Do we need regulatory changes to make biopesticides a mainstream solution? Dr Justin Greaves, University of Warwick.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

PAN campaign on pesticide use reduction: opportunities to join forces Hans Muilerman Henriette Christensen ABIM, October 2009, Luzern.

Advertisements

12 April All-Ireland Chalara Control Strategy Draft Strategy published jointly by DARD and DAFM on the 12 April Available on DARD and DAFM.

© Safeguarding public health Expert Group on Innovation in the Regulation of Healthcare products Adaptive Licencing workshop at the Wellcome Trust October.

1 AEP Perspectives on Development and Commercialization of CCS Technology for Natural Gas Power Generation Matt Usher, P.E. Director – New Technology Development.

Harmonization of biopesticide regulatory Framework By Paul N. Ngaruiya (Dr) Pest Control Products Board (PCPB) 4 th Technical meeting of the Regional SPS.

Reform of Agvet Chemical Regulations. Reform History Chemicals and Plastics Action Agenda established Reducing the Regulatory Burden on.

Ralf-Udo Ehlers e-nema GmbH

Cut-Offs and Candidates for Substitution:

School of Medicine & Health Partnership Working and the Implications for Governance David Hunter.

Biopesticides, regulatory innovation & the regulatory state

Working together across disciplines Challenges for the natural and social sciences.

RELU: Biological alternatives to chemical pesticides in the food chain Dept of Politics & International Studies. Wyn Grant, Justin Greaves. Warwick HRI.

Productivity Commission Dr Warren Mundy Commissioner Presentation to Central Institute for Economic Management Hanoi 1 June 2015 Regulatory Governance.

Understanding Monopoly 10. Natural Barriers to Entry Economies of scale –“Bigger is better” (more cost-efficient) –This is due to the ATC being downward-

Wyn Grant IBMA: Challenges and Opportunities. What does political science say about the political agenda? The political agenda can only deal with so many.

Challenges for the Natural and Social Sciences –David Chandler and Wyn Grant Working Together Across Disciplines.

1 Dave Chandler University of Warwick Biopesticides in the UK: can we get regulatory innovation?

Development of the UK Biopesticide Scheme Richard Davis Pesticides Safety Directorate Richard Davis Pesticides Safety Directorate.

Challenges for the Natural and Social Sciences David Chandler and Wyn Grant Working Together Across Disciplines.

Wyn Grant & David Chandler University of Warwick, UK Biopesticides: scientific challenges & regulatory strategies.

Biopesticide Consultants

Wyn Grant Regulation in Europe and IBMA’s PR/Lobbying Role.

Wyn Grant with Justin Greaves Biopesticides: Environmental and Regulatory Sustainability.

1 Dept of Politics & International Studies. Wyn Grant, Justin Greaves. Warwick HRI. Dave Chandler, Gill Prince. Dept of Biological Sciences. Mark Tatchell.

Dr Justin Greaves University of Warwick Interaction With Social and Economic Sciences (the RELU Experience)

Challenges for the Natural and Social Sciences David Chandler and Wyn Grant Working Together Across Disciplines.

Wyn Grant Biopesticides and sustainability. Practical research.

Health and Safety Executive Health and Safety Executive Improving the efficiency of the regulatory process Rob Mason Head of Regulatory Policy Chemicals.

Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapter 8 Business-Government Relations.

Integrated Pest Management and Biocontrol

Session 3 - Plenary on implementing Principle 1 on an Explicit Policy on Regulatory Quality, Principle 3 on Regulatory Oversight, and Principle 6 on Reviewing.

Integration of Regulatory Impact Assessment into the decision making process in the Czech Republic Aleš Pecka Department of Regulatory Reform and Public.

Biopesticides: challenge of regulatory change

DeRisk Advisory Services Ltd. Doing Business in Conflict-Affected Countries Lisa Curtis 14 th July 2009.

© IOBC WPRS, IOBC promotes research, development and implementation of biological control and integrated pest management.

Use of biopesticides – A safe solution

IPM in greenhouse vegetab. & ornament. IPM in greenhouse vegetab. & ornament. * According to van Lenteren (2000) and in the greenhouses, we can restore.

Tanzania Aflatoxin Workshop December 3 and 4, 2012 Collaboration across Ministries of Health, Agriculture and Livestock to enhance dietary diversity and.

Gender Recognition Legislation – Ireland Broden Giambrone.

EPA: Research Needs and Considerations for Microbial Pest Control Agents and Plant- incorporated Protectants NIFA BRAG PI Meeting, June 4, 2014 John L.

Welcome to the iHV Fellows Fellows of the Institute of Health Visiting 2014.

Imperial College, London. Re-bugging the System The Research Team Imperial College, London: Alastair Bailey, Iain Fraser, Matt Thomas, Abhijit Sharma,

INTEGRATING INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE (IK) INTO UGANDA’S POVERTY ERADICATION ACTION PLAN (PEAP) By Joyce N. Muwanga Assistant Executive Secretary Uganda National.

Chapter 8 Business-Government Relations Copyright © 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

The Growing Impact of EU Legislation

1 Project aims Assess obstacles to regulatory innovation for environmentally friendly pest control using biopesticides, making use of comparisons with.

The Benefits of Sustainable Agriculture Wyn Grant University of Warwick.

10 years of progress in representing biocontrol Wyn Grant University of Warwick.

Overview of Risk Assessment and Risk Management of PIPs in the U.S.

The IR-4 Project’s Role in Registration of Public Health Pesticides Jerry Baron Executive Director February 8, 2010.

The Big Society Social Action Public Service Reform.

1 ST Market Engagement Session 3 rd October 2014 RE-PROCUREMENT OF CUSTODIAL TENANT DEPOSIT PROTECTION SCHEME Presentation by Ruth Hayes.

Government Failure AS Economics Unit 1. Aims and Objectives Aim: Understand government failure Objectives: Define government failure Assess different.

Commercial Biological Control and Integrated Pest Management

7/8/2016 US_Entre_Policy_Feb141 February 2014 Entrepreneurship Policy in the U.S. An Informal Overview Paul D. Reynolds Marie Curie Professional Research.

WHEN MARKETS FAIL Chapters 7 1. Important Definitions: 2  Definition of Government:  Institutions to which people give over a monopoly of violence in.

©Ofcom EU Communications package : State of Implementation Kip Meek, Senior Partner, Content & Competition Brussels, 30 May 2005.

© 2016 Global Market Insights, Inc. USA. All Rights Reserved Biopesticides Market Price, Trends, Industry Outlook & Forecast

Legal Ombudsman Darren Cox Ombudsman

Chapter 20 Pesticides and Pest Control

IPM and biopesticides use in arable crops

18th European Ecoinnovation Forum – Barcelona May 2015 OUTCOMES

Commercial Biological Control and Integrated Pest Management

Minor Uses Developments in the European Union

Regulation in Europe and IBMA’s PR/Lobbying Role

Small Business Taxation A special study for the Mirrlees Review

Implementation of the Services Directive

USDA’s Perspective on Plant Biostimulants

Established Minor Use Programs: North American Perspective

Do we need regulatory changes to make biopesticides a mainstream solution? Dr Justin Greaves, University of Warwick.

Presentation transcript:

Do we need regulatory changes to make biopesticides a mainstream solution? Dr Justin Greaves, University of Warwick

What are biopesticides? Biopesticides are mass produced biologically based agents used for the control of plant pests. They include: - Living organisms (natural enemies) invertebrates, nematodes and micro-organisms - Naturally occurring substances plant abstracts, semiochemicals (eg: insect pheromones) - Genes (USA) plant incorporated products

A mainstream solution? Mainstream ‘in the market’ or politically? Currently not mainstream (except perhaps in the protected crops market) Could regulatory changes make them mainstream? Is something else needed? Or are biopesticides destined to remain on the sidelines?

Why such a low take-up? Regulatory failure hypothesis: systematic problems arising in regulation along with specific problems (the use of a chemical pesticide-driven regulatory model by PSD) Market failure hypothesis: the market size is too small to provide economies of scale and to encourage firms to enter. Biopesticides are niche products so the market size for any one product is small

The Biopesticides Scheme PSD introduced a ‘Pilot Scheme’ in June 2003 to encourage alternative control measures Permanent Biopesticides Scheme introduced in April 2006 (eg: Biopesticides Champion) Outcomes have been modest, although favourable compared with the preceding period

Registration costs Despite the Biopesticides Scheme, registration costs are arguably still too high The big cost is the testing required to meet registration requirements. Changes in the rules for efficacy testing may help biologicals Should market forces decide which products are efficacious (no efficacy testing in US)?

The promotion of alternatives Do we need a biopesticides ‘champion’ organisation with a clear advocacy role? Expertise could be built up within PSD and ACP Would changes in regulatory design help the promotion of alternatives (eg current consultation on the future of PSD)?

Conclusions Regulatory innovation can increase take-up Other possible solutions: pesticides tax, making mutual recognition work, assisting commercial development (Eco zones/91/414 reform in progress) Can they ever be a mainstream solution? They have a low profile amongst policy makers and have not yet realised their full potential

Please visit our website : biopesticides Acknowledgements: Prof Wyn Grant Prof Mark Tatchell Dr David Chandler Gillian Prince (University of Warwick)