Briefs submitted for the TB to approve Tesla’s long lead items: 1)Cold Mass Forging 2)Super conductor wire.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
P.Fabbricatore Sezione di Genova Joint Belle II & SuperB Background Meeting SuperB IR details:magnets SUPERB IR DETAILS: SC MAGNETS P.Fabbricatore INFN.
Advertisements

Q1 for JLAB’s 12 Gev/c Super High Momentum Spectrometer S.R. Lassiter, P.B. Brindza, M. J. Fowler, S.R. Milward, P. Penfold, R. Locke Q1 SHMS HMS Q2 Q3.
Comparison between American and European Pressure Vessel Rules
Cryogenic Experts Meeting (19 ~ ) Heat transfer in SIS 300 dipole MT/FAIR – Cryogenics Y. Xiang, M. Kauschke.
Undulator R & D Jim Clarke STFC Daresbury Laboratory, UK BAW-2 SLAC Jan 2011.
MUTAC Review, 9 April MuCOOL and MICE Coupling Magnet Status Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Berkeley CA
Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel Solenoid Magnet System
Spectrometer Solenoid Design and Procurement Review Steve Virostek Mike Green Mike Zisman Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting October.
23 October 2005MICE Meeting at RAL1 MICE Tracker Magnets, 4 K Coolers, and Magnet Coupling during a Quench Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
1 Update on Focus Coil Design and Configuration M. A. Green, G. Barr, W. Lau, R. S. Senanayake, and S. Q. Yang University of Oxford Department of Physics.
Spectrometer Solenoid Procurement Update Steve VirostekWing Lau Mike GreenStephanie Yang Lawrence Berkeley National LabOxford Physics MICE Collaboration.
9 June 2006MICE CM-15 Fermilab1 Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel and Tracker Magnets since CM-14 Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
1 The Genoa Tracker Solenoids and their Contribution toward a New Design Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and Pasquale Fabbricatore.
Background to the current problem 1. As a result of the high stresses in the bobbin due to the magnet load, the bobbin end plate needs to be increased.
MICE Spectrometer Solenoid Design and Fabrication Update Mike Green and Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Video Conference December.
CM-18 June Magnet Conductor Parameters and How They affect Conductor Selection for MICE Magnets Michael Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Berkeley.
MICE Collaboration Meeting Harbin, China 13 – 17 January 2009 Progress on AFC since the PRR By Wing Lau, Oxford University.
Confidential Not for Distribution AFC Module Tender Action Scope The tender called for 2 AFC modules to be ordered immediately with the option for the.
BTS730 Communications Management Chapter 10, Information Technology Management, 5ed.
Possible HTS wire implementation Amalia Ballarino Care HHH Working Meeting LHC beam-beam effects and beam-beam interaction CERN, 28 th August 2008.
September 30, 2003 NCSX Modular Coil Winding Form Prototype FDR1 NCSX Prototype Modular Coil Winding form FDR Phil Heitzenroeder PPPL September 30, 2003.
MQXF RRP® Strand for Q1/Q3 A. K. Ghosh MQXF Conductor Review November 5-6, 2014 CERN.
Ultra-Compact Electrical Machines for Wind Energy DE-FOA : Demo Machine C. L. Goodzeit and M. J. Ball May 1, 2014 Part 1: Design and Construction.
MQXF Cable for Q1/Q3 D.R. Dietderich MQXF Conductor Review November 5-6, 2014 CERN.
Specification of niobium sheets 031/05/2010 O. Capatina G. Arnau Izquierdo W. Weingarten S. Atieh.
MICE Collaboration meeting (CM20) At RAL 10 – 13 Feb 2008 AFC Magnet – Status and Progress W. Lau, Oxford University.
Spectrometer Solenoid: Plans to Fix Magnet 2 Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Spectrometer Solenoid Review November 18, 2009.
NCSX NCSX TF Coil Procurement 1 February 3, 2006 Michael Kalish NCSX TF Coil Procurement.
MICE Cooling Channel Magnets: Spectrometer Solenoid Procurement RF Module Coupling Coil Proposal Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab NFMCC 07.
MQXF Q1/Q3 Conductor Procurement A. K. Ghosh MQXF Conductor Review November 5-6, 2014 CERN.
Conductor Review Oct 16-17, 2013LARP Strand :Specs. Procurement, Measurement- A. Ghosh1 LARP Strand: Specifications, Procurement and Measurement Plans.
16 T Dipole Design Options: Input Parameters and Evaluation Criteria F. Toral - CIEMAT CIEMAT-VC, Sept. 4th, 2015.
22 October 2005MICE Meeting at RAL1 Tracker Solenoid Overview Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting 22 October 2005.
MICE RF Coupling Coil Magnets Update Derun Li Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory October 6, 2010 Sofia, Bulgaria.
E. Todesco OUTPUT OF THE CABLE REVIEW E. Todesco and the QXF team CERN, Geneva Switzerland CERN, 10 th December 2014 QXF design review, CERN.
1 Small Coolers for MICE Michael A. Green University of Oxford Department of Physics Oxford OX1 3RH, UK MICE Collaboration Meeting RAL.
Task 6: Short Period Nb3Sn Superconducting Helical Undulator George Ellwood
Super Fragment Separator (Super-FRS) Machine and Magnets H. Leibrock, GSI Darmstadt Review on Cryogenics, February 27th, 2012, GSI Darmstadt.
Protection heater design for MQXF outer layer *Using long Super- Heating Stations for ensuring quenhces at low currents* Tiina Salmi, Tampere.
XVII SuperB Workshop and Kick Off Meeting - La Biodola (Isola d'Elba) Italy May 28 th June 2 nd 2011 P.Fabbricatore Sezione di Genova The air core magnets.
MICE CC Magnet Cryostat Design Overview Derun Li Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE CC Cryostat Design Review LBNL, February.
Update on the conductor analysis for the PANDA solenoid Gabriella Rolando Herman ten Kate Alexey Dudarev Helder Pais Da Silva 19 September
HL-LHC Meeting, November 2013D2 Status and Plans – G. Sabbi 1 D2 Conceptual Design Status and Next Steps G. Sabbi, X. Wang High Luminosity LHC Annual Meeting.
Discussion about the technical specification of the Nb-Ti strand and Rutherford cable for the MCBXF corrector magnets.
Logo area 11 T Wire: Procurement Strategy and QA/QC B. Bordini, A. Ballarino, M. Macchini Acknowledgments: thanks to E. Charifoullina for her contribution.
MICE Coupling Coil Vacuum Vessel Fabrication Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Coupling Coil Working Group January 28, 2014 January.
Workshop on Appraisal of Disassembled Magnets: Lessons learned March 17 th, 2005 Boundary Conditions-Technical Specification Jos Vlogaert.
Update on PANDA solenoid design and analysis Gabriella Rolando Helder Pais Da Silva Herman ten Kate Alexey Dudarev 3 November
Thermal Analysis of the Cold Mass of the 2 T Solenoid for the PANDA Detector at FAIR G. Rolando 1, H. H. J. ten Kate 1, A. Dudarev 1 A. Vodopyanov 2, L.
Results from the cold test of the first QD0 prototype
MICE Absorber and Focus Coil Magnet – Test Results
Update on PANDA solenoid design
MQXF cable with RRP wires for Q2
CERN Conductor and Cable Development for the 11T Dipole
JLAB MEETING FDR – April 23-24th 2013
Small Coolers for MICE MICE Collaboration Meeting RAL Michael A. Green
MQXF Short Models Status and Plans
Procurement of Nb3Sn strand for coils assembled at CERN
Analytical Cost Model (16 T dipole)
Introduction to the technical content The Q4 magnet (MQYY) for HL-LHC
MQXF cable with RRP wires for Q2
Status of the PANDA Solenoid Magnet Production in BINP
Large aperture Q4 M. Segreti, J.M. Rifflet
Cooling aspects for Nb3Sn Inner Triplet quadrupoles and D1
SNS PPU Helium Vessel Design and Assembly
Peter McIntyre Visit Overview Slides
Twinax A Twinax is a dual coaxial cable with a common shield (“Extension” of TWP). 3 custom prototypes were produced for R&D purposes. Currently Cu wire.
IWG Worn tyres Tyre Industry work status July 17th 2019
IWG Worn tyres Tyre Industry work status July 17th 2019
IWG Worn tyres Tyre Industry work status July 17th 2019
Presentation transcript:

Briefs submitted for the TB to approve Tesla’s long lead items: 1)Cold Mass Forging 2)Super conductor wire

Technical Board approval for The Cold Mass forging Location of the Cold Mass in the AFC module

Dimensions and material of the Cold Mass Dimension of the Cold Mass as specified in the AFC Technical Spec. Coil size:- Latest agreement on the conductor size with Tesla is:- Formvar insulated: x 1.00mm With a 0.1mm thick interlayer insulation, this makes the coil size:- ~ 210 x 84mm As long as the forging provides a generous machining allowance, there shall be no risk in this respect. Material:- We specified Aluminium T6061 Tesla propose the same material. Material fully compliant!

Forging dimension as specified in Tesla’s purchase order

Cold mass profile as per AFC Technical Spec Profile of the Tesla Bobbin forging Average machining allowance is 9 – 10mm on both surfaces. This is acceptable!

Details of Tesla’s procurement related QA / QC documents are in Attachment 1 and are summarised in the table below ItemDrawing no.Material Specification Lead Time Preferred Vendor LocationFall Back Vendor Acceptance Criteria Super- conducting Wire Tesla Part no, 156-A3000P01 See below7 months European Advanced Superconductor s GmbH GermanynoneCoC, chemical analysis and suppliers inspection report to Tesla purchase spec Bobbin Forging Tesla Drg no. 156-D T612 weeks Anvil Alloys Ltd U.K UKnoneCoC, mill report analysis and suppliers inspection report to Tesla purchase spec CryocoolerTesla Part no, 156-A3300P03 PT415 (Cryomech Part No.) 18 weeks Cryomech IncUSAnoneCoC

Super-conductor wire What was in the AFC Module Conductor Spec Conductor size: 1.65x1.05 over insulation Coil width 210mm Thickness 84mm Turns/layer 127 Layers 76 Helium volume 9.5 litres/coil Inter-layer insulation 0.1mm Ic=760A(5T,4.2K) What Tesla offers and requires our approval:- Conductor size: 1.52 x 0.95mm Formvar insulated: x 1.00mm with 0.1mm interlayer insulation Coil width ~ 210mm Coil thickness ~84mm Turns / layer:- 132 No. of layer:- 76 Helium volume 9.5 litre / coil Ic=686A(5T,4.5K) Obviously Tesla’s proposal is different to that specified in our AFC technical specification

Material composition and details of the proposed super-conductor wire Type F 174 Dimension bare 1.52 x 0.95 mm² Formvar insulated 1.57 x 1.00 mm² Consisting of 174 NbTi filaments In a Cu-matrix Ratio Cu : NbTi abt. 4.0 : 1 Core conductor with Nb-barrier Core Alpha abt Corner radius > 0.20 Filament diameter abt. 48 µm Ic at 4.2 K; 0.1 µV/cm, 5 T – 686 A RRR > 80 A meeting was held on the25th of July and following Elwyn Baynham’s assessment of the proposed wire size (see Appendix 2), we have recommended the acceptance of the type F174 wire; Tesla confirmed that the above change does not have any implication on cost or delivery schedule;

Attachment 1 The following documents are submitted with this review brief:- Word document:- “Final Customer Approval” by Tesla PDF document:- “Purchasing Plan” by Tesla PDF document:- “General Purchasing Specification” by Tesla

Attachment 2 Elwyn Baynham’s preliminary assessment of the MICE specified super-conductor wire with that proposed by Tesla

AFC Module Conductor Spec Spec Conductor 1.65x1.05 over insulation Ic=760A(5T,4.2K) Coil width 210mm Thickness 84mm Turns/layer 127 Layers 76 Helium volume 9.5 litres/coil Inter-layer insulation 0.1mm Attachment 2 P1 of 4

AFC Module Conductor Spec Conductor Options Stay with Original Specification 1.65x1.05 with 0.1mm inter-layer insulation Tesla tolerance specification =/- 0.01mm Turns/layer – 127 turns/layer should be maintained as specified At nominal conductor size the coil width will be mm This is an allowance of 3.5 microns /turn for conductor spacing Tesla should confirm that in their experience this is sufficient margin to wind 127 turns in each layer At conductor max size mm it is not possible to fit 127 turns in the layer Tesla should indicate what they propose to do in this case to meet the specification Increase the coil channel width – what would be required? Contd on next slide Attachment 2 P 2 of 4

AFC Module Conductor Spec Conductor Options - contd Stay with Original Specification 1.65x1.05 with 0.1mm inter-layer insulation Tesla tolerance specification =/- 0.01mm Coil thickness 76 layers at mm interlayer insulation thickness ( we believe the interlayer insulation requirement was accepted by Tesla) Spec was 76 layers at 84mm thickness For this conductor option at nominal size 76 layers x 1.15 =87.4mm For this conductor at max size 76 layers at 1.16 = 88.2mm Consequences/impact The increased thickness will move the coil centre radially outwards and this would require an increase in the operating current of ~ 1Amp ( no real effect) The increased radial thickness would reduce the Helium volume in a single coil by 20% at the max size – this we are concerned about relaxing at this stage because we do not have yet the detailed design calculations from Tesla to confirm heat loads, coil losses during ramping etc Both of these issues were discussed at the meeting in September 07 and communicated to Tesla in a memo at the beginning of May 2008 At both instances we requested that Tesla should give their assessment of the coil thickness build up and possible variations Attachment 2 P 3 of 4

AFC Module Conductor Spec Conductor Options 2 Change the conductor size to1.57x1.00 with 0.1mm inter-layer insulation Tesla tolerance specification =/- 0.01mm Ic=686A(5T,4.5K) Turns/layer – 132 turns/layer should be considered as new spec At nominal conductor size the coil width will be mm This is an allowance of 20 microns /turn for conductor spacing At max conductor size the coil width will be mm This is an allowance of 10 microns /turn for conductor spacing which seems realistic – Tesla should comment Coil thickness Coil thickness is maintained to specification Margins spreadsheet shows that the operating point is 75% along the load line with temperature margin ~ 1.5K Operating current would be A for 200Mev/c Attachment 2 P 4 of 4