Power. The Four Components to a Statistical Conclusion The number of units (e.g., people) accessible to study The salience of the program relative to.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Hypothesis Testing
Advertisements

Type I & Type II errors Brian Yuen 18 June 2013.
Pitfalls of Hypothesis Testing + Sample Size Calculations.
Power and Effect Size Cal State Northridge  320 Andrew Ainsworth PhD.
Power.
Anthony Greene1 Simple Hypothesis Testing Detecting Statistical Differences In The Simplest Case:  and  are both known I The Logic of Hypothesis Testing:
1 Hypothesis Testing William P. Wattles, Ph.D. Psychology 302.
Hypothesis Testing making decisions using sample data.
Statistics 101 Class 8. Overview Hypothesis Testing Hypothesis Testing Stating the Research Question Stating the Research Question –Null Hypothesis –Alternative.
+ Chapter 10 Section 10.4 Part 2 – Inference as Decision.
Section 9.2: What is a Test of Significance?. Remember… H o is the Null Hypothesis ▫When you are using a mathematical statement, the null hypothesis uses.
Business 205. Review Sampling Continuous Random Variables Central Limit Theorem Z-test.
Using Statistics in Research Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology.
Hypothesis Testing Steps of a Statistical Significance Test. 1. Assumptions Type of data, form of population, method of sampling, sample size.
DATA ANALYSIS I MKT525. Plan of analysis What decision must be made? What are research objectives? What do you have to know to reach those objectives?
Power and Effect Size.
Lecture 11 Psyc 300A. Null Hypothesis Testing Null hypothesis: the statistical hypothesis that there is no relationship between the variables you are.
Hypothesis : Statement about a parameter Hypothesis testing : decision making procedure about the hypothesis Null hypothesis : the main hypothesis H 0.
1 Statistical Inference Note: Only worry about pages 295 through 299 of Chapter 12.
PSYC512: Research Methods PSYC512: Research Methods Lecture 9 Brian P. Dyre University of Idaho.
Introduction to Testing a Hypothesis Testing a treatment Descriptive statistics cannot determine if differences are due to chance. A sampling error occurs.
Inferential Statistics
Hypothesis Testing – Introduction
© 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education The Statistical Imagination Chapter 9. Hypothesis Testing I: The Six Steps of Statistical Inference.
Presented by Mohammad Adil Khan
Hypothesis Testing.
Tuesday, September 10, 2013 Introduction to hypothesis testing.
Significance Testing 10/15/2013. Readings Chapter 3 Proposing Explanations, Framing Hypotheses, and Making Comparisons (Pollock) (pp ) Chapter 5.
Chapter 8 Introduction to Hypothesis Testing
Tests of significance & hypothesis testing Dr. Omar Al Jadaan Assistant Professor – Computer Science & Mathematics.
1/2555 สมศักดิ์ ศิวดำรงพงศ์
Hypothesis testing and Decision Making Formal aspects of hypothesis testing.
CONFIDENCE INTERVAL It is the interval or range of values which most likely encompasses the true population value. It is the extent that a particular.
1 ConceptsDescriptionHypothesis TheoryLawsModel organizesurprise validate formalize The Scientific Method.
Inferential Statistics Body of statistical computations relevant to making inferences from findings based on sample observations to some larger population.
S-012 Testing statistical hypotheses The CI approach The NHST approach.
Multiple Testing Matthew Kowgier. Multiple Testing In statistics, the multiple comparisons/testing problem occurs when one considers a set of statistical.
Power Analysis for Traditional and Modern Hypothesis Tests
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Putting Statistics to Work.
Tuesday, April 8 n Inferential statistics – Part 2 n Hypothesis testing n Statistical significance n continued….
URBDP 591 I Lecture 4: Research Question Objectives How do we define a research question? What is a testable hypothesis? How do we test an hypothesis?
_ z = X -  XX - Wow! We can use the z-distribution to test a hypothesis.
1.  What inferential statistics does best is allow decisions to be made about populations based on the information about samples.  One of the most useful.
Introduction to Testing a Hypothesis Testing a treatment Descriptive statistics cannot determine if differences are due to chance. Sampling error means.
Major Steps. 1.State the hypotheses.  Be sure to state both the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis, and identify which is the claim. H0H0.
1 Lecture 5 Introduction to Hypothesis Tests Slides available from Statistics & SPSS page of Social Science Statistics Module.
Hypothesis Testing Steps for the Rejection Region Method State H 1 and State H 0 State the Test Statistic and its sampling distribution (normal or t) Determine.
Chapter 9: Hypothesis Tests for One Population Mean 9.2 Terms, Errors, and Hypotheses.
Populations and Samples Hypothesis Testing Example.
MSE 600 Descriptive Statistics Chapter 11 & 12 in 6 th Edition (may be another chapter in 7 th edition)
Statistical Inference for the Mean Objectives: (Chapter 8&9, DeCoursey) -To understand the terms variance and standard error of a sample mean, Null Hypothesis,
More about tests and intervals CHAPTER 21. Do not state your claim as the null hypothesis, instead make what you’re trying to prove the alternative. The.
The Language of Statistical Decision Making Lecture 2 Section 1.3 Mon, Sep 4, 2006.
Dr.MUSTAQUE AHMED MBBS,MD(COMMUNITY MEDICINE), FELLOWSHIP IN HIV/AIDS
Hypothesis Testing – Introduction
Hypothesis Testing: Hypotheses
MATH 2311 Section 8.2.
Chapter Review Problems
Statistical Tests - Power
P-value Approach for Test Conclusion
Chapter 6 Making Sense of Statistical Significance: Decision Errors, Effect Size and Statistical Power Part 1: Sept. 18, 2014.
Statistical Inference
The Language of Statistical Decision Making
More About Tests Notes from
Chapter 7: Statistical Issues in Research planning and Evaluation
Sample Mean Compared to a Given Population Mean
Sample Mean Compared to a Given Population Mean
Inference as Decision Section 10.4.
1 Chapter 8: Introduction to Hypothesis Testing. 2 Hypothesis Testing The general goal of a hypothesis test is to rule out chance (sampling error) as.
Statistical Power.
Presentation transcript:

Power

The Four Components to a Statistical Conclusion The number of units (e.g., people) accessible to study The salience of the program relative to the noise The odds the observed result is due to chance The odds you’ll observe a treatment effect when it occurs Sample size Effect size Alpha level Power

The Effect Size Is a ratio of... Signal Noise

The Effect Size Is a ratio of... Treatment or program group, Compared to the control group With the standard error of The difference factored in Signal Noise

What Is the Decision Matrix? A basic decision diagram showing the steps in involved in a statistical conclusion A basic decision diagram showing the steps in involved in a statistical conclusion The central decision involves accepting the null or alternative hypothesis The central decision involves accepting the null or alternative hypothesis

The Decision Matrix In reality What we conclude

The Decision Matrix In reality What we conclude Null true Alternative false In reality... There is no real program effectThere is no real program effect There is no difference, gainThere is no difference, gain Our theory is wrongOur theory is wrong

The Decision Matrix In reality What we conclude Null true Alternative false In reality... Accept null Reject alternative We say... There is no real program effect There is no difference, gain Our theory is wrong There is no real program effectThere is no real program effect There is no difference, gainThere is no difference, gain Our theory is wrongOur theory is wrong

The Decision Matrix In reality What we conclude Null true Alternative false In reality... Accept null Reject alternative We say... There is no real program effect There is no difference, gain Our theory is wrong There is no real program effectThere is no real program effect There is no difference, gainThere is no difference, gain Our theory is wrongOur theory is wrong 1-  THE CONFIDENCE LEVEL The odds of saying there is no effect or gain when in fact there is none # of times out of 100 when there is no effect, we’ll say there is none

The Decision Matrix In reality What we conclude Null true Alternative false In reality... Reject null Accept alternative We say... There is a real program effect There is a difference, gain Our theory is correct There is no real program effectThere is no real program effect There is no difference, gainThere is no difference, gain Our theory is wrongOur theory is wrong

The Decision Matrix In reality What we conclude Null true Alternative false In reality... Reject null Accept alternative We say... There is a real program effect There is a difference, gain Our theory is correct There is no real program effectThere is no real program effect There is no difference, gainThere is no difference, gain Our theory is wrongOur theory is wrong  TYPE I ERROR The odds of saying there is an effect or gain when in fact there is none # of times out of 100 when there is no effect, we’ll say there is one

The Decision Matrix In reality What we conclude Null false Alternative true In reality... There is a real program effectThere is a real program effect There is a difference, gainThere is a difference, gain Our theory is correctOur theory is correct

The Decision Matrix In reality What we conclude Null false Alternative true In reality... Accept null Reject alternative We say... There is no real program effect There is no difference, gain Our theory is wrong There is a real program effectThere is a real program effect There is a difference, gainThere is a difference, gain Our theory is correctOur theory is correct

The Decision Matrix In reality What we conclude Null false Alternative true In reality... Accept null Reject alternative We say... There is no real program effect There is no difference, gain Our theory is wrong There is a real program effectThere is a real program effect There is a difference, gainThere is a difference, gain Our theory is correctOur theory is correct TYPE II ERROR  The odds of saying there is no effect or gain when in fact there is one # of times out of 100 when there is an effect, we’ll say there is none

The Decision Matrix In reality What we conclude Null false Alternative true In reality... Reject null Accept alternative We say... There is a real program effect There is a difference, gain Our theory is correct There is a real program effectThere is a real program effect There is a difference, gainThere is a difference, gain Our theory is correctOur theory is correct

The Decision Matrix In reality What we conclude Null false Alternative true In reality... Reject null Accept alternative We say... There is a real program effect There is a difference, gain Our theory is correct There is a real program effectThere is a real program effect There is a difference, gainThere is a difference, gain Our theory is correctOur theory is correct 1-  POWER The odds of saying there is an effect or gain when in fact there is one # of times out of 100 when there is an effect, we’ll say there is one

The Decision Matrix In reality What we conclude Null true Null false Alternative false Alternative true In reality... Accept null Reject alternative Reject null Accept alternative We say... There is no real program effect There is no difference, gain Our theory is wrong We say... There is a real program effect There is a difference, gain Our theory is correct There is no real program effectThere is no real program effect There is no difference, gainThere is no difference, gain Our theory is wrongOur theory is wrong There is a real program effectThere is a real program effect There is a difference, gainThere is a difference, gain Our theory is correctOur theory is correct 1-  THE CONFIDENCE LEVEL TYPE II ERROR  The odds of saying there is no effect or gain when in fact there is none # of times out of 100 when there is no effect, we’ll say there is none The odds of saying there is no effect or gain when in fact there is one # of times out of 100 when there is an effect, we’ll say there is none  1-  TYPE I ERROR POWER The odds of saying there is an effect or gain when in fact there is none The odds of saying there is an effect or gain when in fact there is one # of times out of 100 when there is no effect, we’ll say there is one # of times out of 100 when there is an effect, we’ll say there is one

The Decision Matrix In reality What we conclude Null true Null false Alternative false Alternative true In reality... Accept null Reject alternative Reject null Accept alternative We say... There is no real program effect There is no difference, gain Our theory is wrong We say... There is a real program effect There is a difference, gain Our theory is correct There is no real program effectThere is no real program effect There is no difference, gainThere is no difference, gain Our theory is wrongOur theory is wrong There is a real program effectThere is a real program effect There is a difference, gainThere is a difference, gain Our theory is correctOur theory is correct 1-  THE CONFIDENCE LEVEL TYPE II ERROR   1-  TYPE I ERROR POWER

The Decision Matrix In reality What we conclude Null true Null false Alternative false Alternative true In reality... Accept null Reject alternative Reject null Accept alternative We say... There is no real program effect There is no difference, gain Our theory is wrong We say... There is a real program effect There is a difference, gain Our theory is correct There is no real program effectThere is no real program effect There is no difference, gainThere is no difference, gain Our theory is wrongOur theory is wrong There is a real program effectThere is a real program effect There is a difference, gainThere is a difference, gain Our theory is correctOur theory is correct 1-  THE CONFIDENCE LEVEL TYPE II ERROR   1-  TYPE I ERROR POWER CORRECT CORRECT