G4NAMU meeting March 6th, 2006 Validation Activities at SLAC of Relevance to Medical Users Koi, Tatsumi SLAC/SCCS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Validation in Geant4 Hadronic Shower Simulation Workshop FNAL, 6-8 September 2006 Koi, Tatsumi (SLAC/SCCS) for the Geant4 Collaboration.
Advertisements

Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
P HI T S Exercise ( II ) : How to stop , ,  -rays and neutrons? Multi-Purpose Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System title1 Feb revised.
1 Activation problems S.Agosteo (1), M.Magistris (1,2), Th.Otto (2), M.Silari (2) (1) Politecnico di Milano; (2) CERN.
Parameterized Shower Simulation in Lelaps: a Comparison with Geant4 Daniel Birt, Amy Nicholson.
Geant4 simulation of roman pots A. Kupco, P. Ruzicka, M. Tasevsky.
MONTE-CARLO TECHNIQUES APPLIED TO PROTON DOSIMETRY AND RADIATION SAFETY F. Guillaume, G. Rucka, J. Hérault, N. Iborra, P. Chauvel 1 XXXV European Cyclotron.
Using FLUKA to study Radiation Fields in ERL Components Jason E. Andrews, University of Washington Vaclav Kostroun, Mentor.
Shielding Studies using MARS Monte Carlo code Noriaki Nakao (SLAC) Jan. 6, 2005, WORKSHOP Machine-Detector Interface at ILC, SLAC.
Neutral Particles. Neutrons Neutrons are like neutral protons. –Mass is 1% larger –Interacts strongly Neutral charge complicates detection Neutron lifetime.
A general assistant tool for the checking results from Monte Carlo simulations Koi, Tatsumi SLAC/SCCS.
Bruce Faddegon, UCSF Inder Daftari, UCSF Joseph Perl, SLAC
J. Tinslay 1, B. Faddegon 2, J. Perl 1 and M. Asai 1 (1) Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Menlo Park, CA, (2) UC San Francisco, San Francisco, CA Verification.
(Geant4) Monte Carlo benchmarking
Geant4 Physics Validation and Verification Ions Koi, Tatsumi SLAC/SCCS.
Luciano Pandola, INFN Gran Sasso Luciano Pandola INFN Gran Sasso Zaragoza, September 15 th, 2005 Geant4 and the underground physics community... (part.
Geant4 Physics Verification and Validation Low Energy Neutron Related Efforts ~Microscopic Levels~ Koi, Tatsumi SLAC/SCCS.
Evaluation of G4 Releases in CMS (Sub-detector Studies) Software used Electrons in Tracker Photons in the Electromagnetic Calorimeter Pions in the Calorimeter.
SOI detector Geant4-based studies to characterise the tissue-equivalence of SOI and diamond microdosimeteric detectors, under development at CMRP S. Dowdell,
Ion Transport Simulation using Geant4 Hadronic Physics
Joseph Perl SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Scientific Computing Workshop 20 June 2011 Work supported in part by the U.S. Department of Energy under.
Hadronic Models Problems, Progress and Plans Gunter Folger Geant4 Workshop, Lisbon 2006.
Ian C. Smith 1 A portal-based system for quality assurance of radiotherapy treatment plans using Grid-enabled High Performance Computing clusters CR Baker.
Implementing a dual readout calorimeter in SLIC and testing Geant4 Physics Hans Wenzel Fermilab Friday, 2 nd October 2009 ALCPG 2009.
1 Dr. Sandro Sandri (President of Italian Association of Radiation Protection, AIRP) Head, Radiation Protection Laboratory, IRP FUAC Frascati ENEA – Radiation.
Hadronic Interaction Studies for LHCb Nigel Watson/Birmingham [Thanks to Silvia M., Jeroen v T.]
Araki F. Ikegami T. and Ishidoya T.
1 Status and Plans for Geant4 Physics Linear Collider Simulation Workshop III 2-5 June 2004 Dennis Wright (SLAC)
Release Validation J. Apostolakis, M. Asai, G. Cosmo, S. Incerti, V. Ivantchenko, D. Wright for Geant4 12 January 2009.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Residual Does Rate Analyses for the SNS Accelerator Facility I. Popova, J. Galambos HB2008 August 25-29,
Experimental Studies of Spatial Distributions of Neutrons Produced by Set-ups with Thick Lead Target Irradiated by Relativistic Protons Vladimír Wagner.
Overview of Ion-Ion validation KOI, Tatsumi SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory 1Geant4 Collaboration workshop
Interfacing the JQMD and JAM Nuclear Reaction Codes to Geant4 Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Koi, Tatsumi
ANITA workshop, Uppsala, december 2008 ANITA neutron source Monte Carlo simulations and comparison with experimental data Mitja Majerle Nuclear Physics.
CERF simulation Mitsu 14th Feb Simulation components Production Transportation Detector response
Neutron measurement with nuclear emulsion Mitsu KIMURA 27th Feb 2013.
G.I. SmirnovMaterials for Collimators and Beam Absorbers, Simulating radiation damage effects in LHC collimators (code development status)
1 Neutron Effective Dose calculation behind Concrete Shielding of Charge Particle Accelerators with Energy up to 100 MeV V. E Aleinikov, L. G. Beskrovnaja,
Pedro Arce Introducción a GEANT4 1 GAMOS tutorial RadioTherapy Exercises Pedro Arce Dubois CIEMAT
Frictional Cooling A.Caldwell MPI f. Physik, Munich FNAL
ESTRO, Geneva 2003 The importance of nuclear interactions for dose calculations in proton therapy M.Soukup 1, M.Fippel 2, F. Nuesslin 2 1 Department of.
Radiation Shielding Assessment for MuCool Experimental Enclosure C. Johnstone 1), I. Rakhno 2) 1) Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois.
A Summary of Physics Validations and Developments: Hadronic Dennis Wright Geant4 Collaboration Meeting Hebden Bridge, UK 13 September 2007.
Marina Golubeva, Alexander Ivashkin Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow AGeV simulations with Geant4 and Shield Geant4 with Dpmjet-2.5 interface.
Meson Production at Low Proton Beam Energy (Update) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies May 9, /9/113.
1 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN Background radiation studies using Geant4.
IFMIF d-Li neutron source: Status of codes and nuclear data S.P. Simakov Institut für Reaktorsicherheit, Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe IEA Neutronics Meeting,
1 Activation by Medium Energy Beams V. Chetvertkova, E. Mustafin, I. Strasik (GSI, B eschleunigerphysik), L. Latysheva, N. Sobolevskiy (INR RAS), U. Ratzinger.
Se Byeong Lee, Ph.D Chief Medical Physicist Proton Therapy Center in NCC, Korea.
Validation of GEANT4 versus EGSnrc Yann PERROT LPC, CNRS/IN2P3
Koichi MurakamiGeant4 Physics Verification and Validation (17-19/Jul./2006) 1 Results from the recent carbon test beam at HIMAC Koichi Murakami Statoru.
MCS overview in radiation therapy
Monte Carlo methods in spallation experiments Defense of the phD thesis Mitja Majerle “Phasotron” and “Energy Plus Transmutation” setups (schematic drawings)
A Study of Reverse MC and Space Charge Effect Simulation with Geant4
INTERCOMPARISON P3. Dose distribution of a proton beam
Induced-activity experiment:
Inter-comparison of Particle production (2)
Report to Delta Review: Hadronic Validation
Geant4 REMSIM application
Summary of hadronic tests and benchmarks in ALICE
Shintaro Hashimoto1, Yosuke Iwamoto 1, Tatsuhiko Sato 1, Koji Niita2,
Development and characterization of the Detectorized Phantom for research in the field of spatial fractionated radiation therapy. D. Ramazanov, V. Pugatch,
How to stop a, b, g-rays and neutrons?
1. Introduction Secondary Heavy charged particle (fragment) production
Parasitic Run Physics Simulations
The Hadrontherapy Geant4 advanced example
Performed experiments Nuclotron – set up ENERGY PLUS TRANSMUTATION
Nathan P. DeLauder Co-author: Lawrence W. Townsend
The Geant4 Hadrontherapy Advanced Example
Background Simulations at Fermilab
Presentation transcript:

G4NAMU meeting March 6th, 2006 Validation Activities at SLAC of Relevance to Medical Users Koi, Tatsumi SLAC/SCCS

G4NAMU meeting March 6th, 2006 We regularly check Geant4 performances and provides results for inside and outside users of SLAC. From such our efforts, I pick up several validations which have relations in the medical fields

G4NAMU meeting March 6th, 2006 Medical use case validations “Questions for comparison of clinical Monte Carlo codes” (D. W. O. Roger, Author of EGS-NRC) –Speed test –Accuracy test for 18MV photon beam –Accuracy test for 20MeV electron beam

G4NAMU meeting March 6th, 2006 Speed of photon & electron calculations Geometry –The phantom is 30.5 cm x 39.5 cm x30 cm deep and filled with 5 mm 3 voxels. –The voxels are to be filled randomly with one of 4 materials (water, aluminum, lung (ICRU, ρ =0.26 g/cm 3 ) and graphite) Incident beams –photon 6 MV spectrum (calculated and given) –Electron 6MeV and 20 MeV –a point source at 100 cm SSD and collimated to 10x10 cm 2 at the phantom surface. Statistical Uncertainties to be achieved –an average relative statistical uncertainty on voxels with a dose greater than Dmax/2 of 0.02 or less.

G4NAMU meeting March 6th, 2006 Results geant4 v8.0.p01

G4NAMU meeting March 6th, 2006 Accuracy test Photon case Geometry –Similar to the previous, however material and voxel size are different. –From 0 to 3 cm is water, 3 to 5 cm is aluminum, 5 to 12 cm is lung and 12 to 30 cm is water. –The voxels are 5 mm 2 in the x-y directions but only 2 mm deep to increase the resolution. (beams come from z direction) Incident beams –a uniform 18MV beam from a realistic clinical accelerator as calculated at NRC using the BEAM code (given)

G4NAMU meeting March 6th, 2006 Standard EM H20H20 Aluminum Lung H20H20

G4NAMU meeting March 6th, 2006 Low energy EM PL comes from example/advanced/underground

G4NAMU meeting March 6th, 2006 Accuracy test Electron case Geometry –The phantoms are very similar to those for photon beams –From 1 to 2 cm is water, 2 to 3 cm is aluminium, 3 to 6 cm is lung material and 6 to 30 cm is water. Incinde beams –20 MeV mono energetic electrons

G4NAMU meeting March 6th, 2006 Standard EM H20H20 H20H20 Aluminum Lung

G4NAMU meeting March 6th, 2006 Low energy EM PL comes from example/advanced/underground

G4NAMU meeting March 6th, 2006 Standard EM (ExN03PhysicsList) We also tests Low energy EM (DMXPhysicsList)

G4NAMU meeting March 6th, 2006 These validations are carried out for each release of Geant4.

G4NAMU meeting March 6th, 2006 Nuclear interactions of 160 MeV protons stopping in copper: A test of Monte Carlo nuclear models Bernard Gottschalk, Rachel Platais, and Harald Paganetti pp Med. Phys (1999) The longitudinal charge distribution left by 160 MeV protons stopping in a multilayer Faraday cup (MLFC) was measured The distribution consists of two regions –build-up region attributable entirely to nuclear interactions –sharp peak attributable entirely to protons stopping by EM interactions

G4NAMU meeting March 6th, 2006 Multi Layers Faraday Cups ~160MeV protons Kapton-Cu layers build-up region Hadron Physics Validation sharp peak EM Physics Validation Nuclear interactions of 160 MeV protons stopping in copper: A test of Monte Carlo nuclear models Bernard Gottschalk, Rachel Platais, and Harald Paganetti pp Med. Phys (1999) Bernard GottschalkRachel PlataisHarald Paganetti

G4NAMU meeting March 6th, 2006 Verification of High Precision Neutron models Checking Cross Sections and Final State Products of High Precision Neutron models of Geant4 with Evaluated Nuclear Data File (ENDF) libraries MCNPs depend on ENDF libraries –at least data driven parts of its

G4NAMU meeting March 6th, 2006 Verification of High Precision Neutron models Channel Cross Sections 20MeV neutron on Gd157 Ela XS [barn] Inela XS Inela XS F Inela XS F Inela XS F Inela XS F Inela XS F Inela XS F Cap XS [barn] E E E E E E E-3 Geant4 resultsENDF data

G4NAMU meeting March 6th, 2006 Verification of High Precision Neutron models Energy Spectrum of Secondary Particles

G4NAMU meeting March 6th, 2006 Comparison of Computing Speed and Memory consume among deferent implementation of Simple Voxelized Geometries. Geometry: Phantom 30x30x30 cubic cm. Fill this Phantom by 216k voxels which have size of 0.5x0.5x0.5 cubic cm. Incidence particle: 50MeV electron Vertical incidence to a surface of Phantom Uniform incidence to the surface. Implementation of Phantom 1, All voxels are place by G4Placement. (216k voxels) 2, Configured a rod from voxels and placed these rods. (3.6k rods) 3, Configured a disk from rods and placed these disks. (60disks) 4, Using G4VPVParameterisation with kXAxis with kUndefined

G4NAMU meeting March 6th, 2006 Results Memory consume 1,47830k 2, 572k 3, 2k 4,42250k with kUndefined 4k with kXAxis Computing Speed 100k electrons incidence 1, sec 2, sec 3, sec 4, sec with kUndefined sec with kXAxis (estimated from 1k electrons) Order of magnitude differences appeared in both memory consume and CPU performances. Please take care geometry implementations, even it ’ s a simple voxelized one.

G4NAMU meeting March 6th, 2006 Other validation activities at SLAC

G4NAMU meeting March 6th, 2006 Hadron interaction validation For all major hadronic physics lists (Ex LHEP, QGSP, FTFP etc) –Gamma, Pion, and Kaon production spectra –Mean multiplicity distributions Gazdzicki, M. and Roehrich D., Z. Phys. C (1995) Dermer, Apj (1986) –Charged multiplicity distributions Brick, D. et al., Phys. Rev. D25, 2794 (1982) Adamus, M. et al., Z. Phys. C (1986) Ammar, R. et al., Phys. Lett. B178, (1986)

G4NAMU meeting March 6th, 2006 Ion interaction validations Neutron double differential production cross sections –Iwata et al.,Phys. Rev. C64 pp (2001) Pion double differential production cross sections –J. Papp, LBL-3633, May pp Neutron Yield from Thick Target –T. Kurosawa et al., Phys. Rev. C62 pp (2000) Fragment particle production cross sections –F. Flesch et al., J, RM, 31, 533, 1999 –F. Flesch et al., J, RM, 34, 237, 2001 –Webber, W. R. et al., Phys. Rev.C: Nucl. Phys., vol. 41, no. 2, Feb. 1990, –V.D.AKSINENKO et al. J, NP/A, 348, 518, 1980 –Bertulani, C. A. and B. Gerhard, Phys. Rep., vol. 163, nos. 5 & 6, June 1988, pp –Westfall, G. D. et al., Phys. Rev. C, vol. 19, no. 4, Apr. 1979,

G4NAMU meeting March 6th, 2006 Validation of LC Physics Lists which SLAC provided Geant4 v7.0.p to 800 GeV p on H

G4NAMU meeting March 6th, 2006 QGSP FTFP Geant4 v7.1.p01 Hadronic List PACK 2.5

G4NAMU meeting March 6th, 2006 Neutron Production 400 MeV/n Carbon on Copper Pion Production 1 GeV/c/n Carbon on Be, C, Cu and Pn Geant4 6.2.p02 Binary Cascade Light Ions

G4NAMU meeting March 6th, 2006 Neutron Yield Fe 400 MeV/n beams CarbonThick TargetAluminum Thick Target T. Kurosawa et al., Phys. Rev. C62 pp (2000)

G4NAMU meeting March 6th, 2006 And so on,

G4NAMU meeting March 6th, 2006 Summary Several validations which related to medical use cases are already run regularly at SLAC. We have a plan of expansion of validations –Comparison requests with reference of data are welcome.