Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February 2008 0 The NO A Experiment P5 Meeting SLAC 21 February 2008 Gary Feldman.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
J. Strait Fermilab October 21, 2005 The Neutrino Detector of the Future: A Massive Liquid Argon TPC.
Advertisements

TAUP 2007 R. Plunkett 14 September,2007 Status of the NOvA Experiment Robert Plunkett Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Batavia, IL, USA TAUP 2007.
Sergio Palomares-Ruiz June 22, 2005 Super-NO A Based on O. Mena, SPR and S. Pascoli hep-ph/ a long-baseline neutrino experiment with two off-axis.
Expected Sensitivity of the NO A  Disappearance Analysis Kirk Bays (Caltech) for the NO A Collaboration April 14, 2013 APS DPF Denver Kirk Bays, APS DPF.
Neutrino Oscillation Physics at a Neutrino Factory Rob Edgecock RAL/CERN-AB.
Karol Lang, University of Texas,NOvA, XII International Workshop on “Neutrino Telescopes”, Venice, March 6-9, Karol Lang University of Texas at.
 and the US Neutrino Programme Leslie Camilleri CERN, PH GDR Neutrino IPNO Orsay, 4 octobre 2006.
Neutrino physics: experiments and infrastructure Anselmo Cervera Villanueva Université de Genève Orsay, 31/01/06.
Off-axis Simulations Peter Litchfield, Minnesota  What has been simulated?  Will the experiment work?  Can we choose a technology based on simulations?
Leon Mualem — NNN07 The NO A Experiment Status Leon Mualem California Institute of Technology (for the NO A collaboration) Workshop on Next Generation.
F Axis Off Axis Physics Potential Cambridge Off-Axis Meeting 12 January 2004 Gary Feldman.
How to Build a Neutrino Oscillations Detector - Why MINOS is like it is! Alfons Weber March 2005.
F Axis Off Axis Introduction Off-Axis Cambridge Meeting 12 January 2004 Gary Feldman.
Reactor & Accelerator Thanks to Bob McKeown for many of the slides.
NuMI Offaxis Near Detector and Backgrounds Stanley Wojcicki Stanford University Cambridge Offaxis workshop January 12, 2004.
INDIA-BASED NEUTRINO OBSERVATORY (INO) STATUS REPORT Naba K Mondal Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Mumbai, India NUFACT Scoping Study Meeting at.
Doug Michael Jan. 12, First goal is to be ready to select an optimal technology in ~one year. –Demonstrate that fundamental technologies are ready.
1 Neutrinos: Past, Present and Future Robert C. Webb Physics Department Texas A&M University Robert C. Webb Physics Department Texas A&M University.
2/21/2008 P5 neutrino session1 Conventional neutrino experiments Heidi Schellman P5 February 21, 2008.
The NOvA Experiment At Fermilab Mark Messier Indiana University 34th International Conference on High Energy Physics (ICHEP’08) Philadelphia, PA July 30,
NO A goals & physics NO A goals & physics NO A sites & detectors NO A sites & detectors NO A now & future NO A now & future.
1 The Daya Bay Reactor Electron Anti-neutrino Oscillation Experiment Jianglai Liu (for the Daya Bay Collaboration) California Institute of Technology APS.
Expected Sensitivity of the NO A  Disappearance Analysis Kirk Bays (Caltech) for the NO A Collaboration April 14, 2013 APS DPF Denver Kirk Bays, APS DPF.
Minnesota Simulations Dan Hennessy, Peter Litchfield, Leon Mualem  Improvements to the Minnesota analysis  Comparison with the Stanford analysis  Optimisation.
5/1/20110 SciBooNE and MiniBooNE Kendall Mahn TRIUMF For the SciBooNE and MiniBooNE collaborations A search for   disappearance with:
NO A Experiment Jarek Nowak University of Minnesota For NOvA Collaboration.
Caren Hagner CSTS Saclay Present And Near Future of θ 13 & CPV in Neutrino Experiments Caren Hagner Universität Hamburg Neutrino Mixing and.
F Axis The NO A Experiment: Phase 2 of the Fermilab NuMI Program Workshop on Physics with Atmospheric Neutrinos and Neutrinos from Muon Storage Rings Maury.
1 PHYSICS IN THE NuMI BEAM with a ~10 kiloton LARTPC prototype ASH RIVER or SOUDAN J.Schneps PRELIMINARY,UNFINISHED, & ROUGH Sept. 27, 2007.
Status of the NO ν A Near Detector Prototype Timothy Kutnink Iowa State University For the NOvA Collaboration.
The Earth Matter Effect in the T2KK Experiment Ken-ichi Senda Grad. Univ. for Adv. Studies.
The NO A Experiment Status Leon Mualem California Institute of Technology (for the NO A collaboration) Fermilab Users’ Meeting 2009.
 Leslie Camilleri CERN, PH November 23, NO A is a Long Baseline experiment using the NUMI beam from Fermilab Now being used for MINOS (732km)
Long Baseline Experiments at Fermilab Maury Goodman.
Dec. 13, 2001Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Neutrino and Anti-Neutrino Cross Sections and CP Phase Measurement Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (KEK-IPNS) NuInt01,
Karsten M. Heeger US Reactor  13 Meeting, March 15, 2004 Comparison of Reactor Sites and  13 Experiments Karsten Heeger LBNL.
Fermilab Neutrino Program Jim Strait Neutrino Discussion at CERN 26 November 2013.
The NOvA Experiment Ji Liu On behalf of the NOvA collaboration College of William and Mary APS April Meeting April 1, 2012.
Preliminary Results from the MINER A Experiment Deborah Harris Fermilab on behalf of the MINERvA Collaboration.
NuMI Off-Axis Experiment Alfons Weber University of Oxford & Rutherford Appleton Laboratory EPS2003, Aachen July 19, 2003.
Gary Feldman MINOS in Cambridge 24 March NO A Update MINOS Collaboration Meeting Cambridge, England 24 March 2009 Gary Feldman.
Degeneracy and strategies of LBL Osamu Yasuda Tokyo Metropolitan University NuFACT04 workshop July 28, 2004 at Osaka Univ.
Search for Electron Neutrino Appearance in MINOS Mhair Orchanian California Institute of Technology On behalf of the MINOS Collaboration DPF 2011 Meeting.
Detector possibilities: scintillator based detectors EUCARD 1 st Annual Meeting, RAL, 13 April 2010 Paul Soler.
Medium baseline neutrino oscillation searches Andrew Bazarko, Princeton University Les Houches, 20 June 2001 LSND: MeVdecay at rest MeVdecay in flight.
Harvard Neutrino Group DoE Review August 21, 2006.
Low Z Detector Simulations
1 Neutrino detector test beam requirements 0. Disclaimer 1. News from the neutrino scene 2. Beam requirements for AIDA and others.
2 July 2002 S. Kahn BNL Homestake Long Baseline1 A Super-Neutrino Beam from BNL to Homestake Steve Kahn For the BNL-Homestake Collaboration Presented at.
CP phase and mass hierarchy Ken-ichi Senda Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI) &KEK This talk is based on K. Hagiwara, N. Okamura, KS PLB.
An experiment to measure   with the CNGS beam off axis and a deep underwater Cherenkov detector in the Gulf of Taranto CNGS.
Search for active neutrino disappearance using neutral-current interactions in the MINOS long-baseline experiment 2008/07/31 Tomonori Kusano Tohoku University.
NO A Zebulun Krahn University of Minnesota NNN2009 Estes Park, CO October 8-10 th 2009.
NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.
Steering Group Meeting 10:30 – 12:30 am CDT Monday, July 23, 2007 Y2K.
PAC questions and Simulations Peter Litchfield, August 27 th Extent to which MIPP/MINER A can help estimate far detector backgrounds by extrapolation.
NOvA in light of non-zero θ 13 Gavin S. Davies Iowa State University for the NOvA Collaboration nuTURN Workshop Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, Italy.
Status of the NOνA Experiment Satish Desai - University of Minnesota For the NOνA Collaboration APS Meeting - April 2013 Denver, Colorado.
Status of the NO A Experiment Kirk Bays (Caltech) on behalf of the NO A collaboration Lake Louise Winter Institute Saturday, Feb 22, 2014.
Science Requirements and Instrumentation for Future Neutrino Experiments Gina Rameika, Fermilab Instrumentation Frontier Community Planning January 9 –
 CC QE results from the NOvA prototype detector Jarek Nowak and Minerba Betancourt.
MINOS/NOvA and Future LBNOE Alfons Weber University of Oxford STFC/RAL NExT Neutrino Meeting, Southampton 4-May-2011.
F Axis The NO A Experiment Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 25 January 2007 Gary Feldman Harvard University.
1 Status of the NO A Experiment Sarah Budd Argonne National Lab On behalf of the NO A Collaboration Fermilab Users’ Meeting 2010 June 2, 2010.
NOnA NuMI Off-axis ne Appearance
J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting
Peter Litchfield Minnesota University For the NOA collaboration
T2KK Sensitivity of Resolving q23 Octant Degeneracy
Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February
Fermilab Proton Beams: Program Perspectives Greg Bock Fermilab Science and Engineering at Henderson-DUSEL Capstone Workshop Stony Brook May 5,
Presentation transcript:

Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February The NO A Experiment P5 Meeting SLAC 21 February 2008 Gary Feldman

Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February What is NO A? NO A is a second-generation experiment on the NuMI beamline, which is optimized for the detection of   e oscillations. It will give an order of magnitude improvement over MINOS in measurements of e appearance and  disappearance. NO A is a “totally active” tracking liquid scintillator calorimeter, sited off-axis to take advantage of a narrow- band beam. The NO A project also includes accelerator upgrades to bring the beam power from 400 kW to 700 kW. NO A’s unique feature is its long baseline, which gives it sensitivity to the neutrino mass ordering. NO A is complementary to both T2K and Daya Bay.

Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February NO A Site The Ash River site is the furthest available site from Fermilab along the NuMI beamline. This maximizes NO A’s sensitivity to the mass ordering.

Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February NO A Basic Detector Element Liquid scintillator in a 4 cm wide, 6 cm deep, 15.7 m long, highly reflective PVC cell. Light is collected in a U-shaped 0.7 mm wavelength-shifting fiber, both ends of which terminate in a pixel of a 32-pixel avalanche photodiode (APD). The APD has peak quantum efficiency of 85%. It will be run at a gain of 100. It must be cooled to -15 o C and requires a very low noise amplifier.

Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February Far Detector There are 1003 planes, for a total mass of 15 kT. There is enough room in the building for 18 kT, which can be built if we can preserve half of our contingency. The detector can start taking data as soon as blocks are filled and the electronics connected. An admirer The cells are made from 32-cell extrusions. 12 extrusion modules make up a plane. The planes alternate horizontal and vertical.

Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February NO A Timeline May 20021st Workshop Jun 2002Letter of Intent Mar 2004Proposal to the Fermilab PAC Mar 2005Revised Proposal to the PAC Apr 2005Fermilab Stage 1 Approval Nov 2005CD-0 Granted Feb 2006Recommended by NuSAG Oct 2006Recommended by P5 May 2007CD-1 Granted Oct 2007Passed CD-2/3a Review May 2008CD-2/3a Granted Nov 2008CD-3b Granted Apr 2009Start of Construction Jun 2011Far Detector Building Beneficial Occupancy Aug 20121st 2.5 kT of the Far Detector Online Jan 2014Full Far Detector Online

Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February Funding Profiles With this profile, we could advance the schedule by 10 months.

Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February Reactor vs. Accelerator Peter explained the physics of neutrino oscillations well, so I need not repeat it. However, I would like to expand on a couple of points. Reactor and accelerator experiments do not measure the same thing. Reactors are sensitive to sin 2 (2  13 ), while accelerators are sensitive to sin 2 (  23 ) sin 2 (2  13 ). If  23 ≠  /4, these quantities can be quite different. The good news is that a comparison of NO A and Daya Bay can break this ambiguity and determine whether 3 couples more to  or .

Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February % CL Resolution of the  23 Ambiguity The ambiguity can be resolved in the region below and to the right of the curves. The sensitivity depends on the mass ordering, , and the sign of the ambiguity itself. The curves repre- sent an average over these parameters.

Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February Measurement of sin 2 (2  23 ) This calculation uses NO A’s excellent energy resolution on  CC events. It is a parameterized calculation, which needs to be redone with a full reconstruction.

Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February Sensitivity to sin 2 (2  13 ) ≠ 0

Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February Parameters Consistent with a 2%   e Oscillation Probability

Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February Strategy for Determining the Mass Ordering If the CP-violating term goes in the same direction as the matter effect, then there is no ambiguity and NO A can determine the mass ordering by itself, given sufficient integrated beam. If the CP-violating term goes in the opposite direction as the matter effect, then there is an inherent ambiguity and NO A cannot determine the mass ordering by itself. But it can be determined, in principle, by comparing NO A and T2K. If the neutrino oscillation probability is larger in NO A than in T2K, it is the normal mass ordering; if the opposite, it is the inverted mass ordering.

Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February % CL Resolution of the Mass Ordering NO A Alone Normal OrderingInverted Ordering

Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February Combining Data with T2K When it is useful to combine data with T2K, I will assume that T2K will only run a neutrino beam because This is what they have proposed to do. They have less incentive to run antineutrinos since  They have too short a baseline to get information on the mass ordering.  The antineutrino rates at T2K energies are relatively somewhat lower than at NO A energies.  The complementarity between the two experiments is better statistically if T2K runs only neutrinos since it consists of comparing like runs — neutrinos to neutrinos or antineutrinos to antineutrinos.

Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February % CL Resolution of the Mass Ordering NO A Plus T2K Normal OrderingInverted Ordering

Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February  vs.  13 Contours: Best Possible 

Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February  vs.  13 Contours: Worst Possible  T2K and NO A Alone Profiles, not limits

Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February  vs.  13 Contours: Worst Possible  T2K and NO A Combined

Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February Conclusions I Due to its long baseline and ease of running antineutrinos, NO A will produce important results unavailable from any other experiment in its time frame. It is complementary to both T2K and Daya Bay. What was to become NO A had its first workshop in May It has now passed all of its reviews and is ready to start construction in the spring of 2009, assuming funding will be available. All of the other major US neutrino accelerator initiatives being discussed today are in the workshop phase.

Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February Conclusions II NO A will be the anchor of the US accelerator neutrino program. In addition to its unique physics contributions, It will provide the incentive to increase the NuMI beam power from 400 to 700 kW, and then to either 1.2 MW (SNuMI) or 2.3 MW (Project X), depending on available funding. It will provide a base detector, allowing the necessary liquid argon prototype, LAr5, to double the capacity of NuMI program. It will provide the continuity necessary to keep the program running smoothly, e.g. training experimental and accelerator physicists.

Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February Backup Slides

Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February What NO A Can Do If … sin 2 (2  13 )  0.1 Determine the mass ordering for half of the  space at the 1-3  level; combining with T2K, determine the mass ordering for the other half of the  range at 1-2  level. Exclude about half of the  space at the 1-2  level. Combining with Daya Bay, determine whether 3 couples more strongly to  or  at the 2  level if sin 2 (2  23 ) < 0.97.

Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February What NO A Can Do If … sin 2 (2  13 )  0.06 Determine the mass ordering for half of the  space at the 1-2  level; combining with T2K, determine the mass ordering for the other half of the  range at 1-2  level. Exclude about half of the  space at the 1-2  level. Combining with Daya Bay, determine whether 3 couples more strongly to  or  at the 2  level if sin 2 (2  23 ) < 0.94.

Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February What NO A Can Do If … sin 2 (2  13 )  0.03 Determine the mass ordering for a quarter of the  space at the 1  level. Exclude about half of the  space at the 1-2  level.

Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February What NO A Can Do If … sin 2 (2  13 )  0.01 See a signal at the 1-3  level, confirming weak signals seen in other experiments.

Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February What We Know and What We Don’t Know Don’t know Know to some extent O. Mena and S. Parke, hep-ph/

Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February NO A Near Detector 4.1 m 2.9 m 14.4 m Veto region Target region Shower containment region Muon catcher 1 m iron 209 T 126 T totally active 23 T fiducial The Near Detector will be placed in a cavern off of the MINOS access tunnel on the same off axis line as the far detector.

Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February Event Quality Longitudinal sampling is 0.15 X0, which gives excellent  -e separation. A 2-GeV muon is 60 planes long.

Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February e CC event e p  e - p  + E =2.5GeV E e =1.9GeV E p =1.1GeV E  =0.2GeV

Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February Background NC event  N   p  o E =10.6 GeV E p =1.04GeV E  o =1.97GeV