Program Ownership Inspires Self-Reflection Kirk Minnick, TxCETP Evaluator Kit Price Blount, TxCETP PD Teacher Prep PI Meeting Alexandria, VA March 14,

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Initiative on K-12 Teacher Preparation Natasha Speer, Univ. of Maine Tim Scott and Omah Williams, Texas A & M Noah Finkelstein, Univ. Colorado-Boulder.

Advertisements

Confirming Student Learning: Using Assessment Techniques in the Classroom Douglas R. Davenport Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Truman State University.

April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.

Writing an Effective Proposal for Innovations in Teaching Grant

Driving Questions: Strategies for Uses of ARRA Funds Ongoing Professional Development.

Developing a Statistics Teaching and Beliefs Survey Jiyoon Park Audbjorg Bjornsdottir Department of Educational Psychology The National Statistics Teaching.

Closing the Achievement Gap: An ESL Reform Initiative University of Northern Colorado TQE Dr. Elizabeth Franklin, MLCS Dr. Jenni Harding-Dekam, TE Ms.

Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals: Fellowship Track Washington, DC January 9, 2014.

Center of Excellence in Mathematics and Science Education Cooperative Partners College of Arts and Sciences College of Education Dr. Jack Rhoton East Tennessee.

Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant Title IIB Information Session April 10, 2006.

Foundation Fundraising Update June Goal seek external, foundation funding for consortial, collaborative project(s) which will advance the organization’s.

1 CCLI Proposal Writing Strategies Tim Fossum Program Director Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation Vermont.

Kyrene Professional Growth Plan

Professional Growth= Teacher Growth

Ideas for Educational Components of CAREER Proposals Jeffrey Froyd Director of Faculty and Organizational Development Office.

An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.

Experiences and requirements in teacher professional development: Understanding teacher change Sylvia Linan-Thompson, Ph.D. The University of Texas at.

 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Integrating Diversity into.

Engaging the Arts and Sciences at the University of Kentucky Working Together to Prepare Quality Educators.

Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.

Math Science Partnership Excellence In Mathematics Lanakila Elementary School Honolulu, HI.

Connecting the Dots BISD’S LEARNING PLATFORM AND ESTABLISHING EXPECTATIONS FOR LEARNING RUBRIC.

Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.

Public Charter School Grant Program Workshop Aligning Teacher Evaluation, Professional Development, Recruitment and Retention March 3, 2014.

Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013 This presentation contains.

Leading Change Through a Walk-Through Protocol

College and Career Ready Standards (a.k.a. Common Core Standards) and Educator Effectiveness Systems Kutztown University College of Education Faculty Retreat.

Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.

Monitoring through Walk-Throughs Participants are expected to purpose the book: The Three-Minute Classroom Walk-Through: Changing School Supervisory.

Differential Effects of Participatory Evaluation in a National Multi-site Program Evaluation Frances Lawrenz University of Minnesota.

What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.

Session 2 Objective You will synthesize your knowledge of Mathematical Practice Standard 4 Model with Mathematics.

Math and Science Scholars at Texas A&M University Timothy P. Scott Dean, College of Science Texas A&M University Kit Price Blount TxCETP Project Director.

Urban Mathematics Education Leadership Academy Session 1 February 4-6, 2009 Dallas, TX.

The Earth & Ocean Sciences Science Education Initiative at the University of British Columbia Sara Harris with contributions from Francis Jones & Brett.

Using SEC Data for Program Evaluation Report on SEC Data Analysis for a State MSP.

 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Broadening Participation.

March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.

Developing a Service Learning Program On a Community College Campus.

TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.

Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.

Integrate English as a Second Language (ESL) strategies into the teacher preparation program for all students the semester prior to student teaching. Require.

Mentoring School Name Date Mentor’s Name. OVERVIEW What is Mentoring? The Mentoring Menu The Coaching Process.

Gain an interdisciplinary perspective on how faculty from other units approach teaching and learning Expand knowledge of teaching strategies Acquire the.

NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.

Assessment System Overview Center for Education Overview for the NCATE BOE Team April 18-22, 2009.

Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Part 2 Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.

NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness F. Prioritize Areas for Feedback 1.

Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.

Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.

A TAP Story: A. A. Nelson Elementary School Jacqueline Smith, Principal A.A. Nelson Elementary School TAP Leadership Team Teddy Broussard, State TAP Director.

Needs Recognize there is no one-size-fits-all model for “effective” pedagogy (what works for whom under what conditions) A updated/revised “vision for.

Instructional Leadership: Planning for Improvement.

Nakatani Teaching and Learning Center (NTLC) supports research & faculty development through... NTLC Year-long Research.... Infusing Diversity across the.

1 Far West Teacher Center Network - NYS Teaching Standards: Your Path to Highly Effective Teaching 2013 Far West Teacher Center Network Teaching is the.

THE APPALACHIAN MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE PARTNERSHIP.

SEA Strategies for Promoting Equity: SEA/IHE Collaboration on Teacher Preparation Lynn Holdheide, Center on Great Teachers and Leaders & Collaboration.

Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Pulaski County Schools June

The University of West Florida Reaffirmation of Accreditation Project Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges.

Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.

Description of a Process for Enhancing Pre-service Programs to Better Prepare General Education Teachers to Teach Students with Disabilities 2016 CEEDAR.

Evaluation and Research team March Workshop March 5, 2016 NSF Division of Undergraduate Education.

MSP Summary of First Year Annual Report FY 2004 Projects.

Implementing edTPA An Overview.

“An Impact School Partnership”

Field Experiences and Clinical Practice

Project-Based Learning (PBL)

Research on UTeach: Past, Present, and Future Research

Research on Geoscience Learning

Report on SEC Data Analysis

Presentation transcript:

Program Ownership Inspires Self-Reflection Kirk Minnick, TxCETP Evaluator Kit Price Blount, TxCETP PD Teacher Prep PI Meeting Alexandria, VA March 14, 2004 DUE #

- Texas A&M Univ.-Kingsville - Texas A&M Univ.-Corpus Christi - Texas A&M Univ.-Commerce - Texas A&M International Univ. - Texas A&M University - Angelo State University - Tarleton State University - Texas Woman’s University - West Texas A&M University - Prairie View A&M University TxCETP Partner Campuses

TxCETP Goals Texas Collaborative for Excellence in Teacher Preparation Course Reform to reflect learner-centered pedagogies Recruit more undergraduate students (especially African-American and Hispanic) to STEM teaching Support for Preservice and Novice Teachers to increase retention and quality Strengthen Systemic Reform Connections to maximize alignment and impact Course Reform

Guiding Question Texas Collaborative for Excellence in Teacher Preparation What are science and mathematics professors’ understandings and perceptions about elements of reformed teaching in undergraduate courses?

3-day TxCETP Forum, May, participants -- gallery walk to brainstorm examples that characterize a “reformed” course (trends reflected in, e.g. NCTM, 1991; AAAS, 1990, 1993;NRC, 2000, 2001, Bransford, 2000): –Course design –Prior and new knowledge –Student work –Reflection and assessment –Instructional materials and technology –Multiple representations –Instructional strategies –Learning environment –Problem solving Collaborative Design Process

Workshop leaders clustered participants’ lists into course reform indicators with supporting evidence for each: –Course syllabus –Instructor feedback –Student feedback –Class observations –Student learning products –Assessments 5 levels of implementation identified: –Considering... Planning... Initiating...Implementing... Refining Collaborative Design Process Texas Collaborative for Excellence in Teacher Preparation

Faculty and Student surveys administered Fall, 2002 and 2003 –Faculty receive: feedback on their course(s) aggregated Collaborative results Elements of Effective Instruction guide proposal- writing for funding on TxCETP campuses Implementation of Vision Instrument Texas Collaborative for Excellence in Teacher Preparation

Identify strategies for: –Examining and closing gaps between what students experience and what professor intended they experience –Moving along the course reform continuum –Addressing difficult issues that are illuminated as a result of the course survey process Create environment on our campuses for critical self-reflection and evaluation for the improvement of undergraduate instruction Closing the Loop and Some Next Steps Please visit and send us your comments: