Types of Data SimTracks: generated particles SimHits: energy depositions in a detector volume Digis: Single-channel pieces of the detector’s raw binary.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Giuseppe Roselli (CMS-RPC) Università degli Studi di Bari – INFN RPC Efficiency with Track Reconstruction Giuseppe Roselli.
Advertisements

Simulation of Z->jets in CMS Outline –Introduction –Technique –Results –Conclusion.
Testbeam Requirements for LC Calorimetry S. R. Magill for the Calorimetry Working Group Physics/Detector Goals for LC Calorimetry E-flow implications for.
10/14/20051 Tau reconstruction and H/A →  H/A →  MC events: PYTHIA ⇒ OSCAR ⇒ DIGI (mass 120 GeV ?) 10k events overnight DIGI ⇒ DST: crashes DIGI ⇒
Preliminary analysis of ZHH events (2) Michele Faucci Giannelli, Mike Green, Fabrizio Salvatore Royal Holloway, University of London UK CALICE UK-SOFTWARE.
HCAL Digitization Rick Wilkinson. Program Flow CaloHitResponse CaloSamples (analog signal) HcalElectronicsSim HBHEDataFrame (or HF, or HO) SimHits DetId= ,
Rick Wilkinson Calo Framework & HCAL Digitization Status Calo Framework & HCAL Digitization Status u Optimization using igprof u Time Slewing for HCAL.
Status of EMC background data Tim West University of Manchester.
ACAT ’02 CMS GEANT4 Sim. & Detector Desc. Pedro Arce(CERN/CIEMAT) 1 Simulation Framework and XML Detector Description for the CMS Experiment ARCE Pedro.
CMS Software 101 Yuri Gershtein Organization & People Simulation Reconstruction Data Handling & Analysis Tools.
FCC Software Status Report from a User’s Perspective Colin Bernet (IPNL) 18 March 2015 Code Contributors: Michele De Gruttola, Benedikt Hegner, Clément.
FULL CHAIN SIMULATION of CMS DETECTOR Ijaz Ahmed National centre for Physics, Islamabad.
Update on Corsika Simulation 29 June 2015 Fabrizio Coccetti 1.
Introduzione al Software di CMS N. Amapane. Nicola AmapaneTorino, Aprile Outline CMS Software projects The framework: overview Finding more.
Computing in CMS May 24, 2002 NorduGrid Helsinki workshop Veikko Karimäki/HIP.
Ian Ross Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Mentor: Dr. Richard Teuscher University of Toronto ATLAS Group ATLAS Calorimeter: Cosmic Ray Commissioning.
2004 Xmas MeetingSarah Allwood WW Scattering at ATLAS.
1 High energy photon pairs from RS-1 Gravitons: L1/HLT Studies Vladimir Litvin, Toyoko Orimoto Caltech, CMS WG4 Group Meeting 01 June 2007.
4/04/2001Calorimeter shaking -Andrea Venturi - April '01 ALEPH week 1 New ideas and old doubts about the calorimeter shaking procedure Andrea Venturi INFN.
Status report from T2K-SK group Task list of this group discussion about NEUT Kaneyuki, Walter, Konaka We have just started the discussion.
Analysis with DSTs N. Amapane – INFN Torino CMS Software Tutorial November 4, 2004.
Andreas Morsch, CERN EP/AIP CHEP 2003 Simulation in ALICE Andreas Morsch For the ALICE Offline Project 2003 Conference for Computing in High Energy and.
CHEP06, Mumbai-India, Feb 2006V. Daniel Elvira 1 The CMS Simulation Validation Suite V. Daniel Elvira (Fermilab) for the CMS Collaboration.
Muon Software Tutorial Rick Wilkinson Caltech. The Basics Q: Is there a Muon class? A : No. A muon is just a RecTrack, the same class as the Tracker uses.
Alexander Richards, UCL 1 Atlfast and RTT (plus DCube) Christmas Meeting 18/12/2007.
SiD performance for the DBD Jan Strube CERN. Overview Software Preparation (CERN, SLAC) Machine Environment (CERN, SLAC) Tracking Performance (C. Grefe)
9-13/9/03 Atlas Overview WeekPeter Sherwood 1 Atlfast, Artemis and Atlantis What, Where and How.
Simulations for CBM CBM-India Meeting, Jammu, 12 February 2008 V. Friese
Introduction to CMSSW Framework Concepts Simulation & Reconstruction Liz Sexton-Kennedy January 10, 2008.
The CMS Simulation Software Julia Yarba, Fermilab on behalf of CMS Collaboration 22 m long, 15 m in diameter Over a million geometrical volumes Many complex.
28 July 2006 CERN REU Status Report 1 Lindsey Gray, University of Florida RCT Trigger Supervisor and Database Project Status Lindsey Gray Advisors: Dr.
Fake MET Noisy channels –Online/offline strategies Non-collision backgrounds –Beam halo –Beam loses –Cosmics Hot channels From Song Ming Wang: Joint D0/CDF/CMS.
GLAST LAT Offline SoftwareCore review, Jan. 17, 2001 Review of the “Core” software: Introduction Environment: THB, Thomas, Ian, Heather Geometry: Joanne.
Drell-Yan μ + μ - Studies from Z to TeV Dimitri Bourilkov University of Florida Florida Contribution to Physics TDR SM Review, CPT Week, November 1, 2004,
Digitization and hit reconstruction for Silicon Tracker in MarlinReco Sergey Shulga, Tatiana Ilicheva JINR, Dubna, Russia GSU, Gomel, Belarus LCWS07 30.
Claudio Grandi INFN-Bologna CHEP 2000Abstract B 029 Object Oriented simulation of the Level 1 Trigger system of a CMS muon chamber Claudio Grandi INFN-Bologna.
Software Status for GLD Concepts Akiya Miyamoto 31-October-2007 ILD Optimization Meeting References: - Y.Sugimoto, “GLD and GLDc”, talk at ALCPG07, ILD.
The JANA Reconstruction Framework David Lawrence - JLab May 25, /25/101JANA - Lawrence - CLAS12 Software Workshop.
ECAL software development Yuri Kharlov IHEP Protvino.
Γ +Jet Analysis for the CMS Pooja Gupta, Brajesh Choudhary, Sudeep Chatterji, Satyaki Bhattacharya & R.K. Shivpuri University of Delhi, India.
USCMS Physics, May 2001Darin Acosta1 Status Report of PRS/  D.Acosta University of Florida Current U.S. activities PRS/  Activities New PRS organization.
7 October, 2011Mike Hildreth - LHC Simulation Workshop Pileup Issues and Simulation in CMS Mike Hildreth Université de Notre Dame du Lac & Fermilab Representing.
F. Duru, CMS HCAL Meeting, Fermilab 1 HIGGS’ SELF COUPLING λ F. Duru, M. H. Reno The University of Iowa.
1 Jet Triggers and Dijet Mass Selda Esen and Robert M. Harris Fermilab TTU Weekly HEP Group Meeting Feb 16, 2006.
Vincenzo Innocente, CERN/EPUser Collections1 Grid Scenarios in CMS Vincenzo Innocente CERN/EP Simulation, Reconstruction and Analysis scenarios.
Quality assurance for TPC. Quality assurance ● Process: ● Detect the problems ● Define, what is the problem ● What do we expect? ● Defined in the TDR.
CMS week1 Agenda Sarah Eno: Status of project Volker Drollinger: jet energy scale and top mass Ritua Kinnunen: Higgs mass resolution E. Doroshkevic:
Alain Romeyer - Sept Light Higgs search in SUSY cascades Introduction (Previous studies) Plans for this analysis Simulation chain Reconstruction.
UK LVL1 Meeting, RAL, 31/01/00Alan Watson 1 ATLAS Trigger Simulations Present & Future? What tools exist? What are they good for? What are the limitations?
SARAH MARIE BRUNO HGCAL OVERVIEW Endcap More sensitive to radiation Crystals degrade quickly and must be replaced – expensive!
Big picture: What’re the sub-topics of the software framework? What’s the relationship of them? How to arrange data pipe? 1.
Axel Naumann, DØ University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands 6/20/2001 Dutch Morning Meeting 1 From n-Tuples to b-Tags ?
Introduction to FCC Software FCC Istanbul 11 March, 2016 Alice Robson (CERN/UNIGE) on behalf of / with thanks to the FCC software group.
24 Jul 01 Simulation Meeting1 Status of PMS Sarah Eno.
BES III Software: Beta Release Plan Weidong Li 19 th October 2005.
P.Miné Visu CMS1 Philippe Miné LLR, Ecole Polytechnique, IN2P3/CNRS, France Introduction Views and options Tutorial Demonstration Practice Visualization.
R. Croft, Exclusive Diffractive Higgs Signal at L1, Jan 2005 Diffractive Higgs Events in the L1 Trigger ( Work in progress ) Richard Croft, University.
1 HcalAlCaRecoProducers : Producer for HO calibration Outer hadron calorimeter is expected to improve jet energy resolution Due to different sampling/passive.
1 GlueX Software Oct. 21, 2004 D. Lawrence, JLab.
HYDRA Framework. Setup of software environment Setup of software environment Using the documentation Using the documentation How to compile a program.
papas: CMS single particle tuning
Overview: high-energy computing
Introduction Goal: Can we reconstruct the energy depositions of the proton in the brain if we are able to reconstruct the photons produced during this.
Vincenzo Innocente CERN/EP/CMC
Linear Collider Simulation Tools
Pedro Arce (CERN/CIEMAT)
Jupiter and Satellites
Linear Collider Simulation Tools
ZHH Analysis preliminary results on different detector models
BES III Software: Short-term Plan ( )
Presentation transcript:

Types of Data SimTracks: generated particles SimHits: energy depositions in a detector volume Digis: Single-channel pieces of the detector’s raw binary output RecHits: Reconstructed energy and position for a single detector elements DST Objects: Higher level things, like jets & tracks

Software Components u Generator (such as PYTHIA) è Creates SimTracks è Stores in PAW ntuples in a standard format (HEPEVT) u Simulation (OSCAR) è Swims the tracks through the detector, leaving energy deposits (SimHits) u Fast simulation (FAMOS) è Uses parametrized resolutions to smear the SimTracks, and make higher level (DST) objects u Reconstruction (ORCA) è Simulates detector signals (Digis) from the SimHits è Reconstructs (RecHits) & higher level (DST) Objects è Can run on these objects to make ROOT trees u Visualization (IGUANA)

Starting out with CMS software Starting out with CMS software First place to start is the ROOT file  Get account on Fermilab analysis machines  Pick your favorite dataset  Single-particle sets are fine for now.  Start with a “Digi” or “DST” dataset, not “SimHits”  Follow the instructions in Eric’s talk to run ExRootAnalysis  Make ROOT plots of everything that might interest you  Pick out the calorimetry clusters in some eta/phi radius around certain type of generated particle  See what kind of energy resolution you’re getting  Can you see brem effects in electrons?  How is energy shared between ECAL & HCAL?  How does it depend on eta?  How many generated tracks are there around this particle?  Do they come from pileup? Underlying event?  How many reconstructed tracks?

Learning about reconstruction algorithms Learning about reconstruction algorithms  Try to figure out which algorithms make your favorite reconstructed object  “grep”ping through the codebase is your easiest option  DON’T try to follow the logic of how ORCA actually calls that algorithm  Look through CMS notes for reconstruction algorithms  (don’t expect much documentation for the code)  See what parameters can be varied in the.orcarc  Put some “cout” statements in, scram build, and run ExRootAnalysis again  Run from a “Digi” dataset this time, to make sure everything gets rebuilt. The “DST” dataset will already have the objects, so they won’t get rebuilt.

New Framework u Timescale is spring/summer 2006, for cosmics tests u More rigidly-structured than ORCA è Data is “pushed”, not “pulled” u Stored in ROOT format, so you can plot the data directly from ROOT