Tread softly: making secure steps towards wider adoption of pedagogically-focussed e-learning at Brighton Business School Sue Greener and Asher Rospigliosi.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
STUDENT LED CONFERENCES
Advertisements

The Enchanted Forest. Project Aim To use a Storyline approach to study the effects on early literacy.
Enabling Access - Identifying enabling technology for disabled learners.
Ross Adamson, Dr Jess Moriarty & Dr Vy Rajapillai University of Brighton July 2013 E-reading between the lines: 21st century literature, digital platforms.
Blended learning in higher education: Tapping on the best of both worlds Regina K. Masalela The Fourth Annual Conference of Learning International Networks.
Research Informed Teaching – a summary Dr Susan Hill and Assoc Prof Tony Fetherston.
Presentation to HRPA Algoma January 29, My favourite saying… Fail to plan, Plan to Fail. 2.
Northern Convening Butte College April 26, 2013 College Team Facilitators’ Presentation Student Support (Re)defined.
Writing For Publication Workshop STEM Discipline.
Fiona Chambers Kathleen Armour Sinead Luttrell Frank Herold Deirdre Brennan Walter Bleakley.
Session Objective To understand how to set high quality learning objectives and learning outcomes Session Outcomes By the end of this session you will.
Barriers and Enablers to Technology- Enhanced Learning What can Universities do to encourage innovative teaching? Steve Williams - Newcastle University.
University of Huddersfield School of Education & Professional Development Adopting and adapting teaching and learning styles.
Research as inquiry Models, approaches and conceptions Vicky Davies 1Based on a presentation by L Norton March 2013.
Transforming lives through learningDocument title.
Kodu Trials Celebration 11 December 2009 Evaluation of the Trials Ian Phillips, I & J Management Services.
Chapter 12 Instructional Methods
Classroom Observations: Open Conversations about your Practice for student improvement. How do we change things? There is some magic stuff being done by.
LMS implementation & e-learning maturity: Are we there yet? Presented by Irina Elgort 28 September, 2005.
School’s Cool in Childcare Settings
International Conference on Enhancement and Innovation in Higher Education Crowne Plaza Hotel, Glasgow 9-11 June 2015 Welcome.
Teaching and Learning in a Digital Age Sue Watling Festival of Teaching and Learning June 2014.
Aspects of professional learning; a new framework for student reflection Rachel Lofthouse & Roger Knill, School of Education, Communication & Language.
School Innovation in Science Formerly Science in Schools An overview of the SIS Model & supporting research Russell Tytler Faculty of Education, Deakin.
Growth Mindsets October Born SMART….? Am I smart?
Developing a Strategy for Technology Enhanced Learning at UEL.
Thinking Actively in a Social Context T A S C.
1 Beyond the Library: i-Skills for University Administration © Netskills, Quality Internet Training, Newcastle University Partly.
School’s Cool in Kindergarten for the Kindergarten Teacher School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
Perspectives of student engagement Learning and Teaching Conference Faculty of Science and Engineering 30th March 2015 Mark Langan (School of Science.
I’m In Activity Reflect on the morning in 1-2 sentences “I’m in”
+ REFLECTIVE COACHING APRIL 29, Goals for Today Check in on where everyone is in our self-guided learning and practice with reflective coaching.
Perceptions of the Value of the Online Tools Alessandra Abbattista and Ali Messer, University of Roehampton Dr Arthur Chapman, Institute of Education.
1 Organisational Learning - People in the Process Dtalk Seminar Managing People and Change in Development 29 September 2005 Bruce Britton, INTRAC.
The Art of the Designer: creating an effective learning experience HEA Conference University of Manchester 4 July 2012 Rebecca Galley and Vilinda Ross.
Overview of the workout TimeContentMethod / Person 10 minutesWelcome & objectives Trainer led 20 minutes Coaching – what it is; why it’s so important;
E-Learning in the Disciplines| slide 1 e-Learning in the Disciplines John Cook Centre Manager Reusable Learning Objects CETL Helen Beetham Research Consultant.
Horses for Courses : a comparative approach to developing staff use of technology. Three Models Sally Bradley, Jane Carne, Fran Beaton, Pam Parker SEDA.
Assist in the Implementation of Planned Educational Programs.
On a Good Teacher. “ Believing in what you teach and teaching what you believe creates a powerful role model for our students. ”
Further steps: How to make your initiative sustainable Discipline Change Programme –November 2012.
Special School Experience
Looking at Professional Development Opportunities as an Institutional Barrier to Effective e-Learning in Schools.
PRESENTATION AT THE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITIES QUALITY FRAMEWORK Professor Sarah Moore, Chair, National Forum for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning.
+ Individual Review of the Special School Experience Elley Heard
Enhancing Students’ Self Regulation on Placement 5 th Annual ESCalate ITE Conference Towards a New Era 15 th May, 2009 Robert Collins Moira Paterson Jane.
Adopting and adapting teaching and learning styles Neil Denby.
Effective Teamwork Team Building
Great Expectations Efficacy and Motivation Developing high expectations of what students, schools and school communities can achieve. Ideas developed in.
Tshilidzi Tshiredo. Introduction Long time ago even before technologies, social networking platforms and mobile devices, Dewey, J.( ) stated that.
To educate or to train? Reflections on being a PGCE Tutor Margaret Roberts.
Reflective Thinking. Reflective thinking Critical thinking and reflective thinking are often used synonymously. However, where critical thinking is used.
BUT HOW WILL THIS WORK FOR ME? Reading Apprenticeship at Edmonds Community College… a work in progress. Melody Schneider.
Educational Technology and Science Teaching. Reading Assignment Chapter 13 in Teaching Science to Every Child: Using Culture as a Starting Point.
An introduction for parents Jane Williams. To be a lifelong learner there a certain skills and attributes a person needs in order to be a successful lifelong.
© Crown copyright 2006 Renewing the Frameworks Enriching and enhancing teaching and learning.
Finding similarities. Fahrenheit 451: Clarisse enlightens Montag by asking him, “are you happy?” She shows him what it means to be alive, to taste the.
Role of The Reading Specialist. Literacy Program Developer Problems that may be encountered –Teachers feeling overloaded. –Teachers teaching in isolation.
Race for Equality – A report on the experiences of Black students in further and higher education
Anna Stodter, Genevieve Williams, Alison Northrop, Dan Gordon, Claire Rossato, Itay Basevitch, Charlie Nevison, James Johnson, Justin Roberts Dept. of.
My research questions What are academics’ perceptions of the influences on their curriculum decisions? What are the drivers that support and inhibit.
Video Enhanced Observation in teacher development
Flipping the Institution e-learning, e-teaching, e-literacies
‘He wishes for the cloths of heaven’ by WB Yeats
Teaching Excellence at Newcastle
"I’m finding it really difficult to teach that way":
Developing Learning To teach learning skills schools have to identify the key skills they value. This presentation is to explain the key learning skills.
Can Online Technology Enhance Work Related Learning?
Standard for Teachers’ Professional Development July 2016
Workshop Set-Up: The aim is that at each table we have a variety of disciplines / subjects represented by (ideally) four participants. Ensure a mixture.
Presentation transcript:

Tread softly: making secure steps towards wider adoption of pedagogically-focussed e-learning at Brighton Business School Sue Greener and Asher Rospigliosi University of Brighton

Back story Learning and Teaching Fellowship grant, UoB Three phase project: – Initiation – Support – Feedback It grew…. Annual Learning and Teaching Conference 2009 Conference Friday 10th July 2009: From spark to flame

Research enquiry (dream?) Beginning with the perceived “problem” of adoption of new technologies by academic staff How do experienced and new academics begin to fit e-learning into their personal pedagogies? Bringing a psychological and sociological perspective to the problem of adopting TEL - how does this offer us insight into wider technology adoption strategies? Could we help to enthuse, encourage, support those who were not natural early adopters?

Surfacing initial assumptions Roger’s model (1962) of innovators, early adopters, early majority, late majority and laggards – does it help? Moore (1991) crossing the chasm between early adopters and the follower groups Anderson et al (1998), based on Geoghegan (1994) – just two groups: early adopters (EA) and mainstream faculty (MF) Four factors stop us crossing the chasm/gap – Ignorance of the gap – The technologists’ alliance – Alienation of mainstream faculty – Lack of compelling reason to adopt

Where do you place yourself on technology adoption UofB (MF) CAL (EA)

What is your job? UofB (MF) CAL (EA)

What VLE does your institution have? UofB (MF) CAL (EA)

Who do you use TEL with? CAL (EA) UofB (MF)

How long have you used TEL? CAL (EA) UofB (MF)

Why did you take up TEL? CAL (EA) UofB (MF)

Had you used TEL as a learner? UofB (MF) CAL (EA)

What barriers did you face? UofB (MF) CAL (EA)

What support might have helped? UofB (MF) CAL (EA)

Qualitative responses 1 What surprised them? EA: – mainly positive MF: more negative What didn’t they like? EA: MF: “how motivating it is when students learning becomes fun” “learning moves out of your control” “colleague inertia” “It takes hours”

What was familiar about this learning process? EA focussed on problems with software, crashes, problem solving MF focussed on time taken and related to ease of use “like learning Word only easier”

What contradicted your prior beliefs? EA tended to find external responses contradicted their prior beliefs: MF focussed on personal perceptions which were contradicted: “technology is a tool not a solution” “student confidence in using software is always lower than I expect” “that it would be complicated and that I would fail to understand it” “found it more useful and less scary”

When asked to reflect on the experience of first using new technology to enhance learning EA: MF: some were excited about technology, some feeling over-stretched, some more relaxed than they were, found routines difficult to remember, some, as with technologists, focussed on learning not technology. No clear distinction with application of hindsight “it’s much more about pedagogy in my classroom, not the technology” “regaining confidence – enjoying learning new skills again”

Problems they faced 1.Students’ digital literacy 2.Staff resistance 3.Technology seen as gimmick 4.Lack of time to learn 5.Pressure to conform to VLE 6.Availability of software, hardware No distinction here between two groups Some saw problems as politically based (institutional strategies, resourcing) Few saw problems in making sense of technologies in relation to learning and teaching Everyone in study had persisted with using new technologies

Examples of ideas offered for encouraging adoption Showcases, demonstrations, workshops/training – show it is relevant and useful to improve experience of teaching and learning for both students and teachers Guest speakers in best practice Contact with experienced colleagues, buddying, coaching Sharing student feedback Shadowing those with experience Team-working Focussing on pedagogic gains (student motivation etc) Enthusing and encouraging Time to play (sandpits) Senior manager commitment Adopting technologies for peer assessment and feedback Using less jargon-ridden language Relating adoption to promotion/career paths/staff review Small project funding Celebrating achievements, encouragement of scholarship No obvious distinction between our two groups Strategies focus on pedagogic beliefs, perceived usefulness, role modelling (how), experimentation, reward, access to resource, promoting awareness, mainstreaming

A touch more literature A more complicated picture than we thought Technology Acceptance Model Liao and Lu (2008) discuss TAM and alternates and derive “relative advantage” and “compatibility” as drivers to new technologies adoption by teachers Compatibility? With beliefs, values, teaching philosophy…..

So how can we better analyse the different responses of academics in relation to TEL?

By teaching beliefs? Pedagogies in practice? student, teaching and content-centred (Greener 2008) By discipline? Becher and Trowler (1989) work on academic tribes By sub-discipline, including hard/soft, urban/rural, convergent/divergent and pure/applied focus? (Trowler 2009) By internet use? Peripherals, normatives, all-rounders and active participants? (Eynon 2009) Are Eynon’s “active participants” similar to Drent and Meelissen’s “personal entrepreneurs” (2008)? Could other academic groupings be distinguished by skill sets (Deursen & van Dyk 2009)

Which leads us to the future of this project New staff engagement – action learning project Profile analysis of academic staff in HE in relation to TEL. – digital skillset – degree of digital independence – pedagogic beliefs – openness to sharing and learning Practical application: not just focussing on technology adopters/champions. We need to tread softly in the mainstream and understand better how to meet their needs.

Had I the heaven's embroidered cloths, Enwrought with golden and silver light, The blue and the dim and the dark cloths Of night and light and the half-light, I would spread the cloths under your feet: But I, being poor, have only my dreams; I have spread my dreams under your feet; Tread softly because you tread on my dreams. William Butler Yeats