Justice as Fairness: A Closer Look by Tom Lupkie James Noonan Brian Rodriguez October 6, 2008 A-115, Professor Charles Willie.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Justice & Economic Distribution (2)
Advertisements

Justice.
An Egalitarian Law of Peoples Thomas Pogge
Rawlsian Contract Approach Attempts to reconcile utilitarianism and intuitionism. Attempts to reconcile utilitarianism and intuitionism. Theory of distributive.
Justice as Fairness by John Rawls.
Lecture 6 John Rawls. Justifying government Question: How can the power of government be justified?
John Rawls. Most important pol phil of 20 th cent? No ? The most important lib. Represented academic left vs people like Isaiah Berlin and Robert Nozick.
"... reason accepts no authority above itself and is necessarily subversive." - Allan Bloom, The Closing of the American Mind (1987), p. 258.
Justice as Fairness by John Rawls.
COMP 381. Agenda  TA: Caitlyn Losee  Books and movies nominations  Team presentation signup Beginning of class End of class  Rawls and Moors.
Egalitarians View Egalitarians hold that there are no relevant differences among people that can justify unequal treatment. According to the egalitarian,
RAWLS 1 JUSTICE IS FAIRNESS. John Rawls Teachers: H. L. A. Hart Isaiah Berlin Students: Thomas Nagel Martha Nussbaum Onara O’Neill.
John Rawls, Who? GETTING TO THE ASSIGNED ARTICLE: A THEORY OF JUSTICE (1971) HOW WERE PEOPLE THINKG ABOUT ETHICS AND JUSTICE? – Utilitarian.
RAWLS 2 CRITIQUES OF RAWLS.
Deontological tradition Contractualism of John Rawls Discourse ethics.
Economic Systems.
Rawls John Rawls ( ): A Theory of Justice (Harvard UP, 1971) -and other books, notably Political Liberalism (1990) -and Justice as Fairness Restated.
THE LIMITS OF CONSTITUTIONAL JUSTICE Dr Murray Wesson.
January 20, Liberalism 2. Social Contract Theory 3. Utilitarianism and Intuitionism 4. Justice as Fairness – general conception 5. Principles.
GOVERNMENT Write words or draw pictures that come to mind about when you hear the word “government.” What is the reason or purpose for having a government?
Equality and Inequality: Perspectives from Political Theory
Creating a Quality World Using Glasser’s Needs Theory.
Ethics Theory and Business Practice
“To be able under all circumstances to practise five things constitutes perfect virtue; these five things are gravity, generosity of soul, sincerity, earnestness.
Ethical Theories Presentation LP 5 Melissa Sweet, Tara Guelig, Katherine Norton April 9 th,2009.
Studying Texas Politics and Government. A Framework Pulls together facts and places them in context Explains the history of Texas politics and government.
Justice & Fairness Approach LP: Ethical Theories Presentation By: Nelita, Brandon Keshia,Jennifer Section: Tuesday 5:30 April 1, 2008.
Core Democratic Values Fundamental Beliefs- Life Liberty Pursuit of Happiness Common Good Justice Equality Diversity Truth Popular Sovereignty Patriotism.
Rawls on justice Michael Lacewing co.uk.
Contractualism and justice (1) Introduction to Rawls’s theory.
Warm Up Activity Make a list of all that you know about the concept of Liberalism.
January 20, Liberalism 2. Social Contract Theory 3. Utilitarianism and Intuitionism 4. Justice as Fairness – general conception 5. Principles.
Distributive Justice John Rawls. Which is better? MusicCheese 65.
Natural Rights Philosophy John Locke and the Social Contract.
Justice as Fairness John Rawls PHL 110: ETHICS North Central College.
Today you will need…  A blank piece of notebook paper  Have one person from your table group grab the following from the table by the door. (one for.
Rawls & Nozick Liberalism & Libertarianism Warwick Debating Society Training, 11/05/2011.
Justice as Fairness by John Rawls. Rawls looks at justice. Kant’s ethics and Utilitarianism are about right and wrong actions. For example: Is it ethical.
Justice/Fairness Approach Learning Plan #5 Sara Deibert, Sara Roxbury, Allie Forsythe, Robert Phillips March 31,2008.
John Rawls Theory of Justice. John Rawls John Rawls (February 21, 1921 – November 24, 2002) was an American philosopher and a figure in moral and political.
Rationality in Decision Making In Law Nisigandha Bhuyan, IIMC.
Equity: Ethical Approaches to Social Justice “Excuse me, but its important to get those drinks to those who need them the most.”
The System of Social Justice Principles in the Contemporary Law Tradition of the West dr. Jolanta Bieliauskaitė Brno, 2015.
DEONTOLOGICAL ETHICS (CH. 2.0) © Wanda Teays. All rights reserved.
Deontological Approaches Consequences of decisions are not always the most important elements as suggested by the consequentialist approach. The way you.
Kantian Ethics Good actions have intrinsic value; actions are good if and only if they follow from a moral law that can be universalized.
University of Papua New Guinea Guest Lecture Lecture: Philosophy of Economics.
WEEK 2 Justice as Fairness. A Theory of Justice (1971) Political Liberalism (1993)
Rawls’ Justice Srijit Mishra IGIDR, HDP, Lectures 5, 6 and 7 13, 18 and 20 January 2012.
Chapter 1 Introduction: The Citizen and Government.
© 2012 Wanda Teays. All rights reserved. Rawls, like Kant, is a Deontological Ethicist. He emphasizes moral duty and obligations, rather than end goals.
John Rawls By Othello Jimenez. John Rawls
Democracy and American Politics
PHIL 104 (STOLZE) Notes on Heather Widdows, Global Ethics: An Introduction, chapter 4.
History of Philosophy.
Political theory and law
Marxism PSIR308.
Rawl’s Veil of Ignorance
By: Cailin Considine, Derrick Dudley, and Bryan Aranda
Rawls’ Theory of Justice
John rawls -an American moral and political philosopher
Theories of justice.
Capitalism vs. Socialism
Outline of John Rawls from “Justice as Fairness” and A Theory of Justice (1921) pp The Second Article on Rawls.
Three Dimensions of Justice
Chapter 5 Ethical Decision Making
John Rawls Theory of Justice.
Professional Ethics (GEN301/PHI200) UNIT 3: JUSTICE AND ECONOMIC DISTRIBUTION Handout #3 CLO#3 Evaluate the relation between justice, ethics and economic.
Social and economic inequalities are arranged so that they are both:
Presentation transcript:

Justice as Fairness: A Closer Look by Tom Lupkie James Noonan Brian Rodriguez October 6, 2008 A-115, Professor Charles Willie

Before we begin… Please look at the following list. Using the index card we will give you, please choose one or two things from the list that you believe you are good at:  Fundraising  Motivating others  Goal setting  Being frugal with money  Public speaking  Negotiation  Multi-tasking  Public relations

Justice as Fairness: Our Perspective on the Big Picture The theory attempts to define the scope of an ideal society, not necessarily the one we see from day to day.

Recurring Terms Rawls defines and uses many terms throughout his work, including: Two principles of justice Equal basic liberties The “difference principle” Native endowments as a common asset

Two Principles of Justice The first principle: the idea that everyone in a society has the same set of “equal basic liberties”  The liberties must be compatible with the liberties of others  These liberties are constitutional essentials Justice as Fairness, p. 42

The First Principle A person’s equal basic liberties encompass the following:  Political liberty  Liberty of conscience  Freedom of association  Freedom of thought Justice as Fairness, p

The First Principle How are these liberties created and secured?  Constituent power (i.e., the constitution)  Institutional power (i.e., government institutions) Justice as Fairness, p. 46

Two Principles of Justice The second principle: in order for social and economic inequalities to be permissible in a society that embodies justice as fairness, they must satisfy two conditions… Justice as Fairness, p. 42

The Second Principle  There is fair access and “equality of opportunity” to attain any offices or positions of influence.  Those in these positions use them for the greatest benefit of those who are least advantaged. Two conditions: Justice as Fairness, p

The Second Principle For example, compensatory policies in education funding or affirmative action The second condition is also known as the “Difference Principle” Justice as Fairness, p

Two Principles of Justice 1.Everyone in a society has the same equal basic liberties. 2.In order to inequality to be permissible in this society, two conditions must be met: equal access to positions of influence & the use of these positions for those who are least advantaged. Justice as Fairness, p. 43, 111

Native Endowments A person’s native endowments is their set of unique talents or skills. These endowments may come naturally or be the result of education or training. Justice as Fairness, p

Native Endowments and the Difference Principle The difference principle says a person’s native endowments should be applied to benefit those individuals who are the least advantaged. Justice as Fairness, p. 75

Native Endowments as a Common Asset Taken together, native endowments become a common asset. Justice as Fairness, p

Our Native Endowments  Fundraising  Motivating others  Goal setting  Being frugal with money  Public speaking  Negotiation  Multi-tasking  Public relations

Discussion Questions 1.Many of us know that those in positions of influence do not always use their power for the benefit of the least advantaged, as Rawls’ “difference principle” demands. Given the gap between theory and reality, do you believe that Rawls presumes too much about people’s best intentions? Why or why not? 2.If you were in a position of influence, would you voluntarily allocate resources for quotas or other compensatory policies? What does your answer tell us about Rawls’ theory? 3.What other movements in history also demonstrate the concept of “native endowments as a common asset”? Are there movements that have failed because they could not marshal the group’s native endowments effectively?