Overview of Technology Transfer Process RERC on Technology Transfer University at Buffalo.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
KT for TT – Ensuring Technology- based R&D matters to Stakeholders
Advertisements

MANAGEMENT RICHARD L. DAFT.
Begin with Knowledge Translation; Have the End – Technology Transfer – in Mind Begin with Knowledge Translation; Have the End – Technology Transfer – in.
Contextualized Knowledge Translation Packages for Technology Transfer and Product Development ATIA Orlando, Florida January 2012 James A. Leahy Center.
The Persistence of “Participation”: Representation of the Disability Community on Facebook 1 John Bricout, Ph.D. University of Texas - Arlington Paul M.A.
Achieving Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer: Implications for Evaluation Presenter: Vathsala I. Stone University at Buffalo/
1 Improving Data Quality through Two Dimensional Surveying: the Kano Method Stephen M. Bauer PhD, & Vathsala I. Stone PhD RERC on Technology Transfer,
TTO Role in University / Corporate Partnership
How to Translate Knowledge in Three States: Discovery, Invention, Innovation Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer University.
Getting from Knowledge to Action: Effectively communicating Research & Development value to multiple Stakeholder Groups. Joseph Lane & John Westbrook RESNA.
Innovation in Universal Design “Universal integration of research, education, innovation and enterprise at DIT GrangeGorman” Joseph P. Lane, University.
KT for TT – Ensuring Use and Impact from Technology R&D Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer University at Buffalo.
Industry – The missing link between S&T Policy and Societal Benefit. Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer University.
Training in Oil & Gas Production For BP Technical Interns.
Innovative and entrepreneurial projects. Innovation …the process of bringing any new problem solving idea into use … it is the generation, implementation.
Best Practices in Technology Transfer Jennifer L Flagg Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer University at Buffalo.
Expanding Product Accessibility with Primary Market Research Techniques Jennifer L Flagg Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer, University.
From Industry-University Cooperation to Research Brokering in Estonia The purpose of this paper is to discuss the factors that determine effectiveness.
Tools for Technical, Business & Consumer Analysis in AT Product Development: Expanding the Need to Knowledge Model Joseph P. Lane, Center on KT4TT University.
Work Readiness Program Problem Solving & Decision Making.
The 7th Campbell Colloquium May 14-16, 2007 London, UK Knowledge Translation and Disability and Rehabilitation Research _______________________________________________.
Managing & Communicating Knowledge in Three States Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer School.
International Conference on Ageing, Disability, and Independence (ICADI) Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom Wednesday, 8 September 2010 Accommodating.
The Aging of Participation: Community, Work, and Social Networks 1 Paul M.A. Baker, Ph.D. and Nathan Moon, Ph.D. Georgia Institute of Technology Barry.
VoIP Solutions Summit Focus on Disability Access Issues Cary Barbin RERC on Telecommunications Access Gallaudet University.
Analytic Tools: Ensuring industry relevance for university-based R&D projects intending transfer. Joseph P. Lane & James Condron Center on Knowledge Translation.
Bridging the Deliverable Gap: Improving Government’s approach to innovation intending social benefit. Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for.
Knowledge Translation Conference KT Solutions for Overcoming Barriers to Research Use Hosted by SEDL’s Center on Knowledge Translation for Disability and.
Knowledge Translation Conference KT Solutions for Overcoming Barriers to Research Use Hosted by SEDL’s Center on Knowledge Translation for Disability and.
The KT4TT Knowledge Base: Steps and Supporting Evidence to Improve Your Process! Webcast sponsored by SEDL September 29, 2010, 2:00 pm (Central) / 3:00.
Social Media, Participation and E-Accessibility Paul M.A. Baker, Ph.D. Center for Advanced Communications Policy Georgia Institute of Technology John Bricout,
 Where should the idea come from? ◦ The researcher !
International Conference on Ageing, Disability, and Independence (ICADI) Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom Thursday, 9 September 2010 Telework, Ageing,
An Introduction to Composites Technology Explore the exciting new technology and opportunities in the world of composites.
15 Designing and Managing Integrated Marketing Channels 1.
METHODS A Delphi Study to Identify Barriers, Facilitators and Training Needs for PSE Interventions in SNAP-Ed Karen Franck, University of Tennessee; Karla.
Stages of Research and Development
Engaging stakeholders in the research and development process
Stephen Bauer NIDILRR Program Officer
MANAGEMENT RICHARD L. DAFT.
MANAGEMENT RICHARD L. DAFT.
Knowledge Translation Outcome Measurement
Four Models to Guide AT Projects Intending Innovative Technology Development Outcomes Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer.
The Social Model for A/T Technology Transfer – AAATE 2010 “From Problem Identification to Social Validation: An Operational Model” Joseph P. Lane,
Bridging the Deliverable Gap: Improving Government’s approach to innovation intending social benefit. Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation.
Translating New Knowledge from Technology Based Research Projects: an End-of-Grant Intervention Evaluation Study. Rationale and Methods Vathsala I. Stone.
People with IDD Receiving LTSS while Living in the Home of a Family Member or in their Own Home With or Without Medicaid Waiver Funding 2006 to 2015, United.
Managing & Communicating Knowledge in Three States
Joseph P. Lane, University at Buffalo
Expanding Product Accessibility with Primary Market Research Techniques Jennifer L Flagg Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer, University.
Four Models to Guide AT Projects Intending Innovative Technology Development Outcomes Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer.
Tools for Technical, Business & Consumer Analysis in AT Product Development: Expanding the Need to Knowledge Model Joseph P. Lane, Center on KT4TT.
Joseph P. Lane & James Condron
Disseminating, Tracking and Evaluating New Knowledge in P&O
Joseph Lane & John Westbrook
Industry – The missing link between S&T Policy and Societal Benefit.
System Transformation
Knowledge Translation Outcome Measurement
Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer (KT4TT)
AEA Annual Meeting , Nov , 2009 Achieving Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer: Implications for Evaluation Presenter: Vathsala I. Stone.
RESNA 2018 Annual Conference
Knowledge Translation Across RERC Activities
TBI State and Federal Policy Overview.
Reconciling Government Policies and Programs with Public Expectations: The Case of Innovation in AT Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation.
Knowledge Utility results from Rigor in Methods & Relevance in Content
The Need to Knowledge (NtK) Model: Orienting Scholar “Technology Grantees” to Best Practices in Transfer & Commercialization Joseph P. Lane, Director.
Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer
Getting Started with Project Management
Presentation transcript:

Overview of Technology Transfer Process RERC on Technology Transfer University at Buffalo

Acknowledgement This is a presentation of the T 2 RERC which is funded by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research of the U.S. Department of Education, under grant number H133E The opinions contained in this presentation are those of the grantee and do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S. Department of Education.

What is Technology Transfer? A process for conceiving and implementing a new/novel application for an existing technology (Reisman, 1989)

One process transforms a technology into a product.

Push and pull forces initiate technology transfer.

Three critical events: idea, prototype and product.

Four activity areas.

Five Stakeholder Groups Technology Producers. Technology Consumers. Product Producers. Product Consumers. Resource Providers.

Members of the Five Stakeholder Groups

Five stakeholder groups mapped on process.

Composite of entire process.

Problems for Small Markets Lack internal R&D resources. Require access to external technologies. Lack knowledge of systematic tech transfer process, and the expertise required. Serendipity is insufficient for business planning purposes.

Intermediaries resolve problem. Have knowledge of systematic process. Have access to various stakeholders. Have access to expertise and resources. Have experience in negotiating barriers and applying carriers.

Roles for Intermediaries

Successfully conducting technology transfer requires champions at each step in the process.