Sybil P. Seitzinger International Geosphere-Biosphere Program (IGBP) Stockholm, Sweden Modeling global river export: N, P, C, Si E. Mayorga A.F. Bouwman.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries Changes of agricultural diffuse nutrient inputs in major European river systems and their contribution.
Advertisements

At river mouths, predicts annual average export of: Global NEWS Model Nutrient Export from WaterSheds * DIC in prep. Original models and scenario applications.
Overview – Nutrient Fate and Transport Mark B. David University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Presented at Building Science Assessments for State-Level.
The World Water Quality Assessment Large-scale water quality modeling Hot spots and causes of water pollution.
Management Plan: An Overview
GEF Component B Actual start: January GEF component B Italics: will be completed end 2014 Underlined: completed UP = Un. Philippines WSU = Washington.
Bob McKane, USEPA Bonnie Kwiatkowski & Ed Rastetter, Marine Biological Laboratory Marc Stieglitz & Feifei Pan, Georgia Institute of Technology ~ January.
Eutrophication of the Black Sea
Ecological Perspectives on Critical Loads - Linkages between Biogeochemical Cycles and Ecosystem Change Differences and Similarities in N and S Cycling.
Nitrogen and Ecosystem Nutrient Cycling Nicole and Sarah Biogeochemistry of Northern Ecosystems March 2005.
Robert Howarth Cornell University Ithaca, NY USA Ocean Hypoxia and its Impacts on Ecosystems UNDP Side Event at GESAMP #39 New York City, USA 18 April.
Reactive nitrogen (N) is essential to life, making up compounds such as proteins and nucleic acids. Technology now allows us to create N fertilizers, increasing.
Land Use Change and Its Effect on Water Quality: A Watershed Level BASINS-SWAT Model in West Georgia Gandhi Raj Bhattarai Diane Hite Upton Hatch Prepared.
Marty Matlock, Ph.D., P.E., C.S.E. Professor and Area Director, Center for Agricultural and Rural Sustainability Ecological Engineering Group Biological.
SPARROW Modeling in the Mississippi River Basin Iowa Science Assessment Davenport, IA Nov. 14, 2012 (608) By Dale M. Robertson*
Transports of Organic Carbon and Nutrients in the Kaoping River-Sea System J.-J. Hung, H.-M. Yang, E.-T. Yeh, Y.-C. Yeh, C.-M. Ho and I..-J. Lai Institute.
Environmental Change and Altered Marine Food Webs cont. Altered Marine Food Webs cont. 1)Ozone Hole I.coastal Antactica (what is a problem?) can we solve.
Hydrologic Cycle (in 10 3 km 3 ). Distribution on Earth “Water, water everywhere, nor any drop to drink.” – Coleridge, Rime of the Ancient Mariner.
Acknowledgements This work has been supported by an EPA STAR grant, “Developing regional-scale stressor models for managing eutrophication in coastal marine.
ABSTRACT Much recent work has suggested that nitrogen fluxes to the coastal zone depend on interactions between input loading rates, climate, and landscape.
Long-term Changes in Lamprey River Chemistry William H. McDowell University of New Hampshire.
Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Model Input
(Mt/Ag/EnSc/EnSt 404/504 - Global Change) Water Resources (from IPCC WG-2, Chapter 3) Water Resources Primary Source: IPCC WG-2 Chapter 3 – Freshwater.
Impact of Climate Change on Flow in the Upper Mississippi River Basin
Welcome Global Water Trends Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Water withdrawals from rivers and lakes doubled since 1960; most water use (70% worldwide)
Biogeochemical Cycles: Integration Across the Land- Estuary-Continental Shelf-Ocean Continuum Sybil P. Seitzinger Rutgers University Institute of Marine.
Twinning water quality modelling in Latvia Helene Ejhed, Kickoff meeting Twinning on development of modelling capacity to support water quality.
Other Issues in Water Pollution Urbanization General Population Growth Increased Run-off and Pollution Non-point Pollution Sources (eg Agriculture) Pesticide.
Land Ocean Coupling Coupling riverine fluxes of nutrients to a Global Biogeochemical Ocean General Circulation Model Christophe Bernard,
Science Assessment to Support an Illinois Nutrient Reduction Strategy Mark David, George Czapar, Greg McIsaac, Corey Mitchell March 11,
The Importance of Watershed Modeling for Conservation Policy Or What is an Economist Doing at a SWAT Workshop?
Nitrogen cycle Biogeochemistry October 17, 2005 Maria Moskalenko, Gretchen Miles, Emily Paduano, Jaconette Mirck Biogeochemistry October 17, 2005 Maria.
1 Evaluating and Estimating the Effect of Land use Changed on Water Quality at Selorejo Reservoir, Indonesia Mohammad Sholichin Faridah Othman Shatira.
Fertilizer Fertilizer inputs tended to be highest in the middle portions of the watershed, where crop production was highest. Import of both N and P followed.
Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia and Mississippi River Basin Nutrient Losses Herb Buxton, USGSRob Magnien, NOAA Co-Chairs, Monitoring, Modeling, and Research Workgroup,
CLIMATE CHANGE AND WATER MAKING RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLANS “CLIMATE PROOF” IN SPAIN.
Biophysical and Socioeconomic Assessments: The LOICZ* Approach Liana Talaue-McManus Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science University of Miami.
A GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE ON THE LINKAGE BETWEEN EUTROPHICATION AND HYPOXIA Robert Diaz College of William and Mary Virginia Institute of Marine Science
Assessment of Runoff, Sediment Yield and Nutrient Load on Watershed Using Watershed Modeling Mohammad Sholichin Mohammad Sholichin 1) Faridah Othman 2)
An Adaptive Management Model for the Red River Basin of the North.
Delaware River Basin SPARROW Model Mary Chepiga, , Susan Colarullo, , Jeff Fischer, ,
Ecosystem Based Modeling for Sustainable Regional Development of the Marine and Estuarine Resources in Coastal NSW Philip Gibbs Karen Astles.
Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia and Nutrient Management in the Mississippi River Basin Herb Buxton, U.S. Geological Survey.
(Mt/Ag/EnSc/EnSt 404/504 - Global Change) Water Resources (from IPCC WG-2, Chapter 3) Water Resources Primary Source: IPCC WG-2 Chapter 3 – Freshwater.
1. The Study of Excess Nitrogen in the Neuse River Basin “A Landscape Level Analysis of Potential Excess Nitrogen in East-Central North Carolina, USA”
Building an OpenNSPECT Database for Your Watershed Shan Burkhalter and Dave Eslinger National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Office for.
Food Systems in the Coastal Zone: A LOICZ Perspective L. Talaue-McManus Rosenstiel School of Marine & Atmospheric Science University of Miami.
Opportunities for Collaboration on Water- Quality Issues in the Mississippi River Basin Herb Buxton, Office of Water Quality.
Ecological Perspectives on Critical Loads - Linkages between Emissions, Deposition and Biogeochemical Cycles J. N. Galloway Multi-Agency Critical Loads.
QUANTIFYING UNCERTAINTY IN ECOSYSTEM STUDIES Carrie Rose Levine, Ruth Yanai, John Campbell, Mark Green, Don Buso, Gene Likens Hubbard Brook Cooperators.
Simulation labs for Biology 4263 I gave an introductory lab talk on Keystone Predators and Barnacles and Tides on Thursday, April 16 th. These labs are.
Abstract Man-made dams influence more than just the flow of water in a river. The build up of sediments and organic matter, increased residence times,
Effects of N Loadings from Dairy Cows to the Susquehanna River Effects of N Loadings from Dairy Cows to the Susquehanna River Austin Weidner CE394K : GIS.
BeforeAfter Eutrophication. Eutrophication – nutrient enrichment of waters Major nutrients -phosphorus and nitrogen Consequences -increased plant growth.
A Systems Approach to the Estimation of Ecosystem and Human Health Stressors in Air, Land and Water Ellen Cooter 1, Robin Dennis 1, Jesse Bash 1, Michelle.
FIGURE 17.1 A simple nitrogen and water balance for ‘‘Dave the Sea Lion.’’ Both nitrogen and water flows are in units of grams per 40 days. See text for.
Nitrogen Budgets for the Mississippi River Basin using the linked EPIC-CMAQ-NEWS Models Michelle McCrackin, Ellen Cooter, Robin Dennis, Jana Compton, John.
University of New Hampshire EXPORT OF CARBON, NUTRIENTS, AND WEATHERING PRODUCTS FROM A HIGHLY URBANIZED TROPICAL WATERSHED William H. McDowell, Jody D.
– NUTRIENTS 2 Chapter 3.4 in Chapman et al. Gretchen Gettel/Peter Kelderman UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education Online Module Water Quality.
Nitrogen loading from forested catchments Marie Korppoo VEMALA catchment meeting, 25/09/2012 Marie Korppoo, Markus Huttunen 12/02/2015 Open DATA: Nutrient.
InVEST (Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Trade-offs) Water Purification: Nutrient Retention Host Institution/URL
Optimising Predictions of Sediment and Nutrient Loads Using AnnAGNPS
ReNuMa: Nitrogen Dynamics
Fredrik Wulff Systems Ecology Stockholm University, Sweden
How do small dam removals affect reach-scale nitrogen exports?
Environmental modeling application domains
Overview of Climate Impact Assessment Framework and Implementation
Gopal Bhatt1 and Lewis Linker2 1 Penn State, 2 US EPA
H. Behrendt (IGB), H. Gömann (FAL), C. Sartorius (ISI)
Photo by Cameron W. Wobus
Presentation transcript:

Sybil P. Seitzinger International Geosphere-Biosphere Program (IGBP) Stockholm, Sweden Modeling global river export: N, P, C, Si E. Mayorga A.F. Bouwman C. Kroeze J.A. Harrison A.H.W. Beusen G. Billen G. Van Drecht E. Dumont B.M. Fekete C. Vorosmarty J. Garnier

Coastal effects Sellman et al. 2007

Nutrient SourcesHydrology & Physical Factors In-River N, P, Si, C Removal Global NEWS Model Nutrient Export from WaterSheds Input databases 0.5 o x 0.5 o >5000 watersheds globally STN-30

Nutrient Sources Natural N 2 -Fixation P Weathering Anthropogenic Non-Point Fertilizer (by crop type) N 2 -fixation - crops Manure (by animal species) Atmos. Dep. N Point Sewage (pop.; treatment level) Global Watersheds Water Runoff Precip. Intensity Land-use Slope Hydrology & Physical Factors Rivers & Reservoir Consumptive Water Use In-River N, P, Si, C Removal Nutrient Loading to Coastal Waters Seitzinger et al. 2005, Mayorga et al Seitzinger et al Global NEWS Model

At river mouths, predict export of: Global NEWS Model Nutrient Export from WaterSheds * DIC in prep. Seitzinger et al. 2005, Mayorga et al Seitzinger et al Dissolved Particulate Inorganic Organic N DIN DON PN P DIP DOP PP C DIC * DOC POC Si DSi

Equation for DIN as example Yld F = Fe riv,F * [(RSpnt F + Rsdif ant,F ) + Rsdif nat,F Rsdif ant,DIN = Fe ws,DIN * WSdif ant,N + Ag fr * (f DIN (R nat ) * EC DIN ), where: Fe ws,DIN = e DIN * f DIN (R nat ) WSdif ant,N = WSdif fe,N + WSdif ma,N + WSdif fix,ant,N = WSdif dep,ant,N – WSdif ex,N ]

Outline Applications Spatial Time step Input Output Annual Global watersheds Yangtze watershed Sub-basins global DIP Sub-basins California Scenarios – global

Outline Applications Spatial Time step Input Output Annual Global watersheds 0.5 o x0.5 o watershed ~2005 > 5000 watersheds Yangtze watershed Sub-basins global DIP Sub-basins California Scenarios – global

Nutrient Sources Natural N 2 -Fixation P Weathering Anthropogenic Non-Point Fertilizer (by crop type) N 2 -fixation - crops Manure (by animal species) Atmos. Dep. N Point Sewage (pop.; treatment level) Global Watersheds Water Runoff Precip. Intensity Land-use Slope Hydrology & Physical Factors Rivers & Reservoir Consumptive Water Use In-River N, P, Si, C Removal Nutrient Loading to Coastal Waters Seitzinger et al. 2005, Mayorga et al Seitzinger et al Global NEWS Model

Measured DOC yield (kg C km -2 yr -1 ) Modeled DOC yield (kg C km -2 yr -1 ) Measured DIN export (kg N basin -1 yr -1 ) Modeled DIN export (kg N basin -1 yr -1 ) Colorado Dnepr Susquehanna Gambia Ganges Rhine R 2 =0.88 Ganges Dumont et al. Harrison et al. Global Biogeochem Cycles 2005

River transport of DIN to coast kg N/km2/yr >5000 watersheds Seitzinger et al Global Biogeochemical Cycles

Outline Applications Spatial Time step Input Output Annual Global watersheds 0.5 o x0.5 o watershed ~2005 Yangtze watershedprovince watershed yearly 30 yrs Sub-basins global DIP Sub-basins California Scenarios – global

Yangtze river watershed annual 1970 – 2003 Yan et al GBC Atmos. N deposition Model Predicted Measured Total N input Fertilizer Manure N2-fixation Province level N input data River DIN Export

Outline Applications Spatial Time step Input Output Annual Global watersheds 0.5 o x0.5 o watershed ~2000 Yangtze watershedprovince watershed yearly 30 yrs Sub-basins global DIP 0.5 o x0.5 o 0.5 o x0.5 o ~2010 Sub-basins California Scenarios – global

Hi resolution NEWS-DIP Sub-basin 0.5 o x 0.5 o Harrison et al GBC Measured data Model vs Data

NEWS-Predicted DIP Yield (kg P / km 2 / yr) NEWS-DIP-2005 NEWS-DIP-HD-2010 Harrison et al., GBC 2010 Basin Sub-basin

Outline Applications Spatial Time step Input Output Annual Global watersheds 0.5 o x0.5 o watershed ~2005 Yangtze watershedprovince watershed yearly 30 yrs Sub-basins global DIP 0.5 o x0.5 o 0.5 o x0.5 o ~2010 Sub-basins California 1 km watershed ~2000 Scenarios – global

Measured DOC Yield (kg C / km 2 / yr) (Data courtesy of R. Dahlgren and USGS) Basin delineations: USGS Runoff: USGS Potential Runoff: DWR Land Use: Fire and Resource Assessment Program (FRAP) Concentration: Dahlgren ( ) r 2 validation = 0.80 n = 22 Harrison et al. In prep. NEWS DOC Yield (kg C / km 2 / yr)

Outline Applications Spatial Time step Input Output Annual Global watersheds 0.5 o x0.5 o watershed ~2005 Yangtze watershedprovince watershed yearly 30 yrs Sub-basins global DIP 0.5 o x0.5 o 0.5 o x0.5 o ~2010 Sub-basins California various watershed ~2000 Scenarios – global 0.5 o x0.5 o watershed

Coastal Effects (algae blooms; anoxia; fisheries; etc.) Nutrient Export at River Mouth Future scenarios Nutrient Sources from Food and Energy Policy Options & Costs

Nutrient export trajectories Includes social, economic, policy, and ecological considerations / Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Scenarios

Worst Case Global Orchestration Better Case Adapting Mosaic Envir. Approachreactiveproactive Incomehighmedium Population Increaselowerhigher Fertilizer Usehighmoderate Nutrient Managementnot optimalefficient Meat Consumptionhighmoderate Sewage Treatment accessfullconstant % N removal highmoderate Specifics vary by country Bouwman et al & Van Drecht et al GBC Two scenarios

REFERENCE

Worst Case Global Orchestration Better Case Adapting Mosaic Envir. Approachreactiveproactive Incomehighmedium Population Increaselowerhigher Fertilizer Usehighmoderate Nutrient Managementnot optimalefficient Meat Consumptionhighmoderate Sewage Treatment accessfullconstant % N removal highmoderate Specifics vary by country Bouwman et al & Van Drecht et al GBC Two scenarios

Global Orchestration Adapting Mosaic Seitzinger et al GBC Change DIN river export Seitzinger et al GBC

Contribution to river DIN export South Asia Seitzinger et al. 2010, GBC How were improvements achieved? Sewage connectivity constant % Technological NOx controls Lower meat consumption Efficient management nitrogen in agriculture

Summary Applications Spatial Time step Input Output Annual Global watersheds 0.5 o x0.5 o watershed ~2005 Yangtze watershedprovince watershed yearly 30 yrs Sub-basins global DIP 0.5 o x0.5 o 0.5 o x0.5 o ~2010 Sub-basins California 1 km watershed ~2000 Scenarios – global 0.5 o x0.5 o watershed

Mayorga et al Model development, Envir. Modelling & Software Global Biogeochemical Cycles Special section Seitzinger et al. overview Bouwman et al. agriculture Van Drecht et al. urban wastewater Feteke et al. hydrology Harrison et al. hi resolution DIP Yan et al. Yangtze river Acknowlegements and for more details

Nutrient SourcesHydrology & Physical Factors In-River N, P, Si Removal Input Databases 0.5 o x 0.5 o > 5000 watersheds globally Global NEWS Model Nutrient Export from WaterSheds

DIN export change w/ 2030 climate GO N Inputs w/ GO 2030 Climate Change DIN vs Water runoff change DIN change - Climate only Mayorga, Seitzinger in prep.

DIN export change GO N Inputs w/ GO 2030 Climate Change vs Global Orchestration Climate only Mayorga, Seitzinger in prep.

Effect of climate change only on DIN river export?