Searching for CesrTA guide field nonlinearities in beam position spectra Laurel Hales Mike Billing Mark Palmer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Oscillations and Simple Harmonic Motion:
Advertisements

Neil Marks; DLS/CCLRC L ecture to Cockcroft Institute 2005/6. © N.Marks MMIV Resonances Neil Marks, DLS/CCLRC, Daresbury Laboratory, Warrington WA4 4AD,
Dr. Zafer Nergiz Nigde University THE STATUS OF TURKISH LIGHT SOURCE.
Transverse optics 2: Hill’s equation Phase Space Emittance & Acceptance Matrix formalism Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP) 17 January 2012 Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP)
M. LindroosNUFACT06 School Accelerator Physics Transverse motion Mats Lindroos.
“AC” Dispersion Measurement David Rubin Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
Wilson Lab Tour Guide Orientation 11 December 2006 CLASSE 1 Focusing and Bending Wilson Lab Tour Guide Orientation M. Forster Mike Forster 11 December.
ELENA Tracking studies P.Belochitskii, O.Berrig With thanks to: C.Carli, L.Varming Jørgensen, G.Tranquille.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
Lattice calculations: Lattices Tune Calculations Dispersion Momentum Compaction Chromaticity Sextupoles Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP) 17 January 2012 Rende.
Lecture 5: Beam optics and imperfections
AC dipole for LHC Mei Bai Collider Accelerator Department Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Introduction to particle accelerators Walter Scandale CERN - AT department Roma, marzo 2006.
Ultra-Low Emittance Storage Ring David L. Rubin December 22, 2011.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
115 December 2011 Holger Witte Brookhaven National Laboratory Advanced Accelerator Group Elliptical Dipole.
6. betatron coupling sources: skew quadrupoles, solenoid fields concerns: reduction in dynamic (& effective physical) aperture; increase of intrinsic &
Studies on Lattice Calibration With Frequency Analysis of Betatron Motion R. Bartolini DIAMOND Light Source Ltd FMA workshop, Orsay, LURE, 1 st and 2 nd.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
1 EPIC SIMULATIONS V.S. Morozov, Y.S. Derbenev Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility A. Afanasev Hampton University R.P. Johnson Muons, Inc. Operated.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
November 14, 2004First ILC Workshop1 CESR-c Wiggler Dynamics D.Rubin -Objectives -Specifications -Modeling and simulation -Machine measurements/ analysis.
Part III Commissioning. Proof of Principle FFAG (POP) study The world first proton FFAG –Commissioned in March –From 50 keV to 500 keV in 1ms. –Proof.
Effect of nonlinearity on Head-Tail instability 3/18/04.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Containing a.
Frequency Map Analysis Workshop 4/2/2004 Peter Kuske Refinements of the non-linear lattice model for the BESSY storage ring P. Kuske Linear Lattice My.
Nonlinear Dynamic Study of FCC-ee Pavel Piminov, Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia.
28-May-2008Non-linear Beam Dynamics WS1 On Injection Beam Loss at the SPring-8 Storage Ring Masaru TAKAO & J. Schimizu, K. Soutome, and H. Tanaka JASRI.
E Levichev -- Dynamic Aperture of the SRFF Storage Ring Frontiers of Short Bunches in Storage Rings INFN-LNF, Frascati, 7-8 Nov 2005 DYNAMIC APERTURE OF.
1 Alternative Bunch Compressor 30 th Sep KNU Eun-San Kim.
Zeuten 19 - E. Wilson - 1/18/ Slide 1 Recap. of Transverse Dynamics E. Wilson – 15 th September 2003  Transverse Coordinates  Relativistic definitions.
1 EMMA Tracking Studies Shinji Machida ASTeC/CCLRC/RAL 4 January, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
J-PARC Spin Physics Workshop1 Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC M. Bai Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Daniel Dobos Seminar: Chaos, Prof. Markus
Linear Imperfections equations of motion with imperfections: smooth approximation orbit correction for the un-coupled case transfer matrices with coupling:
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
Accelerator Fundamentals Brief history of accelerator Accelerator building blocks Transverse beam dynamics coordinate system Mei Bai BND School, Sept.
Orbits, Optics and Beam Dynamics in PEP-II Yunhai Cai Beam Physics Department SLAC March 6, 2007 ILC damping ring meeting at Frascati, Italy.
February 5, 2005D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c Status -Operations/Luminosity -Machine studies -Simulation and modeling -4.1GeV.
Chromaticity shift induced by misalignment of Landau Octupole Magnets Neal Anderson Department: BE-ABP Advisor: Rogelio Tomas Mentor: Ewen Maclean LHC.
Zeuten 2 - E. Wilson - 2/26/ Slide 1 Transverse Dynamics – E. Wilson – CERN – 16 th September 2003  The lattice calculated  Solution of Hill 
Xiaoying Pang Indiana University March. 17 th, 2010 Independent Component Analysis for Beam Measurement.
R. Bartolini, John Adams Institute, 27 January 20161/23 HT Lecture on Nonlinear beam dynamics (I) Motivations: nonlinear magnetic multipoles Phenomenology.
Corrections for multi-pass eRHIC lattice with large chromaticity Chuyu Liu ERL workshop 2015 June 7, 2015.
Accelerator Physics & Diagnostics, H.Wiedemann, DITANET, March 6 – 11, 2011, Stockholm, Sweden Accelerator Physics for Diagnostics Helmut Wiedemann Stanford.
E.Wildner NUFACT09 School 1 Accelerator Physics Transverse motion Elena Wildner.
Lecture 4 Longitudinal Dynamics I Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
Single particle dynamics in the ThomX ring Jianfeng zhang 12/02/2015 LAL.
Thomas Roser SPIN 2006 October 3, 2006 A Study of Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC A.U.Luccio, M.Bai, T.Roser Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton,
R. Bartolini, John Adams Institute, 27 January 20161/23 HT Lecture on Nonlinear beam dynamics (I) Motivations: nonlinear magnetic multipoles Phenomenology.
CLIC Frequency Multiplication System aka Combiner Rings Piotr Skowronski Caterina Biscari Javier Barranco 21 Oct IWLC 2010.
Orbit Response Matrix Analysis
Dynamic Aperture Studies with Acceleraticum
Sextupole calibrations via measurements of off-energy orbit response matrix and high order dispersion Nicola Carmignani.
Vertical emittance measurement and modeling Correction methods
Beam based measurements
ELENA Tracking studies
CESRTA Measurement of Electron Cloud Density by TE Wave and RFA
Lecture 7 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS HT E. J. N. Wilson.
Review of Accelerator Physics Concepts
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
SPEAR3 Lower Emittance & Nonlinear Dynamics
Optics Measurements in the PSB
with Model Independent
Sawtooth effect in CEPC PDR/APDR
Lecture 2 - Transverse motion
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
JLEIC Weekly R&D Meeting
Current Status of Ion Polarization Studies
Lecture 8 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS HT E. J. N. Wilson.
Presentation transcript:

Searching for CesrTA guide field nonlinearities in beam position spectra Laurel Hales Mike Billing Mark Palmer

Goals Learn how to find and correct non-linear errors. Correcting these errors will allow us to –Withstand large amplitude oscillations without losing particles. –Get a small vertical bunch size and avoid bunch shape distortions. We have two possible methods for finding non- linear errors. –Our first goal is to test these two methods using simulations. –Then we can test them using the accelerator.

The optics Dipoles - Bend the beam. Quadrupoles - Focus the beam. Sextupoles - Compensate for the energy depended focusing due to the quadrupoles Errors in the optics can lead to: –Losing particles –Bunch shape distortions

What is a BPM? Beam Position Monitor inside the beam-pipe. There are about 100 BPMs around CESR. The BPM can give you an x position and a y position for the beam One BPM vs. Time 4 electrodes on the walls of the beam-pipe Beam-pipe

MIA Drive beam with a sinusoidal shaker Take position data: 100 BPMs ~ 1000 turns Create a matrix P= [position x history] Using Singular Value Decomposition to get: Columns = spatial function around ring (Diagonals) = Eigen values (λ i ) ~ amplitudes of the eigen components Columns = time development of beam trajectory

Our simulation Our simulation uses tracking codes from BMAD. In our simulation we give the particle bunch an initial amplitude and then track it as it circles freely. There is no damping.

Sextupoles Sextupoles have a non-linear restoring force: which can be solved for: when we solve the above equation that gives us different multiples of ω because:

1 st Method The height of the different harmonics should be dependent on the driving amplitude (A). Τau matrix column One of the principle components Higher spectral component

Results for Method 1 The expected power law dependence is clearly shown in the vertically driven simulation.

Machine data (horizontally driven) The horizontally driven data shows the power law relation between driving amplitude and the magnitude of the harmonic signals The line represents a linear dependence

Machine data (vertically driven) The vertically driven data also displays the power law relation. The line represents a linear dependence

What are β and Φ ? β(s) is the amplitude function. –β modulates the amplitude of the oscillation of the particle beam –The envelope of oscillation is defined as, where J is the Action of the beam. Φ defines the phase of the oscillation. –The phase increases monotonically but not uniformly The Φ and β of the ring will change when a quadrupole strength is changed.

2 nd Method The sextupole magnets distort the phase space ellipse into a different shape. This distortion changes the equilibrium value of β(s) This change in β(s) is proportional to the driving amplitude: x x’ x With sextupoles Without sextupoles

2 nd Method A change in β can create a change in phase. The phase of the entire ring is the tune. The tune shift from the β error is: We expect Q vs. A to have a parabolic relationship because:

Results for Method 2 The quadratic dependence is shown in the vertically driven simulation

Machine data The tune shift is large enough to see it in the data from the actual accelerator

A resonance? The horizontal data is not quite what we expected. This may be due to the fact that it is close to the 2(Qh)+3(Qv)+2(Qs)=3 or the 3(Qv)+3(Qs)=2 resonances.

We have shown that the magnitude for the signal heights of the different spectral components are dependent on the driving amplitude. We have also shown that there is a tune shift that is dependent on the driving amplitude. We have also shown that these effects can be detected in the signal from the particle accelerator. Conclusions

We need to determine how changing the lattice effects the signals. From that data we can begin to figure out how we can use these methods to find non-linear errors. Future plans