Georgetown University. Natural Monopoly AC MC Potential Natural Monopolies: 1.Telecommunications 2.Water 3.Electicity Historically, regulated Quantity.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Market Structure and Competition
Advertisements

Vertical Relations and Restraints Many transactions take place between two firms, rather than between a firm and consumers Key differences in these types.
Chapter 9 Market Power in the Electric and Natural Gas Industries.
Economics: Principles in Action
Class 4 Wrap Up and Takeaways GSB 42201: The Legal Infrastructure of Business Market Power: Network Industries Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial.
BEllwork 1. Which of the following is NOT a condition for perfect competition? (1) many buyers and sellers participate (2) identical products are offered.
Understanding Monopoly 10. Natural Barriers to Entry Economies of scale –“Bigger is better” (more cost-efficient) –This is due to the ATC being downward-
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Economics R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien—1 st ed. c h a p t e r fourteen Prepared by: Fernando & Yvonn.
Monopoly - Characteristics
1 End of Regulation? Jerry Hausman Professor of Economics MIT July 2005
This slideshow was written by Ken Chapman, but is substantially based on concepts from Modern Industrial Organization by Carlton and Perloff, 4 th edition,
A Primer on Foreclosure
Harcourt, Inc. items and derived items copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. Monopoly u A monopoly is the sole seller of its product.  its product does not.
Chapter 8. Monopoly How? Firm behavior Monopoly vs. Competition Price Discrimination Policy How? Firm behavior Monopoly vs. Competition Price Discrimination.
Economics: Principles in Action
Chapter 24: Monopoly Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 13e.
Presented by: Gerald W. Braun, Director Business Development June 17, 1998 A Business Unit of Amoco/Enron Solar Financing of Renewables: Considerations.
Finishing Up Monopolies: Natural Monopolies.  natural monopoly ◦ one firm can produce a desired output at a lower cost than two or more firms—cost 
Ch. 7: Market Structures.
19 McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.. Antitrust Policy and Regulation.
AP Microeconomics Warm Up: Why will it be hard for a monopolistic competition firm to sustain profits?
Essential Facilities Doctrine: A Case for India? Jaivir Singh Aashita Dawer (Centre for the Study of Law and Governance, JNU)
Monopoly ETP Economics 101. Monopoly  A firm is considered a monopoly if...  it is the sole seller of its product.  its product does not have close.
Chapter 14: Monopoly Economics In this chapter, you will :  Learn why some markets have one seller  Analyze how a monopolist determines the quantity.
Introductory course on Competition and Regulation Pál Belényesi University of Verona October 2006.
 How firms compete Easy as PIE: Presenting in English 09/03/2011.
Types of Market Structure in the Construction Industry
© 2007 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Essentials of Economics R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien c h a p t e r nine Prepared by: Fernando & Yvonn.
Market Power 101 Phil Weiser Aspen, Colorado Sunday, April 29, 2007.
Monopoly Topic 6. MONOPOLY- Contents 1. Monopoly Characteristics 2. Monopoly profit maximization 3. Assessment of Monopoly 4. Regulation of Monopoly 5.
Can Technology Save Competition in Telecommunications? John W. Mayo Georgetown University (202) Phoenix Center December.
Georgetown University. Congruity and Incongruity in the Evolving Telecommunications Industry John W. Mayo Georgetown University (202)
Proposed Tactical Framework Telecomm Regulation Onno W. Purbo
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.13-1 Natural Monopolies And Regulation.
Monopolies Definition, Causes & Pricing. Monopoly Market Characteristics One Seller Unique Product—no substitutes Difficult/Impossible to enter or leave.
© 2009 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Essentials of Economics Hubbard/O’Brien, 2e. Fernando & Yvonn Quijano Prepared by: Chapter 9 Monopoly and Antitrust.
ECON 100 Mar 10, 2008 Mergers, Natural Monopolies and Deregulation.
Market Structures Regulation and Deregulation. How firms increase Market Power  Controlling prices - leading firms can form a cartel, merge, or practice:
Common Costs and Cross-Subsidies: Why Do Common Costs Appear So Large in Regulated Industries? Mark L. Burton David L. Kaserman John W. Mayo University.
© 2009 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Essentials of Economics Hubbard/O’Brien, 2e. Fernando & Yvonn Quijano Prepared by: Chapter 9 Monopoly and Antitrust.
# McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Pure Monopoly 8.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Chapter 38 Antitrust.
Chapter 12 This chapter is divided into seven learning objectives: the characteristics of pure monopoly, the barriers to entry that create and protect.
ECO 1 MONOPOLY AND MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION Erkmen Giray ASLIM (erkmengirayaslim.com)erkmengirayaslim.com 10/22/2015.
ECON 201 WEEK 7 Finishing Up Monopolies: Natural Monopolies.
Chapter 24 Antitrust Policy and Regulation. Antitrust History Post Civil War “trusts” were formed (oil, railroads) to monopolize. Regulatory agencies.
Monopoly. Intro video
Microeconomics ECON 2302 May 2009 Marilyn Spencer, Ph.D. Professor of Economics Chapter 14.
Comparative Telecommunications Law Prof. Karl Manheim Spring, : Interconnection Copyright © 2007.
Structural Problems & Firms’ Observed Conduct: Economic Prescriptions for Future Growth or “Is it the Long Run Yet?” John W. Mayo Georgetown University.
Chapter 15 Monopoly!!. Monopoly the monopoly is the price maker, and the competitive firm is the price taker. A monopoly is when it’s product does not.
Interconnection and Access Presentation by Dale N. Hatfield Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology Federal Communications Commission June 6, 2000.
University of Papua New Guinea Principles of Microeconomics Lecture 11: Monopoly.
Introduction to Market Structures. Markets and Market Structures What is a market? An arrangement where buyers and sellers of a particular good, service,
2 Consumer Unity & Trust Society International The Relationship of Competition and Regulation Policy and Administration Professor Allan Fels, AO Dean.
49-1 Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Daniel F. Spulber Northwestern University
Monopoly and Other Forms of Imperfect Competition
What determines the behaviour of firms?
Comparison of Market Structures
Time Warner Rules Manhattan
Monopoly A firm is considered a monopoly if . . .
Monopolistic Competition
Economics: Principles in Action
Essential Question 6 What factors affect the level of competition in various U.S. industries?
Wireline Post 1996 TC 310 May 20, 2008.
Market Structure.
Perfect Competition What conditions must exist for perfect competition? What are barriers to entry and how do they affect the marketplace? What are prices.
Definition, Causes & Antitrust Laws Chapter 15
Perfect Competition What conditions must exist for perfect competition? What are barriers to entry and how do they affect the marketplace? What are prices.
Presentation transcript:

Georgetown University

Natural Monopoly AC MC Potential Natural Monopolies: 1.Telecommunications 2.Water 3.Electicity Historically, regulated Quantity €/Q

The Telecommunications Industry Revenues 2008 Deutche Telecom 61.7 b Euros Swisscom 12.2 b CHF NTT 81 b yen AT&T 124 b Dollars Microsoft 60.4 b Dollars

The Evolution of the Telecommunications Industry Pre-divestiture BOC Long lines Post-Divestiture BOC MCI AT&T MCIIXC Post-Act BOC LD BOC CLEC LD

The Essential Facilities Doctrine United States v. Terminal Railroad Ass'n, 224 U.S. 383 (1912) 1. Does the firm have complete control over facilities that are necessary for a downstream competitor to compete? 2. Can the facilities be practically or reasonably duplicated? 3. Has the firm denied access to the facilities? 4. Could the firm have provided access to the facilities?

The Evolution of the Telecommunications Industry Pre-divestiture BOC Long lines Post-Divestiture BOC MCI AT&T MCIIXC Post-Act BOC LD BOC CLEC LD

Industry Structure Matters  Pre-divestiture (1983) Little or no consumer choice Little or no consumer choice AT&T share – 90% AT&T share – 90% One nationwide network One nationwide network Dialing disparity Dialing disparity No demonstrated ability of competitors to expand No demonstrated ability of competitors to expand Willingness to switch Willingness to switch Coast-to-coast call -- $.55/minute Coast-to-coast call -- $.55/minute  2004 Hundreds of LD firms (choice typically >25) AT&T Share – <40% Dialing parity Scores of Facilities-based competitors Demonstrated willingness to switch Coast-to-coast call  $.05/minute.

The Evolution of the Telecommunications Industry Pre-divestiture BOC Long lines Post-Divestiture BOC MCI AT&T MCIIXC Post-Act BOC LD BOC CLEC LD

The Telecommunications Act of 1996 Purpose: “To create a pro-competitive, de-regulatory telecommunications industry.” Represents a major shift in policy approach of regulation from principally acting to protecting consumers from monopoly (and monopoly from entrants) to one of enabling competition. · Eliminates Monopoly franchises (regulatory barriers to entry) · Creates three avenues of entry 1. Pure resale (at price discount of “costs that will be avoided”) 2. Facilities-based entry 3. Unbundled Network Elements

The Electricity Industry Nuclear Coal Gas Turbine Distribution Generation

The Devolution of Vertical Integration in the Electric Utility Industry Distribution ADistribution B Cogenerator

The Devolution of Vertical Integration in the Electric Utility Industry Distribution ADistribution B Cogenerator ISO

Competition in the Water Industry? Falls Church Potomac River Washington DC Historical border Fairfax Water Development projects

Antitrust Analysis  Agreement to exclusive territories  Agreement expires  Fairfax Water announces intention to compete  Fall Church sues, loses  developer is denied permission to move water Falls Church water pipes  2008 – Fairfax sues, monopolization

Final Exam  Comprehensive  Closed book  2 hours  Multiple choice, short answer, essay  Write legibly