NAS Resource Allocation: Economics and Equity Summary Observations Wye Woods Conference Center March 19, 29 2002 George Mason University University of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Performance Indicators: Selection, Application, and Reporting Presented by John M Rodgers Federal Aviation Administration.
Advertisements

Federal Aviation Administration 1 Collaborative Decision Making Module 4 Building A New Trust Model.
Federal Aviation Administration 1 Collaborative Decision Making Module 2 Developing A Collaborative Framework.
ATFM Priorities Evaluation Study Alison Hudgell QinetiQ
Vastly Distributed System ATCSCC CDM net TFM hub TRACONs TRACON(s) Towers ARTCC ARTCC(s) Towers Airports Industry AOC(s) GA International.
1 Market-based DEMAND MANAGEMENT strategies Giovanni Andreatta, University of Padova Lorenzo Brunetta, Milan Polytechnic Un. Guglielmo Guastalla, Eurocontrol.
TRADABLE PERMITS IN WATERWAY TRANSPORT JIM FAWCETT ECONOMIST GALVESTON DISTRICT.
CHARLES N. GLOVER MICHAEL O. BALL DAVID J. LOVELL Collaborative Approaches to the Application of Enroute Traffic Flow Management Optimization Models.
- European CDM - To benefit from the animation settings contained within this presentation we suggest you view using the slide show option. To start the.
FEDERAL ANTIMONOPOLY SERVICE Liberalization and Structural Reorganization of Natural Monopolies (energy, transport, communications) as a Factor of Economic.
George Mason University Transportation Lab Air Transportation System Limitations, Constraints and Trends George L. Donohue March 19-20, Wye Woods Conference.
Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) Saulo Da Silva
March 2009 Emissions Trading in South Africa National Climate Change Summit Emily Tyler.
2011 ADC WINTER FORUM | PAGE 2 Army Energy - A Player in the New California Gold Rush Leveraging Private Financing for Increased Renewables Ms. Aubris.
Infrastructure and development planning Sectoral specialization of government agencies affects process of identifying development projects (planning system)
European Commission Slot allocation at Community airports Infrastructures and Airports Unit Klaas Pel.
A System Dynamics Perspective of the Air Transportation Industry Bruno Miller John-Paul Clarke Massachusetts Institute of Technology Joint Universities.
Aviation Issues, with emphasis on Business Aviation Remarks by Jack Olcott, NBAA President Presented at the FAA/NASA Joint University Program on Air Transportation.
NextGen GA Fund, LLC A Fund to Accelerate NextGen Equipage Benefits for the General Aviation Operator Community.
NAS Resource Allocation and Reallocation on Day-of-Operations Michael O. Ball Robert H Smith School of Business and Institute for Systems Research University.
Challenges for NOAA in Integrating Earth Observations Vice Admiral Conrad C. Lautenbacher, Jr., U.S. Navy (Ret.) Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans.
LMI Airline Responses to NAS Capacity Constraints Peter Kostiuk Logistics Management Institute National Airspace System Resource.
1 Directorate-General for Energy and Transport / Air Transport Directorate EU Directive on Airport Charges Background and content.
FAA Funding. Who Currently Pays  The Aviation Trust Fund is utilized to cover approximately 75% of the costs of operating the National Airspace System.
FAA Strategic Planning Flight Plan Update James Ballough Director, Flight Standards Service November 2004 Flight Standards Service.
Airspace Resource Allocation -Operations Impact Prof. R. John Hansman, Director MIT International Center for Air Transportation
1 National Airspace System Resource Allocation: Market Design Issues Peter Cramton Professor of Economics, University of Maryland President, Market Design.
Equity - Uncertainty and Buying a Seat at the Poker Table National Airspace System Resource Allocation: Economics and Equity Workshop March 20, 2002 Roger.
Market Overview in Electric Power Systems Market Structure and Operation Introduction Market Overview Market Overview in Electric Power Systems Mohammad.
Emissions Trading (Cap and Trade) Kate Macauley. 1. Economics of emissions trading 2. Overview of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS)
Date: 18 February 2008 Federal Aviation Administration Collaborative Decision Making at the FAA/ATO A look at how CDM is applied in the U.S.
ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK FOR OPERATIONAL EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT CONGESTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES AT CLUSTERED AIRPORTS Loan T. Le Research Sponsors: NASA ARC, FAA.
1 Congestion Pricing and Queuing Theory Giovanni Andreatta and Guglielmo Lulli Dip. di Matematica Pura ed Applicata - Università di Padova.
Workshop on National Airspace System Resource Allocation: Economics and Equity Organizers: Mike Ball, University of Maryland George Donohue, Karla Hoffman,
Market Mechanisms to Curb Greenhouse Gases: Challenges and Future Directions Joe Kruger February 20, 2007 Joe Kruger February 20, 2007.
NAS Performance Metrics: Begin with the End in Mind Norm Fujisaki Metron Aviation AVIATION AND THE ENVIRONMENT: ISSUES & METHODS September 27-28, 2007.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level Concept of Operations for Commercial.
Can our ATM systems cope?
1 Dublin 23/24 April 2007Autor Jacques Guldenmundt EFET, input for discussion on ‘day-ahead-auctions’, Dublin, 23/24 April 2007.
Spectrum: a scarce resource Chris Woolford Director, Spectrum and International Policy 2 December 2008.
CENTER FOR AIR TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH Air Travel at the Edge of Chaos George L. Donohue, Ph.D. Professor Systems Engineering and Operations Research.
Distributed Multi-Nodal ATFM Operational Trial
Overview: Airport Congestion Management Concepts Regional Airport Planning Committee April 27, 2007 Oakland, California AIRPORTS COUNCIL INTERNATIONAL.
CENTER FOR AIR TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH A Transparent and Economically Efficient Process for Determining Planned Airport Capacities Phil Railsback.
1 ATM System Wide Modeling Capabilities in Fast-Time Simulation 1 st Annual Workshop – NAS-Wide Simulation in Support of NextGen Dec. 10th – George Mason.
Principles of Good Airport Regulation Stuart Holder Associate Director, London Lisbon 22 November 2005.
CENTER FOR AIR TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING (CDM) Testimony before the National Civil Aviation Review Commission Testimony.
Karl Schlegel April 1 st, Some Basics Use market mechanisms to change behavior. Alternative to direct social regulation. Used on behaviors society.
1 An Integer Linear Programming model for Airline Use (in the context of CDM) Intro to Air Traffic Control Dr. Lance Sherry Ref: Exploiting the Opportunities.
Benefits of CDM Within AFI Region Presented by: Mikateko Chabani.
Ayumi Konishi Director General, East Asia Department Asian Development Bank CCICED Annual General Meeting 2015 Forum G20 and Green Finance 11 November.
PROJECT FINAL MEETING Advocacy and Capacity Building on Competition Policy and Law in Asia (7up2 Project) June 2006 Hotel Landmark Bangkok, Bangkok,
Federal Aviation Administration 1 Collaborative Decision Making Module 5 “The Collaborative Environment”
System Control and Regulation CEE 587 Prof. Anne Goodchild May 18, 2011.
A Technology Partnership for the New Millennium Anne Harlan, Director William J. Hughes Technical Center 68th NASAO Annual Convention September 20, 1999.
William C. Withycombe March 14, 2012 Federal Aviation Administration Pacific Aviation Directors Workshop State of the FAA.
Gary Stowell Noise Abatement Manager San Jose International Airport The Next Step - An Airport Perspective.
15 June 2006 BTRE COLLOQUIUM 1 Towards a New Beginning: A Blueprint for Recovery Michael Bridge CEO - Airnorth Regional Chairman - RAAA.
DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR ENERGY AND TRANSPORT Information Day 6th Framework Programme 1st Call for Proposals, 5 Feb. 2003, Brussels ASAS operational improvements:
Space Operations and the National Airspace System 9 October 2012 Federal Aviation Administration 0 0 Overview of Space Operations and the National Airspace.
University of Brasilia TransLab Enhancement of Airport Collaborative Decision Making with Matching Theory Antonio Carlos de Arruda Junior Li Weigang Kamila.
1 A General Approach to Equity in Traffic Flow Management and Its Application to Mitigating Exemption Bias in Ground Delay Programs Michael Ball University.
RSPA/Volpe Center Arrival/Departure Capacity Tradeoff Optimization: a Case Study at the St. Louis Lambert International Airport (STL) Dr. Eugene P. Gilbo.
Greater Toronto Transportation System
Collaborative Decision Making Module 5 “The Collaborative Environment”
The Role of Air Traffic Control in A CDM ENVIRONMENT
Yellowknife Airport: Governance and Revenue Generation
The Air Traffic Organization: Building Today to Ensure Our Future
UNC Transmission Workstream 7th December 2006
Collaborative Decision Making “Developing A Collaborative Framework”
Presentation transcript:

NAS Resource Allocation: Economics and Equity Summary Observations Wye Woods Conference Center March 19, George Mason University University of Maryland NEXTOR

Summary Observations - 1 ► WHAT IS THE PROBLEM?  The Central US Public Carrier Air Transportation System has a Finite and Quantifiable Capacity  This Capacity is set by Federally Mandated Safety ATC separation standards and a Finite number of Runways near major Population Centers  Slot modification at LaGuardia led to Severe Congestion and System Wide delay increases  All slot controls are to be removed by 2007  Current Wt. Based Landing Fees are not Market Based  FAA NPRM for LaGuardia Slot Auction Design is open for 90 days (June 12, 2001 Federal Register) Comment ►

Summary Observations - 2 ► The Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) system has established a De-facto Market Trading in airspace slots at all US Airports under Weather Perturbation Events  General Aviation priority probably too high  Data accuracy essential to system performance  Airports are not represented in the market  System Works Best if NOT GAMED BY PLAYERS ► The Government, Airline and Airport Property Rights are not well defined in this market and the value of the commodity has not been established ► Current Government Regulations do not have a Value Signaling Mechanism to Encourage Efficient Utilization of valuable and limited public and privately controlled transportation assets  No penalty for FAA over constriction of capacity  Estimates of Annual Delay cost are in excess of $1B/yr

Summary Observations - 3 ► Current Regulations Designed to Encourage use of Excess Capacity  circa 1978  Outmoded and in need of revision ► Change in Regulations requires a Strong Case for Change  Capacity Constraints, Publicly Unacceptable Delays and a Diminishing SAFETY relationship may be the Case  Increased Public Revenue?  How is the Revenue Allocated? ► New Regulations should be Designed to Establish True Value of air transportation assets  Encourage Efficient Utilization  provide incentives for public and private investment to increase system capacity and safety  Equitably deal with Uncertainty

Summary Observations - 4 ► FCC Auctions provide political insights into how regulatory change can occur  Don’t repeat European Auction Mistakes ► Federal Energy Auctions provide valuable insights into how the air transportation market may become more formalized and more efficient  Don’t repeat California Auction Mistakes ► The Traveling Public ultimately Pays the Price for Cancellation, Delays and lack of Schedule Predictability  The Political Push for Reform?

Summary Observations - 5 ► Initial Proposal for Next Step  Define Current Stake holder's Property Rights  Utilize the CDM system for market clearing  Formulate an Incentive System that Encourages Investment in both public (i.e. airport, ATC telecommunications, etc.) and private (i.e. ADS-B, Data- Link communications, Enhanced Flight Management Systems, etc.)  Game/Simulate the System to help Answer the Question: “What Might Happen if DoT/FAA Enacts a New Regulatory Environment?”