Minnesota and Wisconsin CHIPS processes

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of Child Protection Process Presented to: Task Force on Child Protection August 3, 2007 Bill Navas Office of Attorney General 13 th Judicial Circuit.
Advertisements

Practice Guidelines for Attorneys Representing Parents in Abuse, Neglect and Termination of Parental Rights Cases Cindi Wood, JD John Chambers, JD February.
 Federal Dollars for Assurances Which Protect Children Who are in Foster Care.
1 Definitions and Examples of Practices vs. Services in Child Welfare The Service Array Process The National Child Welfare Resource Center for Organizational.
Ohio Alternative Response. WHAT IS AR? Referrals given to the agency for assessment. Read the referrals and decide whether you would screen this in or.
Dallas CASA Court Appointed Special Advocates. Allegations of abuse and neglect Investigation by DFPS DFPS has arranged for a residence for the child.
Working Across Systems to Improve Outcomes for Young Children Sheryl Dicker, J.D. Assistant Professor of Pediatrics and Family and Social Medicine, Albert.
Introducing the Law, the Child Protection System and the Courts Guardian Ad Litem Program.
Subsidized Guardianship Permanency Initiative. SG Introduction Focuses on improving permanency outcomes for children in out-of-home care through a comprehensive.
Denver Family Integrated Drug Court
JUDICIAL PERSPECTIVE. It’s about the CHILD! A little history Until the 1960s the Welfare and Institutions Code was designed to primarily deal with children.
Defining the Role of the Guardian ad Litem
JUDY NORD STAFF ATTORNEY, STATE COURT ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGER, CHILDREN’S JUSTICE INITIATIVE Permanency Timeline.
Dependency Court – A Team Approach Presen Presented by: Judge Brantley S. Clark and Carol A. Dunaway, M.S. 1.
AN OUTLINE OF IT’S ROLES AND STRUCTURE IN MATTERS OF CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES RI’s Family Court System.
Duty to Report Child Abuse, Neglect, and Dependency in North Carolina Janet Mason Institute of Government The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Child Welfare Services Family centered services to achieve well- being through ensuring self-sufficiency, support, safety, and permanence. Dual tracks-
A Judicial Perspective on Differential Response Anthony Capizzi Montgomery County Juvenile Court Dayton, Ohio September.
Successful Solutions Professional Development LLC A Basic Approach to Child Safety Chapter 4 Mandated Reporting Law.
Options for Youth, Monica Bogucki, B.S.W., J.D. Copyright 2013 Monica Bogucki.
1 Agency/Court Collaboration in the CFSR: ENGAGING COURTS AND THE LEGAL SYSTEM The National Child Welfare Resource Center For Organizational Improvement.
JUVENILE COURT: CONTEXT AND OVERVIEW Janet Mason March 8, 2006 Institute of Government UNC at Chapel Hill.
MINNESOTA MALTREATMENT LAWS Sexual abuse Neglect Mental injury Physical abuse.
A production of National Foster Parent Association American Bar Association & Legal Advocates for Permanent Parenting Dependency Court and Removal of.
Allianceforchildwelfare.org Adoptions.
Services and Resources Available for Families & Children.
FTMs and Foster Care Policy Kenny A: FTMs are to be held within 3-9 days after a child comes into care Held to make any key decisions regarding placement.
Citizens Review Panels Blake Jones Program Coordinator.
JUDY NORD STAFF ATTORNEY, STATE COURT ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGER, CHILDREN’S JUSTICE INITIATIVE Achieving Timely.
LAWYERS ETHICS Poverty Law II Irene M. Opsahl. APPLICABLE PROFESSIONAL RULES  Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct 
1 JUVENILE COURT PROTECTION CASES: THE PLAYERS POVERTY LAW Irene M. Opsahl.
Handling a CHIPS Case in FCPC Tribal Court Law Day April 30, 2015.
10/ Introduction to the MA Department of Children and Families’ Integrated Casework Practice Model (ICPM) Fall 2009.
2 3 Regional Manager Employment Services Supervisors Employment Services Supervisors Social Worker Supervisors Social Worker Supervisors Adult Services.
Welcome to Adolescent and Family Services of the Waukesha County Department of Health and Human Services.
Child Abuse: Preventive and Reactive Interventions.
Chapter 16: Juvenile Justice
AMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION The nation’s voice for the protection of children & animals THE CHILD WELFARE RESPONSE CONTINUUM CHRONIC ISSUES THAT HAVE PLAGUED.
Maine DHHS: Putting Children First
Structured Decision Making Child Welfare and the Law Spring 2006.
Polk County Family Drug Court The Honorable Karla Fultz Todd Beveridge, M.S.W., M.S.
WELCOME TO FAMILY TEAM DECISION MAKING MEETINGS. THE PURPOSE OF THIS TRAINING IS.... Explain how Family Team Decision-making Meetings (FTDMs) are part.
CHMDA/CWDA Partnership Series Child Welfare Services “It Takes a Village” Danna Fabella, Interim Director Contra County Employment and Human Services Department.
2012 Child Welfare Legislative Update Ann Ahlstrom
SSIS as a Case Management Tool Nan Beman Anne Broskoff.
Department of Human Services
1 Child in Need of Protection or Services Proceedings Poverty Law II Irene M. Opsahl.
Implementing Fully Every Tool in the Child Welfare Toolbox Chuck Johnson President and CEO National Council For Adoption.
Differential Response Oregon Safety Model Strengthening, Preserving and Reunifying Families Stacy Lake, Differential Response Manager Chuck Nyby, Differential.
Concurrent Permanency Planning. Concurrent Permanency Planning (CPP) The process of working towards reunification while at the same time planning an alternative.
Options for Teens Poverty Law Living Away from Home When parent agrees Informal arrangement Emancipation Delegation of parental authority (DOPA)
Welcome to the … CAPMIS Refresher 1. Name Agency, unit, and primary job function or title, time “on the job” One thing you find helpful about CAPMIS Introductions.
Permanency Planning in Juvenile Court The options GALs have in finding a safe, permanent home for our kids.
A.J. (Tony) Brandenburg August 21, 2015 TCAP Tribal Court Conference Protecting Indian Children (760)
Child In Need of Care (CINC) Code Guardians ad litem Nuts and Bolts October 2015.
FOSTER CARE SERVICES Replicating Hope for Children Prepared by Wes Salsbury Foster Care Replication Committee.
Juvenile Justice. Certification Certification – the proceeding in juvenile court in which the court determines if a juvenile will stand trial as an adult.
Hon. Carlos Villalon, Jr.. TODAYS FOCUS What is a Foster Care Case? Aren’t All Courts the Same? What is the Judge’s Role? What are the Educational Issues.
21 st Century Caregiving : Foster VC Kids Resource Family Training Session 1.
Aiken County Dept. of Social Services Christine Wright, County Director Amy Kosh, HS Program Coordinator.
DFCS Department of Family and Children’s Services
Options for Youth, Monica Bogucki, B.S.W., J.D.
National State Auditors Association
Family Preservation in Georgia
Hon. Karen R. Carroll February 12, 2018
Tuolumne County Adult Child and Family Services
UNLOCKING THE MYSTERIES
Reports by Maltreatment Type
DFCS Department of Family and Children’s Services
Constitutional Safe Guards
Presentation transcript:

Minnesota and Wisconsin CHIPS processes

Family Assessment: Family assessment has been implemented in all 87 Minnesota Counties Family assessment is an alternative to the Child protection investigation process. Avoids “confrontation and intrusion of child protection investigation”. Family assessment assesses safety and risk of maltreatment

Family Assessment: Assesses and builds on strengths of families Partners with families to find solutions to problems they are facing Not used in cases of concern of imminent danger (i.e. injuries, sexual abuse, serious neglect. Involves community agencies and organizations in providing support, and intervention before situation becomes more serious.

Family Assessment: Allows CPS flexibility to meet the needs of the family when child abuse and neglect is reported Enables parents to receive services with minimal negative labeling Meets individual family needs Elicits community participation to support families and keep children safe.

Family Assessment: Short-term case management If improvement in situation is not made, case goes to traditional investigation.

Minnesota CHIPS process Traditional investigation Traditional investigations are conducted when there are concerns of imminent danger or sexual abuse Investigations conducted in coordination with law enforcement If safety concerns exist, CHIPS petition filed

Minnesota CHIPS If child is taken into custody, Law enforcement takes into “police protective custody” for up to 72 hours Child protection has this time to file a CHIPS petition to keep the child in custody Child is placed in Emergency Protective Care (EPC) CHIPS hearing must be held within 10 days of EPC hearing

Minnesota CHIPS Petition may be filed with child in Emergency placement or with child remaining in home If child is placed outside of home, may be in relative care or foster care

Minnesota CHIPS At initial hearing, parents may admit or deny the allegations in the petition If deny, then the case may to go a trial by judge, most resolve before that time Guardian Ad Litems are appointed in any case involving a child

Minnesota CHIPS GAL is a trained and certified volunteer from the community, appointed by the court to be the child’s representative in the court process GAL evaluates actions taken by all parties and makes recommendations based on the best interest of the child

Minnesota CHIPS When case is opened goes to dispositional order, parents are ordered to complete certain conditions to regain placement of their children 90 day review of case in court if child is in placement, 6 month if child is at home Child may remain in their home or return home If child cannot return home, Termination of Parental Rights Hearing may be filed.

Children’s Justice Initiative Collaboration between the Minnesota Judicial branch and Minnesota DHS. Objective is to form a partnership between courts, SS agencies, attorneys, public defenders, courts, GAL and other stake holders to improve CPS cases. “timely safe, stable, permanent homes for abused and neglected children, first through reunification with the child’s parents that if that is safe or, if not, through another permanent placement option.”

Goals of the Children’s Justice Initiative Operating through the “eyes of a child” Timeliness of cases Safety and stability of the child Permanent, nurturing, family for each child Recognition of cultural, social and economic differences System accountability Due process in court system

Wisconsin CHIPS When a report is received, if screened in assigned for investigation Investigations usually conducted with law enforcement If impending danger threats/safety concerns exist CHIPS petition may be filed If child is taken into custody child placed with relative or in foster care

Wisconsin CHIPS Law Enforcement or Social Worker may take child into custody CPS/delinquency Social workers are state certified to take child into custody If child is taken into custody TPC hearing must be held within 48 hours, (excluding holidays and weekends) CHIPS petition is filed at the TPC hearing

Wisconsin CHIPS After TPC hearing, initial plea hearing must be held within 30 days At this time, parents may admit or deny the petition If admit, dispositional hearing must be scheduled in 30 days If deny, scheduled for fact-finding within 10 days May go to trial by jury if parents do not agree Most situations resolve before trial

Wisconsin CHIPS GAL is assigned any proceeding involving a child. If child is over the age of 12 they are assigned adversary counsel GAL are attorneys, appointed by the court When case is opened goes to dispositional order, parents are ordered to complete certain conditions to regain placement of their children

Wisconsin CHIPS CHIPS may be in-home or out of home Court may order 30-60 day court reviews of cases If child is placed out of the home, 6 month permanency review hearings are required Child may remain in their home, or return home If child cannot return home, Termination of Parental Rights Hearing may be filed.

Wisconsin vs. Minnesota Wisconsin social workers may take into custody Minnesota only law enforcement GAL in Minnesota may be community professional GAL in Wisconsin must be an attorney Time lines for reviews may vary Minnesota has Family Assessment, Wisconsin only traditional investigation Minnesota follows Chapter 260 of the Minnesota Statues Wisconsin follows Chapter 48 of the Wisconsin Statutes

Federal Legislation-Adoption and Safe Families Act All states are mandated to follow the Adoption and Safe Families Act When a child is placed in out of home care (relative or foster care) “the clock starts ticking”. States are mandated to file for Termination of Parental Rights if a child has been in out of home care for 15 out of 22 months unless case meets certain exceptions

Federal legislation ASFA also states that if a parent has not made “substantial progress” in the first 6 months of the case, CPS agency may file for termination of parental rights. ASFA requires 6 month review of permanency plan for child ASFA requires a “concurrent plan” for children when they enter out of home care

Concurrent Planning Dual track for child to plan for permanency If child cannot be reunified with their family of origin, have another plan ready to go when decision is made Foster parents and relative placements are working with families to reunify, also prepared to adopt the child if reunification is not possible

Family Based Services Services offered to families focus on the needs of the family Family Group Decision Making In-home family counseling Intensive parenting education One-on-one parenting education Family interaction- supervised/in foster home, family settings when possible as frequently as possible