BRAVO - Results Big Bend Regional Aerosol & Visibility Observational Study Bret Schichtel National Park Service,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An Overview of the Big Bend Regional Aerosol and Visibility Observational (BRAVO) Study Marc Pitchford, Ph.D National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Advertisements

Aerosol Pattern over Southeastern Europe Rudolf B. Husar and Janja D. Husar CAPITA, Washington University, St. Louis, MO Conference on Visibility, Aerosols,
Assessing PM 2.5 Background Levels and Local Add-On Prepared by Bryan Lambeth, PE Field Operations Support Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
FIRE AND BIOFUEL CONTRIBUTIONS TO ANNUAL MEAN AEROSOL MASS CONCENTRATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES ROKJIN J. PARK, DANIEL J. JACOB, JENNIFER A. LOGAN AGU FALL.
Visual Air Quality Big Bend National Park. Big Bend – A Land of Borders One of the largest and least-visited national parks, Big Bend encompasses over.
Regional Air Quality Modeling Patrick Barickman, Air Quality Modeler Tyler Cruickshank, Meteorologist/Modeler Utah Department of Environmental Quality.
Map of the Guadalupe Mountains Region NEW MEXICO TEXAS Guadalupe Mtns. Park Map To Carlsbad To El Paso To I-10 Visibility Degradation in Guadalupe Mountains.
Intercontinental Transport and Climatic Effect of Air Pollutants (ICAP) Second Workshop, October 21-22, 2004, Chapel Hill, NC Intercontinental Aerosol.
BACKGROUND AEROSOL CONCENTRATIONS AND VISIBILITY DEGRADATION IN THE UNITED STATES Rokjin Park Motivated by EPA Regional Haze Rule Quantifying uncontrollable.
Substituting Sulfate for Sulfur Impact on the RHR metrics and control strategies Presented at the 2006 IMPROVE Steering Committee Meeting by B.A. Schichtel.
Chapter 2: Satellite Tools for Air Quality Analysis 10:30 – 11:15.
Springtime Airmass Transport Pathways to the US Prepared by: Bret A. Schichtel and Rudolf B. Husar Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend Analysis (CAPITA)
Springtime Airmass Transport Pathways to the US Prepared by: Rudolf B. Husar and Bret Schichtel CAPITACAPITA,Washington University, Saint Louis, Missouri.
NATURAL AND TRANSBOUNDARY INFLUENCES ON PARTICULATE MATTER IN THE UNITED STATES: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE EPA REGIONAL HAZE RULE Rokjin J. Park ACCESS VII,
ME 449 Sustainable Air Quality Class Report, Spring 2001 Sources and Emissions Particulate Matter Instructor:Rudolf B. Husar Students:Kristin Burford Kurt.
Effects of Pollution on Visibility and the Earth’s Radiation Balance John G. Watson Judith C. Chow Desert Research Institute Reno,
Reason for Doing Cluster Analysis Identify similar and dissimilar aerosol monitoring sites so that we can test the ability of the Causes of Haze Assessment.
Colorado Plateau Sulfate Episode Worst 20% at 5 sites: INGA, BRCA, MEVE, WEMI & SAPE Best 20% at GICL, SACR, CHIR, SIAN, GUMO, TONT, and most California.
Characterization of Aerosol Physical, Optical and Chemical Properties During the Big Bend Regional Aerosol and Visibility Observational Study (BRAVO) Jenny.
Aerosol Extinction Assessment and Impact on Regional Haze Rule Implementation Douglas Lowenthal Desert Research Institute Pat Ryan Sonoma Technology, Inc.
FROM AIR POLLUTION TO GLOBAL CHANGE AND BACK: Towards an integrated international policy for air pollution and climate change Daniel J. Jacob Harvard University.
MODELS3 – IMPROVE – PM/FRM: Comparison of Time-Averaged Concentrations R. B. Husar S. R. Falke 1 and B. S. Schichtel 2 Center for Air Pollution Impact.
Alex Cuclis Houston Advanced Research Center (HARC) Particulate Matter: What Floats in the Air?
By: Kelsey Lewis, Kimmy Parks, Tyler Tucker, Ashley Sun.
The Central American Smoke Event of May 1998 A Draft Summary Based on Reports and Data on the Web Rudolf B. Husar and Bret Schichtel.
Causes of Haze Update Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the 5/24/05 AoH conference call.
Properties of Particulate Matter Physical, Chemical and Optical Properties Size Range of Particulate Matter Mass Distribution of PM vs. Size: PM10, PM2.5.
MANE-VU states, Virginia and West Virginia Regional Haze Trend Analyses Latest available (December 2011) IMPROVE DATA (for TSC 5/22/2012) Tom.
U.S.-Canada Air Quality Agreement: Transboundary PM Science Assessment Report to the Air Quality Committee June, 2004.
1 Options for Estimating Natural Background Visibility in the VISTAS Region Ivar Tombach with benefit of material prepared by Jim Boylan and Daniel Jacob.
Estimating the Contribution of Smoke and Its Fuel Types to Fine Particulate Carbon using a Hybrid- CMB Model Bret A. Schichtel and William C. Malm - NPS.
Regional Scale Air Pollution Rudolf B. Husar Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend Analysis Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA 6 th Int. Conf.
Global Distribution and Transport of Air Pollution Presented at The Haagen-Smit Symposium: From Los Angeles to Global Air Pollution Lake Arrowhead, April.
Airmass History Analysis During High and Low Sulfate Days Bret A. Schichtel NPS/CIRA Fort Collins, CO BRAVO Study Data Analysis Meeting San Antonio, TX.
Causes of Haze Assessment (COHA) Update. Current and near-future Major Tasks Visibility trends analysis Assess meteorological representativeness of 2002.
Global and Local Dust over North America R. B. Husar Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend Analysis (CAPITA) Washington University, St. Louis, MO Prepared.
Influence of the Asian Dust to the Air Quality in US During the spring season, the desert regions in Mongolia and China, especially Gobi desert in Northwest.
NARSTO PM Assessment NARSTO PM Assessment Chapter 5: Spatial and Temporal Pattern TOC Introduction Data Global Pattern NAM Dust NAM Smoke NAM Haze NAM.
August 1999PM Data Analysis Workbook: Characterizing PM23 Spatial Patterns Urban spatial patterns: explore PM concentrations in urban settings. Urban/Rural.
Source Attribution Modeling to Identify Sources of Regional Haze in Western U.S. Class I Areas Gail Tonnesen, EPA Region 8 Pat Brewer, National Park Service.
Technical Projects Update WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT November 10, 2004.
Overview of the Big Bend Regional Aerosol and Visibility Observational (BRAVO) study:  Understand the long-range, trans-boundary transport of visibility-reducing.
NATURAL AND TRANSBOUNDARY POLLUTION INFLUENCES ON AEROSOL CONCENTRATIONS AND VISIBILITY DEGRADATION IN THE UNITED STATES Rokjin J. Park, Daniel J. Jacob,
Springtime Airmass Transport Pathways to the US Prepared by: Bret A. Schichtel and Rudolf B. Husar CAPITA CAPITA,Washington University Saint Louis, Missouri.
Modeling Regional Haze in Big Bend National Park with CMAQ Betty Pun, Christian Seigneur & Shiang-Yuh Wu AER, San Ramon Naresh Kumar EPRI, Palo Alto CMAQ.
Bret A. Schichtel Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend Analysis (CAPITA) Washington University St. Louis, MO, Presented at EPA’s National Exposure.
Global and Local Dust over North America Initial Assessment by a Virtual Community on Dust Coordinated by R.
Support by Inter-RPO WG - NESCAUM Performed by CAPITA & Sonoma Technology, Inc F ast A erosol S ensing T ools for N atural E vent T racking FASTNET Project.
Global Visibility: Regional and Seasonal Pattern Janja D. Husar and Rudolf B. Husar CAPITA, Washington University, St. Louis, MO HTTP\CAPITA\CapitaReports\GLOBVIZ\GLOBVIS1.html.
GEOS-CHEM Activities at NIA Hongyu Liu National Institute of Aerospace (NIA) at NASA LaRC June 2, 2003.
Springtime Airmass Transport Pathways to the US Prepared by: Rudolf B. Husar and Bret Schichtel CAPITACAPITA,Washington University, Saint Louis, Missouri.
WESTAR 2003 Fall Technical Conference Introduction to Class I Area Impact Analyses September 16, 2003 John Bunyak National Park Service.
CAPITA Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend Analysis.
Ambient Monitoring & Reporting Forum Plans for 2005 Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the WRAP Planning Team Meeting (3/9 – 3/10/05)
The Central American Smoke Event of May 1998 A Draft Summary Based on Reports and Data on the Web Rudolf B. Husar and Bret Schichtel CAPITA, Dec 1998.
Proposal Outline The Influence of Weather and Climate Events on Dust, Smoke and Sulfate Events R. Husar, PI Response to EPA STAR RFA Extreme Event Impacts.
Aerosol Pattern over Southern North America Tropospheric Aerosols: Science and Decisions in an International Community A NARSTO Technical Symposium on.
North American Visibility. rdyswth Seasonal Bext.
Atmospheric Lifetime and the Range of PM2.5 Transport Background and Rationale Atmospheric Residence Time and Spatial Scales Residence Time Dependence.
BACKGROUND AEROSOL IN THE UNITED STATES: NATURAL SOURCES AND TRANSBOUNDARY POLLUTION Daniel J. Jacob and Rokjin J. Park with support from EPRI, EPA/OAQPS.
V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt CRGAQS: CAMx Sensitivity Results Presentation to the Gorge Study Technical Team By ENVIRON International Corporation.
Properties of Particulate Matter
Anthropogenic Emission Trend Drivers, Global Visibility (Smoke??) Trends GISS Carbonaceous Aerosol Trends Workshop November 24, 2003, NYC Rudolf.
CMAS Annual Conference, October 24-26, 2016, Chapel Hill, NC
The average PM2.5 mass concentration based on IMPROVE data available from September 2000 to December 2002 is 3.3 mg/m3 The highest occurrence of the 20%
Visual Air Quality Big Bend National Park.
ATOC 4720: class 17 Atmospheric aerosols
Evaluating Revised Tracking Metric for Regional Haze Planning
Continuous measurement of airborne particles and gases
Synthesized CMAQ A BRAVO community Product
Presentation transcript:

BRAVO - Results Big Bend Regional Aerosol & Visibility Observational Study Bret Schichtel National Park Service, Presented at the BRAVO Public Meeting Alpine, Texas September 22, 2004

BRAVO Study Purpose The BRAVO Study’s chief purpose is to quantify the contribution to visibility degradation at Big Bend National Park (BBNP) from various air pollution source regions and source types in the U.S. and Mexico.

Big Bend Extinction Budget – 1998–2002 Sulfate compounds are the largest contributor to haze. Big Bend haze peaks during two periods: springtime when sulfate and organics are the largest contributors and summer/fall when sulfate contributions dominate. Spring Peak (Apr-Jun) Sum/Fall Peak (Aug-Oct) Clear Air

Springtime Smoke Impacting Big Bend Mar, Apr, May is the peak fire season in Mexico and Central America. May, 1998 smoke from large fires in Central America impacts Big Bend and the U.S. Similar fires occurred in Location of Fire SeaWiFS Satellite imagery

Summertime Dust Impacting Big Bend In July and August dust from Sahara Africa regularly the U.S. from Florida to Big Bend NP. Dust cloud leaving Africa Saharan dust in the Gulf of Mexico

Measurements at 37 sites July 1 – October 31, BRAVO Monitoring Network Gas and Aerosol Sampling Locations

BRAVO Study Site at KBar Measurements included speciated fine particles, gases, light scattering & absorption, particle size, meteorological parameters, and tracer concentrations.

Big Bend Source Attribution during BRAVO The contribution from the SO 2 source regions: Texas, eastern US, western US, Mexico and sub-regions including Carbon I & II and east Texas, to Big Bend’s particulate sulfate and haze were modeled.

Models: Linking Emissions to Measured Pollutants Pollutants are emitted from a source, transformed in the atmosphere, and transported with the winds. Along the way they become diluted or may deposit out as dry particles, or in rain, fog, or snow. Multiple source attribution methods were used to apportion Big Bend’s sulfate haze to source regions. All techniques were extensively evaluated against measured and synthetic data sets. All results were reconciled resulting in a single BRAVO best estimate

Big Bend Source Attribution Results Average source attribution of Big Bend’s particulate sulfate and haze during the BRAVO Study

Sulfate Source Attribution vs SO 2 Emissions The SO 2 emissions from Carbon I & II are 5 times more efficient at causing haze at Big Bend than sources in Texas. The SO 2 emissions from Texas are 8 times more efficient at causing haze at Big Bend than sources in eastern U.S. The SO 2 emissions from Carbon I & II are 5 times more efficient at causing haze at Big Bend than sources in Texas. The SO 2 emissions from Texas are 8 times more efficient at causing haze at Big Bend than sources in eastern U.S.

Big Bend’s Sulfate Haze Source Attribution Mexico Texas Eastern US

Sulfate contributes 21% of the haze on clear days (Mexico: 10%, U.S.: 8%). Sulfate contributes 47% of the haze on hazy days (Mexico: 14%, U.S.: 31%). Western US 2 % Contribution to Big Bend’s Haze - BRAVO The relative contributions to light extinction by eastern U.S. and Texas sources of particulate sulfate at Big Bend increase by factors of about 4 and 5, respectively, on the haziest days compared to the least hazy days of the study period. Percent contribution to particulate haze are in parentheses

Hazy Day Least Hazy Day Clear Day Bext ~10 1/Mm

What is Causing Big Bend’s Haze? Sulfate is the single largest contributor to haze at Big Bend NP. Big Bend is one of the only national parks where sulfates and haze are increasing. Some of the highest haze episodes during the spring season are caused by international transport of dust and smoke.

Where Does the Haze Come From… During BRAVO there were days where SO 2 sources in either the eastern U.S., eastern Texas, or Mexico were each most responsible for the haze. The most intense sulfate-dominated haze episodes tended to include significant contributions from SO 2 sources in the eastern U.S. and east Texas. Contributions from sources in Mexico were more persistent and tended to be the dominant contributor during less intense sulfate haze episodes. The Carbón power plant was the single largest contributor to Big Bend’s haze, during BRAVO.

Where Doesn’t the Haze Come From… On the least hazy BRAVO days, Mexico and the western U.S. are the largest contributors. In general the clearest visibility conditions at Big Bend occur most frequently in the winter when flow is most often from the north or west over areas of relatively low emissions density.

Thank-you The BRAVO report and other material can be found at: The BRAVO report and other material can be found at:

How Can Visibility be Improved at Big Bend NP? Significant SO 2 emission reductions in both east Texas and eastern US. –Current and pending federal regulations should reduce sulfur dioxide emissions throughout the United States SO 2 emission reductions from the western U.S and Northern Mexico would help maintain and improve the least hazy days. Control SO 2 emissions from the Carbon power plants. U.S. government has no jurisdiction in Mexico. Should explore the creation of partnerships between U.S. and Mexico government agencies to address the transport of pollution.