Chemistry-based functional proteomics reveals novel members of the deubiquitinating enzyme family Borodovsky A, Ovaa H, Kolli N, Gan-Erdene T, Wilkinson.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BLOTTING TECHNIQUES By Abdullah Al-Hatami PhD student
Advertisements

MAP kinase Pathways in Yeast How are signals specified between pathways that share Common components? MAP = mitogen activated protein kinase.
Fluorescent Assay of a RING-type Ubiquitin Ligase Mississippi State University November 2007.
Determining the roles of the BTB genes At2g04740, At4g08455, At1g04390, and At2g30600 in Arabidopsis thaliana growth and development. Brandon D. Blaisdell,
MN-B-C 2 Analysis of High Dimensional (-omics) Data Kay Hofmann – Protein Evolution Group Week 5: Proteomics.
Intracellular Protein Degradation Chris Weihl MD/PhD Department of Neurology.
Novel labeling technologies on proteins
Enzyme Assays on Chips. Introduction Enzyme assays are used for discovery and characterization of enzymes Identification of protein function instead of.
Proteome.
Biotechnology. DNA technology DNA diagnostics DNA therapy.
Molecular Cell Biology
In God We Trust.
Control of Gene Expression
RA190 Small Molecule Proteasome Inhibitor for Cancer Therapy.
Western blotting. Antibodies in the Immune System Structure: 2 heavy chains + 2 light chains Disulfide bonds 2 antigen binding sites Isotypes: IgG, IgM,
Lecturer: David. * Reverse transcription PCR * Used to detect RNA levels * RNA is converted to cDNA by reverse transcriptase * Then it is amplified.
 Understanding the basics  SDS Electrophoresis Physics & Chemistry Comparative Proteomics Protein Profiling.
20.4 Regulation of Enzyme Activity
Volume 8, Issue 9, Pages (September 2001)
Das_Figure S1 USP15 USP4 USP11 49% 60% 39 % 71 % 52 % 54 %
Intracellular Protein Degradation
Michael Wrzaczek Dept of Biosciences, Plant Biology
Proteins – What do you know?
Proteins By Amber C and Lyla A.
Volume 133, Issue 4, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 41, Issue 5, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (March 2007)
Schematic diagram of ubiquitin and SUMO modification pathways
Volume 18, Issue 12, Pages (December 2011)
A perspective on proteomics in cell biology
The C-terminus of Hsp70-Interacting Protein Promotes Met Receptor Degradation  Kang Won Jang, PhD, Jeong Eun Lee, MD, Sun Young Kim, MD, Min-Woong Kang,
Matthew D. Petroski, Raymond J. Deshaies  Molecular Cell 
HUWE1 regulates ubiquitination of Shoc2 and RAF-1.
The Histone Variant MacroH2A1 Is a BRCA1 Ubiquitin Ligase Substrate
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 22, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (December 2013)
Robert L.S Perry, Maura H Parker, Michael A Rudnicki  Molecular Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Ubiquitin code assembly and disassembly
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 134, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 118, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e5 (May 2017)
What Determines the Specificity and Outcomes of Ubiquitin Signaling?
Volume 137, Issue 1, Pages (April 2009)
Kelly N. Chuh, Anna R. Batt, Matthew R. Pratt  Cell Chemical Biology 
Neddylating the Guardian
Gregory C. Adam, Benjamin F. Cravatt, Erik J. Sorensen* 
Volume 22, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Ubiquitinated Proteins Activate the Proteasome by Binding to Usp14/Ubp6, which Causes 20S Gate Opening  Andreas Peth, Henrike C. Besche, Alfred L. Goldberg 
Volume 18, Issue 12, Pages (December 2011)
Bacterial Interference of Ubiquitination and Deubiquitination
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (February 2015)
A Small-Molecule Inducer of the Antioxidant Response Element
Volume 50, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Regulation of Raf-1 by Direct Feedback Phosphorylation
Xinxin Gao, Rami N. Hannoush  Cell Chemical Biology 
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 47, Issue 3, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Cooperation of a ubiquitin domain protein and an E3 ubiquitin ligase during chaperone/proteasome coupling  Jens Demand, Simon Alberti, Cam Patterson,
Proteasome-Mediated Degradation of p21 via N-Terminal Ubiquitinylation
Volume 9, Issue 10, Pages (October 2002)
Rory Geyer, Susan Wee, Scott Anderson, John Yates, Dieter A. Wolf 
Modification by Single Ubiquitin Moieties Rather Than Polyubiquitination Is Sufficient for Proteasomal Processing of the p105 NF-κB Precursor  Yelena.
TgOTUD3A selectively deubiquitinates K48-linked Toxoplasma proteins.
A Novel Role for FAK as a Protease-Targeting Adaptor Protein
Presentation transcript:

Chemistry-based functional proteomics reveals novel members of the deubiquitinating enzyme family Borodovsky A, Ovaa H, Kolli N, Gan-Erdene T, Wilkinson KD, Ploegh HL, Kessler BM Chemistry and Biology 2002, 9,

Ubiquitination Proteins don’t just “go away” Labeling with ubiquitin (a marker protein) delivers proteins to the proteasome for degradation ubiquitin the proteasome

The ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS) Proteins destined for proteasomal degradation are tagged with a chain of ubiquitin (Ub) proteins via multiple reactions catalyzed by ubiquitin activating (E1), conjugating (E2) and ligating enzymes (E3) Ubiquitination reactions are reversed by the action of deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs)

Ubiquitination and deubiquitination DUB Ub gly 76 ubiquitination deubiquitination

Deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs) can rescue key cell-cycle proteins The tumor suppressor p53 is deubiquitinated by USP7 (aka HAUSP) and cell growth is repressed Ubiquitin (Ub) is removed from histones during chromatin condensation Ub is removed from membrane receptors during endocytosis Expression of many DUBs is tissue specific Each DUB may be dedicated to a specific substrate

What do we know? Sequencing of open reading frames (ORFs) suggests > 40 DUBs in mammalian genomes DUBs belong to 2 families of cysteine proteases No sequence homology DUBs are specific for the hydrolysis of a peptide bond at the Ub C-terminus

Genetics doesn’t tell us… How many of the 40 DUBs are active Whether activity is tissue specific Whether any are constitutively inactive Evolution of different function Co-expressed with an inhibitor Proenzymes with an inhibitory domain

What do we want to know? How many DUBs are active cysteine proteases? How specific are DUBs for their substrates? Can we selectively inhibit a single DUB in the presence of other active cysteine proteases? activity-based profiling activity-based profiling

DUB-Ub Michael adduct Active DUB is tagged by modified Ub Inactive DUBs do not react Other cysteine proteases do not react Ub required for specificity If Ub is labeled we can identify active DUBs

Suicide substrates * *Used in immunoprecipitation studies HA (hemagglutinin) tag allows detection using fluorescent anti-HA antibody

Incubation with whole-cell lysate 8% SDS PAGE Visualized by immunoblotting with anti-HA If Ub is labeled we can identify active DUBs 1. Michael acceptors label with equal efficiency 2. Michael acceptors do not label with equal efficiency 3. Michael acceptors do not label with equal efficiency Alkyl halides label a subset of those proteins labeled by Michael acceptors

DUBs and their partners can be identified Anti-HA antibody covalently attached to agarose beads pulls down HA- labeled Ub-DUB conjugates Some reactive proteins are associated with unknown partners These non-covalently associated proteins can be retained by using a native gel to separate the proteins Protein identification is by tryptic digest and MS/MS

DUBs and their partners can be identified