Overview of Neuroscience Tony Bell Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute University of California at Berkeley.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Spike Train Statistics Sabri IPM. Review of spike train  Extracting information from spike trains  Noisy environment:  in vitro  in vivo  measurement.
Advertisements

Neuronal Coding in the Retina and Fixational Eye Movements Christian Mendl, Tim Gollisch Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Junior Research Group Visual.
Transient Cortical Excitation at the onset of visual fixation Visual recognition is brain state dependent.
Synchrony in Neural Systems: a very brief, biased, basic view Tim Lewis UC Davis NIMBIOS Workshop on Synchrony April 11, 2011.
Cortical Encoding of Natural Auditory Scenes Brigid Thurgood.
1 Correlations Without Synchrony Presented by: Oded Ashkenazi Carlos D. Brody.
1 3. Spiking neurons and response variability Lecture Notes on Brain and Computation Byoung-Tak Zhang Biointelligence Laboratory School of Computer Science.
Neural Coding 4: information breakdown. Multi-dimensional codes can be split in different components Information that the dimension of the code will convey.
Some concepts from Cognitive Psychology to review: Shadowing Visual Search Cue-target Paradigm Hint: you’ll find these in Chapter 12.
Levels in Computational Neuroscience Reasonably good understanding (for our purposes!) Poor understanding Poorer understanding Very poorer understanding.
Mechanisms for phase shifting in cortical networks and their role in communication through coherence Paul H.Tiesinga and Terrence J. Sejnowski.
Functional Brain Signal Processing: Current Trends and Future Directions Kaushik Majumdar Indian Statistical Institute Bangalore Center
Michael P. Kilgard Sensory Experience and Cortical Plasticity University of Texas at Dallas.
fMRI Methods Lecture 12 – Adaptation & classification
Biological Modeling of Neural Networks: Week 10 – Neuronal Populations Wulfram Gerstner EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland 10.1 Cortical Populations - columns.
Eizaburo Doi, CNS meeting at CNBC/CMU, 2005/09/21 Redundancy in the Population Code of the Retina Puchalla, Schneidman, Harris, and Berry (2005)
Date of download: 6/28/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Teamwork Matters: Coordinated Neuronal Activity in.
The Neural Code Baktash Babadi SCS, IPM Fall 2004.
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (November 2009)
Thalamic Burst Mode and Inattention in the Awake LGNd
Margaret Lin Veruki, Espen Hartveit  Neuron 
The Y Cell Visual Pathway Implements a Demodulating Nonlinearity
Heather L. Dean, Maureen A. Hagan, Bijan Pesaran  Neuron 
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Modulation of Neuronal Interactions Through Neuronal Synchronization
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
Neuronal Synchrony: A Versatile Code for the Definition of Relations?
George Dragoi, Kenneth D Harris, György Buzsáki  Neuron 
Volume 58, Issue 3, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages (December 2002)
Ian M. Finn, Nicholas J. Priebe, David Ferster  Neuron 
Two-Dimensional Substructure of MT Receptive Fields
Heather L. Dean, Maureen A. Hagan, Bijan Pesaran  Neuron 
Aaron C. Koralek, Rui M. Costa, Jose M. Carmena  Neuron 
Bassam V. Atallah, Massimo Scanziani  Neuron 
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Cycle 10: Brain-state dependence
Retinal Representation of the Elementary Visual Signal
Dynamic Processes Shape Spatiotemporal Properties of Retinal Waves
EEG and MEG: Relevance to Neuroscience
Gamma and the Coordination of Spiking Activity in Early Visual Cortex
Volume 71, Issue 4, Pages (August 2011)
Shigeyoshi Fujisawa, György Buzsáki  Neuron 
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (April 2016)
Nicholas J. Priebe, David Ferster  Neuron 
Volume 75, Issue 5, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (April 2017)
Slow-γ Rhythms Coordinate Cingulate Cortical Responses to Hippocampal Sharp-Wave Ripples during Wakefulness  Miguel Remondes, Matthew A. Wilson  Cell.
Volume 80, Issue 4, Pages (November 2013)
Sharon C. Furtak, Omar J. Ahmed, Rebecca D. Burwell  Neuron 
Cortical dynamics revisited
Xiangying Meng, Joseph P.Y. Kao, Hey-Kyoung Lee, Patrick O. Kanold 
Jozsef Csicsvari, Hajime Hirase, Akira Mamiya, György Buzsáki  Neuron 
Ilan Lampl, Iva Reichova, David Ferster  Neuron 
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages (October 2001)
Ankit Gupta, Benjamin Hepp, Mustafa Khammash  Cell Systems 
Synchronized Activity between the Ventral Hippocampus and the Medial Prefrontal Cortex during Anxiety  Avishek Adhikari, Mihir A. Topiwala, Joshua A.
Encoding of Oscillations by Axonal Bursts in Inferior Olive Neurons
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages (May 2001)
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages e6 (August 2018)
Transient Slow Gamma Synchrony Underlies Hippocampal Memory Replay
John B Reppas, W.Martin Usrey, R.Clay Reid  Neuron 
Honghui Zhang, Andrew J. Watrous, Ansh Patel, Joshua Jacobs  Neuron 
Volume 9, Pages (November 2018)
Supratim Ray, John H.R. Maunsell  Neuron 
Rapid Neocortical Dynamics: Cellular and Network Mechanisms
Shunting Inhibition Modulates Neuronal Gain during Synaptic Excitation
Dynamics of Orientation Selectivity in the Primary Visual Cortex and the Importance of Cortical Inhibition  Robert Shapley, Michael Hawken, Dario L. Ringach 
Volume 27, Issue 13, Pages e3 (June 2019)
Presentation transcript:

Overview of Neuroscience Tony Bell Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute University of California at Berkeley

Hubel & Wiesel non-oriented receptive field.

Hubel & Wiesel oriented receptive field

Moving epileptic seizure recorded by EEG

Dipole Fitting of Independent Components (Onton & Makeig)

Single Trial Analysis

Communication through neuronal coherence (Pascal Fries)

Correlation coefficient between high gamma amplitude and theta amplitude as a function of theta phase. Includes 95% confidence intervals. (Canolty et al, submitted)

If 1) local pyramidal cell spiking is modulated by the power and phase of local high gamma (neocortical ripples at Hz), which are coherent over an area of radius ~0.3-3 mm [14,15], and 2) the power of local high gamma is modulated by the power and phase of the slower theta rhythm (4-8 Hz), which shows a moderate degree of mutual information over a radius of ~ mm, then 3) the joint probability density distribution of the conductances of billions of neocortical cells would exhibit a statistical dependence which, without massively parallel recordings, could easily pass for noise -- but which would nonetheless influence computation and cybernetic regulation. This study presents evidence which supports premise 2 of the above argument. Canolty writes:

Koepsell et al (submitted)

Spikes are not precisely time-locked to the visual stimulus but rather phase-locked to ongoing network activity:

The influence of ongoing oscillations on the spike timing in LGN can be seen in Figure 1. Figure 1a shows the interval distribution for LGN spikes (red)and retinal synaptic inputs (blue) with distinct peaks at certain intervals corresponding to one (or several) periods of the oscillation. Figure 2b shows the cross-correlogram between synaptic inputs (EPSPs) and spikes in LGN. The narrow peak near time 0 shows that LGN spikes follow synaptic inputs with millisecond precision and the side peaks again show periodicity. The inset shows that the oscillations are coherent over several hundred milliseconds. Figure 2c shows that Spikes occur at a preferred phase of the oscillation (upper panel) that has been detected in the synaptic input. The lower panel shows the so-called shift-predictor which quantifies the phase locking of spikes with respect to the previous repetition of the stimulus. The uniform distribution shows that the oscillations are not stimulus locked. In other words, the absolute phase of the oscillations is not determined by the stimulus but rather dynamically generated in the retina. Figure 1c quantifies the amount of phase locking with respect to different frequencies. The phase locking is maximal at frequencies in the gamma range around 60Hz. Another visualization of the influence of ongoing oscillations on spike timing in LGN: Figure 2a shows spike trains (red) and synaptic input (EPSP) trains (blue) in response to the onset of the movie stimulus at 2.0s. The curve in in the upper panel is the average response or PSTH (post stimulus time histogram). It can be seen that even though the response rate is reproducible from trial to trial, the spike timing on the millisecond scale is seemingly random. Figure 2b shows the same activity after each trial has been re-aligned by a time shift corresponding to the oscillation phase that we could determine from ongoing activity in the input preceding the stimulus (blue). Now the spike in response to the stimulus (red) line up on a millisecond scale. Thus, the spikes are not precisely time- locked to the visual stimulus but rather phase-locked to ongoing network activity!

The Theory of Everything (Laughlin & Pines)

Conclusion. Neurobiology consists of nested networks of diverse mechanisms. There is no “magic level” like the spiking level or the rate level. Information can flow very quickly up and down through the levels. Up through emergence. Down through boundary condition. These cross-level connections form and dissolve dynamically. This is regulated by ‘coherences’ at a given level. Thus it is a ‘dance’ of intra-level and inter-level resonances and information flows. Question. Is there an invariance to how this dance self-organises? Can we find that invariance and create a theory of complex systems? To stand a chance of answering this question, we will need to do some mathematics. Starting tomorrow…