Net Neutrality – An Overview – Bob Bocher Technology Consultant, WI Dept of Public Instruction, State Division for Libraries 608-266-2127,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Freedom of Speech (Part 3)
Advertisements

Status of broadband in the US High speed lines as of December 2008: –102 million total high speed connections 84% were faster than 200 kbps in both directions.
Open Access in CCSF Report to Telecommunications Commission December 20, 1999.
Rep. Blair Thoreson - ND House of Representatives Chairman, House Appropriations Committee (Gov’t. Operations Division)
Earl Comstock President and CEO COMPTEL. The World Has Changed FCC adopts Cable Modem Order and Supreme Court upholds FCC in Brand X FCC adopts Wireline.
The status of broadband FCC defines –High-speed lines that deliver services at speeds in excess of 200 kbps in at least one direction –Advanced services.
Net Neutrality presented by: Brian G. Riesen What Is It? Service providers should remain “end-to-end neutral” The Two Sides: Telecoms (against) View.
Net Neutrality Content Providers vs. ISP vs. Consumers Blake Wright.
John Windhausen, Telepoly Consulting Cathy Sloan, Computer and Communications Industry Association May 19, 2010.
“Meet the Regulator” Network Reliability P.J. Aduskevicz ATT FCC Network Reliability & Interoperability Council Wireless Developments Dale Hatfield, Chief.
Net Neutrality1. Definition Net Neutrality can be broadly defined as the policy of Internet Service Provider’s (ISP’s) and Telecom Carriers treating all.
CSE534 – Fundamentals of Computer Networks Lecture 16: Traffic Shaping + Net Neutrality Created by P. Gill Spring 2014, updated Spring 2015.
Bob Bocher WI State Library Fellow, ALA Office for Information Technology Policy , (dpi.wi.gov/pld/litabb.ppt)
Net Neutrality By Guilherme Martins. Brief Definition of what is Net Neutrality? Network neutrality is best defined as a network design principle. – Think.
Better TV for all.. Jeff Blum Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel
Measuring Internet Access Substitutes and Service Gaps By: Catherine J.K. Sandoval Assistant Professor Santa Clara University School of Law Presentation.
Continuing Uncertainty Under FCC Network Neutrality Rules Prof. Barbara A. Cherry Indiana University Presented at EDUCAUSE Live! Webcast January 26, 2011.
Regulation and Innovation October 7, Issues  The Internet is a public network ;  Net neutrality  Can it be regulated? How?  Why should it.
1 © 2008 Jon Peha Jon M. Peha Carnegie Mellon University Associate Director, Center for Wireless & Broadband Networking Professor of Electrical.
Network Neutrality By Ema Woodward, Phil Denny, & Scott Harrison.
Federal Communications Commission Policy Statement Adopted Aug. 5, 2005Released: Sept. 25, 2005.
What you talk 'in bout?. Net Neutrality prevents Internet providers from blocking, speeding up or slowing down Web content based on its source, ownership.
Net Neutrality Questions. What if? Customer Lamps for Less Luxurious Lumination Telephone Company Welcome to lamps [click] [dial tone] Welcome to Luxurious.
1 End of Regulation? Jerry Hausman Professor of Economics MIT July 2005
Arguments Against NN - Political Difficulty of designing effective laws Poor legislation may actually cause more harm than good May interfere with existing.
Net Neutrality. Tussle Who’s battling? What’s at issue? Is it contained?
Network neutrality is the idea that all internet traffic should be treated equally. It does not matter who is downloading and what is being downloaded.
Network Neutrality By: Jacob Hansen CPE 401. Introduction What is network neutrality? Who wants to get rid of it? Why is it important? What is at stake?
Net Neutrality vs. Common Carrier Laws Is Google being Hypocritical?
Nov/Dec 2003ElectraNet BSP-2 Workshop (khb) 1 EU Telecoms Regulatory Status Governing Legislation Package 2002  Directive 2002/19/EC Access to, and interconnection.
Net Neutrality The debate in the US and in the EU Balázs BARTÓKI-GÖN CZY.
Questions about broadband What do we do about broadband services? –Why didn’t the ILECs deploy DSL faster? Could regulation be to blame? –How do we get.
THE BATTLE OVER NET NEUTRALITY
E-rate, Net Neutrality, Municipal Broadband* Bob Bocher Wisconsin State Library — *
U.S. Telecommunications Regulation and Market Developments September 2008.
By: Matt Klena Nathan Crapis. The principle that Internet service providers (ISP’s) should enable access to all content and applications regardless of.
Changes in State and Federal Telecommunications Policies: How Do They Affect US All? SCAN NATOA 16 th Annual Spring Conference and Star Awards Long Beach,
Internet Basics Monopoly Concerns & Review TC 310 May 22, 2008.
Title II Reclassification What it means to rural communities.
1 Managing the Transition to IP-Based Public Phone Networks in the United States Joe Gillan CRNI November 22, 2013 Gillan Associates.
The Battle for the Soul of the Internet. The Future of our Internet cable, telephone companies and wireless providers Versus Internet content and application.
December 16, FCC Treatment of VoIP Russ Hanser Special Counsel to the Chief Competition Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Federal Communications.
Legal & Regulatory Classification of Broadband Demystifying Title II.
Overview of Network Neutrality Kyle D. Dixon Senior Fellow & Director, Federal Institute for Regulatory Law & Economics The Progress & Freedom Foundation.
Media and Communications Policy at a Critical Juncture University of Wyoming Joel Kelsey, Policy Analyst September 25 th, 2008.
Netowork Neutrality Does it Rock or Smell like Dirty Socks?
Spectrum and the Concept of Net Neutrality Todd D. Daubert Partner Kelley, Drye & Warren, LLP.
Network Neutrality Juergen Hahn MIS 304 November 23, 2010.
Net Neutrality Update Presentation to Montana Telecommunications Association Aug. 5, 2014 John Windhausen Telepoly Consulting
VoIP Regulation Klaus Nieminen TKK Table of Contents Background EU Regulatory Framework Objectives, PATS and ECS definitions VoIP Classification.
Net Neutrality A Series of Tubes without Tollbooths Brandon Vigil.
Net Neutrality: The fight to control the Internet.
Issues in New Media: Net Neutrality. What is “net neutrality?” What is Net Neutrality? (Video)(Video) Net Neutrality (Video)(Video) Save the Internet!
Network Neutrality: An Internet operating principle which ensures that all online users are entitled to access Internet content of their choice; run online.
Differential pricing of Data Services Akhilesh Kumar Trivedi Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, India.
September 2009Network Neutrality – the Norwegian ApproachPage 1 Network Neutrality – the Norwegian Approach Senior Adviser Frode Soerensen Norwegian Post.
Internet Myth Busting and Control of the Internet: Are Internet Service Providers the New Internet Gatekeepers? By Catherine Sandoval Assistant Professor.
Legal Framework for Broadband Internet Access Notice of Inquiry June 17, 2010.
Net Neutrality Gavin Baker Association of Information Technology Professionals, North Central Florida Chapter Gainesville, FL 13 November 2007.
Managing the (Traffic) Managers
Net Neutrality in the US Past, present, possible future(s)
Net Neutrality An ethical examination of the internet’s ownership
Net Neutrality: WhaT YOU NEED TO KNOW
Network neutrality Lee da-som Lee song-i.
Net Neutrality By: Jonathan Zamora.
The Broadband Pricing working Group
Net Neutrality Michael I. Shamos, Ph.D., J.D.
Lecture 10: FCC Organization, Power and Structure
The Use and Abuse of the Carterfone Principle
Net Neutrality: a guide
Presentation transcript:

Net Neutrality – An Overview – Bob Bocher Technology Consultant, WI Dept of Public Instruction, State Division for Libraries , dpi.wi.gov/pld/ppt/netneutral.ppt (Updated April 2008)

2 Topics to Cover 1. Definition and background 2. Internet and FCC regulations 3. Who supports what? 4. Recent actions

3 Net Neutrality – A Definition Net Neutrality: Accessing any content or using any service or application is done in a neutral fashion. That is, there is no network configuration, policy, or practice, outside of end user control or end user knowledge, that discriminates against certain content, services, or applications.

4 Net Neutrality - Background  “Neutrality” issue predates the Internet  Based on common carriage. For telecom:  No one is refused service; all calls are connected regardless of content or location  Major legal and regulatory difference between  “Telecommunication service” (Title II)  Strong common carrier language  “Information service” (Title I)  Weak language  Internet is an information service 47 U.S.C. §202: It shall be unlawful for any common carrier to make any unjust or unreasonable discrimination in charges, practices, or services by any means or device, or to subject any person to any unreasonable prejudice or disadvantage.

5 The Internet and FCC Regulations  1990s: Most consumers had dial-up  More than 7,500 dial-up ISPs  ISPs used telecom provider circuits  Most telecom/cable companies were not ISPs  2000s: More consumers moving to broadband  More telecom/cable companies providing BB  Eroding line between telecom providers and ISPs

6 The Internet and FCC Regulations  2000s: Broadband debate and neutrality issue  Digital divide: U.S. 15 th - 20th in residential BBresidential BB  President’s BB initiative: Connect all by 2007  FCC encourages more BB access  More access based on more competition  More competition based on less regulation  2002: FCC says cable ISPs not subject to strong, common carrier regulation  Provide “information service”

7 The Internet and FCC Regulations  June 2005: Supreme Court Brand X decision  Sept 2005: FCC deregulates broadband  Treat telecom and cable ISPs the same  Removes common carrier language; no strong legal protection for maintaining “neutral” Internet  Telecom circuit is now “ancillary” to unregulated Internet  Issues “Broadband Access to the Internet” principles

8 Net Neutrality Statement The Commission [has] decided to reclassify broadband transmission facilities as Title I “information services” rather than Title II “telecommunications services.” To the uninitiated this sounds like semantics. But it has real consequences. That’s because the nondiscrimination obligations that attach to telecommunications traffic and which were vital to keeping the Internet open in the dial- up era no longer apply to broadband services. We need a watchful eye to ensure that network providers do not become Internet gatekeepers, with the ability to dictate who can use the Internet and for what purpose. —FCC Commissioner Michael Copps, Sept 2005

9 Net Neutrality - Who Supports What?  Neutrality generally supported by:  Consumer organizations  Organizations supporting First Amendment  Content providers  Education and library community  Neutrality generally opposed by:  Telecom/cable companies  Internet service providers  Organizations opposed to government regulation

10 Net Neutrality – Recent Activities  2007 FCC issues “Broadband Notice of Inquiry”  Internet Freedom Preservation Act (S.215)  Has common carrier protections  Comcast blocks or delays P2P traffic  FCC investigates; holds hearings  Comcast and BitTorrent reach agreement  Will develop a “P2P bill of rights”  AT&T to filter Net content? The FCC is still investigating whether the [Comcast] actions violated our principles protecting consumer access to the Internet. --FCC Chairman Kevin Martin, April 22, 2008 This is not about the vast majority of customers who consume content legally. This is about combating illegal activity. —Michael Balmoris, AT&T, Jan. 2008

Net Neutrality : Questions?? Bob Bocher Technology Consultant, WI Dept of Public Instruction, State Division for Libraries , dpi.wi.gov/pld/ppt/netneutral.ppt

12 Home Broadband Adoption – 2007 ( Return