Constrained Optimization 3-8 Continuous &/or Discrete Linear + Cross-products (interactions) Good predictions of effects and interactions 2-Level Factorial.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CSUN Engineering Management Six Sigma Quality Engineering Week 11 Improve Phase.
Advertisements

II.2 Four Factors in Eight Runs Introduction Introduction Confounding Confounding –Confounding/Aliasing –Alias Structure Examples and Exercises Examples.
Fractional Factorial Designs of Experiments
Experimental Design, Response Surface Analysis, and Optimization
1 Chapter 5: Custom Designs 5.1 Custom Design Generation 5.2 Custom Response Surface Designs.
11.1 Introduction to Response Surface Methodology
Design and Analysis of Experiments
II.2 Four Factors in Eight Runs Some Fiber Optics Examples and Exercises* Some DOE’s Some DOE’s Responses: Responses: –Shrinkage (S) –Excess.
II.2 Four Factors in Eight Runs Demonstrating the Effects of Confounding* Response: Conductivity (milliohm/cm), Corrected for Concentration (CC) Response:
1 Chapter 6 The 2 k Factorial Design Introduction The special cases of the general factorial design (Chapter 5) k factors and each factor has only.
14-1 Introduction An experiment is a test or series of tests. The design of an experiment plays a major role in the eventual solution of the problem.
Lecture 11 Today: 4.2 Next day: Analysis of Unreplicated 2 k Factorial Designs For cost reasons, 2 k factorial experiments are frequently unreplicated.
Chapter 8 Two-Level Fractional Factorial Designs
Stat Today: Finish Chapter 3; Start Chapter 4 Assignment 3: 3.14 a, b (do normal qq-plots only),c, 3.16, 3.17 Additional questions: 3.14 b (also.
Chapter 28 Design of Experiments (DOE). Objectives Define basic design of experiments (DOE) terminology. Apply DOE principles. Plan, organize, and evaluate.
Lecture 17 Today: Start Chapter 9 Next day: More of Chapter 9.
1 Design & Analysis of Multi-Stratum Randomized Experiments Ching-Shui Cheng June 6, 2008 National Sun Yat-sen University.
Design-Expert version 71 What’s New in Design-Expert version 7 Factorial and RSM Design Pat Whitcomb November, 2006.
Process exploration by Fractional Factorial Design (FFD)
L. M. LyeDOE Course1 Design and Analysis of Multi-Factored Experiments Fractional Factorial Designs.
1 14 Design of Experiments with Several Factors 14-1 Introduction 14-2 Factorial Experiments 14-3 Two-Factor Factorial Experiments Statistical analysis.
Objectives of Multiple Regression
For Discussion Today (when the alarm goes off) Survey your proceedings for just one paper in which factorial design has been used or, if none, one in which.
Fractional Factorial Experiments (Continued) The concept of design resolution is a useful way to categorize fractional factorial designs. The higher the.
Chapter 8Design and Analysis of Experiments 8E 2012 Montgomery 1 Design of Engineering Experiments The 2 k-p Fractional Factorial Design Text reference,
CPE 619 2k-p Factorial Design
Design-plots for factorial and fractional-factorial designs Russell R Barton Journal of Quality Technology; 30, 1 ; Jan 1998 報告者:李秦漢.
Chapter 3: Screening Designs
DOX 6E Montgomery1 Design of Engineering Experiments Part 7 – The 2 k-p Fractional Factorial Design Text reference, Chapter 8 Motivation for fractional.
Dr. Gary Blau, Sean HanMonday, Aug 13, 2007 Statistical Design of Experiments SECTION V SCREENING.
Chapter 4 Fractional factorial Experiments at two levels
Statistical Analysis Professor Lynne Stokes Department of Statistical Science Lecture 14 Sequential Experimentation, Screening Designs, Fold-Over Designs.
1 Statistical Analysis Professor Lynne Stokes Department of Statistical Science Lecture 6 Solving Normal Equations and Estimating Estimable Model Parameters.
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part II: The Essentials of Fractional Factorial Designs The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 15 2 k Factorial Experiments and Fractions.
Engineering Statistics ENGR 592 Prepared by: Mariam El-Maghraby Date: 26/05/04 Design of Experiments Plackett-Burman Box-Behnken.
1 Chapter 3: Screening Designs 3.1 Fractional Factorial Designs 3.2 Blocking with Screening Designs.
Fractional Factorial Design Full Factorial Disadvantages Full Factorial Disadvantages –Costly (Degrees of freedom wasted on estimating higher order terms)
Statistical Analysis Professor Lynne Stokes
1 The General 2 k-p Fractional Factorial Design 2 k-1 = one-half fraction, 2 k-2 = one-quarter fraction, 2 k-3 = one-eighth fraction, …, 2 k-p = 1/ 2 p.
III.7 Blocking Two-level Designs _ Blocking _ Example _ Four Blocks _ Exercise.
1 Resolution III Designs Designs with main effects aliased with two- factor interactions Used for screening (5 – 7 variables in 8 runs, variables.
MSE-415: B. Hawrylo Chapter 13 – Robust Design What is robust design/process/product?: A robust product (process) is one that performs as intended even.
1 The 2 k-p Fractional Factorial Design Text reference, Chapter 8 Motivation for fractional factorials is obvious; as the number of factors becomes large.
Solutions. 1.The tensile strength of concrete produced by 4 mixer levels is being studied with 4 replications. The data are: Compute the MS due to mixers.
The American University in Cairo Interdisciplinary Engineering Program ENGR 592: Probability & Statistics 2 k Factorial & Central Composite Designs Presented.
Statistical Analysis Professor Lynne Stokes Department of Statistical Science Lecture 15 Review.
II.3 Screening Designs in Eight Runs: Other Screening Designs in 8 runs  In addition to 5 factors in 8 runs, Resolution III designs can be used to study.
Fractional Factorial Designs Andy Wang CIS 5930 Computer Systems Performance Analysis.
VII. Introduction to 2 k Factorial Based Experiments A. An Overview of Experimental Design In my experience, the absolute best way to teach the text's.
L. M. LyeDOE Course1 Design and Analysis of Multi-Factored Experiments Design Resolution and Minimal-Run Designs.
L. M. LyeDOE Course1 Design and Analysis of Multi-Factored Experiments Fractional Factorials Not Based on the Powers of 2 – Irregular Designs.
Designs for Experiments with More Than One Factor When the experimenter is interested in the effect of multiple factors on a response a factorial design.
2 k factorial designs l Examine the response for all possible combinations of k factors at two levels l Are carried out as replicated or unreplicated experiments.
Engineering Statistics Design of Engineering Experiments.
1 Chapter 8 Two-level Fractional Factorial Designs.
1 Chapter 8 Two-level Fractional Factorial Designs.
2 k-p Designs k factors two levels for each factor will only run 2 -p of the possible factor combinations will only run 2 k-p observations total.
Design & Analysis of Experiments 8E 2012 Montgomery
Special Topics In Design
I=ABD=ACE=BCF=BCDE=ACDF=ABEF=DEF
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part II: The Essentials of Fractional Factorial Designs Developed by Don Edwards, John Grego and James.
III.7 Blocking Two-level Designs
Text reference, Chapter 8
ENM 310 Design of Experiments and Regression Analysis Chapter 3
II.2 Four Factors in Eight Runs
Response: Conductivity (milliohm/cm), Corrected for Concentration (CC)
14 Design of Experiments with Several Factors CHAPTER OUTLINE
Presentation transcript:

Constrained Optimization 3-8 Continuous &/or Discrete Linear + Cross-products (interactions) Good predictions of effects and interactions 2-Level Factorial (+ Center Points)

S C U Relative Importance of Three Stages of Experimentation U-Unconstrained Optimization (Response Surfaces Chapter 10) C-Constrained Optimization (Main effects and interactions) S-Screening Experiments (What Factors are important)

A Poor Solution is to Use One-at-a-Time Experiments Run A B C D E F G H

Fractional Factorial Experiments Method for Strategically Picking a Subset of a 2 k Design Used for Screening purposes Has much Higher Power for detecting Effects through hidden replication Can be used to estimate some interactions and limited optimization

I = C A = C I = ABC Half-Fraction of 2 3

Paradigms That Justify Use of Fractional Factorials

Venus – Moon – Jupiter align Jupiter Mars Venus Crescent Moon Hierarchical Ordering Principle ▪Although its possible that three planets may align with the moon, its more often that two planets will align with moon than three ▪Likewise though three factor interactions and higher order interactions are possible, its more likely that large effects will be main effects or two factor interactions

Creating a half fraction design in SAS

I = ABCDE

Would these conclusions have been reached using one at a time experimentation?

· In a one half fraction of a 2 k experiment every effect that could be estimated was confounded with one other effect, thus one half the effects had to be assumed negligible in order to interpret or explain the results · In a one quarter fraction of a 2 k experiment every effect that can be estimated is confounded with three other effects, thus three quarters of the effects must be assumed negligible in order to interpret or explain the results · In a one eighth fraction of a 2 k experiment every effect that can be estimated is confounded with seven other effects, thus seven eights of the effects must be assumed negligible in order to interpret or explain the results, etc.

Creating a 2 k-p Design 1. Create a full two-level factorial in k-p factors 2. Add each of the remaining p factors by assigning them to a column of signs for an interaction among the first k-p columns

These are the generators

the generalized interaction the generators the defining relation

Defining Relation Confounding Pattern or Alias Structure

2 6-3 design base design in 6-3 = 3Factors A, B, C

The three factor generalized interaction is The defining relation is

New Two-Level Design ► Define Variables… ► Add> Select Design…

Example ¼ Fraction of 2 6 One possible set of generators is: Resulting in the following Alias Structure

Another possible set of generators is: Resulting in the following Alias Structure

R, the resolution, is the length of the shortest word in the defining relation. Resolution as a criteria for choosing generators Resolution III – main effects confounded with two-factor interactions Resolution IV – main effects confounded with three-factor interactions, and two factor interactions confounded with other two-factor interactions Resolution V – main effects confounded with four-factor interactions, two-factor interactions confounded with three-factor interactions. In this case if you are willing to assume three factor interactions and higher are negligible, you can estimate all main effects and two factor interactions Higher Resolution means main effects are confounded with higher order interactions

Minimum Aberration as a criteria for choosing generators I = ABCDF = ABCEG = DEFG d 2 F = ABC, G = ADE d 1 F = ABCD, G = ABCE I = ABCF = ADEG = BCDEFG Which is better? d 1 (0, 1, 2) Word length pattern: length 3length 4 length 5 d 2 (0, 2, 0, 1)

Symbolically: (A 3, A 4, A 5, …) A r is number of words of length r

Number of clear Effects as a criteria for choosing generators An effect is defined to be clear if none of its aliases are main effects or two factor interactions See Example64.sas

Only 56% Eucalyptus used in Brazilian forests Hemicellulose hydrolyzate acid treatment Paecilomyces variolii Fermentation Edible Biomass rich in essential amino acids

Generators for minimum aberration

BH

EG Maximum appears to be with Ammonium Sulfate and Sodium Phosphate both at 2 g/L

CH

BEG

Recap 8 Factors would require 2 8 = 256 for full factorial = 24 resulted in plausible interpretation and identification of optimal results LabelFactorOptimal Setting BRice Bran30.0 g/L EAmmonium Sulfate2.0 g/L GSodium Phosphate0.0 g/L

Reverse signs of coded factor levels for Factor B

+

+ Example

Creating Design Augmented by Foldover in SAS Data Step ADX

Augmenting a resolution IV by mirror image or foldover does not break strings of confounded two factor interactions Augment by design with signs reversed on Factor A only, H=ABD

Augment by design Reversing signs on A

High concentration of arsenic reported in ground water in countries such as Bangladesh, Chile, India, Poland, Nepal … causing people to be prone to various forms of cancer Example:

Simple IOCS filters have been used in Bangladesh and Nepal to remove arsenic from ground water

Simple household filters are effective iron oxide coated sand raw water pourous membrane purified water

Coating solution made of ferric nitrate and sodium hydroxide with NAOH added to control pH. IOCS Ramakrishna et. al. (2006) conducted experiments to optimize The coating process. Mix Coating Solution Age Coating Solution Pour over clean sand MixDryFilter Spiked Water Sample repeat noyes

What can be done to separate AD+CF

AD CF No longer orthogonal Fit model Y=A B F AD CF by regression

Exchange Algorithm for maximizing det(X’X) Step 1 replace 0 with -1Step 2 replace -.5 with -1 Step 3 replace.5 with 1 Candidate x’s -1, -.5, 0,.5, 1

Choose additional runs to maximize the

● Plackett-Burman Designs are Resolution III, but there is no defining relation ● Main Effects are confounded with two-factor interactions, but rather than being completely confounded with a few two-factor interactions, they are partially confounded with many two-factor interactions Alias Matrixshows the alias structure

Example

Implications of Partial Confounding 1.We can use Alias matrix to determine what two-factor interactions are confounded with large unassigned effects 2. Models involving main effects and some partially confounded can be fit by regression since X‘X matrix is not saingular

Creating a Plackett-Burman Design in SAS

Read in the data and merge it with the design created earlier Fit the model and output the parameter estimates

Create interactions and do all subsets regression

Run OA(12, 3 1, 2 4 )

Data Similar to Experiment with Teaching Methods in Chapter 2

Dummy variables represent effect of chair style