Assessment of SLR observation performance using LAGEOS data Gang ZHAO, You ZHAO, Mingguo Sun, Huanhuan YU Changchun Observatory, NAOC, CAS, China 16 th.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The definition of a geophysically meaningful International Terrestrial Reference System Problems and prospects The definition of a geophysically meaningful.
Advertisements

Where do precise orbits and clocks come from? Kristine M. Larson ASEN 6090 Spring 2010.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 19 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
ILRS Workshop, 2008, A 33 Year Time History of the J2 Changes from SLR Minkang Cheng and Byron D. Tapley Center for Space Research.
POD/Geoid splinter March 14, 2007 J.P. Berthias Ocean Topography Science Team Meeting - Hobart, Australia – March 2007.
Effect of Surface Loading on Regional Reference Frame Realization Hans-Peter Plag Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological Laboratory University.
Upgrading Plans of the Chinese SLR Network Upgrading Plans of the Chinese SLR Network Yang FuMin(1), Wu Bin(1), Zhang ZhongPing(1), Guo TangYong(2), Zhao.
GRACE GRAVITY FIELD SOLUTIONS USING THE DIFFERENTIAL GRAVIMETRY APPROACH M. Weigelt, W. Keller.
POD/Geoid Splinter Summary OSTS Meeting, Hobart 2007.
2-3 November 2009NASA Sea Level Workshop1 The Terrestrial Reference Frame and its Impact on Sea Level Change Studies GPS VLBI John Ries Center for Space.
Institut for Geodesy Research Unit Earth Rotation and Global Dynamic Processes Earth Orientation Parameters from Lunar Laser Ranging Liliane Biskupek Jürgen.
Impact of SLR tracking on GPS Position Paper presented at the ILRS Workshop on SLR tracking of GNSS constellations September 14-19, 2009 Metsovo, Greece.
1 Progress of Changchun SLR You ZHAO, Cunbo FAN, Xinwei HAN, Gang ZHAO, Ziang ZHANG, Xue DONG Changchun Observatory/NAOC, CAS, , China.
1 Pertubations by the Sun + Moon (Seeber, 3.2.3) Earth, Sun, Moon regarded as point-masses.
Evaluation of PPN parameter Gamma as a test of General Relativity using SLR data Ludwig Combrinck HartRAO 16 th International workshop on laser ranging.
Laser Ranging Contributions to Earth Rotation Studies Richard S. Gross Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA 91109–8099,
Real-Time Orbit And Clock Estimation Using PANDA Software Shi C, Lou YD, Zhao QL, Liu JN GNSS Research Center, Wuhan University, China IGS Analysis Center.
IGS Analysis Center Workshop, Miami Beach, 2-6 June 2008 M. Fritsche, R. Dietrich, A. Rülke Institut für Planetare Geodäsie (IPG), Technische Universität.
DORIS - DAYS Toulouse May 2-3, 2000 DORIS Doppler Orbitography and Radiopositioning Integrated by Satellite  Basic system concept  Main missions  Schedules.
ESPACE Porto, June 2009 MODELLING OF EARTH’S RADIATION FOR GPS SATELLITE ORBITS Carlos Javier Rodriguez Solano Technische Universität München
ESA Living Planet Symposium, Bergen, T. Gruber, C. Ackermann, T. Fecher, M. Heinze Institut für Astronomische und Physikalische Geodäsie (IAPG)
NGS GPS ORBIT DETERMINATION Positioning America for the Future NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION National Ocean Service National Geodetic.
Chapter 8: The future geodetic reference frames Thomas Herring, Hans-Peter Plag, Jim Ray, Zuheir Altamimi.
E. C. Pavlis Geoscience Australia Seminar Canberra, Australia 29 August, 2005 Implications of SLR Network Variations On Geodetic and Geophysical Products.
Regional and Global Measurements: The Reference Frame for Understanding Observations Geoff Blewitt University of Nevada, Reno, USA Zuheir Altamimi IGN,
Space Geodesy (1/3) Geodesy provides a foundation for all Earth observations Space geodesy is the use of precise measurements between space objects (e.g.,
Titelmaster Geometrical and Kinematical Precise Orbit Determination of GOCE Akbar Shabanloui Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformation, University of Bonn.
IGS Analysis Center Workshop, 2-6 June 2008, Florida, USA GPS in the ITRF Combination D. Angermann, H. Drewes, M. Krügel, B. Meisel Deutsches Geodätisches.
MAGE Mid-term review (23/09/04): Scientific work in progress « Integrating the motion of satellites in a consistent relativistic framework » S. Pireaux.
Determination of seasonal geocenter variations from DORIS, GPS and SLR data.
01/0000 HEO and Daylight Ranging “Reality and Wishes” Ramesh Govind ILRS Fall Workshop, 4 th October 2005.
Latest GNSS results of the CMONOC network and its application in earthquake monitoring Junping Chen, Yize Zhang, Yibing Xie, Weijie Tan, Sainan Yang, Bin.
SNARF: Theory and Practice, and Implications Thomas Herring Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, MIT
SLR in the age of GPS Frank G. Lemoine, Scott B. Luthcke, Nikita P Zelensky Brian D. Beckley Code 697, Space Geodesy Laboratory NASA Goddard Space Flight.
Rapid and Precise Orbit Determination for the GOCE Satellite P. Visser, J. van den IJssel, T. van Helleputte, H. Bock, A. Jäggi, U. Meyer, G. Beutler,
Geocenter Variations Derived from GRACE Data Z. Kang, B. Tapley, J. Chen, J. Ries, S. Bettadpur Joint International GSTM and SPP Symposium GFZ Potsdam,
Franz Hofmann, Jürgen Müller, Institut für Erdmessung, Leibniz Universität Hannover Institut für Erdmessung Hannover LLR analysis software „LUNAR“
Reference Frame Theory & Practice: Implications for SNARF SNARF Workshop 1/27/04 Geoff Blewitt University of Nevada, Reno.
International Workshop on Laser Ranging, October 2008, Poznań (Poland) Quality assessment of the ILRS EOP „Daily” Product G. Bianco Agenzia Spaziale.
Do Annual Geopotential Variations Affect IGS Products ? J. Ray NOAA/NGS with major help from S. Bettadpur, J. Ries U. Texas/CSR T.-S. Bae Sejong U. X.
Hobart Australia March 2007Willy Bertiger Ocean Surface Topography Science Team Meeting GPS-Based Precise Orbit Determination: Jason-1 Status Willy Bertiger,
EUM/OPS/VWG/11 Issue /06/2011 Yoke Yoon Yago Andres Christian Marquardt COSMIC GPS Data Processing Slide: 1.
Parameters : Temperature profile Bulk iron and olivine weight fraction Pressure gradient. Modeling of the Martian mantle Recently taken into account :
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 18 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
LLR Analysis – Relativistic Model and Tests of Gravitational Physics James G. Williams Dale H. Boggs Slava G. Turyshev Jet Propulsion Laboratory California.
1. The International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF) needs to be made more robust and stable over multi-decadal time scales. –target accuracy is 0.1.
C H A M P International Laser Ranging Service - General Assembly, October 2005 Eastbourne, UK L. Grunwaldt, R. Schmidt, D. König, R. König, F.-H. Massmann.
Towards the GEOSAT Follow-On Precise Orbit Determination Goals of High Accuracy and Near-Real-Time Processing Frank G. Lemoine Planetary Geodynamics Laboratory.
Satellite geodesy (ge-2112) Introduction E. Schrama.
1 Satellite geodesy (ge-2112) Processing of observations E. Schrama.
A proposal for a consistent model of air pressure loading as part of the International Terrestrial Reference System (ITRS) Conventions Plag, H.-P. (1),
Vermelding onderdeel organisatie A 3-year series of Earth’s gravity field derived from GRACE range measurements Xianglin Liu, Pavel Ditmar, Qile Zhao,
University of Colorado Boulder ASEN 5070: Statistical Orbit Determination I Fall 2015 Professor Brandon A. Jones Lecture 2: Basics of Orbit Propagation.
OSTST Meeting, Hobart, Australia, March 12-15, 2007 On the use of temporal gravity field models derived from GRACE for altimeter satellite orbit determination.
NAPEOS: The ESA/ESOC Tool for Space Geodesy
Jason-1 POD reprocessing at CNES Current status and further developments L. Cerri, S. Houry, P. Perrachon, F. Mercier. J.P. Berthias with entries from.
Determination of the SLR station coordinates and velocities on the basis of laser observations of low satellites Paweł Lejba, Stanisław Schillak Space.
Insensitivity of GNSS to geocenter motion through the network shift approach Paul Rebischung, Zuheir Altamimi, Tim Springer AGU Fall Meeting 2013, San.
Formosat-3/COSMIC WorkshopNov 28 - Dec 1, 2006Taipei, Taiwan Estimates of the precision of LEO orbit determination and GPS radio occultations from the.
Last Time: Gravity Measurements may be surface-based (i.e., taken with instruments placed on the ground surface) or space-based ; absolute or relative.
Investigations on (radial) offsets between different Swarm orbit solutions 8 September th Swarm Data Quality Workshop, IPGP, Paris Heike Peter (PosiTim),
IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting, April 27, 2005, TU of Vienna, Austria Status and Future of the IERS Combination Efforts Markus Rothacher GeoForschungsZentrum.
Thomas Herring, IERS ACC, MIT
CNES/CLS AC (GRG), IDS CC
Space Geodesy Branch Highlights, August 2002 CONT02 VLBI Campaign
Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics
X SERBIAN-BULGARIAN ASTRONOMICAL CONFERENCE 30 MAY - 3 JUNE, 2016, BELGRADE, SERBIA EARTH ORIENTATION PARAMETERS AND GRAVITY VARIATIONS DETERMINED FROM.
WHY DOES THE IGS CARE ABOUT EOPs?
Agenda Background and Motivation
CNES-CLS Dynamical modelling of GPS orbits
Presentation transcript:

Assessment of SLR observation performance using LAGEOS data Gang ZHAO, You ZHAO, Mingguo Sun, Huanhuan YU Changchun Observatory, NAOC, CAS, China 16 th International Workshop on Laser Ranging

Outline Introduction Satellite properties Data processing methods Comparison of gravity field models Statistics of station observation Short-arc POD Assessment of station coordinates Summary 16 th International Workshop on Laser Ranging

As a productive station, Changchun (7237) has provided large numbers of SLR observation data with moderate precision for more than 20 years. It has made great and continuously efforts in SLR equipment and technology. How to sufficiently make use of SLR data, and resource of experiential staffs, is an important issue for our future development. From the beginning of 2008 on, we have realized routine short-arc POD (precision orbit determination) and residual analysis on SLR data of LAGEOS-1/2, which is publicized on our website ( and is updated around once a week. What we can do using POD results, how to apply them in relevant geodynamic and geophysical problems, how to combine them with our observational duty, need seriously consideration. In this report, we’ll present preliminary results and application of our SLR POD work, especially to LAGEOS. Introduction 16 th International Workshop on Laser Ranging

Satellite properties Name LAGEOS-1LAGEOS-2 ID Mass 411 kg CM offset m cross section m 2 Orbit of Lageos-2 : Time span : 1200 days (Mar,1,2005 to Jun,12,2008) 16 th International Workshop on Laser Ranging

Data processing methods Reference Coordinate System Measurement model InertialJ TerrestrialITRF2000 PrecessionIAU1976 NutationIAU1980 Plate tectonic motionNNR-NUVEL1 earth solid tides rotational deformation ocean tide loadingCSR4.0 Tropospheric refractionMarini/Murry model 16 th International Workshop on Laser Ranging

Data processing methods Dynamical Model earth gravity fieldJGM-3 30*30 n-body perturbationJPL ephemerides DE403 (sun/moon) ocean tide modelCSR4.0+TEG4 relativistic correction1-body solar radiation pressureconical earth radiation and albedo thermal radiator (y-bias) empirical drag empirical RTN acceleration 16 th International Workshop on Laser Ranging

Data processing methods Estimated Parameters satellite state vector (3-position & 3-velocity) empirical drag coefficients solar radiation pressure coefficients earth radiation parameters empirical acceleration R/T/N earth rotation parameters (xp,yp,dut1/dt) Numerical Integration IntegratorKrogh-Shampine-Gordon step lengthfixed-step, 150s 16 th International Workshop on Laser Ranging

ILRS network 16 th International Workshop on Laser Ranging

Comparison of gravity field models Gravity models : EGM96 (IERS2003 recommended) GGM02C (GRACE & terrestrial ) JGM-3 (IERS1996 recommended) Arc length = 15 days 16 th International Workshop on Laser Ranging

Comparison of gravity field models RMS(EGM)RMS(GGM)RMS(JGM) LAGEOS LAGEOS Mean Absolute value (m) of orbital precision: Relative value of orbital precision: RMS(EGM)RMS(GGM)RMS(JGM) LAGEOS LAGEOS Mean th International Workshop on Laser Ranging

Statistics of station observation Quantity of observation 16 th International Workshop on Laser Ranging

Statistics of station observation Quality of observation 16 th International Workshop on Laser Ranging

Statistics of station observation S_IDNobsWRMS(cm) S_IDNobsWRMS(cm) LAGEOS-1 : LAGEOS-2 : 16 th International Workshop on Laser Ranging

Short-arc POD Arc length = 3 days LAGEOS-1 Mean of RMS = 1.22 cm LAGEOS-2 Mean of RMS = 1.17 cm 16 th International Workshop on Laser Ranging

Short-arc POD Station performance ( LAGEOS-1) 16 th International Workshop on Laser Ranging

Short-arc POD Station performance ( LAGEOS-2) 16 th International Workshop on Laser Ranging

Short-arc POD S_IDNobsMean RMS (cm) Mean RB (mm) Mean |RB| (mm) Mean TB (us) Mean |TB| (us) Station Statistics on LAGEOS-1 S_IDNobsMean RMS (cm) Mean RB (mm) Mean |RB| (mm) Mean TB (us) Mean |TB| (us) Station Statistics on LAGEOS-2 16 th International Workshop on Laser Ranging

Assessment of station coordinates 16 th International Workshop on Laser Ranging

Assessment of station coordinates [ From LAGEOS-1 ] [ From LAGEOS-2 ] 16 th International Workshop on Laser Ranging

Assessment of station coordinates [ From LAGEOS-1 ] [ From LAGEOS-2 ] 16 th International Workshop on Laser Ranging

Assessment of station coordinates YARAGA (7090) LAGEOS ± ± ±0.004 LAGEOS ± ± ±0.006 Mean ITRF2000 ( X Y Z ) Δ (m) MONUME (7110) LAGEOS ± ± ±0.006 LAGEOS ± ± ±0.012 Mean ITRF2000 ( X Y Z ) Δ (m) GRAZ (7839) LAGEOS ± ± ±0.007 LAGEOS ± ± ±0.008 Mean ITRF2000 ( X Y Z ) Δ (m) th International Workshop on Laser Ranging

Assessment of station coordinates CHANGC (7237) LAGEOS ± ± ±0.013 LAGEOS ± ± ±0.028 Mean ITRF2000 ( X Y Z ) Δ (m) SANJUA (7406) LAGEOS ± ± ±0.012 LAGEOS ± ± ±0.026 Mean Epoch ( X Y Z ) Δ (m) SHANGH (7821) LAGEOS ± ± ±0.107 LAGEOS ± ± ±0.035 Mean Epoch ( X Y Z ) Δ (m) th International Workshop on Laser Ranging

Summary For LAGEOS, the present ability of our precise orbit determination work is in the middle level about 1 to 2 cm; In the case of our study, the choice of gravity model has slight effect on precision of LAGEOS orbit determination. The influencing order in on sub- mm level. It can also been seen that for LAGEOS, although the observation quantity of Changchun is ranked round about 10th, the observation quality is only in moderate level, and has obvious gap with high-performance station. The station coordinates can be determinated in POD process, and the proper value can do help to improve orbit determination precision. The cause of variability of station coordinates need to be further investigated. We wish the POD work in Changchun will build a bridge which can connect theoretical research and observational work. 16 th International Workshop on Laser Ranging