21 June 2002 Naming of the Denys Wilkinson Building Dr. Armin Reichold Large Projects Present & Future.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
12. July 2002Visit of Jonathan Dorfan to RAL1 Linear Collider Alignment and Survey LiCAS.
Advertisements

LC-ABD L inear C ollider – A ccelerator and B eam D elivery Roger Barlow PPARC: UCL 2nd October 2002.
Freiburg Seminar, Sept Sascha Caron Finding the Higgs or something else ideas to improve the discovery ideas to improve the discovery potential at.
Wednesday July 19 GDE Plenary Global Design Effort 1 Instrumentation Technical System Review Marc Ross.
Stephen Gibson, ATLAS Offline Alignment, 2 nd July Incorporating FSI with the Offline Alignment Overview ATLAS Group, University of Oxford Stephen.
MONALISA: Interferometric Position Monitor at the Nanometre Scale David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Oxford University.
The LiCAS FSI Subsystem Current Status and Initial Measurements John Dale for the LiCAS Collaboration IOP HEP April 2008.
X-Ray Survey of The ATLAS SCT. The ATLAS Semi-Conductor Tracker.
Accelerator and Beam Delivery The LC-ABD (Linear Collider: Accelerator and Beam Delivery) consortium is a group of UK institutes aiming to develop new.
The Linear Collider Alignment and Survey (LiCAS) Project Richard Bingham*, Edward Botcherby*, Paul Coe*, Grzegorz Grzelak*, Ankush Mitra*, Johannes Prenting.
LiCAS Project: FSI Overview Richard Bingham, Edward Botcherby, Paul Coe, John Green, Grzegorz Grzelak, Ankush Mitra, John Nixon, Armin Reichold University.
Nailing Electroweak Physics (aka Higgs Hunting) with the Next Linear Collider Bob Wilson High Energy Physics Group CSU Physics Research Evening November.
Final Doublet Stability and in-detector Interferometry MONALISA David Urner Oxford University.
The LHCb Inner Tracker Marc-Olivier Bettler SPS annual meeting Zürich 21 February 2007.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC IP Layout What’s New? Tom Markiewicz LC’99, Frascati, Italy October 1999.
The Linear Collider Alignment and Survey (LiCAS) Project Richard Bingham, Edward Botcherby, Paul Coe, John Green, Grzegorz Grzelak, Ankush Mitra, John.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project IR Working Group Summary Tom Markiewicz LC R&D Workshop, UCSC June 29, 2002.
European Design Study Towards a TeV Linear Collider WP 2 : Beam Delivery System Co-ordinator: Deepa Angal-Kalinin CCLRC, Daresbury Laboratory.
Technology Breakthroughs and International Linear Collider Barry Barish AAAS Annual Meeting Washington DC 19-Feb-05.
Progress towards nanometre-level beam stabilisation at ATF2 N. Blaskovic, D. R. Bett, P. N. Burrows, G. B. Christian, C. Perry John Adams Institute, University.
The Detector and Interaction Region for a Photon Collider at TESLA
Scintillating fibre tracker First SHiP Workshop Zurich, 12 June, 2014 Vladimir SHEVCHENKO, on behalf of Kurchatov Institute SciFi group, Moscow, Russia.
Concepts for Combining Different Sensors for CLIC Final Focus Stabilisation David Urner Armin Reichold.
SuperKEKB to search for new sources of flavor mixing and CP violation - Introduction - Introduction - Motivation for L= Motivation for L=
David Urner, Oxford University, RHUL – June StaFF Stabilization of Final Focus Motion Stabilization with Nano-Meter Precision David Urner Paul Coe.
BPMs and HOM-BPMs for the XFEL Linac N. Baboi for the BPM and the HOM teams (DESY, CEA-Saclay, SLAC, FNAL, Cockroft/Daresbury) XFEL Linac Review Meeting,
Philip Burrows ECFA LC Workshop, Warsaw, 10 June Philip Burrows John Adams Institute Oxford University G. Christian, C. Clarke, B. Constance, H.
Precision Drift Chambers for the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer Susanne Mohrdieck Max-Planck-Institut f. Physik, Munich for the ATLAS Muon Collaboration Abstracts:
ATF2 meeting LAPP; David Urner 1 David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Geoffrey Rayner MPhys alumnus MONALISA Monitoring, Alignment.
Feedback On Nano-second Timescales: An IP Feedback System for the Future Linear Collider Requirement for a fast IP beam-based feedback system Simulation.
LCFI Collaboration Status Report LCUK Meeting Oxford, 29/1/2004 Joel Goldstein for the LCFI Collaboration Bristol, Lancaster, Liverpool, Oxford, QMUL,
Stabilization of Focus at ATF2 David Urner University of Oxford.
FLASH Operation at DESY From a Test Accelerator to a User Facility Michael Bieler FLASH Operation at DESY WAO2012, SLAC, Aug. 8, 2012.
Operations, Test facilities, CF&S Tom Himel SLAC.
Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Robert Apsimon, Philip Burrows, Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Davide Gamba,
P.N. Burrows ECFA/GDE Meeting, BDIR session, Valencia, 9/11/06 Philip Burrows John Adams Institute Oxford University FONT4 tests at KEK/ATF EM background.
Development of a Low-latency, High-precision, Intra-train Beam Feedback System Based on Cavity Beam Position Monitors N. Blaskovic Kraljevic, D. R. Bett,
The beam-based alignment and feedback systems, essential operations of the future colliders, use high resolution Beam Position Monitors (BPM). In the framework.
Particle Physics Research - Birmingham group HEFCE academic staff 7 Research staff 13, Engineers 2, Technicians 2 PhD students 12.
Karsten Büßer Instrumentation of the Forward Region of the TESLA Detector International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics Aachen, July 19th.
Welcome to MONALISA A brief introduction. Who we are... David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Electronics support from CEG Central Electronics.
Tsukuba-hall webcam 1 Beam Pipe and Vertex Detector extraction: on Nov. 10, 2010 Belle Detector Roll-out: Dec. 9, 2010 End-caps, CDC, B-ACC, TOF extraction:
The stabilisation of the final focus (StaFF) system Sun 12 th March 2006 MDI – LCWS06 at I I Sc Bangalore David Urner, Paul Coe, Armin Reichold.
1 H. Hayano ATF Status June/2004 H. Hayano ATF: emittance status beam study status plan nm-project collaboration & plan ATF review 6/17/2004.
1 Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Young Im Kim, Colin Perry John.
1 DR -> IP Beam Transport Simulations with Intra-Train Feedback Glen White, SLAC Jan 19 th 2006.
LC Scope: European View 1- Scope document should define a parameter set for a Linear Collider to be used as the European input to the world wide scope.
Sep/19/2008 Su Dong Stanford Student Orientation: Accelerator based Particle Physics1 Accelerator Based Particle Physics Su Dong Stanford Student Orientation.
July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 Silicon Tracking / Silicon Readout R&D Richard Partridge SLAC / Brown.
MONALISA Update David Urner ATF2 Meeting Dec
From the Standard Model to Discoveries - Physics with the CMS Experiment at the Dawn of the LHC Era Dimitri Bourilkov University of Florida CMS Collaboration.
ATF status M. Ross October 15, 2004 The ATF is the largest test facility built exclusively for linear collider RD –Utility not reduced by the selection.
1 Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Young Im Kim, Colin Perry John.
CERN, 27-Mar EuCARD NCLinac Task /3/2009.
September 2007SLAC IR WS Very Forward Instrumentation of the ILC Detector Wolfgang Lohmann, DESY Talks by M. Morse, W. Wierba, myself.
Andrei Nomerotski 1 Oxford ILC Groups Andrei Nomerotski  John Adams Institute MDI/BDS groups  LFCI –Vertex Detector  All above is instrumentation surrounding.
G.R.White: F.O.N. T. From Ground Motion studies by A.Seryi et al. (SLAC) ‘Fast’ motion (> few Hz) dominated by cultural noise Concern for structures.
IoP HEPP/APP annual meeting 2010 Feedback on Nanosecond Timescales: maintaining luminosity at future linear colliders Ben Constance John Adams Institute,
Instrumentation at ATF / TTF Accelerator Test Facility (KEK) Tesla Test Facility – FLASH (DESY) ESA / LCLS (SLAC) Marc Ross, SLAC.
Overview of progress at FONT Neven Blaskovic TMD technologies CASE student John Adams Institute Oxford University.
ILC R&D Activities at KEK Superconducting Linac Development Beam-handling Technology Development.
Iterative local  2 alignment algorithm for the ATLAS Pixel detector Tobias Göttfert IMPRS young scientists workshop 17 th July 2006.
WP3 Frequency Scanning Interferometry Analysis Techniques for the LiCAS RTRS John Dale.
W.Murray PPD 1 At Scientist at RAL Bill Murray RAL, CCLRC Science Week Wood Farm Primary School ● Who am I? ● Studying the very small.
Detector building Notes of our discussion
David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Oxford University
Background With new accelerators delivering beams always smaller and more energetic, requirements for very precise beam alignment become more and more.
CLIC-ILC BDS & MDI work.
Yasuhiro Okada (KEK) April 17, 2003, CAT, Indore, India
Presentation transcript:

21 June 2002 Naming of the Denys Wilkinson Building Dr. Armin Reichold Large Projects Present & Future

21 June 2002 Naming of the Denys Wilkinson Building Dr. Armin Reichold 2 Overview Excuses What is large anyway? What is large in Oxford today? A large present project: ATLAS What may be large in Oxford tomorrow? Some large future possibilities: Linear Colliders

21 June 2002 Naming of the Denys Wilkinson Building Dr. Armin Reichold 3 England1 23 rd min. Owen Brazil2 45 th min. Rivaldo 50 th min. Ronaldinho England2 23 rd min. Owen 89 th min. Wilkinson Brazil1 45 th min. Rivaldo

21 June 2002 Naming of the Denys Wilkinson Building Dr. Armin Reichold 4 Excuses Don’t talk about all the past, I am too young to do that. Don’t talk about all the other projects (DELPHI, ZEUS, LHCb, CDF, SNO, MINOS, ADLER, VERITAS, HARP, SLD, LCFI, CRESST, ANTARES, Soudan2, Neutrino Factory, GRID) there are too many of them. Don’t talk about all the science, that would take too long. Don’t talk about all the people, you can talk to them directly (they are all here!) Don’t talk about all the problems, we never do that! But do talk about something (said Susan) I will talk about some large projects from this laboratory because large is one of the things that we do best.

21 June 2002 Naming of the Denys Wilkinson Building Dr. Armin Reichold 5 What is large anyway (LHC)

21 June 2002 Naming of the Denys Wilkinson Building Dr. Armin Reichold 6 M(  0 2 ) - M(  0 1 ) SUSY cascade signal t t background What is large anyway The physics potential: Beyond the SM Higgs (also in SM) SUSY Compositeness large extra dimensions anything up to O(few TeV) In the SM B-Physics Top Multi Gauge Boson Interactions

21 June 2002 Naming of the Denys Wilkinson Building Dr. Armin Reichold 7 What is large anyway (ATLAS) large African elephant ATLAS (7000 tons) Size and Weight

21 June 2002 Naming of the Denys Wilkinson Building Dr. Armin Reichold 8 What is large anyway The Collaboration 2400 users 165 institutes 34 countries The hole The Timescale even I have been working on it for 11 years and we will still be going strong in 15 years from now

21 June 2002 Naming of the Denys Wilkinson Building Dr. Armin Reichold 9 past } } present, short term } present, long term What is large in Oxford today ATLAS-Oxford task list Bertie Botts every (16) flavour “dog-leg” cable (4 layer Cu/kapton flex circuits) L-2 Trigger Detector Layout Read-out chip design Mechanical Design Optical data transmission & control Services ‘harness’ Alignment Assembly Software vibrational ESPI, resolution 1/3  m 1.6m Encodes 40 Mbits/s control data onto 40 MHz bunch crossing clock  TTC signal to SCT modules. 3mm

21 June 2002 Naming of the Denys Wilkinson Building Dr. Armin Reichold 10 What is large in Oxford today SCT – Alignment/Survey Alignment Strategy Excellent initial measurements Continuous monitoring of primary support structures Tracks X-ray Survey Energetic enough to penetrate four layers FSI – Frequency Scan Interferometry Over constrained grids of D length measurements

21 June 2002 Naming of the Denys Wilkinson Building Dr. Armin Reichold 11 ATLAS – FSI grid designs 1  m per line gives<5  m in r  total

21 June 2002 Naming of the Denys Wilkinson Building Dr. Armin Reichold 12 ATLAS – FSI on-detector Retro-reflectors are punched in small Al pellets, gold coated, tested using WIPM Quills are precision injection moulded parts

21 June 2002 Naming of the Denys Wilkinson Building Dr. Armin Reichold 13 FSI Results 7 th digit changes L  =4*10 8 nm  =117nm  = 117 L=0.4m  L/L = 0.29 ppm

21 June 2002 Naming of the Denys Wilkinson Building Dr. Armin Reichold 14 ATLAS – X-ray σ(rφ)< 6μm (clocking) σ(r) < 30μm (radius) σ(z) < 50μm (length)

21 June 2002 Naming of the Denys Wilkinson Building Dr. Armin Reichold 15 ATLAS -Assembly Attach 1500 Modules to 3 cylinders (£ 10k each) Debug (first time all components come together) Test Ship Installation slot for planar insertion Barrel mm 0.55mm

21 June 2002 Naming of the Denys Wilkinson Building Dr. Armin Reichold 16 ATLAS - Assembly Problems: Clearances < 1mm Grease layer 100 ± 10  m Insertion accuracy < 100  m Everything is VERY delicate (open wire bonds!) Infra structure: 10kW evaporative cooling system 700 cables, 2100 optical data links 9 computer systems Design and fabrication of assembly equipment Test equipment, TI, WIPM, ToF, FSI Design/manufacture shipping equipment

21 June 2002 Naming of the Denys Wilkinson Building Dr. Armin Reichold 17 ATLAS – Assembly Facilities (ex. Heavy Lab on Level-3) Cooling/UPS/Services Cold Room (ground floor) Control Room (1 st floor) Clean Room (reception) 200 m 2 area on ground floor X-ray

21 June 2002 Naming of the Denys Wilkinson Building Dr. Armin Reichold 18 ATLAS – Assembly Facilities

21 June 2002 Naming of the Denys Wilkinson Building Dr. Armin Reichold 19 What may be large in Oxford tomorrow? Why a Linear Collider? Physics potential Understand EW symmetry breaking mechanism Do Higgs couplings generate masses? Higgs self-coupling Physics beyond the SM (SUSY) Collider even more challenging than detectors New initiatives on collider can use Oxford technology

21 June 2002 Naming of the Denys Wilkinson Building Dr. Armin Reichold 20 Why a LC ? M H = 120 GeV, pb -1 S/  B=3.6 ( pb -1 ) “Complementarity !”

21 June 2002 Naming of the Denys Wilkinson Building Dr. Armin Reichold 21 Tesla LCs are large (i.e. Tesla)

21 June 2002 Naming of the Denys Wilkinson Building Dr. Armin Reichold 22 Large = 30km long Beam energy O(500GeV) Beams start at O(0.1  m) beams end up O(1nm) at interaction point no recirculation, you just have one shot to collide a given bunch

23 Interaction Region (FONT) Machine Interface = Interaction Region FONT = Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales Ground motion moves final doublet and beams stop colliding Beam-beam interaction kicks beams BPM measures kick of first few bunches in train Kicker steers remaining ones back into collision Need very fast feedback system SLAC since June x-band “button” BPM reclaimed SLC kicker P. Burrows, G. White, S. Jolly, G. Nesom

21 June 2002 Naming of the Denys Wilkinson Building Dr. Armin Reichold 24 LC alignment is important (build accuracy: 200  m vertical over 600m for 30km total) This is the main beam line

21 June 2002 Naming of the Denys Wilkinson Building Dr. Armin Reichold 25 Collider & BDS (LiCAS) Collider Alignment LiCAS = Linear Collider Alignment & Survey collider alignment at build time 200  m over 600m Today’s open air survey technology fails Build survey instrument that matches requirement Use FSI (ATLAS) & Straightness monitors (ZEUS and ATLAS) Extend technologies to new conditions

21 June 2002 Naming of the Denys Wilkinson Building Dr. Armin Reichold 26 LiCAS Phase I Automatic survey train measures reference markers Later measure collider against reference Internal lines in vacuum Use scalable laser technology (not large monolithic lasers) DESY during FEL installation Same scheme for TESLA & NLC FSI-distance measurements straightness monitors straightness monitor beam reference markers tunnel wall single car with sensors

21 June 2002 Naming of the Denys Wilkinson Building Dr. Armin Reichold 27 Detector (LCFI) 0 0.5m ask her