“Green Means ‘Go?’ – A Colorful Approach to a U.S. National Renewable Portfolio Standard Authors: Benjamin K. Sovacool and Christopher Cooper Public Policy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
State Policy Initiatives Financing Wind Power: The Future of Energy May 7-9, 2008 Richard Cogen.
Advertisements

Florida RPS & Solar Dick Lowry Assoc. Manager of Government Relations 7/26/07.
Proposed Federal Renewable Electricity Standard (RES) April 20, 2009.
State renewable portfolio standard State renewable portfolio goal Solar water heating eligible * † Extra credit for solar or customer-sited renewables.
WEST VIRGINIA DIVISION OF ENERGY West Virginia’s Renewable Energy Opportunities.
Bringing Wind Home: Incentives for Community Wind Justin Barnes North Carolina Solar Center Database of State Incentives for Renewables and Efficiency.
International Energy Policy Trends Dennis Scanlin Appalachian State University March 2011.
1 Jesse Jenkins (RNP) November 7th, 2006 Northwest Energy: A Look at the Past, Present and Future of Electricity Generation in the Pacific Northwest.
Net Metering and Interconnection A Policy Perspective Brad Klein Staff Attorney Envt’l Law & Policy Center March 28, 2007.
DIMACS Workshop on Algorithmic Decision Theory for the Smart Grid Challenges of Generation from Renewable Energy on Transmission and Distribution Operations.
Money for Nothing and Heat for Free: U.S. Incentives for Solar Water Heating Ty Gorman North Carolina Solar Center Database of State Incentives for Renewables.
American Wind Energy Association Presentation by: Randall Swisher, Executive Director American Wind Energy Association Wind Market Overview COG Renewable.
State Solar Policy: Overview & Trends Rusty Haynes N.C. Solar Center N.C. State University NCSL Solar Energy Institute Washington, D.C. October 19, 2007.
Introduction to DSIRE Amy Heinemann North Carolina Solar Center/DSIRE May 8, 2012.
NW Investor-Owned Utilities Sales Trends, 2003 – 2008 (Powerful Choices IX)
Jason Marks Commissioner, District 1 February 4, 2008 New Mexico’s Path to a Sustainable Energy Future.
CEO Climate Change Task Force Meeting A Wall Street Perspective Karl H. Pfeil III Managing Director Public Power December 3, 2007.
1 Practicing What We Preach Dr. James Fenton, Director A Research Institute of the University of Central Florida Creating Energy Independence Since 1975.
An Overview of State Renewable Portfolio Standards Colin Hagan, JD 2012 Research Associate Institute for Energy and the Environment, Vermont Law School.
1 Renewable Energy Certificates and the California RPS NARUC 2006 Summer Meeting San Francisco, CA Andy Schwartz Division of Strategic Planning California.
U.S. Photovoltaic Markets: PV Policies Leading the Way Susan Gouchoe North Carolina Solar Center NC State University ASES 2008 San Diego, California May.
The Regulatory Assistance Project 110 B Water Street Hallowell, Maine USA Tel: Fax: State Street, Suite 3 Montpelier,
1 Bradley Nickell Director of Transmission Planning Connecting Policy and Wind Energy Investment Iowa State University WESEP-REU June 12, 2012.
Jason Marks, Esq. New Mexico Public Regulation Commission February 7, 2008 Cost Recovery for Renewable Energy & DSM: A New Mexico Regulatory Perspective.
Incentives, Mandates, and Federal / State Policies for Promoting Renewable Energy Forrest Stegelin Extension Agribusiness Economist University of Georgia.
The Context for Solar Resource Development: Where are we now? Amy Heinemann August 30,
Renewable and Appropriate Energy Laboratory - rael.berkeley.edu Green Growth: Powering Innovation Daniel M. Kammen Co-Director, Berkeley Institute of the.
Energy and the Built Environment CRP / Lecture 12 Energy Policy Christian E. Casillas.
Update from DSIRE: Solar Policy News & Trends Susan Gouchoe North Carolina Solar Center IREC Annual Meeting Long Beach, California September 24, 2007.
PJM© Welcome to PJM. PJM© Today’s Agenda 1.Introductions 2.PJM Overview 3.State and Federal Regulation Steve Boyle.
Incentives for Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Understanding the Options for Local Governments Justin Barnes North Carolina Solar Center/DSIRE March.
State Solar Policy Trends in the Southeast Amy Heinemann North Carolina Solar Center Georgia Tech Clean Energy Speakers Series May 26, 2010.
State Solar Policy: Developments & Current Trends Rusty Haynes N.C. Solar Center N.C. State University IREC Annual Meeting October 13, 2008.
Rusty Haynes N.C. Solar Center / DSIRE N.C. State University IREC webinar June 23, States, 30 Directions: Making sense of state solar policy.
State Solar Policy Current Status & Future Outlook Rusty Haynes N.C. Solar Center N.C. State University Solar America Cities Annual Meeting April 15, 2008.
Implications of State Climate Change Policies for the Utility Sector Josh Bushinsky State Solutions Fellow Pew Center on.
Pew Center Resources for State Climate Action Josh Bushinsky State Solutions Fellow Pew Center on Global Climate Change August.
State Performance-based Incentives and Rebates for Small Wind * / March 2011 Rebates/PBIs available in 18 states and DC for small wind.
Renewable Portfolio Standards: Design and Impact Haitao Yin Shanghai Jiao Tong University Nick Powers University of Michigan.
State of Solar in North Carolina Amy Heinemann March 7,
Transforming Renewable Energy at the U.S. Department of Energy OFEE Symposium East – June 2008 Anne Sprunt Crawley U.S. Department of Energy.
Renewable Portfolio Standards Update: 2012’s Compliance Modifications, Progress and Prognostications Renewable Energy Markets Association Webinar March.
Synergies between Renewable Energy, Energy Efficiency, and Emissions Offsets  National Trading Program  International Trading Platform Enron is well.
Unclassified1 Competitive Acquisition of Renewable Energy & Renewable Energy Certificates Andrea L. Kincaid, Contracting Officer Electricity & Renewables.
Connecting the Dots: Policy, Markets and the Clean Energy Future New England Restructuring Roundtable Boston, MA September 30, 2016.
Clean Energy Federalism
/ February 2017 Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) with Solar or Distributed Generation Provisions / February 2017 VT:
RPS Policies with Solar/DG Provisions
Renewable Portfolio Standard Policies / February 2017
House price index for AK
Ryan Wiser and Mark Bolinger
/ March 2015 Net Metering Note: Net Metering rules are being actively discussed in over a dozen state public service & utility commissions.
/ March 2015 Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) with Solar or Distributed Generation Provisions / March 2015 WA: 2 MW.
Net Metering Note: Net Metering rules are being actively discussed in over a dozen state public service & utility commissions across the country.
/ March 2015 Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) with Solar or Distributed Generation Provisions / March 2015 WA: 2 MW.
Non-Citizen Population, by State, 2011
23 states + Washington DC have an RPS with solar or DG provisions
/ March 2015 Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) with Solar or Distributed Generation Provisions / March 2015 WA: 2 MW.
IAH CONVERSION: ELIGIBLE BENEFICIARIES BY STATE
Renewable Portfolio Standard Policies / February 2017
Renewable Portfolio Standard Policies / October 2018
/ August 2016 Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) with Solar or Distributed Generation Provisions / August 2016 VT: 1%
The Future of Renewable Energy in New England
* Renewable Portfolio Standard Policies
100% Clean or Renewable Electricity Targets
Renewable & Clean Energy Standards
/ February 2017 Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) with Solar or Distributed Generation Provisions / February 2017 VT:
Renewable & Clean Energy Standards
100% Clean or Renewable Electricity Targets
Income Eligibility Levels for Children in Medicaid/CHIP, January 2017
Presentation transcript:

“Green Means ‘Go?’ – A Colorful Approach to a U.S. National Renewable Portfolio Standard Authors: Benjamin K. Sovacool and Christopher Cooper Public Policy Analysis Econ 539 Catherine Clark

What is a Renewable Portfolio Standard (PRS)? A law mandating that suppliers must provide a certain percentage of their electricity from renewable sources by a particular date.

Renewables Portfolio Standards State Goal ☼ PA: 18%¹ by 2020 ☼ NJ: 22.5% by 2021 CT: 10% by 2010 MA: 4% by % annual increase WI: requirement varies by utility; 10% by 2015 goal IA: 105 MW MN: 25% by 2025; (Xcel: 30% by 2020) TX: 5,880 MW by 2015 *NM: 20% by 2020 (IOUs) 10% by 2020 (co-ops) ☼ AZ: 15% by 2025 CA: 20% by 2010 ☼ NV: 20% by 2015 ME: 30% by 2000; 10% by 2017 goal - new RE State RPS *MD: 7.5% by 2019 ☼ Minimum solar or customer-sited requirement * Increased credit for solar or customer-sited ¹PA: 8% Tier I / 10% Tier II (includes non-renewables); SWH is a Tier II resource HI: 20% by 2020 RI: 15% by 2020 ☼ CO: 20% by 2020 (IOUs) *10% by 2020 (co-ops & large munis ) ☼ DC: 11% by 2022 Source: Database of State Incentives for Renewables and Efficiency March 2007www.dsireusa.org ☼ NY: 24% by 2013 MT: 15% by 2015 *DE: 10% by 2019 IL: 8% by 2013 VT: RE meets load growth by 2012 Solar water heating (SWH) eligible *WA: 15% by 2020

Two Important Acts for Energy Policy Energy Policy Act (EPAct) 2005 Deregulation in this act energy changed energy production from a state based operation to a geographically unlimited business making some state RPS’s ineffective. Public Utilities Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA) Dictates no set price for energy produced by individual consumers.

Net Metering Policies Standards for measuring and crediting on-site, interconnected, small scale renewable energy production (generally thought of as consumer produced renewable energy). These policies vary state to state and even from utility company to utility company.

The Proposed National RPS Traditional State RPS programs are based on obtaining a certain % of energy produced from renewable sources. The proposed National RPS would call for a certain % of energy demanded from renewable sources. The difference is it provides an opportunity for providers to turn to demand-reducing strategies (such as energy efficiency and expanded load management practices) to meet the regulatory goals of the RPS.

The Proposed National RPS The authors propose the national RPS to be implemented by Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and to include a national net metering standard to empower individual consumers and keep utility companies from excluding small generators.

The Proposed National RPS Under the proposed national RPS program, utilities would be required to pay market rates for the renewable energy purchased from small generators but would also buy the rights to the Renewable Energy Credit (REC) associated with that energy.

Aren’t we worried about intermittent power from renewables? Ways Denmark, Spain, and Germany have overcome the problem of intermittence: Diversify source locations. Diversify source technologies. Integrate with existing hydropower and demand response. Predicting wind patterns (just as utilities currently do with demand and rainfall).

Economic Benefits Small generators would have to decide whether to sell their energy and their RECs at the retail rate or sell just the energy This could encourage utilities to invest more heavily in their own renewable energy sources as well.

Economic Benefits RECs would be available to sell between utilities on a national level. This could create a secondary market for renewable energy, pushing the price for renewable energy down. Such a system of a credits market would be similar to the sulfur credit program now.

How would this change current energy markets? In a competing market, it is projected that an increased use in renewable energy will alleviate pressure on the natural gas market causes prices of natural gas to fall. Under mandates to keep using renewable energy, this could cause the price of electricity to fall for consumers.

Why is a National RPS better than State RPS? It could: Establish a level terrain for small scale renewable generation across states. Encourage or allow market forces to dictate the most geographically advantageous distribution of investments in renewables. Enable renewable energy technologies to flourish in the places where they are most useful. Allow for vastly different technologies across space. Provide the regulatory predictability that encourages long term planning.

Questions?? Source: Savacool, Benjamin K. and Christopher Cooper. “Green Means ‘Go?’-A Colorful Approach to U.S. National Renewable Portfolio Standards.” Electricity Journal 19:6 (2006) :