Flux emergence: An overview of thin flux tube models George Fisher, SSL/UC Berkeley.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The solar dynamo(s) Fausto Cattaneo Center for Magnetic Self-Organization in Laboratory and Astrophysical Plasmas Chicago 2003.
Advertisements

Historical Development of Solar Dynamo Theory Historical Development of Solar Dynamo Theory Arnab Rai Choudhuri Department of Physics Indian Institute.
The Origin of the Solar Magnetic Cycle Arnab Rai Choudhuri Department of Physics Indian Institute of Science.
2011/08/ ILWS Science Workshop1 Solar cycle prediction using dynamos and its implication for the solar cycle Jie Jiang National Astronomical Observatories,
The Hemispheric Pattern of Filaments and Consequences for Filament Formation Duncan H Mackay Solar Physics Group University of St. Andrews.
Convection Convection Matt Penrice Astronomy 501 University of Victoria.
Using HMI to Understand Flux Cancellation by Brian Welsch 1, George Fisher 1, Yan Li 1, and Xudong Sun 2 1 Space Sciences Lab, UC-Berkeley, 2 Stanford.
Evolution of Magnetic Helicity in the Corona During Flux Emergence Anna Malanushenko, Humed Yusuf, Dana Longcope.
Shin Toriumi & Takaaki Yokoyama Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of Tokyo FEW 2011: 22 Aug 2011.
Chip Manchester 1, Fang Fang 1, Bart van der Holst 1, Bill Abbett 2 (1)University of Michigan (2)University of California Berkeley Study of Flux Emergence:
The Importance of Sub-surface Magnetic Field Structure and Evolution George H. Fisher SSL, UC Berkeley Shine Meeting 2005.
Simulations of Emerging Magnetic Flux in Active Regions W. P. Abbett Space Sciences Laboratory University of California, Berkeley.
SHINE The Role of Sub-Surface Processes in the Formation of Coronal Magnetic Flux Ropes A. A. van Ballegooijen Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory.
Coupled Models for the Emergence of Magnetic Flux into the Solar Corona W. P. Abbett UC Berkeley SSL G. H. Fisher, Y. Fan, S. A. Ledvina, Y. Li, and D.
Influence of depth-dependent diffusivity profiles in governing the evolution of weak, large-scale magnetic fields of the sun Night Song and E.J. Zita,
Magnetic Helicity Generation Inside the Sun
Understanding the Connection Between Magnetic Fields in the Solar Interior and the Solar Corona George H. Fisher Space Sciences Laboratory UC Berkeley.
Active Region Magnetic Fields in the Solar Interior W.P. Abbett UC Berkeley SSL.
Dec. 2, 2008 Bangalore, India Active region emergence and its effect on the solar corona Dana Longcope Montana State University, Bozeman, MT Isaac Klapper.
Flare-related current systems H. S. Hudson & B. T. Welsch Space Sciences Lab, UC Berkeley.
Subsurface Evolution of Emerging Magnetic Fields Yuhong Fan (HAO/NCAR) High Altitude Observatory (HAO) – National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR)
SSL (UC Berkeley): Prospective Codes to Transfer to the CCMC Developers: W.P. Abbett, D.J. Bercik, G.H. Fisher, B.T. Welsch, and Y. Fan (HAO/NCAR)
Active Region Magnetic Fields in the Solar Interior W.P. Abbett UC Berkeley SSL.
Using HMI to Understand Flux Cancellation by Brian Welsch 1, George Fisher 1, Yan Li 1, and Xudong Sun 2 1 Space Sciences Lab, UC-Berkeley, 2 Stanford.
High Altitude Observatory (HAO) – National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) The National Center for Atmospheric Research is operated by the University.
Helicity as a Component of Filament Formation D.H. Mackay University of St. Andrews Solar Theory Group.
The Effect of Sub-surface Fields on the Dynamic Evolution of a Model Corona Goals :  To predict the onset of a CME based upon reliable measurements of.
Simulating the Rise of Low Twist Flux Ropes in the Convection Zone Mark Linton (Naval Research Lab) James Leake (George Mason University)
Twist & writhe of kink-unstable magnetic flux ropes I flux rope: helicity sum of twist and writhe: kink instability: twist  and writhe  (sum is constant)
LINE OF SIGHT MAGNETIC FIELD EVOLUTION & DATA ANALYSIS Dandan Ye.
High Altitude Observatory (HAO) – National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) The National Center for Atmospheric Research is operated by the University.
Statistical properties of current helicity and twist distribution in the solar cycle by high resolution data from SOT/SP on board Hinode K. Otsuji 1),
Coronal Heating of an Active Region Observed by XRT on May 5, 2010 A Look at Quasi-static vs Alfven Wave Heating of Coronal Loops Amanda Persichetti Aad.
The Dynamic Evolution of Twisted Omega-loops in a 3D Convective Flow W.P. Abbett 1, Y. Fan 2, & G. H. Fisher 1 W.P. Abbett 1, Y. Fan 2, & G. H. Fisher.
Helicity Observations by Huairou Vector Magnetograph Mei Zhang National Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences Plan of the Talk: 1.Huairou.
The Solar Dynamo and Emerging Flux Presented by Angelo P. Verdoni Physics 681 Fall 05 George H. Fisher, Yuhong Fan, Dana W. Longcope, Mark G. Linton and.
Understanding the Photospheric and Near-Photospheric Magnetic Field A View of the Past, Present, and Future of First-Principles Magnetic Field Modeling.
Solar activity as a surface phenomenon Axel Brandenburg (Nordita/Stockholm) Kemel+12 Ilonidis+11Brandenburg+11Warnecke+11 Käpylä+12.
3D simulations of solar emerging flux ISOBE Hiroaki Plasma seminar 2004/04/28.
3D Spherical Shell Simulations of Rising Flux Tubes in the Solar Convective Envelope Yuhong Fan (HAO/NCAR) High Altitude Observatory (HAO) – National Center.
Recent Progress in Understanding The Sun’s Magnetic Dynamo David H. Hathaway NASA/MSFC National Space Science and Technology Center 2004 April 28 University.
Team Report on integration of FSAM to SWMF and on FSAM simulations of convective dynamo and emerging flux in the solar convective envelope Yuhong Fan and.
SHINE 2006 David Alexander Rice University Exploring the dynamics of flux-emergence in magnetically-complex solar active regions David Alexander and Lirong.
1 Mei Zhang ( National Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences ) Solar cycle variation of kinetic helicity Collaborators: Junwei Zhao (Stanford,
SHINE Formation and Eruption of Filament Flux Ropes A. A. van Ballegooijen 1 & D. H. Mackay 2 1 Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge,
ИЗМЕНЕНИЯ МАГНИТНОЙ СПИРАЛЬНОСТИ В СОЛНЕЧНОМ ЦИКЛЕ Kirill Kuzanyan ИЗМИРАН, Россия Zhang H., Gao Yu Национальные Астрономические Обсерватории АН КНР.
Sunspot activity and reversal of polar fields in the current cycle 24 A.V. Mordvinov 1, A.A. Pevtsov 2 1 Institute of Solar-Terrestrial Physics of SB RAS,
Introduction to Space Weather Jie Zhang CSI 662 / PHYS 660 Spring, 2012 Copyright © The Sun: Magnetic Structure Feb. 16, 2012.
What the Long-Term Sunspot Record Tells Us About Space Climate David H. Hathaway NASA/MSFC National Space Science and Technology Center Huntsville, AL,
Solar Magnetism: Solar Cycle Solar Dynamo Coronal Magnetic Field CSI 662 / ASTR 769 Lect. 03, February 6 Spring 2007 References: NASA/MSFC Solar Physics.
CSI /PHYS Solar Atmosphere Fall 2004 Lecture 04 Sep. 22, 2004 Solar Magnetic Field, Solar Cycle, and Solar Dynamo.
What we can learn from active region flux emergence David Alexander Rice University Collaborators: Lirong Tian (Rice) Yuhong Fan (HAO)
H. Isobe Plasma seminar 2004/06/16 1. Explaining the latitudinal distribution of sunspots with deep meridional flow D. Nandy and A.R. Choudhhuri 2002,
Axel Brandenburg & Jörn Warnecke NorditaStockholm  loop emergence –Buoyant rise –Many scale heights –Twist needed Dynamo –bi-helical field Emergence.
GOAL: To understand the physics of active region decay, and the Quiet Sun network APPROACH: Use physics-based numerical models to simulate the dynamic.
THE DYNAMIC EVOLUTION OF TWISTED MAGNETIC FLUX TUBES IN A THREE-DIMENSIONALCONVECTING FLOW. II. TURBULENT PUMPING AND THE COHESION OF Ω-LOOPS.
Helicity Thinkshop 2009, Beijing Asymmetry of helicity injection in emerging active regions L. Tian, D. Alexander Rice University, USA Y. Liu Yunnan Astronomical.
What Thin Flux Tube Models Can Tell Us About Star Spots Thomas Granzer, Vienna,
What happens in a star when convection stops? G th October 2007 Jonathan Braithwaite CITA, Toronto.
Stability of magnetic fields in stars Vienna 11 th September 2007 Jonathan Braithwaite CITA, Toronto.
Magnetic Helicity in Emerging Active Regions
Solar magnetic fields: basic concepts and magnetic topology
WG1 – Sub-surface magnetic connections
GOAL: To understand the physics of active region decay, and the Quiet Sun network APPROACH: Use physics-based numerical models to simulate the dynamic.
From the Convection Zone to the Heliosphere
Introduction to Space Weather
On the nature of moving magnetic feature pairs around sunspots
Preflare State Rust et al. (1994) 太陽雑誌会.
Magnetic Helicity in Solar Active Regions: Some Observational Results
From the Convection Zone to the Heliosphere
Presentation transcript:

Flux emergence: An overview of thin flux tube models George Fisher, SSL/UC Berkeley

How can we learn about magnetic fields in the solar dynamo by studying magnetic active regions at the surface? Approach: Use thin flux tube models of active region scale flux tubes to compute dynamical behavior, and compare to observed properties of active regions. Use comparisons with observations to deduce properties of magnetic fields in the solar dynamo layer near the base of the convection zone.

What properties of solar dynamo magnetic fields can we learn about? Magnetic field strength at the base of convection zone The role of convective motions on active region orientation Why active regions diffuse away after emergence The origin and role of magnetic twist in some active regions

Features of active regions we can explain with flux tube dynamics: The “equatorial gap” in the distribution of active regions Asymmetries between the leading and following sides of active regions The variation of “tilt angle” with latitude and with active region size The dispersion of tilt angles with active region size The distribution of active region twist with latitude The properties of  -spot active regions as highly twisted, kink unstable flux ropes (see talk by Fan)

Why is a flux tube paradigm appealing for emergence?

Untwisted thin flux tube models :

Can thin flux tube models say anything about the latitude distribution of active regions?

Latitude constraints based on initial equilibria, dynamic motions: If B > 10 5 G, no low-latitude equilibria possible If B < 3x10 4 G, poleward motion too great for observed latitude distributions If active region flux tubes are initially toroidal, field strength is constrained.

Active Region Tilts and Joy’s Law

Comparison of model tilts versus average observed values:

Simple idea for torque balance to determine amount of tilt

How does tilt vary with magnetic flux?

Not only are there tilts, but quite significant fluctuations of tilt… Analysis of ~24,000 spot groups shows tilt dispersion is not a function of latitude, but is a function of d, with  ~ d -3/4.

Observed variation of  with d suggests convective turbulence as a possible mechanism for tilt fluctuations…

Compute tilt fluctuations using tube dynamics driven by turbulence consistent with standard mixing length theory:

Asymmetric spot motions Panels (a), (b), (c) correspond to field strengths at the base of the convection zone of 30, 60, and 100 kG respectively (Fan & Fisher Sol. Phys. 166, 17)

Caligari Moreno-Insertis & Schüssler suggest that the emergence of these asymmetric loops will result in faster apparent motion of the “leading” spot group polarity c.f. the “following” polarity, a well known observational phenomenon…

3D-MHD models of flux emergence confirm the asymmetric shape of the  loop

The Coriolis force might be a possible explanation for asymmetries in the morphology of active regions…

Field strength asymmetries could lead to morphological differences between leading and following polarity…

Why does magnetic flux diffuse away once it has emerged?

“Dynamic Disconnection” of active region flux tubes after emergence…

First – flux emerges through convection zone as  -loop

Apex of flux loop emerges through photosphere and corona

Once emergence has ceased, flux tube tries to establish hydrostatic equilibrium (but can’t)…

How twisted are typical active regions? Where does active region twist come from?

where

What is the physical meaning of the source term  ?  depends only on the motion of tube axis. For a thin flux tube: H =  2 (Tw+Wr). ( Conservation of magnetic helicity H,where Tw is “twist”, and Wr is “writhe”.) Therefore,  exchanges writhe (Wr) with twist (Tw).

Could flux tube writhing account for observed levels of active region twist? Possible sources of writhing: “Joy’s Law” tilts of active regions during emergence is one possibility, but is too small…

Writhing by convective turbulence is another possibility… Develop tractable model of convective turbulence including kinetic helicity Solve equations of motion and twist evolution for a flux tube rising through such a turbulent medium Such a model was explored by Longcope, Fisher and Pevtsov…

Writhing by convective turbulence consistent with observations…

Conclusions Thin flux tube models provide a useful tool for gaining qualitative understanding of active region dynamics and constraints on the magnetic field at the base of the solar convection zone Better models will require detailed 3D MHD simulations