“The Other Issues” II Moving Forward in Uncertain Times: Clearly, with reduced/loss of funding in the US and the UK, a timeline of 2010 for an EDR is unrealistic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ILCSC Report KILC12 / Daegu Jonathan Bagger Chair, ILCSC Johns Hopkins University 4/23/12.
Advertisements

1 PTA Process Task Force January Task Force Participants Alan Gellman Beth Rhine Elizabeth Moyle LaShawn Route-Chatmon Lisa Hobbs Lisa Puntillo.
DOE Neutrino Program Plans
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy SLAC Users Organization Meeting July 6, 2004 Dr. Robin Staffin, Associate Director Office of High Energy Physics.
GDE Meeting B Barish 16-Aug-05 The GDE – who, what and how? The BCD – what is it? Internal Organization toward BCD What do we want out of Snowmass? How.
January 17, 2008Mike Hildreth – Aspen 2008 International Linear Collider Project Status Mike Hildreth University of Notre Dame Representing the Global.
Global Design Effort - CFS TILC09 and GDE AAP Review Meeting - Tsukuba, Japan 1 GDE ACCELERATOR ADVISORY PANEL REVIEW CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES.
January 17, 2008Mike Hildreth – Aspen 2008 International Linear Collider Project Status Mike Hildreth University of Notre Dame Representing the Global.
September 21 - November 6, 2006 Global Design Effort 1 Beyond the RDR - some ideas Brian Foster (Oxford & GDE)
1 Albrecht Wagner, Snowmass 0805 Albrecht Wagner DESY and Hamburg University Challenges for Realising the ILC.
HEPAP and P5 Report DIET Federation Roundtable JSPS, Washington, DC; April 29, 2015 Andrew J. Lankford HEPAP Chair University of California, Irvine.
Global Design Effort BDS KOM Opening remarks/comments from EDR Project Management SLAC Marc Ross / Nick Walker.
Long Range Planning Pier Oddone September 24, 2007.
Global Design Effort Americas Region Efforts and Resources Mike Harrison GDE.
GOAL SETTING. Goals  What is a goal?  Something you would like to achieve.  What is the purpose of setting goals?  Goals give you direction and keep.
Nick Walker, Brian Foster LAL, Orsay WP2: Coordination with the GDE.
Our mandate has been completed The physics and detector perspective of the ILC-TDR Sakue Yamada May 27, /05/271Sakue Yamada ECFA.
U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science High Energy Physics Advisory Panel Meeting FY 2009 Budget Request.
P5 and the HEP Program A. Seiden Fermilab June 2, 2003.
International Linear Collider The ILC is the worldwide consensus for the next major new facility. One year ago, the choice was made between the two alternate.
27-March-10 LCWS10 - Beijing Global Design Effort 1 Barry Barish LCWS10 - Beijing 27-March-10 “Cost Containment” for the TDR.
1 1 LCC Physics and Detector Hitoshi Yamamoto ECFA LC2013, DESY May 27, 2013.
Why Americans pay to use National Parks? How much does the average visitor cost the National Park Service?
WWSWWS Next steps for Detectors by F. Richard LAL/Orsay TILC08 TILC08 Joint ACFA Physics and Detector Workshop and GDE meeting on ILC, 3-6 March 2008,
Proton Plan PMG 2/22/06 E Prebys 1 Some Disclaimers I’ll be 100% honest These are my personal opinions  Pretty much in line with conversations I’ve had.
1 HiGrade Kick-off Welcome to DESY Hamburg Zeuthen.
All Hands Meeting FY 2008 Budget Pier Oddone Fermilab December 20, 2007.
ILC in Japan A 10 minute introduction H.Weerts Argonne National Lab March 24, 2014 University of Chicago.
31 MAY 2007 ILC 2007 DESY 1 The U.S. Way Tom Lackowski GDE.
RD’s Report on Detector Activity General Overview Project Advisory Sakue Yamada December 14, 2012 Sakue Yamada.
4.4 Timeline for M2M Consolidation Susan Miller ATIS Head of Delegation Meeting of Potential M2M Consolidation Partners #2 Washington, D.C. August 17-18,
FALC Funding Agencies for Large Colliders. We will soon enter the era of The Fermi energy scale The origin of mass – the Higgs paradigma The ratio between.
What is Expected in Updating Your SIP? Metro-Nashville Public School System School Improvement Plan Process September 2008.
24-Aug-11 ILCSC -Mumbai Global Design Effort 1 ILC: Future after 2012 preserving GDE assets post-TDR pre-construction program.
Challenges & Issues for SBNE Nigel S. Lockyer 4/4/14.
STEP 4 Manage Delivery. Role of Project Manager At this stage, you as a project manager should clearly understand why you are doing this project. Also.
Introducing Project Management Update December 2011.
Report from ILCSC Shin-ichi Kurokawa KEK ILCSC Chair GDE meeting at Frascati December 7, 2005.
FALC Was “Funding agencies for linear collider” Now “funding agencies for large colliders” WHY ??
ECFA European Committee for Future Accelerators Report from the chairman M. Krammer HEPHY, Vienna, Austria July 24, 2014RECFA DESY1.
WWSWWS The WWS Roadmap for ILC Detectors by F. Richard LAL/Orsay.
WWSWWS Report of the World Wide Study J. Brau June 4, 2008 Dubna ILCSC Meeting.
F. Richard LAL/Orsay What has happened end of 2007 for ILC and the consequences? F. Richard LAL/Orsay First ILD workshop Berlin, Germany, Jan 14-16, 2008.
Global Design Effort Introduction and goals of the meeting Andrei Seryi, Toshiaki Tauchi Fifth ATF2 Project Meeting December 19-21, 2007.
1 Global Design Effort: Controls & LLRF Controls & LLRF Working Group: Tuesday Session (29 May 07) John Carwardine Kay Rehlich.
Proton Improvement Plan: View from the Directorate (and the DOE) Stuart Henderson PIP Meeting Jan 3, 2012.
Introduction and Charge Barry Barish GDE Meeting Frascati 7-Dec-05.
WP2: Crystallising the Fruits of the European RTD + D Efforts Hugo de Moor ECN Eleni Despotou EPIA Anton Milner EPIA Board.
Department of Energy Office of Science  FY 2007 Request for Office of Science is 14% above FY 2006 Appropriation  FY 2007 Request for HEP is 8% above.
DRWS07 KEK Global Design Effort ILC Damping Rings Mini-Workshop December, 2007 High Energy Accelerator Research Organization KEK,
28-Jan-08 SiD Workshop Global Design Effort 1 ILC Status Impacts of US/UK Budget Actions Replan for GDE Technical Design Phase Barry Barish SiD Workshop.
Beijing ILC Workshop Global Design Effort 1 The S0S1 Taskforce: an Example of the Complexity for the ILC R&D Environment Lutz Lilje DESY.
Run II Review Closeout 15 Sept., 2004 FNAL. Thanks! …all the hard work from the reviewees –And all the speakers …hospitality of our hosts Good progress.
Americas comments on Linear Collider organization after 2012 P. Grannis, for LCSGA – Aug. 24, 2011 ILCSC GDE.
P5 Report: The Particle Physics Roadmap 1 A. Seiden Fermilab May 14, 2007.
CLIC project 2012 The Conceptual Design Report for CLIC completed – presented in SPC, ECFA and numerous meetings and conferences, also providing basis.
ILC 2007 Global Design Effort 1 Planning Damping Rings Activities in the Engineering Design Phase Andy Wolski Cockcroft Institute/University of Liverpool.
Office of Science January 28, 2008J.Blazey / SiD Workshop / SLAC1 The View from DOE Moving ForwardMoving Forward HEPAPHEPAP FY08 “in review”FY08 “in review”
The ILC Outlook Barry Barish HEP 2005 Joint ECFA-EPS Lisbon, Portugal 23-July-05.
John Womersley PPD Staff Meeting 12 October 2005.
Global Design Effort Close-Out Points EDR time-scale (2010) –No demonstrations to ILC-like RF unit –3(?) CMs constructed at FNAL – not RDR baseline –2(?)
Goal Setting What can I plan now to help me in the future?
DOE Mini-Review Summary and Management Updates Mark Palmer Fermilab March 15, 2013.
Report on plan to produce an Engineering Design Report
Project Management by : Miss.Nadia-ZAID
Introduction to the Workshop
Update of the Detector Program for ILC Sakue Yamada March
Requests of Future HEP e+/e-Facilities
The S0S1 Taskforce: an Example of the Complexity for the ILC R&D Environment Lutz Lilje DESY Beijing ILC Workshop Global Design Effort.
Visions and Voyages: The Planetary Decadal Survey
Presentation transcript:

“The Other Issues” II Moving Forward in Uncertain Times: Clearly, with reduced/loss of funding in the US and the UK, a timeline of 2010 for an EDR is unrealistic Funding cuts in the US and UK were very broad, affecting many areas of Science –cuts had nothing to do with the scientific and technical achievements and merit of the ILC programme (or any of the other ones)  hope for reversal in 2009 budgets (or before) if sanity prevails However, the other 30+ countries working on the project haven’t had such draconian cuts –Worldwide interest in the ILC is still high –Clear technical path and the organization put forth in the RDR makes prioritization straightforward even on a stretched timeline –R&D will continue elsewhere towards the EDR goal January 17, 2008 Mike Hildreth – Aspen 2008

Moving Forward I GDE Executive Committee met last weekend at DESY and FALC Meeting this week:  Formulating plans to maintain support for key individuals and projects –Residual level of funding still uncertain in the US  Considering Modifications to EDR Timetable/Strategy –Maintain key R&D milestones for the project with an eye towards demonstrating technical robustness as rapidly as possible priority on achieving accelerating gradient, other critical items re-allocation of available resources to insure that this happens –will probably stretch timeline of eventual EDR US Detector R&D not funded from the $60M  $15M pot of money –still affected by low funding levels at DoE and NSF –small number of critical projects may continue January 17, 2008 Mike Hildreth – Aspen 2008

Moving Forward II Ultimately, the ILC has to be approved based on the Physics –the Physics Case is strong, no matter the nature of the New Physics –LHC (or Tevatron!) results should provide the final push the current situation could turn around immediately with a discovery (Personal Exhortation: so get out there and find something, dammit!) Even in the face of current adversity, the global nature of the GDE and the research program, along with the huge amount that has already been accomplished, gives some cause for optimism going forward January 17, 2008 Mike Hildreth – Aspen 2008