1 HENDRICKS COUNTY Key Points Labor Nexus Test – Meaning - ees with a relationship to LR function not covered – Rationale - avoid conflicts of interest.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BUSINESS EGGS NEGOTIATION. RELATIONSHIP CONFLICTS Strong Emotions Misperceptions or Stereo types Poor or miscommunication Negative behavior DATA CONFLICTS.
Advertisements

Contract Interpretation CBA’s – Contracts Between two parties – Rules for Governing a Workplace Govern a continuing relationship between two parties “Workplace.
Gregg v. Georgia Tiffany Browne Karisa Myers 2 nd Hour.
Comparative Constitutional Law Class 14 October 8, 2008 Comparing constitutional law on abortion in the U.S., Germany, and Canada.
1 UM/UIM COVERAGE FOR FAMILY MEMBERS AFTER Kyle v. Buckeye Union Ins. Co., 103 Ohio St.3d 170, 2004-Ohio-4885 Robert W. Kerpsack, Esq. ROBERT W. KERPSACK.
1 ELECTION STANDARDS HOLLYWOOD CERAMICS/ GENERAL KNIT : Election overturned when there is: –a substantial departure from truth –timed so that other party.
A CAUTIONARY TALE What can we learn about surplus from the New Hampshire Local Government Center situation? Jenny Emery March 11, 2014.
Dana Corporation, 351 NLRB No. 28, 2007 Legal Issues – Should employees in a bargaining unit to be able to challenge an employer’s lawful voluntary recognition.
1 Relationship between collective agreement/arbitration and law.
The Federal Courts. The Nature of the Judicial System Introduction: – Two types of cases: Criminal Law: The government charges and individual with violating.
Disturbing Trends in the Abandonment of Hazardous Waste Sites Through Bankruptcy H. Hamner Hill Southeast Missouri State University Royanne Kashiwahara.
1 Weingarten Ee has Section 7 right to refuse to be interviewed without representative present where: –ee requests union representation –ee “reasonably.
Presented by Harry I. Johnson Arent Fox LLP Los Angeles, CA March 7, 2012 D.R. Horton & Class Action Waivers: Sea Change Or Flash In The Pan?
BUSINESS LAW. What is agency law? Legal relationship where one party has legal permission to act for another party Two primary parties are “agent” and.
Great Men as Supreme Court Justices: Leadership and Cohesion in the Warren and Burger Courts.- Capstone Presentation By Geoff Warren.
1 CWA v. Beck Issue –Today we must decide whether (Section 8(a)(3)) permits a union over the objections of dues-paying nonmember employees, to expend funds.
1 “The company raised no objection to the Board's order on the ground that the scope of information required was too broad or that disclosure would put.
INTRODUCTION TO RACIAL DISCRIMINATION 2/07/08. Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority (1961) ISSUE: It is a violation of the equal protection clause of.
Preferential Treatment on the Job Background: From Plessy to Brown Background: From Plessy to Brown United Steelworkers v. Weber United Steelworkers v.
1 CWA v. Beck Issue –Today we must decide whether (Section 8(a)(3)) permits a union over the objections of dues-paying nonmember employees, to expend funds.
1 Oakwood Care Center 343 N.L.R.B. No. 76 (2004) Is a proposed bargaining unit that includes or is composed of employees that are employed jointly by a.
1 Epilepsy Foundation Does the Weingarten right extend to employees who are not covered by a collective agreement? May an employer discipline a non-exclusively.
1 Kentucky River – Relevant Statutory Provisions Sec. 2(3) The term “employee”... shall not include... any individual employed as a supervisor,..... Sec.
1 Ex-Cell-O Notes inadequacy of Board’s remedies Limitations on Board’s Remedial Authority –May not punish respondent –May not cause irreparable harm to.
OS 352 4/15/08 I. Reminder for next time: Read and bring to class the Mohler article. II. Benefits (continued). III. Labor-management relations. IV. Next.
1 Frank Frodyma Acting Director Directorate of Evaluation and Analysis Occupational Safety and Health: A Regulatory Perspective.
1 University of Vermont 2008 Study of U.S. Institute An Introduction to American Constitutional Law and the Constitution of the United States Lawrence.
Cerritos Fresno Irvine Pleasanton Riverside Sacramento San Diego The History of Collective Bargaining in California Public Schools ACSA Negotiators’ Planning.
Employee Grievances: Tips and Strategies for Putting Forward Your Best Case Presented by Erin G. Jackson Thompson, Sizemore, Gonzalez & Hearing, P.A. May.
1 Oakwood, Golden Crest, Croft Metals (Sept. 29, 2006) Supervisory cases Interpreting “Kentucky River” Citations –Oakwood Healthcare, Inc., 348 NLRB No.
 Court: U.S. Supreme Court  Date: 1985  Issue: Did New York City's decision to use Title I funds to pay salaries of parochial school teachers violate.
25-1 Chapter 1 Legal Heritage and the Digital Age.
I.U.D. (of OSHA) v Am. Petrol. Inst. (1980)  Important facts: Sec. of Labor authorized to set standards for safe and healthy work environments and when.
Legal Aspects of Special Education and Social Foundations The American Legal System.
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW CLASS 12 February 4, 2008 Limits on Federal Legislative Powers: The Tenth Amendment.
THE FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM: The Judicial Branch LESSON 10.
The Judicial Branch Chapter 16 The Role of the Courts.
Judicial Review "The rules governing judicial review have no more substance at the core than a seedless grape."
Dana Corporation (I), 341 N.L.R.B No. 150, 2004 Should a collective bargaining relationship established pursuant to an agreement between a company and.
A Look at the Judicial Branch The Federal Court System & Supreme Court.
1 THE INSPECTOR GENERAL. 2 THE INSPECTOR GENERAL AND THE RULE OF LAW Traditional Role of the Inspector General – advise leadership of status of units.
Constitutional Law Spring 2008 Class 26: Dormant Commerce Clause II.
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW SPRING 2008 PROF. FISCHER CLASS 10 January 30, 2008 The Commerce Clause II Interpretation: 1937-present.
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW SPRING 2008 Prof. Fischer Class 20 Executive Appointment and Removal Power.
Constitutional Law Spring 2007 Class 22 Substantive Due Process Continued: Personal Liberty – Reproduction,Contraception, Abortion.
Carolyn Mitchell. Agenda Importance of Bargaining Unit Wagner Act and Bargaining Unit NLRB Bargaining Unit Determinations Wagner Act Experience vs. Taft-Hartley.
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW SPRING 2008 PROF. FISCHER Class 25 The Dormant Commerce Clause Part I.
1 IBM Corporation An employee who is not represented by a union is not entitled to the presence of a co-worker at an interview that the employee reasonably.
1 American Hospital Association Does the Board have the legal authority under the NLRA to adopt a rule determining eight presumptively appropriate bargaining.
Argued: December 13, 1971 Reargued October 11, 1972 Decided: January 22, 1973.
1 Lecture 8 Collective Bargaining and Unionism in the Public Sector Introduction to Public Personnel Administration Spring 2014.
Thornburgh v. Abbott, 490 U.S 401 (1989) Evan Liwosz Korey Freyermuth Julian Taylor.
Facts of the Case  Two students were found smoking cigarettes in a school bathroom.  One of the students (TLO) denied smoking, so her bag was searched.
Commerce Power Champion v. Ames (1903) Shreveport Rate Case (1914) Hammer v. Dagenhart (1918) Stafford v. Wallace (1922) NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel.
CONFLICTS AND CONFIDENTIALITY
Hoffman Plastic Compounds (Rehnquist w/ O’Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas) Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) of 1986, among other things, makes.
Linden Lumber Does Sec. 9(c)(1)(B) of the NLRA obligate an employer who has committed no unfair labor practices to petition for a representation election.
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
NLRB v. Katz (and following notes)
New J New Jersey v. T.L.O L.O..
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
Burns Security Services 406 U.S. 272, 1972
Part 2: Reconstruction to the Burger Court
Part 4: Sovereign Immunity and New Judicial Federalism
How A Bill becomes a Law Diagram
Borg-Warner Three Categories of Issues Rationale
Electromation Board cannot consider “changing industrial realities” in interpreting NLRA where statute is clear to the contrary of requested interpretation;
M.B. Sturgis (and Jeffboat) 331 N.L.R.B. No. 173 (8/25/2000)
CALIFORNIA’S AGRICULTURAL LABOR RELATIONS LAW
Collective Bargaining
Presentation transcript:

1 HENDRICKS COUNTY Key Points Labor Nexus Test – Meaning - ees with a relationship to LR function not covered – Rationale - avoid conflicts of interest in labor relations (adversarial assumption) Authority of Board to interpret NLRA where it is silent or ambiguous –Legislative function of Board? “Legislative History” as a means of legal analysis Scope of “protected activity” under Sec. 7

2 Legislative History Majority (Brennan w/ White, Marshall, Blackmun, Stevens –Because House version of T-H would have excluded all confidential employees, and Senate version did not, and conference adopted Senate version, Board’s pre T-H interpretation holds –Statutory Interpretation Dissent (Powell w/ Burger, Rehnquist, O’Connor) –Conferees understood that all confidential employees excluded. –Basic principles of Act Line between labor and management

3 “In sum, our review of the Board's decisions indicates that the Board has never followed a practice of depriving all employees who have access to confidential business information from the full panoply of rights afforded by the Act. Rather, for over 40 years, the Board, while declining to create any implied exclusion from the definition of "employee" for confidential employees, has applied a labor-nexus test in identifying those employees who should be excluded from bargaining units (emphasis added) because of access to confidential business information. We cannot ignore this consistent, longstanding interpretation of the NLRA by the Board. ” (454 U.S. 170, )

4