Unconstrained Learning Species Constraints Timing Constraints Domain Constraints.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CLL Session 8: Age effects in SLA
Advertisements

How Critical is the Critical Period: The Acquisition of Definiteness in L2 Hebrew by Children with L1 Russian Sharon Armon-Lotem Bar-Ilan University ISB5,
Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Grant Goodall Dept. of Linguistics.
{ “Age” Effects on Second Language Acquisition Examination of 4 hypotheses related to age and language learning
The age factor in L2 and the critical period hypothesis
English Language Learners Washoe County School District Janeen A. Kelly Washoe County Schools Director English Language Learners.
Critical Period The Critical Period Hypothesis: There is a biological period during which language can be acquired easily, perfectly, and without an accent;
Language Learning in Early Childhood Explaining first language acquisition.
Arizona Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Is there critical age for second language learning? 3308 심리언어학 Steinberg & Schiarini 2006, Chapter 6.
Figure 1. SAT-9 Reading Percentile Scores from Sample Schools with Mostly Native English-Speaking Students (
Chapter 6 Formal Approaches to SLA Joanna – N98C0026 楊鎧綺 Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2008). Second language acquisition: An introductory course (3rd.
IMMIGRATION EXPLOSION AND MATURING SETTLEMENT DOWELL MYERS School of Policy, Planning, and Development University of Southern California.
Early Intervention: An Outcomes Based Evaluation of Disparity in Access Taletha M. Derrington, M.A. and Beppie J. Shapiro, Ph.D. Center on Disability Studies,
On learning a Language-21 Today Review theories on language learning: Behaviorist psychology (Skinner) Universal Grammar (Chomsky) Monitor Theory (Krashen)
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
California Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Colorado Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Validating Self-Reported Education: Results of a Pilot Study Jesse Rothstein Cecilia Rouse Ashley Miller.
Title III Accountability. Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives How well are English Learners achieving academically? How well are English Learners.
Ohio Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High School.
A cognitive perspective on language learning in young and older adults Henk Haarmann ILR Plenary Session, Foreign Service Institute (February 15, 2008)
July 18, 2011 Oakland Boys and Men of Color Project Data Profile of Latino Males in Oakland Unified School District Prepared by: Urban Strategies Council.
West Virginia Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%)
Alaska Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
What is Language? Education 388 Lecture 3 January 23, 2008 Kenji Hakuta, Professor.
Jasmine Tilley 12/6/10 UP 206A Final.  How do child poverty, school enrollment, household income, and adult educational attainment in LA County relate.
Louisiana Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
New York Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Indiana Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Michael Fix, Randy Capps Immigration Studies Program The Urban Institute The Health and Well-Being of Young Children of Immigrants The Health and Well-Being.
Utah Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High School.
Tennessee Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
South Dakota Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%)
GROUP 5 ANNIS LUTHFIANA AULYA PURNAWIDHA D FITA ARIYANA
Major Aspect of Comparison Formal EducationALS  Elementary Program (grade 1 to 6)  Secondary Program (1 st yr to 4 th yr)  Basic Literacy Program.
Missouri Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
“-- the optimal time to learn a second language is between age three and five or as soon thereafter as possible, and certainly before the onset of puberty.”
Iowa Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High School.
Hawaii Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Pennsylvania Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%)
Minnesota Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
© WestEd, Teacher Professional Development, 2003© WestEd, Teacher Professional Development, 2006 Demographic changes: Population of ELs by state,
Rhode Island Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%)
1 EIAF Best Classroom Practices Covers Understanding English in a Flash™ Introduction to English in a Flash Resources Working EIAF into Your Schedule –Classroom.
Washington Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Texas Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High School.
IMMIGRATION AND SETTLEMENT. Percentage of 2000 Population that is Foreign Born Dowell Myers USC School of Policy, Planning, and Development.
Wiersma  1. To help with the study’s design  How does it relate to: -the research question? -the hypothesis? -the method? -the findings?  2.
Chapter 7 Linguistics aspect of interlanguage
Kentucky Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Virginia Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Illinois Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Oklahoma Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
New Hampshire Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%)
North Carolina Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%)
Vermont Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Oregon Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Kansas Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Michigan Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
eSIS To EMIS LEP Reporting
Economics of Education Regional Data Region 11 Updated May 2017
Economics of Education Regional Data Region 6 Updated May 2017
Copyright © American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
The Critical Period Hypothesis
Chapter 1 Q: Explain SLA.
The effects of age in SLA
Chapter 1 Q: Explain SLA.
Traditional Grammar VS. Generative Grammar
August 5, 2015 – Proposal Level
Presentation transcript:

Unconstrained Learning Species Constraints Timing Constraints Domain Constraints

Unconstrained Learning Species Constraints Timing Constraints Domain Constraints

Taste Aversion

Konrad Lorenz

Unconstrained Learning Species Constraints Timing Constraints Domain Constraints

Categorical Speech Perception

Noam Chomsky

John is easy to please. John is eager to please.

John is easy to please. John is eager to please. It is easy to please John. *It is eager to please John.

(1)Who do you want to see? (2)Who do you want to feed the dog? (3)Who do you wanna see? (4)*Who do you wanna feed the dog?

(1)Who do you want to see? (2)Who do you want to feed the dog? (3)Who do you wanna see? (4)*Who do you wanna feed the dog? (5)You want to see who? (6)You want who to feed the dog?

(1)Who do you want to see? (2)Who do you want to feed the dog? (3)Who do you wanna see? (4)*Who do you wanna feed the dog? (5)You want to see who? (6)You want who to feed the dog? (7)Who i do you want to see t i ? (8)Who i do you want t i to feed the dog?

Unconstrained Learning Species Constraints Timing Constraints Domain Constraints

Figure 2. Some theoretical predictions of the critical period hypothesis showing disruption at predicted end of the critical period. (a)(b)

Critical Period in Second Language Learning?

Figure 1. Re-analysis of Johnson and Newport study showing discontinuity at age 20, and continued decline in adult subjects. Reported in Bialystok & Hakuta, r=-.87r=-.49

ChineseSpanish Figure 3. Self-reported English proficiency for U.S. immigrants as a function of age of arrival. Data from 1990 Census. Analysis reported in Bialystok & Hakuta, 1999.

Figure 4. Comparison of performance on selected English grammatical structures in adult and child learners. Source: Bailey, Madden & Krashen, 1974, Language Learning.

Figure 5. English proficiency development in immigrant students from a Northern California school district, separated by poverty level in schools. This is a cross-sectional sample, but all subjects included in this analysis were enrolled in this school district since Kindergarten.

Figure 6. Self-reported English proficiency for native Chinese immigrants as a function of age of arrival, separated by educational attainment. Data from 1990 Census. Analysis reported in Bialystok & Hakuta, Age of Immigration English Proficiency Some College HS Graduate Some HS <8 yrs school <5 yrs school