Green Light? No violation if the declarant is subject to cross at trial within the meaning of Crawford Is the declarant “subject to cross at trial” if.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Prior Statements By Testifying Witnesses 801(d)(1)
Advertisements

CVLS Hearsay Refresher Who Cares About Hearsay? A Four-Step Hearsay Formula Hearsay Exceptions Questions.
Courtroom Roles and Responsibilities
CJ305: Legal Foundations of Criminal Evidence Welcome to Unit 6! Instructor: K. Austin Zimmer, J.D. Make sure you adjust your speakers and audio settings.
Miranda Warning Law Enforcement I.
Trial Procedures. Pleadings – papers filed with the beginning of a trial – establish the issues the court is being asked to decided Spell out allegations.
ADMISSIONS & CONFESSIONS FOR STREET OFFICERS Portland – October 24, 2013 Bangor – October 30,
AJ 104 Chapter 14 Self-Incrimination.
Chapter 5 – Criminal Procedure. The Role of the Police The process by which suspected criminals are identified, arrested, accused and tried in court is.
Hearsay and Its Exceptions
The Government must respect ALL legal rights of all people. It must treat people fairly.
Mock Trial.  GOAL IS TO MAP OUT YOUR CASE IN A STORY  TELL A STORY FROM YOUR PERSPECTIVE  DO NOT ARGUE!
Obtaining Statements and Confessions for use as Evidence
The Investigation Phase Criminal Law and Procedure.
Miranda Rights 5th Amendment
PRIOR INCONSISTENT STATEMENTS FRE 801(d) Non Hearsay by definition Rule 801(d)(1) Prior Statement by Witness is not hearsay If declarant testifies and.
Miranda v. Arizona 1966 Read Miranda v. Arizona Parties Facts Issue.
Criminal Procedure for the Criminal Justice Professional 11 th Edition John N. Ferdico Henry F. Fradella Christopher Totten Prepared by Tony Wolusky Interrogations,
Introduction to the Grand Jury ACG 6935/4939. What in the world is a Grand Jury.
Right Against Self-Incrimination ACG 6935/4939. Based in the 5th Amendment Can only be applied if defendant’s statement is testimonial. (not blood samples,
1 EXPERT EVIDENCE The evidential value of the expert’s testimony will depend on the expertise of the expert. Reference should be made to the qualifications,
FRAUD EXAMINATION ALBRECHT, ALBRECHT, & ALBRECHT Legal Follow-Up Chapter 18.
Confrontation After Crawford v. Washington Jessica Smith, Institute of Government June, 2004.
Detentions May an officer set up and conduct a license checkpoint –Without reasonable suspicion of any offense? –If all cars are not stopped? –Without.
INTRODUCTION TO THE LAW OF EVIDENCE
CRIMINAL LAW 2.5 INVESTIGATION & PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDINGS.
Crawford v. Washington US Supreme Court, March 2004 Implications for Elder Abuse Investigations Adapted from material presented June 30, 2004 by Sean Morgan.
Unit Five Lesson 31 How do the Fourth and Fifth Amendments Protect Against Unreasonable Law Enforcement Procedures.
1 Chapter 12 Obtaining Statements and Confessions for use as Evidence Obtaining Statements and Confessions for use as Evidence.
Rights When Arrested Objective 2.01 Recognize types of courts. Business Law.
Crawford v. Washington US Supreme Court, March 2004 Implications for Elder Abuse Prosecutions Adapted from material presented June 30, 2004 by Sean Morgan.
The Trial Process and the Investigator as a Witness.
Courtroom Roles and Responsibilities. Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission.
A Federal Defender’s Guide to Confrontation Jessica Smith School of Government, UNC-Chapel Hill.
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE P. JANICKE 2008.
Unit 6 The Trial: Players, Motions, Hearings, and Pleas Or I am getting my day in court.
Chapter Fifteen Criminal Procedure Before Trial. Introduction to Law, 4 th Edition Hames and Ekern © 2010 Pearson Higher Education, Upper Saddle River,
Crawford v. Washington US Supreme Court, March 2004 Implications for Courts NYC Elder Abuse Training Project.
Unit 6  What needs to be done this week SeminarSeminar QuizQuiz Discussion boardDiscussion board Unit 9 Analysis and ApplicationUnit 9 Analysis and Application.
The Criminal Justice System
SELF-INCRIMINATION “No person…shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself[.]” The 5 th Amendment “I plead the Fifth!”
Investigative Constitutional Law Charles L. Feer, JD, MPA Bakersfield College Department of Criminal Justice Investigative Constitutional Law.
Motions and Challenges to Evidence
CJ305 Criminal Evidence Welcome to our Seminar!!! (We will begin shortly) Tonight – Unit 6 (Chapter 8 – Admissions & Confessions)
CRIMINAL LAW Objective: Know the rights a person has when arrested Recognize a person’s potential criminal liability for the actions of others Understand.
Pre-trial Process Court Systems and Practices. Entry into the Court System A person enters the court system when they are arrested – An arrest occurs.
 Online Miranda quiz Online Miranda quiz. The constitutional implications of custodial interrogation.
David W. Neubauer Henry F. Fradella Joe Morris Northwestern State University, Natchitoches, LA Cherly Gary North Central Texas.
PROCEDURES IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM, 8 th ed. Roberson, Wallace, and Stuckey PRENTICE HALL ©2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ
CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROCESS: THE INVESTIGATION Chapter 12.
CJ227: Criminal Procedure Unit 6 Seminar Mary K Cronin.
Attorney/Judge. The purpose of opening statements by each side is to tell jurors something about the case they will be hearing. The opening statements.
Comparing the Inquisitorial and Adversarial Systems.
Criminal Court Proceedings. Investigation Police gather evidence in the crime, in order to get an arrest warrant signed by a judge. Police may arrest.
Unit 4 Seminar. Tell me what the Miranda warning is and what it means to you.
Know Your Rights Santa Teresa High School Intro to LPSCS.
Outline of the U.S. and Arizona Criminal Justice Systems
DEMYSTIFYING VICTIM COUNTERINTUITIVE BEHAVIOR IN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS “The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie-deliberate, contrived.
Courtroom Roles and Responsibilities
Miranda v. Arizona.
CONFRONTATION ARKANSAS APRIL 2011 MIKE DENTON.
Criminal Justice Process
Miranda Warning Law Enforcement I.
Court Systems and Practices
Crime Scene Processing 5th & 6th Amendments
Lesson 5-2 Criminal Procedure.
How Witnesses are Examined
Witnesses’ Roles in a Case
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
Miranda v. Arizona Matthew & Noah.
Presentation transcript:

Green Light? No violation if the declarant is subject to cross at trial within the meaning of Crawford Is the declarant “subject to cross at trial” if he or she is: –called to the witness stand by the state but successfully invokes a privilege? –not present but could have been subpoenaed by the defendant? –not called to the witness stand by the state but is present in the courtroom and could be called as a witness by the defendant?

Green Light-2? Wife talks to police officer and says that one week ago her husband hit her. She shows officer bruises, and defendant is arrested. Before trial, wife advises prosecutor that she made it all up. State calls wife to stand, offers prior statement, and tenders witness to defense for cross-x. Defense objects to prior statement. Result?

Red Light? Violation if statement is testimonial and not within limited exceptions allowed by Crawford Are the following testimonial? –Defendant’s alleged accomplice signs written confession implicating defendant during in-custody interrogation S. v. Pullen –Accomplice voluntarily makes oral statements to police in own home In-custody interrogation not required Formal statement not required

Red Light-2? Law enforcement officers rescue woman who was being held at knifepoint by kidnapper. Immediately after rescue, without any questioning by officer, and while shaking, crying, and nervous, woman starts talking about what happened. Law enforcement officers rescue woman who was being held at knifepoint by kidnapper. She is taken to secure area, where she is no longer in peril, and she gives statement about what happened to detective who is there to for purpose of taking her statement.

Red Light-3? During DSS investigation, social worker interviews child to obtain information about alleged abuse. State offers child’s statement in criminal prosecution. –Listener does not have to be law enforcement officer

Red Light-4? Child tells mom about sexual abuse by dad. Mom takes child to doctor, and child tells doctor about sexual abuse, including that dad was the abuser. –Does listener have to be government agent? –How important is listener’s purpose? –How important is speaker’s awareness of purpose? –Can some parts of statement be testimonial? –Does Crawford apply to civil cases?

Red Light-5? Some factors in determining whether statement was testimonial –Formality of statement and questioning –Affiliation with government –Purpose of production of statement –Declarant’s awareness of purpose of statement –Nature of information provided

Red Light-6? If the statement is testimonial, are any of the following admissible under a Crawford exception? –Woman’s statement to officer about what happened is offered to corroborate woman’s in-court testimony (or properly impeaches her in-court testimony). –Alleged domestic violence victim does not appear for trial because defendant threatened to kill her if she testifies. What evidence must the state produce? See Rule 104(a). Probably not sufficient that alleged victim is terrified of the defendant after what allegedly happened

Red Light-7? Chemical analyst’s affidavit –Is it testimonial? –Do any exceptions apply?

Expert Opinion Child was sexually abused or probably was sexually abused –There must be physical evidence, and –Physical evidence must support a diagnosis of sexual abuse Characteristics are consistent with sexual abuse –Physical evidence not required, but –Opinion may be admissible to explain or corroborate only

License Checkpoints Is Mitchell all dicta? Written guidelines not required –But oral guidelines, properly implemented, may be Specific supervisory approval may not be required –But, general advance approval, and checking in on day of, may be All incoming traffic stopped

$50 Appointment Fee In criminal prosecution, state can’t assess cost up front because state constitution bars assessment unless defendant found guilty Fee can still be assessed if defendant found guilty Rubin was »wrong