LIGO-G020011-00-W Lessons Learned From E7 at LIGO Hanford Observatory Fred Raab Daniel Sigg.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of Pilots Alex Bryson Policy Studies Institute ESRC Methods Festival, St Catherines College, Oxford University, 1st July 2004.
Advertisements

LIGO-G D Comments: Staged implementation of Advanced LIGO Adv LIGO Systems 17 may02 dhs Nifty idea: a way to soften the shock, spread cost, allow.
LIGO-G W Earth Tide Investigations Fred Raab LIGO Hanford Observatory August 15, 2001 PredictionFeedforward 30.
GWDAW-8 (December 17-20, 2003, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA) Search for burst gravitational waves with TAMA data Masaki Ando Department of Physics, University.
LIGO-G W Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning Frederick J. Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G M 1 Conceptual Design Review: Initial LIGO Seismic Isolation System Upgrade Introduction Dennis Coyne April 12, 2002.
LIGO-G0200XX-00-M LIGO Laboratory1 Pre-Isolation Dennis Coyne LIGO Laboratory NSF LIGO Annual Review, at MIT 23 October 2002.
LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory1 Adv. LIGO Installation (INS) Plans, Schedule, Costs, Team Plan, Schedule Costs Team.
LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO Status and Plans Barry Barish 5 June 2000 Gravitational Waves: A Challenge to Theoretical Astrophysics Trieste, 5-9 June 2000.
LIGO-G W Proposed LHO Commissioning Activities in May 02 Fred Raab 29 Apr 02.
G L E7 Lessons Learned Mark Coles Feb. 4, 2002.
LIGO-G W LIGO Hanford Observatory Manpower Frederick J. Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
G D Interferometer Status LSC Meeting, Ann Arbor, June 4, 2005 Daniel Sigg.
LIGO-G W Report on LIGO Science Run S4 Fred Raab On behalf of LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
LIGO-G W Tidal Compensation Update Fred Raab, Hugh Radkins, Daniel Sigg LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G D 1 Requirements Environment and constraints Performance requirements Functional requirements.
LIGO-G W Commissioning Data on Vibration Isolation & Suspensions Fred Raab 24 October 02.
Latch/Register Scheduling Under Process Variation Aaron Hurst EE 290a, Spring 2005.
LIGO-G W Summary of S1 at LIGO Hanford Observatory Fred Raab 9 September 02.
James Tam Evaluating Interfaces With Users Why evaluation is crucial to interface design General approaches and tradeoffs in evaluation The role of ethics.
Psychology 111: General Psychology Reflections on and Outcomes of an Integrated Learning Experience in Introductory Psychology Jeff Wagman, Dawn McBride,
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Activities Keith.
LIGO-G D Commissioning PAC11, 2001 Daniel Sigg, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G W Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning Frederick J. Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G Z NSF Review LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Michigan 1 LSC Participation in Initial LIGO Detector Characterization.
LIGO-G DM. Landry – Amaldi5 July 9, 2003 Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory Monitoring LIGO Data During the S2 Science Run Michael.
Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik (Albert-Einstein-Institut) Institut für Atom- und Molekülphysik Detector Characterization of GEO 600 during.
LIGO-G W News From Joint Run Planning Committee Roberto Passaquieti & Fred Raab 23May2007.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of the Detector Characterization Sessions Keith.
Virgo Commissioning update Gabriele Vajente for the Virgo Collaboration LSC/VIRGO Meeting – MIT 2007, July LIGO-G Z.
Status of LIGO Data Analysis Gabriela González Department of Physics and Astronomy Louisiana State University for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Dec.
Novemebr 5, 2006LSC meeting1 Virgo Update Prospects on detector performance and running schedules B. Mours.
How to Read Research Papers? Xiao Qin Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering Auburn University
Glitch Group S5 Activities Laura Cadonati for the Glitch Working Group LSC meeting, Hanford March 21, 2006 G Z.
LIGO-G D What can we Expect for the “Upper Limit” Run Stan Whitcomb LSC Meeting 13 August 2001 LIGO Hanford Observatory A Personal Reading of.
LIGO Commissioning Status
LIGO-G M Organization and Budget Gary Sanders NSF Operations Review Caltech, February 26, 2001.
LIGO-G D LSC Meeting Nov An Early Glimpse at the S3 Run Stan Whitcomb (LIGO–Caltech) LIGO Scientific Collaboration Meeting LIGO Hanford.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of the Detector Characterization Sessions Keith.
LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory1 Adv. LIGO Installation (INS) Plans, Schedule, Costs, Team Plan, Schedule Costs Team.
LIGO- G D E7: An Instrument-builder’s Perspective Stan Whitcomb LIGO Caltech LSC Meeting Upper Limits Plenary Session 22 May 2002 LIGO Livingston.
LIGO-G Z DMT Status for UL Analysis K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 DMT Monitors -- Status Update for Upper Limits Analysis.
May 29, 2006 GWADW, Elba, May 27 - June 21 LIGO-G0200XX-00-M Data Quality Monitoring at LIGO John Zweizig LIGO / Caltech.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Issues K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Detector Characterization Issues -- S2 Analysis & S3 Planning.
LIGO-G D Commissioning at Hanford Stan Whitcomb Program Advisory Committee 12 December 2000 LIGO Livingston Observatory.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Issues K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Introduction to Detector Characterization Sessions Keith.
LIGO-G ZRai Weiss LSC Session on Scientific Monitoring March 21, 2006 Committee formed by Peter Saulson to: Consider the value and effectiveness.
LIGO-G Z Introd. to Detect. Charact. Sessions K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Introduction to the Detector Characterization.
LIGO-G W “Astrowatch” at LIGO Hanford Observatory Fred Raab LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G M Overview of the LIGO Continuing Operations (FY FY2006) Proposal Gary Sanders LIGO PAC9 Meeting December 2000.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of the Detector Characterization Sessions Keith.
LIGO-G Z Report on the S2 RunK. Riles / S. Whitcomb 1 Report on the S2 Run Keith Riles (University of Michigan) Stan Whitcomb (LIGO–Caltech)
LIGO-G W What Should We Do To H2 in AdLIGO? Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G Z Report on E2 Lock Losses K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Report on E2 Lock Losses David Chin, Dick Gustafson Keith Riles.
Page 1 Coles – Operating the Observatories PAC 9 Dec. 13, 2000 G L Operating the Observatories Mark Coles.
Gravitational Wave Data Analysis  GW detectors  Signal processing: preparation  Noise spectral density  Matched filtering  Probability and statistics.
All The future of DC work. GEO DC workshop June Restructuring of DC and Detector Work for many reasons the DC work was not very efficient in the.
October 2006, LIGO Hanford Observatory
Is there a future for LIGO underground?
Photon Calibrator Investigations During S6
nicolas smith-lefebvre MIT GWDAW 2011
Report on the S2 Run Keith Riles (University of Michigan)
Status of the LIGO Detectors
Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning
The Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory
Stan Whitcomb LSC meeting Hanford 15 August 2005
Planning for the S4 Run Keith Riles (University of Michigan)
P Fritschel LSC Meeting LLO, 22 March 2005
Improving LIGO’s stability and sensitivity: commissioning examples
LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Michigan
Presentation transcript:

LIGO-G W Lessons Learned From E7 at LIGO Hanford Observatory Fred Raab Daniel Sigg

LIGO-G W Raab/Sigg - E7 Lesson at Hanford2 The Next-to-Bottom Line: Duty Cycle Configuration Duty Cycle Locked > 15 min 3-IFO34.5%17.6% L170.7%62% H172%56.6% H252.5%38.5%

LIGO-G W Raab/Sigg - E7 Lesson at Hanford3 Limitations to Duty Cycle H2 Exhibited Large Variation in Availability »Produced long locked sections for most of first 10 days during non- construction hours. Up to 7.5 hours! Twice! »Lost significant time (> 1 shift) to CDS crashes on two occasions »Following 2 nd crash we never had good availability for rest of E7 »Reasons for this poor performance period have not been found »Much of data plagued by MICH_CTRL bursts H1 Had Far Less Actuation Range in DSC »More susceptible to seismic environment, control glitches »Fine actuators often ran out of range for tidal control »Thus locked sections typically shorter, but kept on running and produced more data for searches, but lousy strain spectrum

LIGO-G W Raab/Sigg - E7 Lesson at Hanford4 Operational Lessons Scientists and operators agree that no one likes 12-hr shifts Frequent phone contacts between control rooms worked well to optimize up time between sites Daily teleconferences between sites did not seem that helpful Need better script – but at least there was one »Minimal intervention to preserve data quality was uniformly understood direction, but interpretation varied shift to shift »We can write better directions next time, but daily review & revision may be needed – topic for daily telecon?

LIGO-G W Raab/Sigg - E7 Lesson at Hanford5 Needs Exposed by E7 “Expert” science monitors should have expertise; advise more LSC participation in commissioning Operator expertise is varied – need more uniformity to always have similar capability on hand Need troubleshooting guide to indicate when and how to intervene and when not to intervene Need better way to avoid “configuration drift” Some DMT monitors need more user-friendly interfaces and better transparency; e.g.,few people could tell if monitors were working as opposed to running

LIGO-G W Raab/Sigg - E7 Lesson at Hanford6 Largest need is for better control room monitoring of data quality We had very good visibility from control room into when locked data was accumulating at either observatory using DMT lock monitor Had poor idea of data quality (the bottom line!) »Example: intervened at lock onset when H2 MICH_CTRL was too “bursty” and threatening lock durations, but did not know if burst search quality was improved or degraded by intervention! Need some data analysis monitors viewable from control room to really get hands on data quality Need on-line LDAS visibility and intervention capability in control room to restart stalled jobs.

LIGO-G W Raab/Sigg - E7 Lesson at Hanford7 Commissioning Benefits of E7 Long running times in relatively constant configuration gave unique commissioning opportunity »Tidal compensation thru fine actuator proved a success on 2K IFO and provided useful data to solve for perturbative corrections to tidal model »Tidal compensation thru fine actuator was successful on 4K IFO, until tides exceeded fine actuator range as expected »Confirmed that microseism at high excitation can exceed range on 4K digital suspension controllers without feedforward compensation »Valuable lock loss data – e.g., found MICH_CTRL bursts a killer on recycled 2K interferometer

LIGO-G W Raab/Sigg - E7 Lesson at Hanford8 Overall Evaluation Run cost approximately a month of schedule – expensive, so need to learn without too many iterations! Duty cycle was impressive, given lack of time to emphasize lock stability in preparations for E7 Some LSC Detector Characterization deliverables were delivered and used in control room On-line analysis system worked impressively in first real trial Sensitivity was poor, as expected, but will serve to give LSC data-analysis people a look at something closer to reality Provided opportunity for LSC participation; maybe some will become interested in larger commissioning role? Long running times gave special window for commissioning We have some experience under our belts