Beam Loss in the Extraction Line for 2 mrad Crossing Angle A.Drozhdin, N.Mokhov, X.Yang.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Recap of heat loads and peak doses from HL-LHC Q1 to Q7 L.S. Esposito, F. Cerutti HL-LHC WP3 meeting, 22 May 2014.
Advertisements

Ideas and Speculations for the Headon Extraction Line L. Keller Oct. 19, Give up the 3.5 m Separation between the Charged Dump and the Incoming.
EXTRACTION BEAM LOSS AT 1 TEV CM WITH TDR PARAMETERS Y. Nosochkov, G. White August 25, 2014.
Beam-Beam Effects for FCC-ee at Different Energies: at Different Energies: Crab Waist vs. Head-on Dmitry Shatilov BINP, Novosibirsk FCC-ee/TLEP physics.
Short bunches in SPEAR J. Safranek for the SPEAR3 accelerator group November 2, 20101J. Safranek CLS THz Workshop.
Solenoid effects and compensation B. Dalena, D. Swoboda, R. Tomás.
Alexandr Drozhdin March 16, 2005 MI-10 Injection.
MARS15 Simulations of the MERIT Mercury Target Experiment Fermilab March 18, Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider Collaboration meeting Sergei.
Zero Degree Extraction using an Electrostatic Separator Take another look at using an electrostatic separator and a weak dipole to allow a zero degree.
Shielding Studies using MARS Monte Carlo code Noriaki Nakao (SLAC) Jan. 6, 2005, WORKSHOP Machine-Detector Interface at ILC, SLAC.
Transport formalism Taylor map: Third order Linear matrix elementsSecond order matrix elements Truncated maps Violation of the symplectic condition !
27 June 2006Ken Moffeit1 Comparison of 2mrad and 14/20 mrad extraction lines Ken Moffeit ILC BDS 27 June 06.
1 August 12, 2005 Running 2mrad IR in e-e- mode: BDS constraints A.Seryi August 12, 2005.
Background comparison between 20 mrad and 2 mr crossings Takashi Maruyama SLAC Machine-Detector Interface Workshop SLAC January 6-8, 2005.
A.Seryi, Nov 22, 2005, slide 1 Evaluation of Aug9 2mrad Use 2mrad extraction, version Aug 9, Use high.
Status of ongoing studies for comparing 2-mrad and 20-mrad IRs T. Maruyama SLAC.
IR Beamline and Sync Radiation Takashi Maruyama. Collimation No beam loss within 400 m of IP Muon background can be acceptable. No sync radiations directly.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC Backgrounds What’s New? Tom Markiewicz LC’99, Frascati, Italy October 1999.
Overview of Extraction Line Designs and Issues
Design of the Photon Collimators for the ILC Positron Helical Undulator Adriana Bungau The University of Manchester Positron Source Meeting, July 2008.
1/18 The Distribution of Synchrotron Radiation Power in the IR C. H. Yu IR Overview SR Distribution in the IR The Protection of SR Power.
H- beam collimation in the transfer line from 8 GeV linac to the Main Injector A. Drozhdin The beam transfer line from 8 GeV Linac to the Main Injector.
Details of space charge calculations for J-PARC rings.
Synchrotron radiation at eRHIC Yichao Jing, Oleg Chubar, Vladimir N. Litvinenko.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
LCWS2004 Paris 1 Beam background study for GLC Tsukasa Aso, Toyama College of Maritime Technology and GLC Vertex Group H.Aihara, K.Tanabe, Tokyo Univ.
Beam Loss Simulation in the Main Injector at Slip-Stacking Injection A.I. Drozhdin, B.C. Brown, D.E. Johnson, I. Kourbanis, K. Seiya June 30, 2006 A.Drozhdin.
19 July 2006Ken Moffeit1 Comparison of 2mrad and 14/20 mrad extraction lines Ken Moffeit (via Eric Torrence) VLCW06 19 July 06.
1 Overview of Polarimetry Outline of Talk Polarized Physics Machine-Detector Interface Issues Upstream Polarimeter Downstream Polarimeter Ken Moffeit,
Updates on FLUKA simulations of TCDQ halo loads at IR6 FLUKA team & B. Goddard LHC Collimation Working Group March 5 th, 2007.
ATF2 background and beam halo study D. Wang(IHEP), S. Bai(IHEP), P. bambade(LAL) February 7, 2013.
G4Beamline Simulated Electron Distribution within the HPRF Cavity 2/15/20121.
Analysis of Multipole and Position Tolerances for the ATF2 Final Focus Line James Jones ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory.
SIGNAL AND BACKGROUND SIMULATION AT THE RECOMBINATION CHAMBER Vadim TALANOV CERN and IHEP, Protvino Joint LHC Machine-Experiments Workshop on Very Forward.
Collimator and beamline heating External Review of the LHC Collimation Project CERN Wed 30/6/2004.
Activation around dump shielding, and design of beam line mask Mathieu Baudin, RP Genevieve Steele, EN-STI Helmut Vincke, RP.
1 O. Napoly ECFA-DESY Amsterdam, April 2003 Machine – Detector Interface : what is new since the TDR ? O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.
Recent Studies on ILC BDS and MERIT S. Striganov APD meeting, January 24.
ILC EXTRACTION LINE TRACKING Y. Nosochkov, E. Marin September 10, 2013.
Location of the LW detector- Simulation of the LW signals Lawrence Deacon RHUL ATF2 meeting August 23 rd 2006 KEK.
Ken Moffeit SLAC LCWA09 1 Polarization Considerations for CLIC Ken Moffeit, SLAC 2009 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas 29 September to 3 October.
Beam losses in the CLIC drive beam: specification of acceptable level and how to handle them ACE Michael Jonker.
Case study: Energy deposition in superconducting magnets in IR7 AMT Workshop A.Ferrari, M.Magistris, M.Santana, V.Vlachoudis CERN Fri 4/3/2005.
Beam collimation in the transfer line from 8 GeV linac to the Main Injector A. Drozhdin The beam transfer line from 8 GeV Linac to the Main Injector is.
1 O. Napoly ECFA-DESY Amsterdam, April 2003 Machine – Detector Interface : what is new since the TDR ? O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.
Ma zhongjian Ding yadong Wang qingbin Wu qingbiao Radiation Protection Group/IHEP.
Dark Current in ILC Main Linac N.Solyak, A.Sukhanov, I.Tropin ALCW2015, Apr.23, 2015, KEK LCWS'15, Tsukuba, 04/2015Nikolay Solyak1.
Synchrotron Radiation Absorption and Vacuum Issues in the IR at PEP-II and a Higgs Factory John Seeman, SLAC October 11, 2014 HF2014 Beijing.
MAIN DUMP LINE: BEAM LOSS SIMULATIONS WITH THE TDR PARAMETERS Y. Nosochkov E. Marin, G. White (SLAC) LCWS14 Workshop, Belgrade, October 7, 2014.
Baseline BDS Design Updates Glen White, SLAC Sept. 4, 2014 Ichinoseki, MDI/CFS Meeting.
Design challenges for head-on scheme Deepa Angal-Kalinin Orsay, 19 th October 2006.
The design of the 2mrad extraction line Rob Appleby Daresbury Laboratory On behalf of the SLAC-BNL-UK-France task force ILC European Regional Meeting and.
JLEIC MDI Update Michael Sullivan Apr 4, 2017.
Update of the SR studies for the FCCee Interaction Region
Beam Dynamics in Electron Storage Ring
Benchmarking MAD, SAD and PLACET Characterization and performance of the CLIC Beam Delivery System with MAD, SAD and PLACET T. Asaka† and J. Resta López‡
M. Sullivan for the SLAC SuperB Workshop Jan , 2009
M. Sullivan International Review Committee November 12-13, 2007
The Interaction Region
Analysis of 14/20 mrad Extraction Line Energy Chicane
Final Focus Synchrotron Radiation
Other beam-induced background at the IP
The small crossing angle layout - where are we and what do we do now?
ILC Baseline BDS Collimation Depth Calculations
The PEP-II Interaction e+e- Factories Workshop
The 2mrad horizontal crossing angle IR layout for the ILC
SN 1006 Extract spectra for each region..
FLUKA Energy deposition simulations for quench tests
Beam-Beam Effects in High-Energy Colliders:
IR/MDI requirements for the EIC
Presentation transcript:

Beam Loss in the Extraction Line for 2 mrad Crossing Angle A.Drozhdin, N.Mokhov, X.Yang

Beta and dispersion calculated by STRUCT in the extraction line with real extraction trajectory and QF1 multipoles from KoL to K9L February 28, 2006 A.Drozhdin, N.Mokhov, X.Yang

Disrupted beam (file beam1 from cs21_hs) without vertical offset at IP (red), 3 sigma beam (blue) and beamstrahlung photon (file photon.dat from cs21_hs) beam (green) are printed out at QD0 exit, SD0 exit, QF1 exit, QEX1 entry, QEX1 exit, QEX1B exit, SEX1 exit, and BHEX1 exit in the order of top to bottom and left to right. February 28, 2006 A.Drozhdin, N.Mokhov, X.Yang

Disrupted beam (file beam1 from cs21_hs) without vertical offset at IP (red), 3 sigma beam (blue) and beamstrahlung photon (file photon.dat from cs21_hs) beam (green) are printed out at QEX3 exit, QEX4 exit, QEX 5 exit, BHEX2 exit, BYENE exit,BHEX3 exit, DUMP entry, and DUMP exit in the order of top to bottom and left to righ. February 28, 2006 A.Drozhdin, N.Mokhov, X.Yang

Disrupted beam (file beam1 from cs21_dy100_hs) with vertical offset at IP of 100 nm (red), 3 sigma beam (blue) and beamstrahlung photon (file photon.dat from cs21_dy100_hs) beam (green) are printed out at QD0 exit, SD0 exit, QF1 exit, QEX1 entry, QEX1 exit, QEX1B exit, SEX1 exit, and BHEX1 exit in the order of top to bottom and left to right. February 28, 2006 A.Drozhdin, N.Mokhov, X.Yang

Disrupted beam (file beam1 from cs21_dy100_hs) with vertical offset at IP of 100 nm (red), 3 sigma beam (blue) and beamstrahlung photon (file photon.dat from cs21_dy100_hs beam (green) are printed out at QEX3 exit, QEX4 exit, QEX 5 exit, BHEX2 exit, BYENE exit,BHEX3 exit, DUMP entry, and DUMP exit in the order of top to bottom and left to righ. February 28, 2006 A.Drozhdin, N.Mokhov, X.Yang

Disrupted beam (file beam1 from cs21_dy100_hs) with vertical offset at IP of 100 nm (green) and synchrotron radiated photons (red) from the disrupted beam are printed out at QD0 exit, SD0 exit, QF1 exit, QEX1 entry, QEX1 exit, QEX1B exit, SEX1 exit, and BHEX1 exit in the order of top to bottom and left to right. February 28, 2006 A.Drozhdin, N.Mokhov, X.Yang

Particle loss distributions for beam with vertical offset at IP of 100 nm (large amplitude file tail1 from cs21_dy100_hs) for increased aperture of beam line. As shown in the first two lines, aperture increase up to R= ~mm does not help to reduce electron loss in the region downstream of the last chicane below 1.5 KW/m. The only way to reduce heat load to the magnets is to place shadow collimators and synchrotron radiation masks between all magnets. Heat load to these collimators (bottom, left) is very high KW/m. There is no primary particle loss at the magnets (bottom, right). Heat load from the secondary flux will be calculated using MARS. February 28, 2006 A.Drozhdin, N.Mokhov, X.Yang

Synchrotron radiation loss distribution along the extraction line for beam with vertical offset at IP of 100 nm (total beam file beam1-2 from cs21_dy100_hs). The total synchrotron radiation power from the beam is 0.76 MW. This is 3.4% of the beam power. Synchrotron radiation load to the beam line elements can not be reduced by increasing of aperture (see top line). Photons are intercepted by the aperture at any case because they do not follow the trajectory of the beam line as the beam does. The only way to reduce heat load from synchrotron radiation to the magnets is to place synchrotron radiation masks with less aperture between magnets. Photon losses in the chicane region to the masks are approximately equal to 5-10 kW (bottom line). There is no primary photon loss at the magnets at this case. February 28, 2006 A.Drozhdin, N.Mokhov, X.Yang

Particle (left) and synchrotron radiation photon (right) loss distribution along the extraction line for beam with vertical offset at IP of 100 nm (total beam file beam1-2 from cs21_dy100_hs) for beam line without collimators and masks (top), with masks (middle) and with masks and collimators (bottom). February 28, 2006 A.Drozhdin, N.Mokhov, X.Yang

Particle (left) and photon (right) loss distributions for line with shadow collimators and synchrotron radiation masks between all magnets. Heat load to these collimators is very high KW/m. There is no primary particle and photon loss at the magnets (see bottom line). February 28, 2006 A.Drozhdin, N.Mokhov, X.Yang

SR photon loss distribution for line without collimators and synchrotron radiation masks, with aperture R200 mm in the BHEX1, BYCHICB and BYCHICM magnets. There is aperture reduction to R170 mm in the middle of BYCHICM magnet. There are SR photon loss of 1kW/m starting from BYCHICB magnet even with aperture R200 mm. February 28, 2006 A.Drozhdin, N.Mokhov, X.Yang

Synchrotron radiation photon distributions at the BYCHICM magnet entrance in the 0.5TeV CM 2mrad extraction line without aperture restrictions in all beam line elements. Photons generated at different magnets of beam line are shown for disrupted beam cs15- dy000nm. February 28, 2006 A.Drozhdin, N.Mokhov, X.Yang

Synchrotron radiation photon distributions at the BYCHICM magnet entrance in the 0.5TeV CM 2mrad extraction line without aperture restrictions in all beam line elements. Photons generated at different magnets of beam line are shown for disrupted beam cs15- dy120nm. February 28, 2006 A.Drozhdin, N.Mokhov, X.Yang

Synchrotron radiation photon distributions at the BYCHICM magnet entrance in the 1TeV CM 2mrad extraction line without aperture restrictions in all beam line elements. Photons generated at different magnets of beam line are shown for disrupted beam cs21-dy000nm. February 28, 2006 A.Drozhdin, N.Mokhov, X.Yang

Synchrotron radiation photon distributions at the BYCHICM magnet entrance in the 1TeV CM 2mrad extraction line without aperture restrictions in all beam line elements. Photons generated at different magnets of beam line are shown for disrupted beam cs21-dy100nm. February 28, 2006 A.Drozhdin, N.Mokhov, X.Yang

An example of typical synchrotron radiation loss distributions across the synchrotron radiation mask. February 28, 2006 A.Drozhdin, N.Mokhov, X.Yang

Vertical-longitudinal view of energy deposition per train in first millimeters of the left jaw (left) and transverse view of energy deposition per train at shower maximum (z=4 cm) (right). February 28, 2006 A.Drozhdin, N.Mokhov, X.Yang

Transverse view of residual dose at the upstream end of collimator HCOLL3 irradiated for 30 days 20% average intensity and cooled for 1 day; to convert to a full intensity one needs to multiply this plot by 5. Conclusions: - total power dissipation in collimator HCOLL3 is 16~kW; - peak temperature rise is dT=20C per train; - estimated steady state temperature can be about 200C or higher, strongly dependent on cooling system (it is desirable to have a few times lower); - activation on the upstream end and on the beam-side (jaws) reaches 25 Sv/hr or 2500 R/hr (about 4 orders of magnitude above the limits); - peak accumulated dose reaches 10e+12 Gy/yr which can severely limit the lifetime even for metals. February 28, 2006 A.Drozhdin, N.Mokhov, X.Yang