Will Engle LIBR 559L June 14, 2010 The Collaborative Environment: The Use of Wikis in Scholarly Communication.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Partnering with Faculty / researchers to Enhance Scholarly Communication Caroline Mutwiri.
Advertisements

A CASE STUDY OF THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF OA ON A UNIVERSITY DONALD W. KING SCHOOL OF INFORMATION SCIENCES UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEETING ON NATIONAL POLICIES.
+ Making Web2.0 Researchable Web2.0 and Scholarly Communication innovation and use James Stewart.
German Physical Society (DPG): Open Access in physics Regensburg March 2007.
Committed to making the worlds scientific and medical literature a public resource.
and how to avoid plagiarism
" OPEN ACCESS INITIATIVE IN ONE OF THE PALESTINIAN UNIVERSITIES: BIRZEIT UNIVERSITY" Prepared by Mrs. Diana Sayej-Naser Library Director Birzeit University.
Electronic Publishing and Open Access
Challenges of OA in the Next Frontier: ALM & Research Impact Assessment Jennifer Lin Product Manager, PLOS.
PubMed Central ANCHASL Spring Meeting April 1, 2005 Robert James Associate Director of Public Services Duke University.
DARE: building a networked academic repository in the Netherlands ICOLC October 25 Ronald Dekker Delft University of Technology Library.
The Library behind the scene How does it work ? The Library behind the scenes 1 JINR / CERN Grid and advanced information systems 2012 Anne Gentil-Beccot.
Open Access and Scholarly Communications Tyler Walters Julie G. Speer Library Faculty Advisory Board November 20, 2009.
Web 2.0 Technology Tools By Dona Sisk EDUC California State Board of Education Vision Statement “All California students of the 21st century will.
Intellectual Property in the Digital Age Series “Don’t I Own My Own Work?” Negotiating to Keep Your Copyright Intellectual Property in the Digital Age:
Committee Charges Identify and implement local actions in response to the scholarly communications issues raised by the committee. Consider actions that.
Greater Reach for your Research: Author’s Rights & the Shifting Landscape of Scholarly Communication Lisa Goddard & Shannon Gordon Memorial University.
Data Publishing Workflows: Strategies and Standards
E-journal Publishing Strategies at Pitt Timothy S. Deliyannides Director, Office of Scholarly Communication and Publishing and Head, Information Technology.
UCL LIBRARY SERVICES The work of UNICA in the context of new modes of publication and dissemination Dr Paul Ayris Chair, UNICA Scholarly Communications.
Presented by Ansie van der Westhuizen Unisa Institutional Repository: Sharing knowledge to advance research
Much Ado about Everything: Data, Publications, and the Role of Repositories Rebecca Kennison Center for Digital Research and Scholarship Columbia University.
According to the APA Publication Manual, some online books, journals, and magazines have added “digital object identifier (doi) numbers to their bibliographic.
Alternative Models of Scholarly Communication: The "Toddler Years" for Open Access Journals and Institutional Repositories Greg Tananbaum President The.
The Public Library of Science: Open-Access Publishing and Advocacy Barbara Cohen ICML 9, Salvador de Bahia, September 2005.
Epublishing and journals Angus Phillips Director Oxford International Centre for Publishing Studies.
Journals Publishing Tracing the Life of a Research Article Emily Gillingham Library Marketing and Communications Manager – Blackwell Publishing.
Jeffery Loo December 17, 2009 On Promoting Open Access at LBNL.
Designing the Microbial Research Commons: An International Symposium Overview National Academy of Sciences Washington, DC October 8-9, 2009 Cathy H. Wu.
Open Access Ayesha Abed Library BRAC University October 30, 2011.
Open Access and Open Source LIS-505 Introduction to Library & Information Studies March 22, 2010.
Thomson Scientific October 2006 ISI Web of Knowledge Autumn updates.
SCIENCE, RESEARCH DATA, AND PUBLISHING Stewart Wills Editorial Director, Web & New Media, Science 26 February 2013.
Digital/Open Access repositories Paul Sheehan Director of Library Services DCU HEAnet National Networking Conference Athlone 11 th November 2005.
MEDG421 MediaWiki Create & Edit a Wiki Page Stefanie Butland
E - Physical Sciences & Engineering Jeff Pache IEE
Scholarly communications Discussion group Linked Data Workshop May 2010.
Presenter Name Presenter Institution ACRL Scholarly Communication 101: Starting with the Basics Introduction to the Scholarly Communications System.
Committed to making the world’s scientific and medical literature a public resource.
Scientific and technical health information as a public good: equitable access, ownership and copyright Hooman Momen Editor Bulletin of the World Health.
What are Researchers Doing? Michael Jubb Research Information Network 3 rd Bloomsbury E-Publishing Conference 26 June 2009.
Software Sustainability Institute Software Attribution can we improve the reusability and sustainability of scientific software?
1 International Open Access Week St. Lukes Campus, University of Exeter, 25 th October 2012.
Networked Information Resources SPARC, E-prints & Open Access initiatives.
3.1. Types of scientific reports and their purpose oral form - it is not obligatory, could be very formal and it can not be used for the justification.
Presented by Ansie van der Westhuizen Unisa Institutional Repository: Sharing knowledge to advance research
Open Access - an introduction, Aleppo, December Open Access – an introduction Ian Johnson.
ScholarSpace & Open UH Mānoa March 2013 Beth Tillinghast Web Support Librarian ScholarSpace & eVols Project Manager UHM Library.
Kimberly Hoyt Walden University EDUC 8841 July 1, 2011.
Digital repositories and scientific communication challenge Radovan Vrana Department of Information Sciences, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences,
UNIT 8 SEMINAR COLLABORATION IN THE WORKPLACE SUSAN HARRELL KAPLAN UNIVERSITY CM 415 Effective and Appropriate Communication in the Workplace.
It’s the data that makes a paper Joerg Heber Executive Editor Nature Communications.
1 WORKSHOP ON SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING 1 June 2004 Columbia University James G. Neal Remarks During Open Session.
New Formats and Models for Scholarly Communication: Publication and Access.
Open Access is Here to Stay: DATE: Monday, May 19, 2014 EVENT: VLAPF Conference LOCATION: Richmond, VA PRESENTERS: Kay Buchanan –
C HAPTER Introduction to Web 2.0 Wikis Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 4.
Publication Ethics Webinar: Jan 2016 (Ethical) framework for author-driven publishing Dr Michaela Torkar Editorial Director, F1000Research
Open Access 101: What is open access and how is it changing scholarship? Prepared by Andrew Wesolek, Scholarly Communication Librarian Open Access Week,
Redefining the Library’s Role through an Institutional Repository Sharon Mader, Dean Jeanne Pavy, Scholarly Communications Librarian Earl K. Long Library.
ScienceOpen: Scientific Publishing for “Generation Open” Open Access Ambassadors Conference, December, Munich Dr. Stephanie Dawson, CEO.
Talking about the Scholarship Repository June 21, 2016 Charlotte Roh, University of San Francisco.
Open Access Publishing and Intellectual Freedom: Remembering Aaron Swartz Rhode Island Library Association Annual Conference June 4, 2013 Andrée Rathemacher.
Research and Education in the Digital Age: Background & Theory.
Epublishing and journals
Our Digital Showcase Scholars’ Mine Annual Report from July 2015 – June 2016 Providing global access to the digital, scholarly and cultural resources.
The Wiki: An Environment For Scholarly Conversation And Publishing
Author Rights Sarah A. Norris, Scholarly Communication Librarian,
Sarah Norris, Lily Flick, UCF Libraries
Scientific Publishing in the Digital Age
What’s New Maureen Fitzpatrick & Kathryn Byrne English Department
Presentation transcript:

Will Engle LIBR 559L June 14, 2010 The Collaborative Environment: The Use of Wikis in Scholarly Communication

A wiki is a tool for distributed collaboration

Scientific and scholarly advancement are processes of collaboration __ Research builds upon, challenges, or reuses previously published knowledge (Panton Principles, n.d.)

Early Wikipedia Model: A serious encyclopedia in which the results were not proprietary, but were freely distributable in any desired medium

Not very quickly

Ward Cunningham: Groups of people who want to collaborate also tend to trust one another

No distinction between reader and writer Version control

Can Wikis be Used to Improve Scholarly Communication And Collaboration?

It depends

Three Aspects of Scholarly Communication (1)Conducting research, developing ideas and communicating informally with other scholars and scientists (2)Preparing, shaping and communicating to a group of colleagues what will become formal research results (3)The ultimate formal product that is distributed to libraries and others in print or electronically (Thorin, 2006)

Larry Sanger (2008): Derivative versus Original Communication

The purpose of a scholarly journal is not only to disseminate information to the community but, in its present configuration, it also provides quality control, a trusted archive and author recognition. (Rowland, 1997)

Advantage of Wikis Central repository for information Central repository for communication Tracking and revision Intertextuality

In the standard scholarly publishing environment, updating information requires the generation of a new article. (Mietchen et al., 2011)

Barriers to Use Lack of credit or ownership Lack of control Perceptions about quality and scholarly merit Need for static, citable/archivable end-product

Wikigenes: A wiki for the life sciences where authorship matters.

Scholarpedia

Outlook

Semantic Wikis Information can be given meaning so that can it might function like a table in the relational database system

The Formal Product Is Changing Explosion in research Explosion in pricing – Libraries changing from owning intellectual works to merely licensing them Impact Factor Spiral Digital communication

Public & Transparent Peer Review: Wikis are used for transparent peer review. Reviewers could even edit the submitted text by themselves rather than writing a report about what should be changed.

Larry Sanger (2008): An article that is written with a large and diverse set of authors— particularly if it is under the gentle guidance of experts—can be expected to be lengthier, broader in its coverage, and fairer in its presentation of issues.

References Arita, M. (2009). A pitfall of wiki solution for biological databases. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 10(3), doi: /bib/bbn053 Grace, T. P. L. (2009). Wikis as a knowledge management tool. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(4), doi: / Hinten, C. V., Hense, A., & Razum, M. (2008). A Wiki for Collaboration and Publication in Research IEEE Fourth International Conference on eScience, Ieee. Retrieved from Hoffmann, R. (2008). A wiki for the life sciences where authorship matters. Nat Genet, 40(9), doi: /ng.f.217 Huss, J. W., Orozco, C., Goodale, J., Wu, C., Batalov, S., Vickers, T. J., Valafar, F., et al. (2008). A Gene wiki for community annotation of gGene Function. PLoS Biol, 6(7), e175. doi: /journal.pbio Procter, R., Williams, R., Stewart, J., Poschen, M., Snee, H., Voss, A., & Asgari-Targhi, M. (2010). Adoption and use of Web 2.0 in scholarly communications. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 368 (1926), doi: /rsta Sanger, L. (2008). Should science communication be collaborative? Plenary address at 10th conference of the International Network on Public Communication of Science and Technology. Retrieved from Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody : the power of organizing without organizations. New York: Penguin Press. Thorin, S. E. (2006). Global Changes in Scholarly Communication. In H. S. Ching, P. W. T. Poon, & C. McNaught (Eds.), eLearning and Digital Publishing (Vol. 33, pp ). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. Retrieved from

Photo Credits All photos by Used with permision from the creator.