Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan 04 1 Current Background Situation in BaBar “Always a concern, often an issue but never a showstopper” zThe background.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beam-plug and shielding studies related to HCAL and M2 Robert Paluch, Burkhard Schmidt November 25,
Advertisements

Future Dataflow Bottlenecks Christopher O’Grady with A. Perazzo and M. Weaver Babar Dataflow Group.
M. Sullivan Mini-workshop on the MEIC design Nov 2, 2012.
June 28, 2004 BBBTF Steven H. Robertson McGill University, Institute of Particle Physics 1 Beam Background Simulation with B A B AR with B A B AR June.
Snowmass G. Eigen, University of Bergen G. Eigen University of Bergen Snowmass July 14, 2001.
Super-B Factory Workshop April 20-23, 2005 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 1 Status on an IR Design for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the Super-B Factory.
Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan 04 1 BELLE/BABAR present background situation zThe information from BELLE:
Initial rough Background comparisons between Run5 and Run 4 Guy Wormser LAL Orsay.
PEP-II B Factory Machine Status and Upgrades John T. Seeman for the PEP-II Staff SLAC DOE Site Review April 9, 2003.
W. KozaneckiMD planning meeting, 20 Jan 04 Background characterization strategy  MD goals  Background sources  Operational procedures  Open questions.
1 IR Vacuum M. Sullivan MAC Review Jan , 2006 M. Sullivan for the Machine Advisory Committee Review January 18-20, 2006 IR Vacuum.
W. KozaneckiMDI meeting, 19 Mar 04 Separating the luminosity background from the non-colliding beam-gas contribution  Principle  the problem  the beam-gas.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC IR Layout and Background Estimates Jeff Gronberg/LLNL For the Beam Delivery Group LCWS - October 25, 2000.
June 2-4, 2004 DOE HEP Program Review 1 M. Sullivan for the PEP-II Team DOE High Energy Physics Program Review June 2-4, 2004 PEP-II Status and Plans.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Accelerator Backgrounds M. Sullivan 1 Accelerator Generated Backgrounds for e  e  B-Factories M. Sullivan.
M. WeaverPEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07  Operational issues  radiation aborts  background monitoring  Background extrapolations  model comparisons.
W. KozaneckiMDI meeting, 16 Jan 2004 BaBar-wide Background monitoring  Motivation  institutionalize...  through a weekly report to PEP-II/BBR meeting.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region Design for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the Super-B.
SLAC Accelerator Department The PEP-II Accelerator John T. Seeman Assistant Director of the Technical Division Head of the Accelerator Department SLUO.
Machine Detector Interface Summary Junji Haba, KEK.
Patrick Robbe, LAL Orsay, for the LHCb Collaboration, 16 December 2014
Radiation-protection experience at Belle / summary of beam abort system 22 September, 2003 T.Tsuboyama (KEK)
Future Very High Luminosity Options for PEP-II John T. Seeman For the PEP-II Team e+e- Factories Workshop October 13-16, 2003.
Operational Experience with machine backgrounds at KEKB 23 September 2003 T.Tsuboyama (KEK)
Background Issues: Real Time Radiation Measurement S.M.Yang EPC.IHEP Mini-Workshop on BEPCII Background Study March 2008 Institute of High Energy.
INSTR-08, BINP, Novosibirsk 1 Belle calorimeter upgrade B.Shwartz, Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics Novosibirsk on behalf of BELLE calorimeter.
W. KozaneckiIR summary, BES-III workshop Interaction Region: a terse summary  Accelerator issues  Parameter comparison with PEP-II/KEKB  IR layout 
IR summary M. Sullivan Nov. 3, 2011 JLAB MEIC IR workshop.
Page 1 Overview and Issues of the MEIC Interaction Region M. Sullivan MEIC Accelerator Design Review September 15-16, 2010.
All Experimenters MeetingDmitri Denisov Week of July 7 to July 15 Summary  Delivered luminosity and operating efficiency u Delivered: 1.4pb -1 u Recorded:
D0 Status: 04/01-04/08 u Week integrated luminosity –1.7pb -1 delivered –1.5pb -1 utilized (88%) –1.1pb -1 global runs u Data collection s global data.
ILC MDI workshop January 6-8, 2004 PEP-II IR M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region of PEP-II M. Sullivan for the ILC MDI workshop January 6-8, 2005.
Progress on the beam tracking instrumentation Position measurement device Tests performed and their resolution Decision on electronics Summary.
Interaction Region Backgrounds M. Sullivan for the MEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2015.
SVTRAD Upgrades M. Bruinsma1Sept. 22nd 2003 SVTRAD Upgrades M. Bruinsma September 22, 2003 Background Workshop, SLAC Motivation.
Working Group D Backgrounds M Sullivan for everyone in WG D IRENG07 Sept 20, 2007.
Interaction Region Issues M. Sullivan for the EIC User Group Meeting Jan. 6-9, 2016.
LHC-CC Validity Requirements & Tests LHC Crab Cavity Mini Workshop at CERN; 21. August Remarks on using the LHC as a test bed for R&D equipment.
Experimental Study of the BEPC Ⅱ Backgrounds JIN Da-Peng IHEP, Beijing, China Representing the Backgrounds Study Group May 11, 2007, BEPC Ⅱ IMAC Meeting.
1 Run7 startup M. Sullivan MAC Review Nov , 2007 M. Sullivan for the PEP-II Team Machine Advisory Committee Review November 15-17, 2007 Run 7 Startup.
M. WeaverB-Factory Operations Review April 24, 2006 BaBar Backgrounds Matt Weaver B-Factory Operations Review April 24, 2006.
William Lockman UC Santa Cruz May 6, 2005MDI meeting G4 simulation: status and validation strategy Goals Contributors Status Needed plots Future tasks.
Beam Background Simulation at Belle/KEKB Motivation SR background Particle background Feedback to the detector design SR alarm Summary O. Tajima (Tohoku.
Initial Study of Synchrotron Radiation Issues for the CEPC Interaction Region M. Sullivan SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory for the CEPC14 Workshop.
Results of TCL scans D. Mirarchi, M. Deile, S. Redaelli, B. Salvachua, Collimation Working Group, 22 nd February 2016.
BELLE-BABAR template Guy Wormser LAL Orsay. Completing the template Very good response to my extra requests: thanks to everydoby! Now we can make direct.
PPAC Jonathan Olson University of Iowa HCAL November 11-13, 2004.
WBS 1.05 Commissioning Detector Scope, Cost & Schedule Sven Vahsen University of Hawaii.
JLEIC MDI Update Michael Sullivan Apr 4, 2017.
presented by W. Kozanecki (CEA-Saclay) for the BaBar - PEPII MDI group
IOP HEPP Conference Upgrading the CMS Tracker for SLHC Mark Pesaresi Imperial College, London.
The Interaction Region
Trigger, DAQ, & Online: Perspectives on Electronics
BBBTF: where do we go from here? – a personal viewpoint -
DCH Electronics Upgrade: Overview and Status
Machine Background Status & issues in BaBar/PEP-II
Introduction to the Backgrounds Study in the BEPCⅡ/BESⅢ
RPC and LST at High Luminosity
Francesco Forti SuperB Workshop LNF, March, 2006
Trickle Background Investigation
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
Radiation Abort Policy
Accelerator R&D Results from the B-factory
Calorimeter Backgrounds
Background issues for the Super-B background simulation team
DIRC Background Status
Long term projections summary
Background characterization: MD plan
ETD parallel session March 18th 2010
Some of the Points Raised During my JLAB Visit
Presentation transcript:

Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan 04 1 Current Background Situation in BaBar “Always a concern, often an issue but never a showstopper” zThe background sources: (Synchrotron Radiation), Beam-Gas, Radiative Bhabbas, Beam-Beam effects, Radiation bursts, Injection, (Touscheck) zThe background effects: integrated dose, instantaneous damage, operational issues, data quality zThe background remediation strategy Babar protection system, budget policy, forward looking to bottlenecks using projection and simulations z Today’s questions yTrickle injection yInjection quality yPreparation for tomorrow z Conclusion

Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan 04 2 The background sources zSynchrotron radiation : very well masked, has never been a problem for BABAR zBeam-Gas : BABAR sees debris from electromagnetic showers of scattered electrons and photons. yTwo subcomponents : Brems and Compton scattering yWell described by simulation yEfficient collimator scheme

Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan 04 3 The background sources (2) zRadiative Bhabbas yShowers debris from off-energy electrons or positrons after Bhabbas scattering swept away by magnetic elements in interaction regions zBeam-beam effects z« Trapped/Dust events » (HER specific) zTouschek effects : not observed yet

Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan 04 4 Predictability score zPredictables sources ySynchrotron yBeam gas xBremstralhung xCompton yTouschek zIn principle predictable source yRadiatvie Bhabbas zUnreliably predictable sources yBeam-beam yElectron cloud effects yInjection doses zUnpredictable sources yRadiation bursts, “dust events”

Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan 04 5 Agressive PEP-II plans Can BABAR keep up? Present headroom limited! Historically, the same challenge has always been met!

Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan 04 6 Background parametrization based on February 2002 data The observed background is roughly twice larger than the sum of the single beam contributions

Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan 04 7 DCH background history M. Kelsey

Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan 04 8 Serious problem in DCH readout if nothing is done

Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan 04 9 Remediation and Forward looking of bottlenecks zExample of DIRC TDC y In 1999, we predicted that the single rate PMT in the DIRC would in exceed the 200 kHz limit yA lot of effort to improve the shiedling yLaunch design of a new TDC, implemented in summer 2002 with a 2 MHz capability. yThe 200 kHz limit was indeed reached in fall 2002 zNext on line: DCH read out!

Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan DIRC main source of background: Radiative Bhabhas striking Q4 magnet inboard flange z Source discovered empirically with a Geiger counter. z Shielding erected step-by-step slowly building empirically a proof that things are improving. z A final shield erected in 2001, and the whole job completed in z Carsten proved later, with a Turtle program, that a major source of DIRC background is the radiative Bhabhas striking Q4 inboard flange, which is too small.

Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan IFR issues zIFR is the only BABAR subdetector where the existing hardware capabilities are presently significantly degraded because of background: Layers 13, 15,16 turned off in the forward endcap (loss of factor ~2 in the mu/pi rejection in that region) IFR background comes losses near collimator BSC3042 which is very sensitive to beam-beam effects and thus very useful to the rest of BABAR… Must provide a shielding wall (summer 2004)

Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan IFR issues

Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan IFR and beam loss monitor

Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan SVT Background from HER (BW:MID) Moves toward half-integer HER sensitive SVT module (Does not have threshold shift problem): Background almost doubled after move to half-integer Again it has come down a bit during run-4 Note peak occupancy is 150% higher than average occupancy! For occupancies in all SVT modules, see:

Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan SVT rates in 2003 compared to 2002 extrapolation

Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan Single beam and lumi sensitivity HERHER **2 LERLER* *2 Lumi SVT( mid) XY0 DCH DRC EMC

Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan MID Plane Doses Stable beam contribution of FW:MID and BW:MID is overestimated Run 3+4 dose is % of Run1+2 Luminosity is 55% of Run1+2 Damage in SVT modules starts

Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan TOP Doses Dominated by injection dose (up to 90%) Getting HER to “trickle quality” would provide large gains

Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan Summary of Detector sensivities and main issues zSVT : Integrated Dose, Occupancy, single beam and beam-beam, FE electronics strange effects zDCH : Readout capabilities, radiative Bhabbas zDIRC : No problem for now, radaitive Bhabbas zEMC Integrated dose in Endcap for the long term, leakage current in Diodes (neutrons?), occupancy, zIFR Single rate for external layers, beam-beam effects zSVTRAD : integrated dose, will need to be replaced soon zIntegrated dose: SVT 2Mrad in the most exposed regions, EMC 1 krad in the most exposed regions zRather similar to what BELLE received ?

Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan MID Dose Rates until 2009 Use Seeman model for beam currents to predict dose rates: Dose rates do not looking forbiddingly high Rates peak at roughly the current soft abort limits - DQ should still be reasonable

Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan Midplane Doses until 2009 Module exchange in 2005 looks well timed with 4 Mrad budget One rotation in 2007 should be able to keep MID modules installed in 2005 below 5 Mrad A rotation will move the high dose in FE:MID to other module

Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan BABAR scorecard July 2004

Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan BABAR scorecard July 2006

Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan Dose in calorimeter

Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan BABAR scorecard 2009

Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan Data quality issues in SVT

Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan Resolution degration with occupancy

Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan Example in

Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan HER Injection Problems

Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan Characterization of injection aborts/inhibits BP / LP + ODF

Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan A variety of fast radiation spikes (stored beams) B. Petersen G. Wormser

Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan A variety of fast radiation spikes (stored beams) B. Petersen G. Wormser

Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan Run 4 Trip Summary Average of 4 trips/day – Run 3 average was 3 trips/day Last two weeks average is down to almost 1 trip/day Only one other abort looked suspicious A couple of aborts are due to broken thermistor

Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan Some exemple of « Dust events »

Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan Trickle solved top of fill beam_beam effects

Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan Revided simulation efforts zLocations of the sources of Lumi terms and possible shielding zImprovment of collimators locations zValidation of new IR design

Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan Evidence for neutron radiation? zDiode leakage current in EMC read-out zIFR background ? zJ. Vavra developped a neutron detector very insensitive to photons that will be placed shortly along the beam pipe

Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan Conclusions for short term issues zWe have to look far ahead: Minimum 3 years zLook for worst case scenarios! zLook for end-product effects! zBABAR issues yImmediate concerns: SVT ATOM chip, IFRForward endcap yNext on-line: DCH DAQ yLonger term issues: SVT and EMC in 2008 zChanges in background issues yBeam-beam tails yinjections ytrapped events

Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan Background issues for a Super B factory zDetector has to stay always on! z Detector Protection system : can we get rid of it? If not, it has to stand 100 MRad yAvoid all detector susceptible to instantaneous damage zOnce proper rad hard technology has been chosen, occupancy will become the next major issue : ultra fast and hyper-segmented

Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan 04 40

Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan BABAR scorecard today X: visible effect with non-zero impact - : visible effect with no impact ? : yet unknown fixed: det upgrade to fix a significant issue x(trickle)