The CMS Level-1 Trigger: System and Operation Christian Hartl (CERN) on behalf of CMS SPG-ÖPG, Lausanne, 15 June 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
J. Varela, CERN & LIP-Lisbon Tracker Meeting, 3rd May Partitions in Trigger Control J. Varela CERN & LIP-Lisbon Trigger Technical Coordinator.
Advertisements


Digital Filtering Performance in the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger David Hadley on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
Karol Buńkowski Warsaw University The RPC based muon trigger of the CMS Experiment XI Workshop on Resistive Plate Chambers and Related Detectors, 5-10.
Defined plateau region Knee 95% WP=knee+150V RPC operation and Hardware Performance  Annual HV module recalibration – all CAEN A3512N HV module offsets.
The CMS Trigger.
A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for the ATLAS Detector Mark Sutton University College London 7 th October 2005.
27 th June 2008Johannes Albrecht, BEACH 2008 Johannes Albrecht Physikalisches Institut Universität Heidelberg on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration The LHCb.
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS Johannes Haller (CERN) on behalf of the ATLAS First-Level Trigger Groups International Europhysics Conference on High.
First CMS Results with LHC BeamToyoko Orimoto, Caltech 1 First CMS Results with LHC Beam Toyoko Orimoto California Institute of Technology On behalf of.
J. Leonard, U. Wisconsin 1 Commissioning the Trigger of the CMS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider Jessica L. Leonard Real-Time Conference Lisbon,
IJAZ AHMEDNational Centre for Physics1. IJAZ AHMEDNational Centre for Physics2 OUTLINES oLHC parametres oRPCs oOverview of muon trigger system oIdea of.
The ATLAS trigger Ricardo Gonçalo Royal Holloway University of London.
Real Time 2010Monika Wielers (RAL)1 ATLAS e/  /  /jet/E T miss High Level Trigger Algorithms Performance with first LHC collisions Monika Wielers (RAL)
Online Measurement of LHC Beam Parameters with the ATLAS High Level Trigger David W. Miller on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration 27 May th Real-Time.
General Trigger Philosophy The definition of ROI’s is what allows, by transferring a moderate amount of information, to concentrate on improvements in.
February 19th 2009AlbaNova Instrumentation Seminar1 Christian Bohm Instrumentation Physics, SU Upgrading the ATLAS detector Overview Motivation The current.
The SLHC and the Challenges of the CMS Upgrade William Ferguson First year seminar March 2 nd
Karol Buńkowski CERN, UW Trigger at CMS Warsaw 2 November 2011.
Tracking at the ATLAS LVL2 Trigger Athens – HEP2003 Nikos Konstantinidis University College London.
The CMS Level-1 Trigger System Dave Newbold, University of Bristol On behalf of the CMS collaboration.
Manfred Jeitler, HEPHY Vienna CMS Level-1 Trigger MGU, 11 July The Level-1 Trigger of the CMS Experiment at LHC Design, challenges and performance.
1 Perspectives for quarkonium production in CMS Carlos Lourenço, on behalf of CMSQWG 2008, Nara, Japan, December 2008.
Manfred Jeitler, HEPHY Vienna Trigger Systems at LHC Experiments Instr-2008, Novosibirsk, 4 March Trigger Systems at LHC Experiments Manfred Jeitler.
Copyright © 2000 OPNET Technologies, Inc. Title – 1 Distributed Trigger System for the LHC experiments Krzysztof Korcyl ATLAS experiment laboratory H.
Claudia-Elisabeth Wulz Institute for High Energy Physics Vienna Level-1 Trigger Menu Working Group CERN, 9 November 2000 Global Trigger Overview.
ILC Trigger & DAQ Issues - 1 ILC DAQ issues ILC DAQ issues By P. Le Dû
On-line Software Requirements for the Global Trigger, the Global Muon Trigger and the Barrel Muon Trigger Track Finder Claudia-Elisabeth Wulz & HEPHY Vienna.
Status of Global Trigger Global Muon Trigger Sept 2001 Vienna CMS-group presented by A.Taurok.
CMS Week Mumbai, Dec Claudia-Elisabeth Wulz Institute for High Energy Physics Vienna Level-1 Trigger Menus.
Four Seas Conference Istanbul, 10 September 2004 Claudia-Elisabeth Wulz Institute for High Energy Physics, Vienna Fast Event Selection at CERN’s Large.
Barrel RPC Chamber consists of 2 double-gaps, each equipped with a common plane of 96 strips read-out by 6 front-end boards. The two double- gaps have.
Il Trigger di Alto Livello di CMS N. Amapane – CERN Workshop su Monte Carlo, la Fisica e le simulazioni a LHC Frascati, 25 Ottobre 2006.
W. Smith, DOE/NSF Review, August, 2006 CMS Trigger - 1 SORT ASICs (w/heat sinks) EISO Bar Code Input DC-DC Converters Clock delay adjust Clock Input Oscillator.
Claudia-Elisabeth Wulz Anton Taurok Institute for High Energy Physics, Vienna Hannes Sakulin CERN Annual Review CERN, 24 Sep Global Trigger Global.
All Experimenters MeetingDmitri Denisov Week of July 16 to July 22 D0 Summary  Delivered luminosity and operating efficiency u Delivered: 1.6pb -1 u Recorded:
IOP HEPP: Beauty Physics in the UK, 12/11/08Julie Kirk1 B-triggers at ATLAS Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Introduction – B physics at LHC –
Commissioning and Performance of the CMS High Level Trigger Leonard Apanasevich University of Illinois at Chicago for the CMS collaboration.
CMS101 Introduction to the CMS Trigger Darin Acosta University of Florida.
Compact Muon Solenoid Christian Hartl CERN Austrian Doctoral Student June 2009 Institut für Hochenergiephysik, ÖAW CMS Global Trigger Control and Monitoring.
The Status of the ATLAS Experiment Dr Alan Watson University of Birmingham on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
Artemis School On Calibration and Performance of ATLAS Detectors Jörg Stelzer / David Berge.
1 Triggering on Diffraction with the CMS Level-1 Trigger Monika Grothe, U Wisconsin HERA-LHC workshop March 2004 Need highest achievable LHC Lumi, L LHC.
CMS Week Mumbai, Dec Claudia-Elisabeth Wulz Institute for High Energy Physics Vienna Level-1 Trigger Menus.
Data Acquisition, Trigger and Control
First CMS Results with LHC Beam
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
Vienna Group Discussion Meeting on Luminosity CERN, 9 May 2006 Presented by Claudia-Elisabeth Wulz Luminosity.
The CMS LEVEL 1 TRIGGER SYSTEM FUNCTIONALITY and PERFORMANCE
Performance of the ATLAS Trigger with Proton Collisions at the LHC John Baines (RAL) for the ATLAS Collaboration 1.
LHC CMS Detector Upgrade Project RCT/CTP7 Readout Isobel Ojalvo, U. Wisconsin Level-1 Trigger Meeting June 4, June 2015, Isobel Ojalvo Trigger Meeting:
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment [1] is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
1 J. Varela, CMS Trigger, RT09, Beijing, May 2009 J. Varela IST/LIP Lisbon CMS Trigger Project Manager 16 th IEEE NPSS Real Time Conference May 10-15,
The LHCb Calorimeter Triggers LAL Orsay and INFN Bologna.
EPS HEP 2007 Manchester -- Thilo Pauly July The ATLAS Level-1 Trigger Overview and Status Report including Cosmic-Ray Commissioning Thilo.
Upgrade of the Trigger System of CMS Manfred Jeitler for the
IOP HEPP Conference Upgrading the CMS Tracker for SLHC Mark Pesaresi Imperial College, London.
The CMS High-Level Trigger
ALICE – First paper.
Commissioning of the ALICE HLT, TPC and PHOS systems
Status of CMS and the Austrian Contribution to the Trigger System
Trigger Systems at LHC Experiments
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS
Example of DAQ Trigger issues for the SoLID experiment
Project Presentations August 5th, 2004
Commissioning of the ALICE-PHOS trigger
LHCb Trigger, Online and related Electronics
Design Principles of the CMS Level-1 Trigger Control and Hardware Monitoring System Ildefons Magrans de Abril Institute for High Energy Physics, Vienna.
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
The LHCb Front-end Electronics System Status and Future Development
Presentation transcript:

The CMS Level-1 Trigger: System and Operation Christian Hartl (CERN) on behalf of CMS SPG-ÖPG, Lausanne, 15 June 2011

In this talk 1. Basics 1. Basics 2. Triggering at CMS 2. Triggering at CMS 3. Level-1 Trigger System 3. Level-1 Trigger System 4. Operational Experience 4. Operational Experience

Christian HartlThe CMS Level-1 SPG-ÖPG 2011, Lausanne3 Before triggering Early experiments in particle physics observed phenomena of interest directly. Early experiments in particle physics observed phenomena of interest directly. counting experiments counting experiments no trigger no trigger Later experiments to spot rare events by eye Later experiments to spot rare events by eye e.g. bubble chamber pre-trigger to take snapshot in right moment (no events rejected online) trained analysts scanned up to 250k photos/month! omega-minus BNL Rutherford's Gold Foil Experiment 1909

Christian HartlThe CMS Level-1 SPG-ÖPG 2011, Lausanne4 Triggering for physics at LHC looking for extremely rare signals looking for extremely rare signals standard model physics = background e.g inelastic p-p collisions compared to one H SM  4µ can't record everything can't record everything must reject background must remain efficient for signal need to decide fast need to decide fast to avoid dead-time How? How? LHC design energy and luminosity:

Christian HartlThe CMS Level-1 SPG-ÖPG 2011, Lausanne5 Simple concepts electrical signals from detectors are combined to define trigger signal electrical signals from detectors are combined to define trigger signal "traditional approach" "traditional approach" trigger signal causes digitization and recording of data trigger signal causes digitization and recording of data no further trigger possible until data on tape (dead time penalty) no further trigger possible until data on tape (dead time penalty) NIM logic modules NIM logic modules O(10) operations per module AND OR NOT threshold delay electronic chips (FPGA, ASIC) electronic chips (FPGA, ASIC) O(10 4 ) logic operations per chip dead-time fraction = trigger rate x readout time back then today

Christian HartlThe CMS Level-1 SPG-ÖPG 2011, Lausanne6 Multi-level triggering – from LEP to LHC intermediate readout buffer(s) intermediate readout buffer(s) fast local readout, reduced dead-time after trigger fast local readout, reduced dead-time after trigger bunch crossing clock as pre-trigger in hadron colliders bunch crossing clock as pre-trigger in hadron colliders time between bunch collisions used to calculate trigger decision time between bunch collisions used to calculate trigger decision several trigger levels several trigger levels fast (low-latency) early level(s), advanced later level(s) fast (low-latency) early level(s), advanced later level(s) Pipelined trigger and readout Pipelined trigger and readout process several events simultaneously in a pipeline (triggering & readout) prevents long dead-time after accept in early trigger stage more channels  less occupancy more channels  less occupancy deal with pile-up at LHC luminosities several proton- proton interactions may pile up in a bunch crossing LEP already in LEP new in LHC needed if: time between bunch crossings << calculation and distribution of trigger decision

In this talk 1. Basics 1. Basics 2. Triggering at CMS 2. Triggering at CMS 3. Level-1 Trigger System 3. Level-1 Trigger System 4. Operational Experience 4. Operational Experience

Christian HartlThe CMS Level-1 SPG-ÖPG 2011, Lausanne8 CMS at LHC

Christian HartlThe CMS Level-1 SPG-ÖPG 2011, Lausanne9 CMS uses two trigger levels LHC design LHC design collisions p-p (Pb-Pb) collisions p-p (Pb-Pb) √s=14 TeV (Pb-Pb: 5.52 TeV) √s=14 TeV (Pb-Pb: 5.52 TeV) 40 MHz bunch collision rate 40 MHz bunch collision rate 25 ns spacing (LEP: 22 µs) 25 ns spacing (LEP: 22 µs) 2835/3564 slots filled 2835/3564 slots filled luminosity 10 Hz/nb luminosity 10 Hz/nb p/bunch p/bunch average pile-up = 18 events/bunch crossing average pile-up = 18 events/bunch crossing Level-1: 40 MHz  100 kHz Level-1: 40 MHz  100 kHz custom electronics based on FPGAs and ASICs massive parallel pipeline, fixed latency (~3.2 µs) decision based on coarse calorimetric and muon data High Level Trigger: 100 kHz  300 Hz High Level Trigger: 100 kHz  300 Hz CPU farm running algorithms processing time depends on event complexity (~40 ms) decision based on full detector data, seeding on Level-1 info 40 MHz 100 kHz 300 Hz to tape L1-HLT throughput: 100 GB/s data acquisition scheme

In this talk 1. Basics 1. Basics 2. Triggering at CMS 2. Triggering at CMS 3. Level-1 Trigger System 3. Level-1 Trigger System 4. Operational Experience 4. Operational Experience

Christian HartlThe CMS Level-1 SPG-ÖPG 2011, Lausanne11 Level-1 trigger approach channels used: channels used: calorimeter systems calorimeter systems muon detectors muon detectors beam monitoring systems beam monitoring systems tracker channels NOT used tracker channels NOT used construction of trigger objects: construction of trigger objects: "local"  "regional"  "global" applying cuts applying cuts only at global trigger level Level-1 Global Trigger: Level-1 Global Trigger: receives four best objects of each kind checks 128 programmable conditions: object multiplicity, transverse momentum & energy, position, quality, topology checks 64 technical trigger conditions: signals provided by sub-detectors combines conditions in final OR with mask and prescales Level-1 accept distributed by Trigger Control System according to detector readiness and trigger rules

Christian HartlThe CMS Level-1 SPG-ÖPG 2011, Lausanne12 Level-1 trigger architecture RPC = resistive plate chambers RPC = resistive plate chambers CSC = cathode strip chambers CSC = cathode strip chambers DT = drift tubes DT = drift tubes ECAL = lead-tungstate e/m calorimeter ECAL = lead-tungstate e/m calorimeter HCAL = brass- scintillator hardronic calorimeter HCAL = brass- scintillator hardronic calorimeter TTC = Timing, Trigger & Control system TTC = Timing, Trigger & Control system TTS = Trigger Throtting system TTS = Trigger Throtting system DAQ = data acquisition system DAQ = data acquisition system 0.9<|  |<2.4 4 µ 4+4 µ 4 µ MIP + ISO bits e, J, E T, H T, E T miss, H T miss Level-1 Accept 40 MHz pipeline Calorimeter Trigger ECAL Trigger Primitives HCAL/HF Trigger Primitives Regional Calorimeter Trigger Global Calorimeter Trigger Muon Trigger RPC hitsCSC hitsDT hits Segment finder Track finder Pattern Comparator Segment finder Track finder Global Muon Trigger Global Trigger TTC systemTTS system Detector Frontend Status Link system 32 partitions 0<|  |<5 |  |<3 |  |<1.2|  |<3

Christian HartlThe CMS Level-1 SPG-ÖPG 2011, Lausanne13 Custom-built Level-1 trigger hardware detector status (trigger throttling) Level-1 Accept, control signals calorimeter objects: e, J, E T, H T, E T miss, H T miss muon objects Regional Calorimeter Trigger Resistive Plate Chambers Pattern Comparator Cathode Strip Chambers Track Finder Drift Tube Track Finder Global Calorimeter Trigger Global Trigger Global Muon Trigger Timing Trigger & Control System Fast Merging Modules WisconsinWarsaw FloridaBologna Madrid Vienna Imperial College Vienna

Christian HartlThe CMS Level-1 SPG-ÖPG 2011, Lausanne14 Level-1 trigger objects match & merge match & merge barrel: DT-RPC endcap: CSC-RPC cancel duplicates cancel duplicates overlap region: DT-CSC sort by momentum and quality sort by momentum and quality jet algorithm (GCT) electron/photon algorithm (RCT) muon track algorithm (DT Track Finder) Global Muon Trigger algorithm:

Christian HartlThe CMS Level-1 SPG-ÖPG 2011, Lausanne15 Global Trigger, Trigger Control System Every bunch crossing, for which a potential Level-1 accept is inhibited, is counted as dead. Every bunch crossing, for which a potential Level-1 accept is inhibited, is counted as dead. needed to calculate recorded integrated luminosity needed to calculate recorded integrated luminosity CMS regional trigger GCT GMT 40 MHz pipeline calo & muon objects GLOBAL TRIGGER LOGIC 1. Logic OR 2. Prescale 3. Rate Counters 128x algos technical trigger signals (beam monitoring systems etc.) 64x technical GLOBAL TRIGGER FINAL DECISION LOGIC physics calib random randcalib TRIGGER CONTROL SYSTEM L1A candidate Level-1 Accept (via TTC system to detector) backpressure, trigger rules deadtime counters

Level-1 trigger software system Trigger Supervisor (TS) framework Trigger Supervisor (TS) framework based on XDAQ middleware based on XDAQ middleware distributed control & monitoring system distributed control & monitoring system hardware access hardware access basic unit = TS cell basic unit = TS cell main executive, >=1 per subsystem main executive, >=1 per subsystem deployed as linux service on machine connected to hardware deployed as linux service on machine connected to hardware Services provided by each TS cell Services provided by each TS cell hardware configuration hardware configuration interconnection testing interconnection testing monitoring monitoring alarming alarming logging logging database access database access inter-TS-cell communication inter-TS-cell communication AJAX-based web interfaces AJAX-based web interfaces Level-1 page Level-1 page monitor and start/stop processes central monitoring of important subsystem items speed-dial for important applications current configuration status and identifieres (keys) … Trigger Function Manager Trigger Function Manager interface adapter: Run Control – Level-1 online software example: configuration service (component diagram) courtesy of Marc Magrans

Christian HartlThe CMS Level-1 SPG-ÖPG 2011, Lausanne17 Level-1 trigger web applications Level-1 Page Central TS Cell GMT TS Cell GT TS Cell Trigger Supervisor applications (examples) Level-1 trigger Data Quality Monitoring (CMS Data Analysis Software – CMSSW) RCT TS Cell

In this talk 1. Basics 1. Basics 2. Triggering at CMS 2. Triggering at CMS 3. Level-1 Trigger System 3. Level-1 Trigger System 4. Operational Experience 4. Operational Experience

Good start in 2010 Optimized synchronization of Level-1 trigger systems  efficiency increase Optimized synchronization of Level-1 trigger systems  efficiency increase Trigger performance good in first 2010 run Trigger performance good in first 2010 run Level-1 and HLT trigger menus continuously adapted to LHC conditions Level-1 and HLT trigger menus continuously adapted to LHC conditions Below ~ 0.4 Hz/µb minimum-bias trigger simple threshold cuts no (little) pre-scaling Up to 200 Hz/µb (end of 2010) triggers based on physics objects controlling rates with prescales effects from pile-up, detector etc. example: DT trigger performance (from J/Psi) nominal trigger cut: 5 GeV example: RPC trigger w.r.t. mininum- bias trigger 43 pb -1 collected in 2010 (p-p) 348 bunches colliding 150 ns bunch spacing

Christian HartlThe CMS Level-1 SPG-ÖPG 2011, Lausanne – Level-1 trigger improvements better muon algorithms better muon algorithms DT ghost busting DT ghost busting RPC pattern recognition RPC pattern recognition better energy resolution in calorimeter trigger better energy resolution in calorimeter trigger electron energy corrections electron energy corrections jet energy corrections jet energy corrections improved online software stability improved online software stability avoid operational downtime (many bottlenecks) avoid operational downtime (many bottlenecks) veto triggers that pre-fire (25 ns early, 5% of time) veto triggers that pre-fire (25 ns early, 5% of time) pre-firing kills collision events (trigger rules disallow two consecutivee triggers) pre-firing kills collision events (trigger rules disallow two consecutivee triggers) avoid this: veto on signal from BPTX (electrostatic beam-pickup), advanced by 25 ns avoid this: veto on signal from BPTX (electrostatic beam-pickup), advanced by 25 ns for example:

Christian HartlThe CMS Level-1 SPG-ÖPG 2011, Lausanne – experience and outlook Very good performance of Level-1 & HLT Very good performance of Level-1 & HLT smooth & efficient operations smooth & efficient operations > 850 pb -1 7 TeV) recorded > 850 pb -1 7 TeV) recorded continous improvements continous improvements excellent work in hardware, software, analysis, trigger menu development excellent work in hardware, software, analysis, trigger menu development Steep increase in luminosity Steep increase in luminosity peak lumi > 1.25 Hz/nb (1042 bunches colliding) peak lumi > 1.25 Hz/nb (1042 bunches colliding) current menu is for 1.4 Hz/nb current menu is for 1.4 Hz/nb possibly reach 5 Hz/nb in 2011 possibly reach 5 Hz/nb in 2011 best wishes to the LHC! best wishes to the LHC! Level-1 and HLT trigger menus are steadily evolving. physics prioritiesluminosity physics resultscontrol rates

Thank you