Laws of , , and  Excluded middle law Contradiction law P   P  T P   P  F NameLaw Identity laws P  F  P P  T  P Domination laws P  T  T P.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Propositional Equivalences
Advertisements

Propositional Equivalences
Rules of Inferences Section 1.5. Definitions Argument: is a sequence of propositions (premises) that end with a proposition called conclusion. Valid Argument:
Introduction to Theorem Proving
CSE 311: Foundations of Computing Fall 2013 Lecture 3: Logic and Boolean algebra.
Chapter 1: The Foundations: Logic and Proofs 1.1 Propositional Logic 1.2 Propositional Equivalences 1.3 Predicates and Quantifiers 1.4 Nested Quantifiers.
CS128 – Discrete Mathematics for Computer Science
Discrete Mathematics Lecture 1 Logic of Compound Statements Harper Langston New York University.
Lecture 19 Exam: Tuesday June14 4-6pm Overview. Disclaimer The following is a only study guide. You need to know all the material treated in class.
Syllabus Every Week: 2 Hourly Exams +Final - as noted on Syllabus
1 Inference Rules and Proofs Z: Inference Rules and Proofs.
1 Inference Rules and Proofs Z: Inference Rules and Proofs.
Proof by Deduction. Deductions and Formal Proofs A deduction is a sequence of logic statements, each of which is known or assumed to be true A formal.
Introduction to Logic Logical Form: general rules
Discussion #10 1/16 Discussion #10 Logical Equivalences.
Formal Theories SIE 550 Lecture Matt Dube Doctoral Student - Spatial.
Chap. 2 Fundamentals of Logic. Proposition Proposition (or statement): an declarative sentence that is either true or false, but not both. e.g. –Margret.
CSci 2011 Discrete Mathematics Lecture 6
Propositional Calculus – Methods of Proof Predicate Calculus Math Foundations of Computer Science.
Natural Deduction CS 270 Math Foundations of CS Jeremy Johnson.
CS 381 DISCRETE STRUCTURES Gongjun Yan Aug 25, November 2015Introduction & Propositional Logic 1.
Fundamentals of Logic 1. What is a valid argument or proof? 2. Study system of logic 3. In proving theorems or solving problems, creativity and insight.
Chapter Four Proofs. 1. Argument Forms An argument form is a group of sentence forms such that all of its substitution instances are arguments.
Propositional Logic. Propositions Any statement that is either True (T) or False (F) is a proposition Propositional variables: a variable that can assume.
1 Introduction to Abstract Mathematics Expressions (Propositional formulas or forms) Instructor: Hayk Melikya
Extra slides for Chapter 3: Propositional Calculus & Normal Forms Based on Prof. Lila Kari’s slides For CS2209A, 2009 By Dr. Charles Ling;
Ch. 2 Basic Structures Section 1 Sets. Principles of Inclusion and Exclusion | A  B | = | A | + | B | – | A  B| | A  B  C | = | A | + | B | + | C.
What is Reasoning  Logical reasoning is the process of drawing conclusions from premises using rules of inference.  These inference rules are results.
2007 D iscrete The foundations C ounting theory N umber theory G raphs & trees structure s
UMBC CMSC 203, Section Fall CMSC 203, Section 0401 Discrete Structures Fall 2004 Matt Gaston
Proof Tactics, Strategies and Derived Rules CS 270 Math Foundations of CS Jeremy Johnson.
Chapter 2 Fundamentals of Logic 1. What is a valid argument or proof?
CSci 2011 Discrete Mathematics Lecture 4 CSci 2011.
Lecture 1.3: Predicate Logic, and Rules of Inference* CS 250, Discrete Structures, Fall 2011 Nitesh Saxena *Adopted from previous lectures by Cinda Heeren.
Today’s Topics Argument forms and rules (review)
Foundations of Discrete Mathematics Chapter 1 By Dr. Dalia M. Gil, Ph.D.
1 Propositional Proofs 1. Problem 2 Deduction In deduction, the conclusion is true whenever the premises are true.  Premise: p Conclusion: (p ∨ q) 
Discrete Math by R.S. Chang, Dept. CSIE, NDHU1 Fundamentals of Logic 1. What is a valid argument or proof? 2. Study system of logic 3. In proving theorems.
CSci 2011 Discrete Mathematics Lecture 5 CSci 2011.
Sound Arguments and Derivations. Topics Sound Arguments Derivations Proofs –Inference rules –Deduction.
March 23 rd. Four Additional Rules of Inference  Constructive Dilemma (CD): (p  q) (r  s) p v r q v s.
7.1 De Morgan's Laws Bond Chapter 7.1 Part 2.
Logic and Reasoning.
2. The Logic of Compound Statements Summary
Chapter 8 : Fuzzy Logic.
The Foundations: Logic and Proofs
Advanced Algorithms Analysis and Design
Discrete Mathematics Lecture 1 Logic of Compound Statements
Discrete Mathematics Logic.
Formal Logic CSC 333.
Methods of proof Section 1.6 & 1.7 Wednesday, June 20, 2018
Logical Equivalence of Propositions
Discussion #10 Logical Equivalences
Introduction to Symbolic Logic
Propositional Equivalences
Information Technology Department
7.1 Rules of Implication I Natural Deduction is a method for deriving the conclusion of valid arguments expressed in the symbolism of propositional logic.
Sets and Logic…. Chapter 3
CS201: Data Structures and Discrete Mathematics I
Methods of Proof. Methods of Proof Definitions A theorem is a valid logical assertion which can be proved using Axioms: statements which are given.
Deductive Reasoning: Propositional Logic
CSE 311 Foundations of Computing I
CS 220: Discrete Structures and their Applications
Inference Rules: Tautologies
The Method of Deduction
Malini Sen WESTERN LOGIC Presented by Assistant Professor
Lecture 2: Propositional Equivalences
Discrete Mathematics Logic.
Proof Tactics, Strategies and Derived Rules
CS201: Data Structures and Discrete Mathematics I
Presentation transcript:

Laws of , , and  Excluded middle law Contradiction law P   P  T P   P  F NameLaw Identity laws P  F  P P  T  P Domination laws P  T  T P  F  F Idempotent laws P  P  P P  P  P Double-negation law  (  P)  P

Commutative laws P  Q  Q  P P  Q  Q  P NameLaw Associative laws (P  Q)  R  P  (Q  R) (P  Q)  R  P  (Q  R) Distributive laws (P  Q)  (P  R)  P  (Q  R) (P  Q)  (P  R)  P  (Q  R) De Morgan’s laws  (P  Q)   P   Q  (P  Q)   P   Q Absorption laws P  (P  Q)  P P  (P  Q)  P

Laws of  and  Implication Law P  Q   P  Q NameLaw Equivalence Law P  Q  P  Q  Q  P Contrapositive Law P  Q   Q   P P  Q  P   Q  F Contradiction Law

Main Rules of Inference A, B |= A  B Law of combination A  B |= B Law of simplification A  B |= A Variant of law of simplification A |= A  B Law of addition B |= A  B Variant of law of addition A, A  B |= B Modus ponens  B, A  B |=  A Modus tollens A  B, B  C |= A  C Hypothetical syllogism A  B,  A |= B Disjunctive syllogism A  B,  B |= A Variant of disjunctive syllogism A  B,  A  B |= B Law of cases A  B |= A  B Equivalence elimination A  B |= B  A Variant of equivalence elimination A  B, B  A |= A  B Equivalence introduction A,  A |= B Inconsistency law