Welcome to the CDS Workshop Jeanette Pham Syd Bell Hobart 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Current status of  -lactamases-producing gram-negative bacilli isolated in Korea Kyungwon Lee, MD, PhD Department of Laboratory Medicine and Research.
Advertisements

Detection of ESBLs & AmpC
Detection of b-Lactamase-Mediated Resistance
Emerging Antimicrobial Resistance in Texas The new ESBLs.
2009 CLSI M100-S19 Update Nebraska Public Health Laboratory.
Methods for detection β-lactamases Sarah Alharbi.
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing – Part II
New Resistance in Gram Negative Rods (GNRs)
Klebsiella oxytoca and K1 enzyme
ESBL producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistant to CAZ, ATM, FEP, borderline resistant to PIP, susceptible to TIM and TZP. Note the synergy between TIM.
Performance of Fox 10 Vs Staph. aureus DHM (Sydney), Gribbles (Melb.) Used Fox 10 since Jan 05 (> 1000) Borderline strains tested for mecA gene Results:
A review and update of the CDS test CDS Workshop ASM 2009 Perth.
WELCOME to the CDS WORKSHOP Sydney Excel Spreadsheet for Registration.
Plate 1a: Staphylococcus aureus resistant to penicillin (P0.5) only. Note the annular radius of the zone of inhibition of 9.5 mm around the cefoxitin (FOX.
Plasmid mediated Metallo-Beta- Lactamase (MBL) Plasmid mediated Hydrolyses all beta-lactam (except aztreonam) Inhibited by EDTA Binds zinc (Zn 2+ ) Pseudomonas.
n°10 : Klebsiella pneumoniae
ANTIBIOTICS.
Resistance to  -lactam antibiotics within the Enterobacteriaceae Paul D. Fey, Ph. D. University of Nebraska Medical Center.
Gram Negative Gram Positive
Dave Warshauer, PhD, D(ABMM)
COL Helen Viscount, PhD, D(ABMM) LTC Steven Mahlen, PhD, D(ABMM)
Culture and Sensitivity Helping the Infection Preventionist Interpret Antibiograms Walter Phillips, BS, MS, PhD Director of Microbiology TriStar Healthcare.
Antibiotics 101 Puja Van Epps 1/20/14.
MDR Organisms in Holy Family Hospital Rawalpindi
Methods Revised Abstract Methods Results TP-271 is a Potent, Broad-Spectrum Fluorocycline with Activity Against Community-Acquired Bacterial Respiratory.
Beta lactam antibiotics & Other cell wall synthesis inhibitors
BSAC User Group Meeting 2007 BSAC recommendations for interpreting the susceptibility of urinary tract isolates Jenny Andrews.
Antibiogram panel Designing
12 August 2003 AmpC  -Lactamases & their detection David Livermore Health Protection Agency, Colindale, London.
Clinical Cases Beta-Lactam Answers. Case 1 What antibiotic would you recommend for intravenous therapy in a 40yo BM with a Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA)
ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE
Detection of  -lactamase- mediated resistance David Livermore Health Protection Agency, Colindale, London.
ESBL, MBL and Amp C beta lactamase detection DEPARTMENT OF MICROBIOLOGY JIPMER PUDUCHERRY.
Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli ESBLs and Other Bad Bugs David P. Dooley, FACP UTHSC-San Antonio Audie Murphy VA Hospital San Antonio, TX.
Nebraska Public Health Laboratory 2008 CLSI M100-S18 update Paul D. Fey, Ph.D. Associate Professor/Associate Director Josh Rowland, M.T. (ASCP) State Training.
김의종(집필대표), 강정옥, 김미나, 김민중, 김성일, 이경원, 이도현, 이장호, 이남용, 이창규, 신종희, 장철훈, 최혜심
Bacterial Resistance in China
Dr. Laila M. Matalqah Ph.D. Pharmacology
Dr. Iman M. Fawzy Clinical Pathology MD, PhD Mansoura, Egypt
ESBL, AmpC -lactamase 표준진단법
細菌藥物敏感性試驗規範- 聚焦在主要抗藥性菌種
How to interpret the results of antimicrobial susceptibility testing – what to do next? Mi Suk Lee, MD. Division of infectious Diseases Kyung Hee University.
How to interpret the results of antimicrobial susceptibility testing – what to do next? Mi Suk Lee, M.D. Division of infectious Diseases Kyung Hee University.
(Ambler class A, Bush group 2) Inhibited by CA
4/28/2017 AST.
Using Nursing Home Antibiograms To Improve Antibiotic Prescribing and Delivery Training Slides for Nursing Home Nurses Comprehensive Antibiogram Toolkit.
MRSA, ESBLs and Carbapenem Resistance
C-158 Genetic and Biochemical Characterisation of OXA-405, a New Extended Spectrum Class D -Lactamase from Serratia marcescens L. Dortet1,2, S. Oueslati1,
Current Status of Antimicrobial Resistance
N°XXXX Rapid detection of extended-spectrum BETA-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae from urine using the ESBL NDP test Patrice Nordmann, Laurent Poirel,
Serotypes, genotypes and antimicrobial resistance patterns of human diarrhoeagenic Escherichia coli isolates circulating in southeastern China  Y. Chen,
EARS-Net data on Antimicrobial Resistance in Ireland, Q
Standardisation – What does this mean for the CDS?
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
The Role of the Microbiology Laboratory in AMS programs
Emergence of Klebsiella pneumoniae with an AmpC(DHA-1) and blaSHV-11 in a Belgian hospital. Timothy Vanwynsberghe1, Katia Verhamme2, Marijke Raymaekers3,
Clinico-Pathological Conference (CPC) Meet
کارگاه میکروب شناسی سیستم ادراری
Table 1: Resistance profile
Figure 1. Molecular modeling of : a) GES-1 and b) GES-1P174E
BSAC Bacteraemia Resistance Surveillance Update 2013
C th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy October 25-28, Washington, DC Examining Temocillin Activity in Combination.
L. Poirel, P. Nordmann  Clinical Microbiology and Infection 
Evaluation of a diagnostic flow chart for detection and confirmation of extended spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL) in Enterobacteriaceae  S. Polsfuss, G.V.
Phenotypic detection of extended-spectrum β-lactamase production in Enterobacteriaceae: review and bench guide  L. Drieux, F. Brossier, W. Sougakoff,
TRAINING PRESENTATION
Highly antibiotic-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates are killed by the green tea polyphenol (–)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG)  A.
Jacques Sirot  Clinical Microbiology and Infection 
Multi-centre evaluation of a phenotypic extended spectrum β-lactamase detection guideline in the routine setting  T.N. Platteel, J.W. Cohen Stuart, A.J.
Serotypes, genotypes and antimicrobial resistance patterns of human diarrhoeagenic Escherichia coli isolates circulating in southeastern China  Y. Chen,
Presentation transcript:

Welcome to the CDS Workshop Jeanette Pham Syd Bell Hobart 2011

VALE-Maria Yates

The Sixth Edition is Coming !

Help Needed ! If you have any suggestions on modifications or additions to the Manual Please us at:

Changed Cefotaxime/Ceftriaxone Testing for Pneumococci (sites other than CSF) Streptococcus “milleri” group (anginosus, constellatus & intermedius) Antibiotic/discCut-off (mm)MIC(mg/L) Cefotaxime 0.5  g4mm0.5 Ceftriaxone 0.5  g4mm 0.5

Susceptibility of “milleri” Group Streptococcus pyogenesStrep Streptococcus “milleri”

Non multi-resistant MRSA = original CA-MRSA Resistant to penicillin (P 0.5) and cefoxitin (FOX 10) S/ erythromycin (E 5), tetracycline (TE 10), co-trimoxazole (SXT 25) and ciprofloxacin (CIP 2.5) and gentamicin (not shown). Recent isolates: R/ Ery, Cip.

β –Lactamase negative NMR- MRSA Clear large zone around OX 1, light growth around P 0.5 and a small zone around FOX 10 => excellent inducer of PBP 2a. Report as resistant to methicillin and all other β ‑ lactams.

Staphylococus aureus v/s cefoxitin 10 Standard 6 mm cut off mecA gene negative:zone around mm mecA gene positive:zone mm * Rare strains have problem with expressing the resistance => zone around 6 mm * Repeat with higher inoculum or * Send for mecA gene PCR

Enterococci Tested on blood Sensitest agar in 5% CO2 (high humidity in CO2 incubator enhances the growth) Ampicillin 5 µg (AMP 5, 4 mm) Gentamicin 200 µg (CN 200, high level resistance) Linezolid 10 µg (LZD 10) Nitrofurantoin 200 µg (F 200, urine, 4 mm) Quinupristin/Dalfopristin 15 µg (QD 15) (E. faecalis: naturally R/ QD) Streptomycin 300 µg (S 300, high level resistance, 4 mm) Teicoplanin 15 µg (TEC 15*) Tigecycline 15 µg (TGC 15) Vancomycin 5 µg (VA 5*) * Hazy edge with growth towards the discs

Plate incubated in CO2: Vancomycin resistant Enterococcus faecium of VanB phenotype At 24 h, the reduced zone and the light growth towards the vancomycin disc (VA 5) is frequently observed with this phenotype. R/ VANS/ TEC => vanB phenotype

Plate incubated in Air: Same VR Enterococcus faecium of VanB phenotype At 24 h, the light growth towards the vancomycin disc (VA 5) is not obvious on the Sensitest agar plate incubated in air.

The ß-lactamases of Gram-negative bacilli An update on the detection of common plasmid mediated β-lactamases in clinical isolates

Common transferable (plasmid mediated) β-lactamases in coliforms TEM-1, SHV-1, ESBLs (Bush group 2, Ambler class A) Inhibited by clavulanic acid (CA) S/ AMC 60 AmpC: (Bush group 1, Ambler class C) Not inhibited by CA, inhibited by boronic acid R/ AMC 60S/ FEP 10 MBL: (Bush group 3, Ambler class B) Not inhibited by CA, inhibited by EDTA May have large zones R/ AMC 60R/ FEP 10 KPC: “Super ESBL” (Bush group 2, Ambler class A) Partially inhibited by CA R/ AMC 60R/ ALL

E. coli ACM 5186 (used in QC) producing TEM-1 Resistant to ampicillin (AMP 25)

An E. coli producing an inhibitor resistant TEM (IRT) Resistant to ampicillin (AMP 25) and Augmentin (AMC 60) Susceptible to cephalexin (CL 100), imipenem (IPM 10), cefotaxime (CTX 5).

Confirmation of IRT : R/ Augmentin (AMC 60), Timentin (TIM 85) and Tazocin (TZP 55) S/ cephalexin (CL 100), ceftazidime (CAZ 10) and cefotaxime (CTX 5).

A typical Acinetobacter lwoffi (β-lactamase negative) S/ ALL

A typical A. baumanii (or A. baumanii-like): High level of non inducible AmpC R/ ampicillin (AMP 5), cephalexin (CL 100), cefotaxime (CTX 5), cefepime (FEP 10), Augmentin (AMC 60) S/ imipenem (IPM 10)

A strain of Acinetobacter sp.( Acinetobacter genomospecies 3) Low AmpC activity R/ CL 100 (cephalexin), AMP 25 zone > 6 mm with colonies at the edge Report:R/ ampicillin, cephalexin Cefotaxime is borderline (6mm) => R/S

Enterobacteriaceae / Acinetobacter sp. Always test AMP 25 and CL 100 in parallel. (Cephalexin highly susceptible to AmpC hydrolysis) 1.S/ AMP 25, CL=> S/ Ampicillin, amoxicillin, CL 2.R/ AMP 25, CL=> R/ Ampicillin, amoxicillin, CL 3. R/ AMP; S/ CL 100=> R/ Ampicillin, amoxicillin S/ CL(TEM-1) 4. S/ AMP; R/ CL 100=> R/ Ampicillin, amoxicillin, CL (Low AmpC) (optional: confirm by nitrocefin testing)

ESBLs (Ambler class A, Bush group 2) Inhibited by CA R/Cephalosporins including cefepime (FEP) and aztreonam (ATM) S/ Augmentin (AMC 60) S/ Cephamycin (cefoxitin, cefotetan) CDS routine testing → Synergy with AMC 60 (no need for confirmation) S/ Imipenem (T)

Disc positions recommended for urine isolates Klebsiella pneumoniae producing an ESBL in routine CDS test S/ Augmentin (AMC 60), typical synergy between Augmentin and cefotaxime (CTX 5) / cefepime (FEP 10) Report: S/ imipenem (IMP 10)

Disc positions recommended for urine isolates Klebsiella pneumoniae producing an ESBL: synergy between Augmentin (ACM 60) and cefepime (FEP 10), no obvious synergy with cefotaxime (CTX 5) Probable intrinsic resistance and high ESBL activity.

Disc positions recommended for urine isolates E. coli: No obvious synergy between Augmentin (AMC, borderline) and cefepime (FEP, 0 mm) or cefotaxime (CTX, 0 mm); probable high ESBL activity of ESBL and intrinsic resistance. S/ IMP (large zone, no resistant colonies)

Detection of high activity ESBL or ESBL + intrinsic resistance Same E. coli: synergy between Augmentin (AMC) and aztreonam (ATM) placed in the centre, close to AMC disc. Need ATM to show synergy with AMC 60=> ESBL

PM-AmpC in E. coli/ Klebsiella R/ AMC 60 (not inhibited by CA) R/ CL 100 S/ FEP 10 Standard interpretation (No resistant mutants) > 6 mm (no resistant col.)=> S/ CTX 5 R/ CTX 5 Confirmation (optional): inhibition by boronic acid (BA) (1-Benzothiophene-2-boronic acid)

Routine CDS test showing an E. coli with a TEM-1 and a plasmid mediated AmpC R/ ampicillin (AMP) Augmentin (AMC), cephalexin (CL), cefotaxime (CTX) S/ cefepime (FEP 10) and imipenem (IPM 10).

The same E. coli (PM-AmpC) Synergy between boronic acid discs (blank) and adjacent discs: cefotaxime (CTX 5), Augmentin (AMC 60), cephalexin (CL 100), ceftazidime (CAZ 10). Blank disc= 250 µg boronic acid disc S/ FEP, IMP

Routine CDS test showing an E. coli with a TEM-1 and a LOW ACTIVITY plasmid mediated AmpC: AMP (0 mm), AMC (5 mm), CL (2 mm), CTX (7.5 mm), FEP (12 mm), IMP (12 mm). No resistant mutants in CTX zone. Report:R/ AMP, AMC, CL S/ CTX, FEP, IMP

Routine CDS test showing an E. coli with an inducible PM AmpC/resistant mutants (very rare): R/ ampicillin (AMP), Augmentin (AMC 60), cephalexin (CL 100), cefotaxime (CTX 5) + resistant colonies in the zone. Report:S/ cefepime (FEP 10) and imipenem (IPM 10)

CDS test showing an E. coli with an unusual PM AmpC from B/C Large zones around ampicillin (AMP 25, no TEM-1), Augmentin (AMC 60), cephalexin (CL 100), cefotaxime (CTX 5) + resistant colonies in the zones. S/ cefepime (FEP 10) and imipenem (IPM 10) with clear zone, no colonies. Report:S/ cefepime, imipenem

Same E. coli: resistant colony in CTX zone R/ ampicillin (AMP), Augmentin (AMC 60), cephalexin (CL 100), cefotaxime (CTX 5) showing synergy with boronic acid (blank disc). Report: S/ cefepime, imipenem

Acquired Metallo-Beta-Lactamases (MBLs) Ambler class B or Bush group 3 * Inhibited by EDTA (Zinc molecule) IMP-4 (most common) VIM, SPM, GIM, SIM (P. aeruginosa) NDM (new) * Hydrolyses all beta-lactam (except aztreonam) Enterobacteriaceae May have a zone > 6mm with IPM 10 Pseudomonas aeruginosa Highly resistant to all β-lactams => no zone S/ aztreonam

E coli: R/AMP 25, AMC 60, CTX 5, CL100 and FEP 10, colonies at the edge of imipenem zone (> 6 mm). No synergy between FEP/AMC → not ESBL => ? MBL Resistant colonies at the edge of IPM 10 zone => ? MBL

Simple phenotypic detection of MBL: Same isolate showing synergy between an EDTA (blank) discs placed next to cefotaxime (CTX)/ imipenem (IPM)/ cefepime (FEP)/ ertapenem (ETP) discs.. S/ ATM

Klebsiella pmeumoniae: Synergy between EDTA (blank discs) and IPM 10/ETP 10 only R/ ATM and synergy with AMC 60 => MBL and ESBL

Pseudomonas aeruginosa candidate for MBL detection: No zone around imipenem (IPM 10) ceftazidime (CAZ 10), tazocin (TZP 55), cefepime (FEP 10) and Timentin (TIM 85) S/ aztreonam (ATM 30)

The same Pseudomonas aeruginosa with EDTA Detection of MBL: Synergy between an EDTA disc placed next to imipenem (IPM 10)/ meropenem (MEM 5)/ ceftazidime (CAZ 10) discs. S/ aztreonam (ATM 30) EDTA 415 EDTA 415 EDTA 415

Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistant to all β-lactams, imipenem (IPM 10) ceftazidime (CAZ 10), tazocin (TZP 55), cefepime (FEP 10) and Timentin (TIM 85) including aztreonam (ATM 30). ??? * Small zone around MEM 5, IPM 10 and ATM 30

The same P. aeruginosa: Synergy between EDTA and ATM/TZP/CAZ/TIM and MEM 5 but not with IPM => Non specific synergy between EDTA and beta-lactams =>not MBL EDTA 415 EDTA 415 EDTA 415

K. pneumoniae: R/ Augmentin (AMC 60), cephalexin (CL100), cefotaxime (CTX 5), cefepime (FEP 10), imipenem (IPM 10) zone (> 6 mm). No synergy between EDTA and IPM 10 ???

The same K. pneumoniae: Synergy between AMC 60 and IPM 10 => inhibited by clavulanate ??? A β-lactamase of Ambler class A or Bush group 2 hydrolysing carbapenem => a KPC-2 producing K. pneumoniae from Greece

KPC in Klebsiella pneumoniae Plasmid mediated K. pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) Ambler class A or Bush group 2f Reported in Europe, US (Brooklyn 24%) Australia (first isolate in Sept 2010) Inhibited by clavulanic acid => ESBL affecting carbapenems KPC-1, KPC-2,…KPC-4 High level resistance to FEP, CTX, CRO, CAZ, ATM, …. Imipenem MIC ≥ 4 mg/L (border line) Ertapenem MIC > 8 mg/L (resistant) Inoculum dependent => broth MIC unreliable Summary: “Super” ESBL + R/IPM or colonies at edge of IPM zone In doubt, test ertapenem and/or send for confirmation

New Table 10.4 A guide to the testing and reporting of β ‑ lactam antibiotics for Gram ‑ negative organisms. 1. EEC to replace ESCHAPM (Table 10.4) 2. Serratia marcescens (Table 10.4) 3. Aeromonas sp. (Table 10.4) 4. HPM: standard interpretation 5. K. oxytoca: standard interpretation 6. PM AmpC: standard interpretation