Revealing anyonic statistics by multiphoton entanglement Jiannis K. Pachos Witlef Wieczorek Christian Schmid Nikolai Kiesel Reinhold Pohlner Harald Weinfurter.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Henry Haselgrove School of Physical Sciences University of Queensland
Advertisements

Identifying universal phases for measurement-based quantum computing Stephen Bartlett in collaboration with Andrew Doherty (UQ)
Sergey Bravyi, IBM Watson Center Robert Raussendorf, Perimeter Institute Perugia July 16, 2007 Exactly solvable models of statistical physics: applications.
Superconducting qubits
Exploring Topological Phases With Quantum Walks $$ NSF, AFOSR MURI, DARPA, ARO Harvard-MIT Takuya Kitagawa, Erez Berg, Mark Rudner Eugene Demler Harvard.
Anyon and Topological Quantum Computation Beijing Normal university
Gavin Brennen Lauri Lehman Zhenghan Wang Valcav Zatloukal JKP Ubergurgl, June 2010 Anyonic quantum walks: The Drunken Slalom.
Non-Abelian Anyon Interferometry Collaborators:Parsa Bonderson, Microsoft Station Q Alexei Kitaev, Caltech Joost Slingerland, DIAS Kirill Shtengel, UC.
Holonomic quantum computation in decoherence-free subspaces Lian-Ao Wu Center for Quantum Information and Quantum Control In collaboration with Polao Zanardi.
Twist liquids and gauging anyonic symmetries
Universal Optical Operations in Quantum Information Processing Wei-Min Zhang ( Physics Dept, NCKU )
Fractional topological insulators
Strongly Correlated Systems of Ultracold Atoms Theory work at CUA.
Jordan-Wigner Transformation and Topological characterization of quantum phase transitions in the Kitaev model Guang-Ming Zhang (Tsinghua Univ) Xiaoyong.
On the energy landscape of 3D spin Hamiltonians with topological order Sergey Bravyi (IBM) Jeongwan Haah (Caltech) FRG Workshop, Cambridge, MA May 18,
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME Xiangning Luo EE 698A Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Notre Dame Superconducting Devices for Quantum Computation.
Quantum Dots and Spin Based Quantum Computing Matt Dietrich 2/2/2007 University of Washington.
Probing and Manipulating Majorana Fermions in SO Coupled Atomic Fermi Gases Xia-Ji Liu CAOUS, Swinburne University Hawthorn, July.
School of Physics & Astronomy FACULTY OF MATHEMATICAL & PHYSICAL SCIENCE Parallel Transport & Entanglement Mark Williamson 1, Vlatko Vedral 1 and William.
Philipp Hauke, David Marcos, Marcello Dalmonte, Peter Zoller (IQOQI, Innsbruck) Brighton, Phys. Rev. X 3, (2013) Experimental input:
Topological Insulators and Beyond
Interfacing quantum optical and solid state qubits Cambridge, Sept 2004 Lin Tian Universität Innsbruck Motivation: ion trap quantum computing; future roads.
Superconducting Qubits Kyle Garton Physics C191 Fall 2009.
Quantum Devices (or, How to Build Your Own Quantum Computer)
Localization of phonons in chains of trapped ions Alejandro Bermúdez, Miguel Ángel Martín-Delgado and Diego Porras Department of Theoretical Physics Universidad.
Study of Quantum Phase Transition in Topological phases in U(1) x U(1) System using Monte-Carlo Simulation Presenter : Jong Yeon Lee.
School of something FACULTY OF OTHER Quantum Information Group School of Physics and Astronomy Spectrum of the non-abelian phase in Kitaev's honeycomb.
6. Second Quantization and Quantum Field Theory
Modular Tensor Categories and Topological Quantum Computing Prakash Panangaden and Eric Paquette.
From Bits to Qubits Wayne Viers and Josh Lamkins
F.F. Assaad. MPI-Stuttgart. Universität-Stuttgart Numerical approaches to the correlated electron problem: Quantum Monte Carlo.  The Monte.
An Introduction to Quantum Phenomena and their Effect on Computing Peter Shoemaker MSCS Candidate March 7 th, 2003.
Implementation of Quantum Computing Ethan Brown Devin Harper With emphasis on the Kane quantum computer.
Simulation for the feature of non-Abelian anyons in quantum double model using quantum state preparation Jinhua Aug 14, 2012 Zheng-Wei Zhou( 周正威) Key Lab.
Solving Impurity Structures Using Inelastic Neutron Scattering Quantum Magnetism - Pure systems - vacancies - bond impurities Conclusions Collin Broholm*
Correlated States in Optical Lattices Fei Zhou (PITP,UBC) Feb. 1, 2004 At Asian Center, UBC.
Quantum Glassiness and Topological Overprotection Quantum Glassiness and Topological Overprotection Claudio Chamon DMR PRL 05, cond-mat/
1 The Topological approach to building a quantum computer. Michael H. Freedman Theory Group Microsoft Research.
Introduction to topological superconductivity and Majorana fermions
Ady Stern (Weizmann) Papers: Stern & Halperin , PRL
A simple nearest-neighbour two-body Hamiltonian system for which the ground state is a universal resource for quantum computation Stephen Bartlett Terry.
Gang Shu  Basic concepts  QC with Optical Driven Excitens  Spin-based QDQC with Optical Methods  Conclusions.
Entangling Quantum Virtual Subsytems Paolo Zanardi ISI Foundation February Universita’di Milano.
Atoms in optical lattices and the Quantum Hall effect Anders S. Sørensen Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen.
Large scale quantum computing in silicon with imprecise qubit couplings ArXiv : (2015)
F Matrix: F F F F F Pentagon Fusion rules: 1x1 = 0+1; 1x0 = 0x1 = 1; 0x0 = 0 Fibonacci anyon with topological “charge” 1.
Topological Quantum Computing
The Puzzling Boundaries of Topological Quantum Matter Michael Levin Collaborators: Chien-Hung Lin (University of Chicago) Chenjie Wang (University of Chicago)
Entanglement Entropy In Gauge Theories Sandip Trivedi Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, India.
Order parameters and their topological defects in Dirac systems Igor Herbut (Simon Fraser, Vancouver) arXiv: (Tuesday) Bitan Roy (Tallahassee)
QUANTUM PHYSICS BY- AHRAZ, ABHYUDAI AND AKSHAY LECTURE SECTION-5 GROUP NO. 6.
1 The 5/2 Edge IPAM meeting on Topological Quantum Computing February 26- March 2, 2007 MPA Fisher, with Paul Fendley and Chetan Nayak Motivation: FQHE:
Arnau Riera, Grup QIC, Dept. ECM, UB 16 de maig de 2009 Intoduction to topological order and topologial quantum computation.
Quantum simulations of high-energy physics models MAX-PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR PHYSIK January 27th, 2015 In collaboration with J. Pachos (Leeds) S. Kühn B.
Arnau Riera, Grup QIC, Universitat de Barcelona Universität Potsdam 10 December 2009 Simulation of the Laughlin state in an optical lattice.
From fractionalized topological insulators to fractionalized Majoranas
Fractional Berry phase effect and composite particle hole liquid in partial filled LL Yizhi You KITS, 2017.
Linear Quantum Error Correction
Information-Theoretical Analysis of the Topological Entanglement Entropy and Multipartite correlations Kohtaro Kato (The University of Tokyo) based on.
Topological Order and its Quantum Phase Transition
Strong Coupling of a Spin Ensemble to a Superconducting Resonator
3rd Lecture: QMA & The local Hamiltonian problem (CNT’D)
Charging and noise as probes of non-abelian quantum Hall states
Non- Abelian Quantum Hall States:
Topological quantum computing ▬ Toric code
Quantum Computing: the Majorana Fermion Solution
Chiral Spin States in the Pyrochlore Heisenberg Magnet
QM2 Concept test 3.1 Choose all of the following statements that are correct about bosons. (1) The spin of a boson is an integer. (2) The overall wavefunction.
in collaboration with Andrew Doherty (UQ)
Introduction to topological superconductivity and Majorana fermions
Presentation transcript:

Revealing anyonic statistics by multiphoton entanglement Jiannis K. Pachos Witlef Wieczorek Christian Schmid Nikolai Kiesel Reinhold Pohlner Harald Weinfurter QEC07, USC, December 2007 arXiv:

Overview In condensed matter anyons appear as ground or excited states of two dimensional systems: –Superconducting electrons in a strong magnetic field (Fractional Quantum Hall Effect) –Lattice systems (Kitaev’s toric code/hexagonal lattice, Wen’s models, Ioffe’s model, Freedman-Nayak- Shtengel model…) Energy gap protects anyons for applications Relatively large systems to have many anyons and move them in arbitrary paths

Overview

Anyons Anyons have non-trivial statistics. Bosons Fermions Anyons 3D 2D Consider as composite particles of fluxes and charges. Then phase is like the Aharonov-Bohm effect.

Criteria for Topo Order and TQC (CM) Initialization (creation of highly entangled state with TO) Dynamically, adiabatically, cooling, (possibly H) Addressability (anyon generation, manipulation) Trapping, adiabatic transport, pair creation & annihilation. Measurement (Topological entropy of ground state, interference of anyons) Scalability (Large system, many anyons, desired braiding) Low decoherence (Temperature, impurities, anyon identification) [G. Brennen and J.K.P., Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 2007] [I. Cirac, S. Simon, private communication]

Criteria for Topo Order and TQC (CM) Initialization (creation of highly entangled state with TO) Dynamically, adiabatically, cooling, (possibly H) Addressability (anyon generation, manipulation) Trapping, adiabatic transport, pair creation & annihilation. Measurement (Topological entropy of ground state, interference of anyons) Scalability (Large system, many anyons, desired braiding) Low decoherence (Temperature, impurities, anyon identification) [G. Brennen and J.K.P., Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 2007]

Criteria for Topo Order and TQC (CM) Initialization (creation of highly entangled state with TO) Dynamically, adiabatically, cooling, (possibly H) Addressability (anyon generation, manipulation) Trapping, adiabatic transport, pair creation & annihilation. Measurement (Topological entropy of ground state, interference of anyons) Scalability (Large system, many anyons, desired braiding) Low decoherence (Temperature, impurities, anyon identification) Ocneanu rigidity: algebraic structure is rigid to small perturbations of the Hamiltonian [G. Brennen and J.K.P., Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 2007]

Toric Code: ECC Consider the lattice Hamiltonian p p p p s s s s s X1X1 X4X4 X3X3 X2X2 Spins on the vertices. Two different types of plaquettes, p and s, which support ZZZZ or XXXX interactions respectively. The four spin interactions involve spins at the same plaquette. p

Toric Code: ECC Consider the lattice Hamiltonian p p p p s s s s Good quantum numbers:  eigenvalues of XXXX and ZZZZ terms are 1 and -1 Also Hamiltonian exactly solvable: s X1X1 X4X4 X3X3 X2X2 p

Toric Code: ECC Consider the lattice Hamiltonian p p p p p s s s s Indeed, the ground state is: The |00…0> state is a ground state of the ZZZZ term and the (I+XXXX) term projects that state to the ground state of the XXXX term. [F. Verstraete, et al., PRL, 96, (2006)] s X1X1 X4X4 X3X3 X2X2

Toric Code: ECC p p p p p s s s s Excitations are produced by Z or X rotations of one spin. These rotations anticommute with the X- or Z-part of the Hamiltonian, respectively. Z excitations on s plaquettes. X excitations on p plaquettes. X and Z excitations behave as anyons with respect to each other. Z X s X1X1 X4X4 X3X3 X2X2

One Plaquette It is possible to demonstrate the anyonic properties with one s plaquette only. The Hamiltonian: The ground state: s GHZ state!

One Plaquette One can demonstrate the anyonic statistics with only this plaquette. First create excitation with Z rotation at one spin: Energy of ground state 1 Z1Z1 Energy of excited state s

One Plaquette One can demonstrate the anyonic statistics with only this plaquette. First create excitation with Z rotation at one spin: Note that the second anyon from the Z rotation is outside the system. Move an X anyon around the Z one. What we really want is the path that it traces and this can be spanned on the spins 1,2,3,4. 1 Z1Z1 s

One Plaquette One can demonstrate the anyonic statistics with only this plaquette. First create excitation with Z rotation at one spin: Assume there is an X anyon outside the system. With successive X rotations it can be transported around the plaquette. 1 Z1Z1 s

One Plaquette One can demonstrate the anyonic statistics with only this plaquette. First create excitation with Z rotation at one spin: X1X1 Z1Z1 s Assume there is an X anyon outside the system. With successive X rotations it can be transported around the plaquette.

One Plaquette One can demonstrate the anyonic statistics with only this plaquette. First create excitation with Z rotation at one spin: X1X1 X2X2 Z1Z1 s Assume there is an X anyon outside the system. With successive X rotations it can be transported around the plaquette.

One Plaquette One can demonstrate the anyonic statistics with only this plaquette. First create excitation with Z rotation at one spin: X1X1 X2X2 X3X3 Z1Z1 s Assume there is an X anyon outside the system. With successive X rotations it can be transported around the plaquette.

One Plaquette One can demonstrate the anyonic statistics with only this plaquette. First create excitation with Z rotation at one spin: X1X1 X2X2 X3X3 X4X4 Z1Z1 Assume there is an X anyon outside the system. With successive X rotations it can be transported around the plaquette. The final state is given by: s

One Plaquette After a complete rotation of an X anyon around a Z anyon (two successive exchanges) the resulting state gets a phase (a minus sign): hence ANYONS with statistical angle A property we used is that A crucial point is that these properties can be demonstrated without the Hamiltonian!!! An interference experiment can reveal the presence of the phase factor. Anyonic statistics

Extended System From the formula X1X1 X2X2 X3X3 X4X4 Z1Z1 s the extended state is given by The two X, Z anyonic state is given by

Interference Process Create state With half Z rotation on spin 1,, one can create the superposition between a Z anyon and the vacuum: for. Then the X anyon is rotated around it: Then we make the inverse half Z rotation

Interference Process That we obtained the state is due to the minus sign produced from the anyonic statistics. If it wasn’t there then we would have returned to the vacuum state. Distinguish between states: has even number of 1’s. has odd number of 1’s.

Experiment

Qubit states 0 and 1 are encoded in the polarization, V and H, of four photonic modes. [J.K.P., W. Wieczorek, C. Schmid, N. Kiesel, R. Pohlner, H. Weinfurter, arXiv: ]

Experiment Qubit states 0 and 1 are encoded in the polarization, V and H, of four photonic modes. Vacuum Anyon Counts Measurements and manipulations are repeated over all modes. The states that come from this setup are of the form:

Experiment: State identification Consider correlations: Witness for genuine 4-qubit GHZ entanglement: Fidelity: Visibility > 64% Vacuum Anyon y-displacement ~ EPRxEPR x-displacement: -7° and +2° Correlations

Experiment: Fusion Rules Generation of anyon: Fusion exe=1: (invariance of vacuum state) Fusion ex1=e: (Invariance of anyon state) Fusion rules

Experiment: Statistics Interference - loop around empty plaquette: - loop around occupied plaquette: - interference of the two processes:

Experiment

Invariance of vacuum w.r.t. to closed paths: Useful for: quantum error correction, topological quantum memory, quantum anonymous broadcasting Implement Hamiltonian, larger systems… Properties and Applications [arXiv: ; J.K.P., Annals of Physics 2007, IJQI 2007] 4 qubit GHZ stabilizers A B C