Théorie Financière Structure financière et coût du capital Professeur André Farber.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Capital Structure.
Advertisements

Capital Structure Theory Under Three Special Cases
Last Lecture.. Cost of Equity Cost of Preferred Stock Cost of Debt
Chapter Outline The Capital Structure Decision
Capital Structure Refers to the mix of debt and equity that a company uses to finance its business Capital Restructuring Capital restructuring involves.
Does Debt Policy Matter? Student Presentations Capital Structure Considerations Modigliani and Miller – Propositions 1 and 2 Financial Risk and Expected.
Interactions of investment and financing decisions
Copyright: M. S. Humayun1 Financial Management Lecture No. 34 Optimal Capital Structure – Impact of Debt on Firm Value & WACC Graphs.
Capital Structure Decision
Capital Structure: Basic Concepts
Corporate Financial Policy Introduction
Corporate Financial Policy WACC Professor André Farber Solvay Business School Université Libre de Bruxelles.
Corporate Financial Policy WACC Professor André Farber Solvay Business School Université Libre de Bruxelles.
Théorie Financière Structure financière et coût du capital Professeur André Farber.
Solvay Business School – Université Libre de Bruxelles 11/06/2015Vietnam Corporate Finance Choosing a Capital Structure Prof. André Farber Solvay.
FINANCE 11. Capital Structure and Cost of Capital Professor André Farber Solvay Business School Université Libre de Bruxelles Fall 2007.
Capital Structure (Ch. 12)
How Much Does It Cost to Raise Capital? Or How Much Return Do Security-Holders Require a Company to Offer to Buy Its Securities? Lecture: 5 - Capital Cost.
FINANCE 12. Capital Structure and Cost of Capital Professor André Farber Solvay Business School Université Libre de Bruxelles Fall 2004.
Solvay Business School – Université Libre de Bruxelles 22/06/2015ExMaFin Modgliani Miller 1 Corporate Finance Modigliani Miller Professor André.
Théorie Financière Structure financière et coût du capital Professeur André Farber.
DOES DEBT POLICY MATTER?
Corporate Finance Financing and Valuation
FINANCE 11. Capital Structure and Cost of Capital Professor André Farber Solvay Business School Université Libre de Bruxelles Fall 2006.
FINA 6335 The CAPM and Cost of Capital Lecture 9
Valuation and levered Betas
Lecture No. 36 Review of Capital Structure Management
Lecture No. 36 Review of Capital Structure, Leverage, WACC, & Betas
The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance & The Theory of Investment American Economic Review Miller & Modigliani, 1958 Presented by Marc Fuhrmann February.
Sampa Video, Inc. A small video chain is deciding whether to engage in a new line of delivery business and is conducting an economic analysis of the valuation.
London Business School
Chapter 15 Debt Policy Fundamentals of Corporate Finance Fifth Edition
Capital Structure and Value Optimal capital structure is the mix of debt and equity that maximizes the value of the firm or minimizes the weighted average.
© 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible Web site, in whole or in part.
Capital Structure.
Advanced Project Evaluation
FIN 351: lecture 12 The Capital Structure Decision MM propositions.
VALUATION AND FINANCING
Capital Structure Modigliani-Miller
Capital Structure and Valuation Example.
FINANCIAL LEVERAGE AND CAPITAL STRUCTURE POLICY Chapter 16.
1. 2 Learning Outcomes Chapter 11 Compute the component cost of capital for (a) debt, (b) preferred stock, (c) retained earnings, and (d) new common equity.
Capital Structure. Effect of Corporate Taxes So far capital structure was irrelevant. What if we introduces corporate taxes? Corporate taxes are paid after.
Copyright © 2011 Thomson South-Western, a part of the Thomson Corporation. Thomson, the Star logo, and South-Western are trademarks used herein under license.
When is The Financing Decision Irrelevant? MF 807: Corporate Finance Professor Thomas Chemmanur.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED No part of this document may be reproduced without written approval from Limkokwing University of Creative Technology 1-1 Chapter 10.
Determinants of Beta Formally: Cyclicality of Revenues
Determinants of Beta Formally: 1.Cyclicality of Revenues – Not the same volatility of revenues – Biotech vs. Steel 2.Operating Leverage – The mix of fixed.
6- 1 Outline 6: Capital Structure 6.1 Debt and Value in a Tax Free Economy 6.2 Capital Structure and Corporate Taxes 6.3 Cost of Financial Distress 6.4.
Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved McGraw-Hill/Irwin Cost of Capital Cost of Capital - The return the firm’s.
Chapter 12: Leverage and Capital Structure
Chapter 17 Principles of Corporate Finance Eighth Edition Does Debt Policy Matter? Slides by Matthew Will Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies,
MODIGLIANI – MILLER THEOREM ANASTASIIA TISETSKA. AGENDA:  MODIGLIANI–MILLER I – LEVERAGE, ARBITRAGE AND FIRM VALUE  MODIGLIANI–MILLER II – LEVERAGE,
16- 1 McGraw Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved Fundamentals of Corporate Finance Chapter 16 McGraw Hill/Irwin.
CAPITAL STRUCTURE & COST OF EQUITY MODIGLIANI AND MILLER MODEL CAPITAL STRUCTURE & COST OF EQUITY MODIGLIANI AND MILLER MODEL
Does Debt Policy Matter?
Capital Structure I: Basic Concepts.
Chapter 11 Risk-Adjusted Expected Rates of Return and the
Capital Structure Debt versus Equity.
Capital Structure (How Much Debt?)
Corporate Financial Policy Introduction
M&M II with taxes; no bankruptcy costs
Corporate Financial Policy Debt and Taxes
Capital Structure I: Basic Concepts.
Corporate Financial Policy WACC
Executive Master in Finance Capital Structure – Wrap up
Prof. P. Basatin Arockia Raj
Advanced Finance Debt and Taxes
Théorie Financière Structure financière et coût du capital
Presentation transcript:

Théorie Financière Structure financière et coût du capital Professeur André Farber

June 13, 2015 Structure financière |2 Cost of capital with debt Up to now, the analysis has proceeded based on the assumption that investment decisions are independent of financing decisions. Does the value of a company change the cost of capital change if leverage changes ?

June 13, 2015 Structure financière |3 Modigliani Miller (1958) Assume perfect capital markets: not taxes, no transaction costs Proposition I: The market value of any firm is independent of its capital structure: V = E+D = V U Proposition II: The weighted average cost of capital is independent of its capital structure WACC = r A r A is the cost of capital of an all equity firm

June 13, 2015 Structure financière |4 Weighted Average Cost of Capital (no taxes) An average of: The cost of equity r equity The cost of debt r debt Weighted by their relative market values (E/V and D/V) Note: V = E + D

June 13, 2015 Structure financière |5 An example CAPM holds – Risk-free rate = 5%, Market risk premium = 6% Consider an all-equity firm: Market value V100 Beta1 Cost of capital11% (=5% + 6% * 1) Now consider borrowing 20 to buy back shares. Why such a move? Debt is cheaper than equity Replacing equity with debt should reduce the average cost of financing What will be the final impact On the value of the company? (Equity + Debt)? On the weighted average cost of capital (WACC)?

June 13, 2015 Structure financière |6 Using MM 58 Value of company: V = 100 InitialFinal Equity Debt 0 20 Total MM I WACC = r A 11%11% MM II Cost of debt-5% (assuming risk-free debt) D/V00.20 Cost of equity11%12.50% (to obtain r wacc = 11%) E/V100%80%

June 13, 2015 Structure financière |7 Cost of equity calculation Value of all-equity firm Value of equity Value of debt V (=V U ) = E + D rErE rDrD rArA

June 13, 2015 Structure financière |8 Why is WACC unchanged? Consider someone owning a portfolio of all firm’s securities (debt and equity) with X equity = E/V (80% in example ) and X debt = D/V (20%) Expected return on portfolio = r equity * X equity + r debt * X debt This is equal to the WACC (see definition): r portoflio = WACC But she/he would, in fact, own a fraction of the company. The expected return would be equal to the expected return of the unlevered (all equity) firm r portoflio = r A The weighted average cost of capital is thus equal to the cost of capital of an all equity firm WACC = r A

June 13, 2015 Structure financière |9 What are MM I and MM II related? Assumption: perpetuities (to simplify the presentation) For a levered companies, earnings before interest and taxes will be split between interest payments and dividends payments EBIT = Int + Div Market value of equity: present value of future dividends discounted at the cost of equity E = Div / r equity Market value of debt: present value of future interest discounted at the cost of debt D = Int / r debt

June 13, 2015 Structure financière |10 Relationship between the value of company and WACC From the definition of the WACC: WACC * V = r equity * E + r debt * D As r equity * E = Div and r debt * D = Int r wacc * V = EBIT V = EBIT / WACC Market value of levered firm EBIT is independent of leverage If value of company varies with leverage, so does WACC in opposite direction

June 13, 2015 Structure financière |11 MM II: another presentation The equality WACC = r A can be written as: Expected return on equity is an increasing function of leverage: rArA D/E r equity 11% r debt 5% % r wacc Additional cost due to leverage

June 13, 2015 Structure financière |12 Why does r equity increases with leverage? Because leverage increases the risk of equity. To see this, back to the portfolio with both debt and equity. Beta of portfolio:  portfolio =  equity * X equity +  debt * X debt But also:  portfolio =  Asset So: or

June 13, 2015 Structure financière |13 Back to example Assume debt is riskless:

June 13, 2015 Structure financière |14 Corporate Tax Shield Interest are tax deductible => tax shield Tax shield = Interest payment × Corporate Tax Rate = (r D × D) × T C r D : cost of new debt D : market value of debt Value of levered firm = Value if all-equity-financed + PV(Tax Shield) PV(Tax Shield) - Assume permanent borrowing V L =V U + T C D

June 13, 2015 Structure financière |15 Cost of equity calculation Value of all-equity firm Value of tax shield Value of equity Value of debt V U + T = E + D rErE rDrD rArA rDrD

June 13, 2015 Structure financière |16 Cost of equity calculation (2) If r TS = r D & VTS = T C D Similar formulas for beta equity (replace r by β) General formula

June 13, 2015 Structure financière |17 WACC

June 13, 2015 Structure financière |18 Example A B Balance Sheet Total Assets 1,000 1,000 Book Equity 1, Debt (8%) Income Statement EBIT Interest 0 40 Taxable Income Taxes (40%) Net Income Dividend Interest 0 40 Total Assume r A = 10% (1) Value of all-equity-firm: V U = 144 / 0.10 = 1,440 (2) PV(Tax Shield): Tax Shield = 40 x 0.40 = 16 PV(TaxShield) = 16/0.08 = 200 (3) Value of levered company: V L = 1, = 1,640 (5) Market value of equity: E L = V L - D = 1, = 1,140

June 13, 2015 Structure financière |19 What about cost of equity? 1) Cost of equity increases with leverage: 2) Beta of equity increases Proof: But V U = EBIT(1-T C )/r A and E = V U + T C D – D Replace and solve In example: r E = 10% +(10%-8%)(1-0.4)(500/1,140) = 10.53% or r E = DIV/E = 120/1,140 = 10.53%

June 13, 2015 Structure financière |20 What about the weighted average cost of capital? Weighted average cost of capital decreases with leverage Weighted average cost of capital: discount rate used to calculate the market value of firm by discounting net operating profit less adjusted taxes (NOPLAT) NOPLAT = Net Income + Interest + Tax Shield = (EBIT-r D D)(1-T C ) + r D D +T C r D D = Net Income for all-equity-firm = EBIT(1-T C ) VL = NOPLAT / WACC As: In example: NOPLAT = 144 V L = 1,640 WACC = 10.53% x % x 0.60 x 0.31 = 8.78%