 Federal regulations specify “engagement” at the institutional level  Cornell has a Federalwide Assurance specifying its commitment to comply with regulations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IRB Issues in Medical Education Research – OHRP Perspective American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine 2 nd Annual Meeting – June 24-26,
Advertisements

Human Investigation Committee  Is It Research?  Is It Human Subjects Research?  Is It Human Subjects Research that requires IRB review?
1 Multichannel Learning System (MLS) Research Protocol Requirements Jacob Hodges Lockheed Martin International Training Team (LMITT)
QI project or research? Thomas F. Byrd M.D. HRRC Chair Subcommitees 2 and 4 December 3, 2013.
THE UW HEALTH SCIENCES IRB S OVERVIEW PRACTICAL REGULATORY ISSUES IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH.
FERPA and IRB: Implications for Testing Centers Judith W. Grant, Ph.D.,CIP NCTA Conference San Antonio, Texas August 6, 2009.
Research Compliance What’s the Buzz?. Research Compliance The Buzz Publicized research participant deaths since 1999 Changing federal authorities Increasing.
Exempt Research Mary Banks BS, BSN IRB Director CRC IRB and BUMC IRB.
Introducing BA 430 A Workshop for Faculty 11/21/2009 Jim SpickardJim Spee.
Cooperative Research IRB Brownbag, 3/4/08. ISU Policy Cooperative research projects are those projects which involve more than one institution. The official.
CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting November 9, 2004 Research Use of Stored Data and Tissues.
Request For Exemption RFE. A Review of Penn’s Commitment to Research Research is a substantial and esteemed enterprise at Penn. The research community.
IRB Monthly Investigator Meeting Columbia University Medical Center IRB October 11, 2005.
Human Investigation Committee  Is it research?  If yes, does it involve human subjects?  If yes, can it be exempt?  If no, will a Request for.
Tasha Osafo, CIP Assistant Director IRB Office Exempt Review.
Quick Facts about Exempt Research No continuing review required IRB Reviewer makes Exempt determination 6 OHRP & 4 FDA categories(1 category overlaps)
Conducting Exempt Research An Overview of Human Subjects Protections Issues and the Review Process at ASU Office of Research Integrity and Assurance Institutional.
Avoiding the Pitfalls of an IRB Submission Chris Ayres Chair, Institutional Review Board Social & Behavioral Science & Chair, Department of Kinesiology,
Expedited vs Exempt by Richard R. Riker MD Vice-Chair, IRB Maine Medical Center.
April 2011 Conducting Research at SPC Approval Process and Procedures Center of Excellence for Teaching and Learning.
BRI Institutional Review Board (IRB) Does your project require IRB oversight? By Chris Weir, CIP BRI IRB Manager April 18 th, 2011.
Research Ethics The Protection of Human Subjects.
1 Developed by: U-MIC To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the.
Stanley Estime, MSCI, CIP Senior QA/QI Specialist Lisa Gabel, CIP QA/QI Specialist IRB Determinations: What type of Review will your study receive?
1 Ethics of Working with Human Subjects (BIOL/CHEM 397 ) Header image designed by Michelle Jordan, UMBC Creative Services, 2009.
Conducting Exempt Research: An Overview of Human Subjects Protections Issues and the Review Process at ASU.
SLCL Human Subjects Review Committee. Who we are Four faculty from SLCL: – Melissa Bowles, Chair (SIP) – José Ignacio Hualde (Linguistics/SIP) – Jennifer.
The Institutional Review Board: A Community College Toolkit Dr. Geri J Anderson.
The Linguistics Department Institutional Review Board Committee Silvina Montrul, chair Fred Davidson Irene Koshik Ryan Shosted September 22, 2008.
Investigators’ Responsibilities in Conducting Human Subjects Research Dept. of Regulatory Affairs April 18, 2012.
A step-by-step guide to help you determine if your research protocol is required to be reviewed by the Lindenwood University IRB INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD.
Education Research and Social & Behavioral Science IRB.
Determining the Appropriate IRB Application for Your Research August 10, 2015.
Dustin Yocum, MA Institutional Review Board University of Illinois HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH.
Institutional Review Board Issues for Classroom Research Sharon McWhorter IRB Administrator, The University of Akron (With assistance from Phil Allen,
Human Subjects Review: Policies and Procedures. Why A Human Subjects Review? It is the policy of this University that all researchers undertaking studies.
UD IRB Guidelines for Applications for: Registrations of exempt research, Expedited IRB review, Full IRB review.
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
What Institutional Researchers Should Know about the IRB Susan Thompson Senior Research Analyst Office of Institutional Research Presented at the Texas.
Case Studies: Puzzles in Human Research Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst, Program for Research Integrity Development and Education.
Regulations 201: Thorny Issues What is Research? Exempt and Expedited Reviews.
 Epidemiology -- Research – or Not Research? Medical Research Summit March Tom Puglisi, PhD.
© 2015 Marketo, Inc. Marketo Proprietary and Confidential Page 1 Investigators’ Responsibilities in Conducting Human Subjects Research Office of the Vice.
Human Subjects Research at Mines Colorado School of Mines New Faculty Orientation November 20, 2015.
Susan Loess-Perez, MS, CIP, CCRC Director of Research Compliance Office of Research Services Graduate Thesis and Dissertation Conference February 6, 2016.
Human Research Protection Program 101 March 20, 2007 Cincinnati, OH.
Research Ethics Office of Research Compliance. Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Covers 9 content areas –Animal Subjects (IACUC) –Human Subjects (IRB)
Created by Steve Martin, PA-C IRB Application Received Exempt Complete Yes No Mississippi College IRB Application Process Determine Review Category Expedited.
Protecting Human Subjects Overview of the Issues Applications to Educational Research The IRB Process.
Presentation prepared for GCSU ENGAGE INSTITUTION REVIEW BOARD (IRB): FUNCTION AND SERVICE Tsu-Ming Chiang, Chair Whitney Heppner, Vice Chair Qiana Wilson,
What is exempt research? Angela Bain, IRB Administrator
Submitting human subjects research
Tarleton State University
Introduction to the Institutional Review Board
IRB Educational Session - IRB Regulations and Types of Review
Submitting human subjects research
Multichannel Learning System (MLS) Research Protocol Requirements
This takes approximately 5 minutes or less from start to finish
Intro to Projects – Research with Human Subjects
What types of research are exempt and ohrp guidance on exemptions
Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D. Associate Dean,
2018 Revised Common Rule: Exemptions
Exploring 45 CFR , Criteria for IRB Approval of Research
Common Rule Update: Exempt categories UT IRB
Common Rule Changes Effective date is January 21, 2019
BRI Institutional Review Board (IRB)
IRB Educational Session - IRB Regulations on Expedited Review
What the IRB is looking for when reviewing your protocol
Human Participants Research
Current IRB at DMACC September 2018.
Presentation transcript:

 Federal regulations specify “engagement” at the institutional level  Cornell has a Federalwide Assurance specifying its commitment to comply with regulations and ethical review requirements  Applies to all Cornell University research with human participants, regardless of funding source or location  Applies to all human participant research at Cornell or using Cornell resources What does it mean to be engaged in research?

What needs to come to IRB for review?  Activities/projects that involve human participants AND  are defined as research according to the federal regulations (45 CFR ).

Definitions of Research & Human Participants Research: “…a systematic investigation, including research development, testing and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge.”Research: “…a systematic investigation, including research development, testing and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge.” Human participants: “…living individuals about whom an investigator (whether professional or student) conducting research obtains (1) data through intervention or interaction with the individual, or (2) identifiable private information.”Human participants: “…living individuals about whom an investigator (whether professional or student) conducting research obtains (1) data through intervention or interaction with the individual, or (2) identifiable private information.”

Exemptions [45 CFR (1-6)] (1) Research conducted in established or commonly accepted educational settings, involving normal educational practices, such as (i) research on regular and special education instructional strategies, or (ii) research on the effectiveness of or the comparison among instructional techniques, curricula, or classroom management methods.

 (2) Research involving the use of educational tests (cognitive, diagnostic, aptitude, achievement), survey procedures, interview procedures or observation of public behavior, unless: (i) information obtained is recorded in such a manner that human subjects can be identified, directly or through identifiers linked to the subjects; and (ii) any disclosure of the human subjects' responses outside the research could reasonably place the subjects at risk of criminal or civil liability or be damaging to the subjects' financial standing, employability, or reputation.

(3) Research involving the use of educational tests (cognitive, diagnostic, aptitude, achievement), survey procedures, interview procedures, or observation of public behavior that is not exempt under paragraph (b)(2) of this section, if: (i) the human subjects are elected or appointed public officials or candidates for public office; or (ii) federal statute(s) require(s) without exception that the confidentiality of the personally identifiable information will be maintained throughout the research and thereafter.

(4) Research involving the collection or study of existing data, documents, records, pathological specimens, or diagnostic specimens, if these sources are publicly available or if the information is recorded by the investigator in such a manner that subjects cannot be identified, directly or through identifiers linked to the subjects.

(6) Taste and food quality evaluation and consumer acceptance studies, (i) if wholesome foods without additives are consumed or (ii) if a food is consumed that contains a food ingredient at or below the level and for a use found to be safe, or agricultural chemical or environmental contaminant at or below the level found to be safe, by the Food and Drug Administration or approved by the Environmental Protection Agency or the Food Safety and Inspection Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.