeting, UCSD L. M. Waganer, June 2006 An Approach for Low Cost Fabrication of the Coil Structure L. M. Waganer With Support from Kevin Slattery.
The main function of the divertor is minimizing the helium and impurity content in the plasma as well as exhausting part of the plasma thermal power. The.
ARIES Project Meeting, L. M. Waganer, 3-4 April 2007 Page 1 Groundrules, Bases, and Definitions to Scope “The Next Step” L. Waganer The Boeing Company.
Feb 5-7, 2007/ARR 1 ARIES-CS Coil Configuration and Structural Design Presented by A. R. Raffray University of California, San Diego with contributions.
Status of the ARIES-CS Power Core Configuration and Maintenance Presented by X.R. Wang Contributors: S. Malang, A.R. Raffray ARIES Meeting PPPL, NJ Sept.
March 20-21, 2000ARIES-AT Blanket and Divertor Design, ARIES Project Meeting/ARR Status ARIES-AT Blanket and Divertor Design The ARIES Team Presented.
ARIES-IFE Study L. M. Waganer, June 7, 2000 Page 1 Considerations of HI Beam and Vacuum System Arrangement L. Waganer The Boeing Company 7 June 2001 ARIES.
LARP QXF 150mm Structure Mike Anerella / John Cozzolino / Jesse Schmalzle November 15, nd Joint HiLumi LHC-LARP Annual Meeting.
Engineering Division 1 Mechanical and Integration CD0 Walkthru, 19-Dec, 2007 Eric Anderssen, LBNL.
3 March 2009M. Breidenbach1 SiD LoI Costs M. Breidenbach.
ARIES -AT Study L.M. Waganer ARIES 3/20-21/00 Page1 ARIES-AT Vacuum Vessel Design Approach L. M. Waganer The Boeing Company 20 March 2000 UCSD San Diego,
3D Finite Element Analysis for Ribbed Structure Vacuum Vessel By: Hamed Hosseini Advisor: Prof. Farrokh Najmabadi.
Working Metals Depending on the application, the process used to work a metal may vary. Common processes include: Casting Forging / Pressing Fabricating.
Welding Processes.  The process of joining two or more pieces of like metal  Parts are heated enough to cause it to melt where they meet  When the.
 1. steel cutting  2. block  3. deck house.
Unclassified U.S. ARMY TANK AUTOMOTIVE RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING CENTER Reverse Engineering Re-defined Requirements TARDEC 25 AUG Presented.
NCSX Vacuum Vessel Joint Design Mike Viola PPPL July 1 st, 2003.
TPO Lap Splicing Lap Splicing Lap splicing on a TPO system is defined as joining two separate sheets, by way of heat welding, into one monolithic sheet.
Ultra-Compact Electrical Machines for Wind Energy DE-FOA : Demo Machine C. L. Goodzeit and M. J. Ball May 1, 2014 Part 1: Design and Construction.
ARIES AT Project Meeting - Princeton, NJ 18 Sept 00 1 ARIES-AT Toroidal Field (TF) and Poloidal Field (PF) Coils Tom Brown, Fred Dahlgren, Phil Heitzenroeder.
1 Advanced Endplate - mechanics: Development of a Low-Material TPC Endplate for ILD Dan Peterson Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics, Cornell University.
Open die forging Shapes generated by open die forging are simple; examples include shafts, disks and rings. An example of open die forging in the steel.
ERT 216 HEAT & MASS TRANSFER Sem 2/
UCRL-PRES Magnet Design Considerations & Efficiency Advantages of Magnetic Diversion Concept W. Meier & N. Martovetsky LLNL HAPL Program Meeting.
Progress to Date PPPL Advisory Board Meeting May 20101NSTX Upgrade – R. L. Strykowsky CD-0 Approved February 2009 The NSTX Upgrade Project organization.
Mechanical Designs of The Central Detector Jinyu Fu
Shielded metal arc welding process Fig : Schematic illustration of the shielded metal-arc welding process. About 50% of all large-scale industrial welding.
ARIES Review, PPPL L. M. Waganer, 4-5 Oct 2006 Page 1 Maintenance and Building Conceptual Approach L. Waganer and R. Peipert The Boeing Company 4 October.
ARIES-CS Power Core Configuration Presented by X.R. Wang Contributors: Laila A. Ei-Guebaly, S. Malang, T.K. Mau, Richard Peiperty, A.R. Raffray and L.
ARIES Meeting, UCSD L. M. Waganer, June 2006 Maintainability and Availability Analyses L. M. Waganer The Boeing Company ARIES Meeting University.
ARIES -ST Study L. Waganer 4 December 1998 Page 1 Revised TF Coil Costing Cost Assessment Changes Revised Weights Adjusted to 11/98 Strawman CAD Baseline.
1 Field Period Assembly Office of Science Project Review Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Princeton, NJ November 2, 2005 T. Brown Princeton Plasma Physics.
16 T Dipole Design Options: Input Parameters and Evaluation Criteria F. Toral - CIEMAT CIEMAT-VC, Sept. 4th, 2015.
LMQXFA Cold Mass Assembly Antonios Vouris Fermilab February 3, 2016.
9/28/20051 Mike Viola 1, T. Brown 1, P. Heitzenroeder 1, F. Malinowski 1, W. Reiersen 1, L. Sutton 1, P. Goranson 2, B. Nelson 2, M. Cole 2, M. Manuel.
AT-VAC SPC Nicolaas KOS Beam Screens for Inner Triplet Magnets LHC Upgrade Phase 1 Nicolaas KOS  LHC Upgrade phase 1  Inner triplet BS Requirements.
ERT 216 HEAT & MASS TRANSFER Sem 2/ Dr Akmal Hadi Ma’ Radzi School of Bioprocess Engineering University Malaysia Perlis.
Various shapes and sizes of steel are available for different purposes. Blooms, billets, and slabs arrive at finishing mills, where they are formed into.
FP420 Hybrid Mechanical Design Ray Thompson / Manchester Manchester Xmas O7 Ray Thompson Julian Freestone, Andy Elvin.
Lesson Plan: Drafting and Design J6-2. What is 3D solid modeling? How do 3D solid modeling programs work?
PXIE RFQ Engineering Design Steve Virostek Engineering Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory April 10, 2012 Project X Collaboration
QXF magnet integration Paolo Ferracin Joint LARP/CM20 HiLumi meeting Napa Valley, CA, USA 8-10 April, 2013.
1 Long QXF Mirror Fabrication (MQXFPM1) Rodger Bossert HiLumi-LARP Collaboration Meeting May 18-20, 2016 SLAC R. Bossert - HiLumi Collaboration Meeting.
Floor Plans Floor plans are the central or core drawings of any set of CD’s. They not only contain a tremendous amount of information for consultants and.
Full build thermal modeling of the additive manufacturing process
Produktentwicklung und Maschinenelemente
Rapid Tooling.
SiD LoI Costs M. Breidenbach 29 July 2010 M. Breidenbach.
Integrated Design: APEX-Solid Wall FW-Blanket
Trade-Off Studies and Engineering Input to System Code
Electrogas Flux cored Shielding
Presentation transcript:

ARIES Review, PPPL L. M. Waganer, 4-5 Oct 2006 Summary of Low Cost Fabrication of Integrated Coil Structure L. M. Waganer With Support from Kevin Slattery and John Waldrop-III The Boeing Company ARIES Project Meeting PPPL, Princeton, NJ 4 October 2006

ARIES Review, PPPL L. M. Waganer, 4-5 Oct 2006 Page 2 Material: JK2LB low carbon, boron steel Mass: ~ 3 x 10 6 kg for 3 field periods Construction: Monolithic for entire field period Fabrication Location: At construction site Fabrication: Additive machining – arc deposition of near net shape, final machining of coil grooves by robot milling machines on inner surface and field period interfaces Coil Fabrication: Coil cables will be wound into the grooves with robot winding machines Accuracy of Coils: EM forces will be analyzed to determine displacement. Placement of the grooves will be compensated so the coils will be in proper location when coils are energized. Summary of Advanced Fabrication of the Coil Structure Interior grooves show on exterior for clarity

ARIES Review, PPPL L. M. Waganer, 4-5 Oct 2006 Page 3 Nominal Cross-Section This is the nominal coil cross-section to be fabricated. The thicknesses will vary depending on the predicted local EM forces, thicker inboard and thinner outboard. 28 cm 20 cm Strongback Inter-coil Structure Range 10 to 35 cm Range 20 to 45 cm Coil dimensions 18.4 cm x 67.2 cm Cover plate 5 cm thick

ARIES Review, PPPL L. M. Waganer, 4-5 Oct 2006 Page 4 Volumetric Heating the Coil Structure The volumetric heating is relatively low in the coil structure. Cooling with intimately joined coolant lines is quite adequate for the level of heating. This approach is quite reliable, very low cost, and compatible with fabrication approach. Moreover, the location of the tubes can be adjusted to local heating fluxes. Cooling the Structure Intercoil Structure Strongback Structure

ARIES Review, PPPL L. M. Waganer, 4-5 Oct 2006 Page 5 Plasma Arc Deposition The deposition wire is fed into the plasma arc and the material deposited in layers Overhanging features can be created with cooled slip plates Planar Features Overhanging Features Near net shape grooves can be created as the material is deposited by starting and stopping the deposition. These features require only minimal machining. All other surfaces probably will require no machining. Near Net Shape Grooves

ARIES Review, PPPL L. M. Waganer, 4-5 Oct 2006 Page 6 Groove Fabrication Guide rails and fiducial reference datums will be added to the structure parts to guide the milling machines for final groove machining. A similar machine will use the same rails and fiducial datums to install the superconducting cables into the coil groove After all the cable is in place for the coil, the cover place will be installed and friction-stir welded in place to secure the coil.

ARIES Review, PPPL L. M. Waganer, 4-5 Oct 2006 Page 7 Concept to Fabricate Structure 1.Start with solid base 2.Begin to create structure 3.Continue to add layers 4.Ditto 5.Until it is complete for a field period 1 2 5

ARIES Review, PPPL L. M. Waganer, 4-5 Oct 2006 Page 8 Staging of Field Period Structures The most cost effective approach is to construct one field period at a time, but staged to move deposition, heat treatment, and machining equipment from one FP to another as required. After the first FP is completed, it will be moved into place in the Reactor Building. All three FPs should be completed in roughly 3 years. DepositionHeat Treatment Machining Features FP #3 FP #2FP #1 Multiple deposition robots will be required to build a field period in roughly a year Each deposition robot will be assigned a zone to build Plan View The coil sectors will probably be fabricated close to the Reactor Building and moved inside the Reactor Building FP #3FP #2 FP #1

ARIES Review, PPPL L. M. Waganer, 4-5 Oct 2006 Page 9 Preliminary Costing A preliminary engineering cost estimate has been developed Additional detail can be added as needed Costs will be presented in $2006 Total mass is 10 6 kg (393m 3 x 7800 kg/m 3 ) Cost of specialty steel, JK2LB, in wire form is $20/kg (estimate) Build each segment (FP) separately in sequence Build Time is driven by deposition rate, but is adjustable by using more robots (10 assumed)

ARIES Review, PPPL L. M. Waganer, 4-5 Oct 2006 Page 10 Cost of Deposition Today’s price estimate Assumption of 10 robots Driving schedule item Representative robot cost Highest Cost Element

ARIES Review, PPPL L. M. Waganer, 4-5 Oct 2006 Page 11 Cost of Stress Relief Typical low temp time Minimal operators

ARIES Review, PPPL L. M. Waganer, 4-5 Oct 2006 Page 12 Cost of Coil Channel Machining CAD determination 3 operators + QA Probably high Arbitrary number

ARIES Review, PPPL L. M. Waganer, 4-5 Oct 2006 Page 13 Cost of Coil Cable and Cover Installation Arbitrary number

ARIES Review, PPPL L. M. Waganer, 4-5 Oct 2006 Page 14 Cost of Cooling Channel Machining Arbitrary size This is a representative way of cooling the structure using machined channels with a friction stir welded cover plate.

ARIES Review, PPPL L. M. Waganer, 4-5 Oct 2006 Page 15 Cost of Cooling Channel Closeout Arbitrary size This is a representative way of cooling the structure using machined channels with a friction stir welded cover plate.

ARIES Review, PPPL L. M. Waganer, 4-5 Oct 2006 Page 16 Summary Schedule and Costs This is a good approximation of the coil structure fabrication cost using advanced low cost techniques that will have no complexity factor. This compares to much more expensive conventional fabrication approach that has high labor costs and significant complexity factors. ~ 2.4 yr fabrication Labor costs are < ½ the cost of raw material costs!

ARIES Review, PPPL L. M. Waganer, 4-5 Oct 2006 Page 17 Low Cost Fabrication Slides for Engineering Summary

ARIES Review, PPPL L. M. Waganer, 4-5 Oct 2006 Page 18 Material: JK2LB low carbon, boron steel Mass: ~ 3 x 10 6 kg for 3 field periods Construction: Monolithic for entire field period Fabrication Location: At construction site Fabrication: Additive machining – arc deposition of near net shape, final machining of coil grooves by robot milling machines on inner surface and field period interfaces Coil Fabrication: Coil cables will be wound into the grooves with robot winding machines Accuracy of Coils: EM forces will be analyzed to determine displacement. Placement of the grooves will be compensated so the coils will be in proper location when coils are energized. Summary of Advanced Fabrication of the Coil Structure Interior grooves show on exterior for clarity

ARIES Review, PPPL L. M. Waganer, 4-5 Oct 2006 Page 19 Plasma Arc Deposition The deposition wire is fed into the plasma arc and the material deposited in layers Overhanging features can be created with cooled slip plates Planar Features Overhanging Features Near net shape grooves can be created as the material is deposited by starting and stopping the deposition. These features require only minimal machining. All other surfaces probably will require no machining. Near Net Shape Grooves

ARIES Review, PPPL L. M. Waganer, 4-5 Oct 2006 Page 20 Groove Fabrication Guide rails and fiducial reference datums will be added to the structure parts to guide the milling machines for final groove machining. A similar machine will use the same rails and fiducial datums to install the superconducting cables into the coil groove After all the cable is in place for the coil, the cover place will be installed and friction-stir welded in place to secure the coil.

ARIES Review, PPPL L. M. Waganer, 4-5 Oct 2006 Page 21 Concept to Fabricate Structure 1.Start with solid base 2.Begin to create structure 3.Continue to add layers 4.Ditto 5.Until it is complete for a field period 1 2 5

ARIES Review, PPPL L. M. Waganer, 4-5 Oct 2006 Page 22 Staging of Field Period Structures The most cost effective approach is to construct one field period at a time, but staged to move deposition, heat treatment, and machining equipment from one FP to another as required. After the first FP is completed, it will be moved into place in the Reactor Building. All three FPs should be completed in roughly 3 years. DepositionHeat Treatment Machining Features FP #3 FP #2FP #1 Multiple deposition robots will be required to build a field period in roughly a year Each deposition robot will be assigned a zone to build Plan View The coil sectors will probably be fabricated close to the Reactor Building and moved inside the Reactor Building FP #3FP #2 FP #1

ARIES Review, PPPL L. M. Waganer, 4-5 Oct 2006 Page 23 Preliminary Costing A preliminary engineering cost estimate has been developed Additional detail can be added as needed Costs will be presented in $2006 Total mass is 10 6 kg (393m 3 x 7800 kg/m 3 ) Cost of specialty steel, JK2LB, in wire form is $20/kg (estimate) Build each segment (FP) separately in sequence Build Time is driven by deposition rate, but is adjustable by using more robots (10 assumed)

ARIES Review, PPPL L. M. Waganer, 4-5 Oct 2006 Page 24 Summary Schedule and Costs This is a good approximation of the coil structure fabrication cost using advanced low cost techniques that will have no complexity factor. This compares to much more expensive conventional fabrication approach that has high labor costs and significant complexity factors. ~ 2.4 yr fabrication Labor costs are < ½ the cost of raw material costs!