Spreading dynamics on small-world networks with a power law degree distribution Alexei Vazquez The Simons Center for Systems Biology Institute for Advanced.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mobile Communication Networks Vahid Mirjalili Department of Mechanical Engineering Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology.
Advertisements

R 0 and other reproduction numbers for households models MRC Centre for Outbreak analysis and modelling, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology.
Algorithmic and Economic Aspects of Networks Nicole Immorlica.
Modeling Malware Spreading Dynamics Michele Garetto (Politecnico di Torino – Italy) Weibo Gong (University of Massachusetts – Amherst – MA) Don Towsley.
Network Mapping of Large Data Sets Al Ozonoff, Ph.D. Joel Bernanke, M.Sc. Boston University School of Public Health.
School of Information University of Michigan Network resilience Lecture 20.
Information Networks Generative processes for Power Laws and Scale-Free networks Lecture 4.
Information Networks Small World Networks Lecture 5.
Advanced Topics in Data Mining Special focus: Social Networks.
CS 599: Social Media Analysis University of Southern California1 The Basics of Network Analysis Kristina Lerman University of Southern California.
RD processes on heterogeneous metapopulations: Continuous-time formulation and simulations wANPE08 – December 15-17, Udine Joan Saldaña Universitat de.
Weighted networks: analysis, modeling A. Barrat, LPT, Université Paris-Sud, France M. Barthélemy (CEA, France) R. Pastor-Satorras (Barcelona, Spain) A.
On the Spread of Viruses on the Internet Noam Berger Joint work with C. Borgs, J.T. Chayes and A. Saberi.
University of Buffalo The State University of New York Spatiotemporal Data Mining on Networks Taehyong Kim Computer Science and Engineering State University.
Extracting hidden information from knowledge networks Sergei Maslov Brookhaven National Laboratory, New York, USA.
The Barabási-Albert [BA] model (1999) ER Model Look at the distribution of degrees ER ModelWS Model actorspower grid www The probability of finding a highly.
The structure of the Internet. How are routers connected? Why should we care? –While communication protocols will work correctly on ANY topology –….they.
Scale Free Networks Robin Coope April Abert-László Barabási, Linked (Perseus, Cambridge, 2002). Réka Albert and AL Barabási,Statistical Mechanics.
Review of Basic Probability and Statistics
Sexual Network Constraints on STD Flow The role of Sexual Networks in HIV spread by James Moody The Ohio State University Presented at The UNC Center for.
Zhenhua Wu Advisor: H. E. StanleyBoston University Co-advisor: Lidia A. BraunsteinUniversidad Nacional de Mar del Plata Collaborators: Shlomo HavlinBar-Ilan.
Common Properties of Real Networks. Erdős-Rényi Random Graphs.
The moment generating function of random variable X is given by Moment generating function.
Epidemic Potential in Human Sexual Networks: Connectivity and The Development of STD Cores James Moody The Ohio State University Institute for Mathematics.
Summary from Previous Lecture Real networks: –AS-level N= 12709, M=27384 (Jan 02 data) route-views.oregon-ix.net, hhtp://abroude.ripe.net/ris/rawdata –
Modeling the population dynamics of HIV/AIDS Brandy L. Rapatski James A. Yorke Frederick Suppe.
The Erdös-Rényi models
Information Networks Power Laws and Network Models Lecture 3.
Epidemic spreading in complex networks: from populations to the Internet Maziar Nekovee, BT Research Y. Moreno, A. Paceco (U. Zaragoza) A. Vespignani (LPT-
1 Worm Modeling and Defense Cliff C. Zou, Don Towsley, Weibo Gong Univ. Massachusetts, Amherst.
Online Social Networks and Media Epidemics and Influence.
Complex networks A. Barrat, LPT, Université Paris-Sud, France I. Alvarez-Hamelin (LPT, Orsay, France) M. Barthélemy (CEA, France) L. Dall’Asta (LPT, Orsay,
Are global epidemics predictable ? V. Colizza School of Informatics, Indiana University, USA M. Barthélemy School of Informatics, Indiana University, USA.
Author: M.E.J. Newman Presenter: Guoliang Liu Date:5/4/2012.
Presentation: Random Walk Betweenness, J. Govorčin Laboratory for Data Technologies, Faculty of Information Studies, Novo mesto – September 22, 2011 Random.
Brandy L. Rapatski Juan Tolosa Richard Stockton College of NJ A Model for the Study of HIV/AIDS.
Diffusion 1)Structural Bases of Social Network Diffusion 2)Dynamic limitations on diffusion 3)Implications / Applications in the diffusion of Innovations.
V5 Epidemics on networks
Separating internal and external dynamics of complex systems Marcio Argollo de Menezes Albert-László Barabási.
Epidemic dynamics on networks Kieran Sharkey University of Liverpool NeST workshop, June 2014.
Weighted networks: analysis, modeling A. Barrat, LPT, Université Paris-Sud, France M. Barthélemy (CEA, France) R. Pastor-Satorras (Barcelona, Spain) A.
1 Burning a graph as a model of social contagion Anthony Bonato Ryerson University Institute of Software Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapter 5 Discrete Random Variables.
Emergence of Scaling and Assortative Mixing by Altruism Li Ping The Hong Kong PolyU
"Social Networks, Cohesion and Epidemic Potential" James Moody Department of Sociology Department of Mathematics Undergraduate Recognition Ceremony May.
E PIDEMIC SPREADING Speaker: Ao Weng Chon Advisor: Kwang-Cheng Chen 1.
Physics of Flow in Random Media Publications/Collaborators: 1) “Postbreakthrough behavior in flow through porous media” E. López, S. V. Buldyrev, N. V.
Percolation Processes Rajmohan Rajaraman Northeastern University, Boston May 2012 Chennai Network Optimization WorkshopPercolation Processes1.
Complex Network Theory – An Introduction Niloy Ganguly.
Probability Refresher COMP5416 Advanced Network Technologies.
Lecture 10: Network models CS 765: Complex Networks Slides are modified from Networks: Theory and Application by Lada Adamic.
1 Epidemic Potential in Human Sexual Networks: Connectivity and The Development of STD Cores.
How Do “Real” Networks Look?
Class 19: Degree Correlations PartII Assortativity and hierarchy
Class 21: Spreading Phenomena PartI
Transport in weighted networks: optimal path and superhighways Collaborators: Z. Wu, Y. Chen, E. Lopez, S. Carmi, L.A. Braunstein, S. Buldyrev, H. E. Stanley.
Netlogo demo. Complexity and Networks Melanie Mitchell Portland State University and Santa Fe Institute.
Fractal Networks: Structures, Modeling, and Dynamics 章 忠 志 复旦大学计算机科学技术学院 Homepage:
Random Variables By: 1.
Scale-free and Hierarchical Structures in Complex Networks L. Barabasi, Z. Dezso, E. Ravasz, S.H. Yook and Z. Oltvai Presented by Arzucan Özgür.
Epidemic spreading on preferred degree adaptive networks Shivakumar Jolad, Wenjia Liu, R. K. P. Zia and Beate Schmittmann Department of Physics, Virginia.
How Do “Real” Networks Look?
How Do “Real” Networks Look?
How Do “Real” Networks Look?
How Do “Real” Networks Look?
Department of Computer Science University of York
Properties and applications of spectra for networks
Advanced Topics in Data Mining Special focus: Social Networks
Presentation transcript:

Spreading dynamics on small-world networks with a power law degree distribution Alexei Vazquez The Simons Center for Systems Biology Institute for Advanced Study Alexei Vazquez The Simons Center for Systems Biology Institute for Advanced Study

Epidemic outbreak Population External source

Population structure N individuals p k connectivity distribution D average distance Contact graph

Sexual contacts p k ~k - , 2<  <5 Liljeros et al. Nature (2001) Jones & Handcook, Nature (2003) Schneeberger et al, Sex Transm Dis (2004) Sexually transmitted diseases 1 yearlifetime Sweden  -1

Sexual contacts Colorado Springs HIV network Potterat et al, Sex. Transm Infect 2002 STD N=250 D  8 k -2

Physical contact or proximity Barrat et al, PNAS 2004 N=3,880 Eubank et al, Nature day Portland k USA D  4.37 city nation/world

Physical contact or proximity

Branching process model Spanning tree Generation 0root pkpk kp k / k-1 k

d d+1 generation t t+T 1 t+T 2 t+T 3 time Generation time T Distribution G(  )=Pr(T  ) Branching process model Timming

1.The process start with a node (d=0) that generates k sons with probability distribution p k. 2.Each son at generation 0. 3.Nodes at generation D does not generate any son. 4.The generation times are independent random variables with distribution function G(  ). Note: Galton-Watson, Newman Bellman-Harris, Crum-Mode-Jagers Branching process model

Recursive calculation t=0 d d T2T2 T1T1 d+1

ResultsResults Constant transmission rate : G(  )=1-e -  Vazquez, Phys. Rev. Lett Reproductive number Time scale Incidence I(t): expected rate of new infections at time t

p k ~k - , k max ~N   >3,t<<t 0 (t 0  when N  )  >t 0 (t 0  0 when N  ) Vazquez, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006

Numerical simulations Network: random graph with a given degree distribution. p k ~k -  Constant transmission rate N=1000, 10000, graph realizations, outbreaks

I(t)/N t t e (K-1) t t D-1 e - t  1,000  10,000  100,000 log-loglinear-log Numerical simulations

Case study: AIDS epidemics  New York - HOM  New York - HET  San Francisco - HOM  South Africa  Kenya  Georgia Latvia  Lithuania Szendroi & Czanyi, Proc. R Soc. Lond. B 2004 t2t2 t3t3 t3t3 t3t3 t2t2 t (years) Cumulative number exponential

GeneralizationsGeneralizations Degree correlations Multitype

Degree correlations k’ k

Degree correlations kk KkKk KkKk

N( t) D-1 e - t e (R*-1) t  Vazquez, Phys. Rev. E 74, (2006) k’ k

Multi-typeMulti-type i=1,…,M types N i number of type i agents p (i) k type i degree distribution e ij mixing matrix D average distance Reproductive number matrix  : largest eigenvalue

Multi-typeMulti-type Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 Type 4 e ij Strongly connected type-networks Vazquez, Phys. Rev. E (In press); Type-network e ii

GeneralizationsGeneralizations Non-exponential generating time distributions

Intermediate states Vazquez, DIMACS Series in Discrete Mathematics… 70, 163 (2006)

Long time behavior: worms Receive infected time Sent infected s generating time (residual waiting time) Generating time probability density In collaboration with R. Balazs, L. Andras and A.-L. Barabasi

activity patterns Left: University server 3,188 users 129,135 s sent ~1 day  E ~25 days Right: Comercial server ~1,7 millions users ~39 millions s sent ~4 days  E ~9 months TT

Incidence: model

Prevalence: Prevalence: Prevalence data Decay time ~ 1 year data  E ~25 days - University  E ~9 months - Comercial Poisson model ~1 day - University ~4 days - Comercial I(t)I(t) I(t)I(t) I(t)I(t)

ConclusionsConclusions Truncated branching processes are a suitable framework to model spreading processess on real networks. There are two spreading regimes. –Exponential growth. –Polynomial growth followed by an exponential decay. The time scale separating them is determined by D/R. The small-world property and the connectivity fluctuations favor the polynomial regime. Intermediate states favor the exponential regime.