The North American Carbon Program: An Overview for AmeriFlux investigators Kenneth Davis The Pennsylvania State University Co-chair, NACP Science Steering.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An example of a large-scale interdisciplinary carbon problem Multidecadal climate variability Atmospheric evidence Ocean source? (upwelling, biological.
Advertisements

The North American Carbon Program Google Earth Collection Peter C. Griffith, NACP Coordinator; Lisa E. Wilcox; Amy L. Morrell, NACP Web Group Organization:
CMIP5: Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5
National Assessment of Ecological C Sequestration and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes – the USGS LandCarbon Project Zhiliang Zhu, Project Chief, What.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy North American Carbon Balance – Results from the Regional Synthesis Project of the North America Carbon.
Estimating the contribution of agricultural land use to terrestrial carbon fluxes in the continental US Keith Paustian 1,2, Steven Ogle 2, Scott Denning.
Carbon Cycle and Ecosystems Important Concerns: Potential greenhouse warming (CO 2, CH 4 ) and ecosystem interactions with climate Carbon management (e.g.,
At-A-Glance Agenda Mon 31 Jan AmeriFlux Tue 1 Feb AmeriFlux & NACP Wed 2 Feb NACP Thu 3 Feb NACP Fri 4 Feb NACP 8:30–10:30AmeriFlux Programmatic Issues.
National Soil Carbon Network Breakout Thanks to our rapporteur: Mark Waldrop participants.
Combination of mechanisms responsible for the missing carbon sink using bottom-up approach Haifeng Qian March 29, A Carbon Cycle and Climate Past,
Ocean Research Priorities Plan Near-Term Priority Abrupt Climate Change and the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) Anticipated Outcomes.
Slide: 1 27 th CEOS Plenary |Montréal | November 2013 Agenda Item: 15 Chu ISHIDA(JAXA) on behalf of Rick Lawford, GEO Water CoP leader GEO Water.
The U.S. Climate Change Science Program Dr. James R. Mahoney Assistant Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere Director, Climate Change Science Program.
Climate Futures and Oregon’s Coastal Communities A Survey and Strategy to Address the Effects of Climate Change on the Oregon Coast.
Discussion of Draft CEQ Guidelines for Addressing Climate Change in NEPA Projects Tim Stroope, NEPA Coordinator, GMUG National Forest
The Global Ocean Carbon Cycle Rik Wanninkhof, NOAA/AOML Annual OCO review, June 2007: Celebrating Our Past, Observing our Present, Predicting our Future:
MAPPING NACP PROGRESS ONTO LONG-TERM CARBON CYCLE SCIENCE GOALS Anna M. Michalak.
14 May 2015, København, side event of ECCA The BACC-II report -process, and -Summary of results Hans von Storch Co-chair of BACC-II 14 May 2015, København,
A New U.S. Carbon Cycle Science Plan Anna Michalak, Gregg Marland, Rob Jackson, Chris Sabine and the Carbon Cycle Science Working Group.
Update on the U.S. Climate Change Science Program UN Framework Convention on Climate Change Subsidiary Body Meeting June 21, 2004 Linda V. Moodie Senior.
US Climate Change Science Program Incorporating the US Global Change Research Program and the Climate Change Research Initiative U.S. Climate Change Science.
Workshop on common metrics to calculate the CO 2 equivalence of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions by sources and removals by sinks Javier Hanna, UNFCCC.
Satellite observations of coastal pCO 2 and air-sea flux of carbon dioxide Presenter: Steven E. Lohrenz Department of Marine Science The University of.
Diagnosis, attribution, prediction and decision support: Progress, problems and two paths forwards Kenneth Davis Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.
December 6, 2013 USDA Climate Change Program Office.
U.S. Climate Change Science Program: Strategic Planning to Implementation DOE Office of Science BERAC Meeting November 13, 2003 James R. Mahoney, Ph.D.
The role of the Chequamegon Ecosystem-Atmosphere Study in the U.S. Carbon Cycle Science Plan Ken Davis The Pennsylvania State University The 13 th ChEAS.
O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 1 Vegetation/Ecosystem Modeling and Analysis Project (VEMAP) Lessons Learned or How to Do.
Carboeurope Update of synthesis of continental carbon fluxes Dourdan carboocean 2008 meeting.
Report from the US Collaboration Panel Rik Wanninkhof NOAA/AOML, Miami [For the 4 th time] On behalf of Richard Feely, Associated US representative SSC.
NACP breakout group: Atmospheric Measurements and Analyses: Summary for the plenary Room: Cheyenne I Time: Monday, 3-5pm.
Science push or policy pull? How to get forest C science into the policy realm and vice versa Lessons from Canadian experience Presenter: Graham Stinson.
CarboEurope: Future - Annette Freibauer MPI for Biogeochemistry, Jena.
Slide: 1 Osamu Ochiai Water SBA Coordinator The GEO Water Strategy Report – The CEOS Contribution Presentation to the 26 th CEOS Plenary at Bengaluru,
Translation to the New TCO Panel Beverly Law Prof. Global Change Forest Science Science Chair, AmeriFlux Network Oregon State University.
Science Mission Directorate Overview of NASA Research in Carbon Data Fusion and Data Assimilation Carbon Fusion Workshop, May, 2006 Bill Emanuel Program.
Spatial and temporal patterns of CH 4 and N 2 O fluxes from North America as estimated by process-based ecosystem model Hanqin Tian, Xiaofeng Xu and other.
The Global Effort to Understand Carbon Dioxide James R. Mahoney, Ph.D. Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere NOAA Deputy Administrator.
Joint Canada-Mexico-USA (North American*) Carbon Program Planning Meeting January 25–26, 2007 *By North America we mean the North American land, adjacent.
Climate and Cryosphere (CliC): Legacy for 2013 and Beyond Jeff Key NOAA/NESDIS Chair, CliC Observation and Products Panel (Agenda item )
North American Carbon Sources and Sinks: Magnitude, Attribution and Uncertainty Anthony King Daniel Hayes Deborah Huntzinger Tristram West Wilfred Post.
Terrestrial Carbon Observations TCO Previous Strategy 1- better identify the potential end users, and their requirements 2- organize and coordinate reliable.
The United States Carbon Cycle Science Program: An Interagency Partnership Providing a coordinated and focused scientific strategy for conducting federal.
International workshop on Asian Greenhouse Gases Budgets Physical Research Laboratory, Ahmedabad, India September 2011 Pep Canadell*, Prabir Patra.
Site-Level Model-Data Comparison A Proposed NACP Interim Synthesis Project Ken Davis, Peter Thornton, Kevin Schaefer, Dan Riciutto Coordinators.
Science Advisory Board Public Session 1 1 Peter Schultz, Ph.D. Associate Director for Science Integration Climate Change Science Program Office CCSP Update.
Flux Measurements and Systematic Terrestrial Measurements 1.discuss gaps and opportunities What are gaps? 2. brainstorm ideas about collaborative projects.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Jerry Elwood Director, Climate Change Research Division, Office.
Arctic Research Office May, 2002 Update on SEARCH from the Agency Perspective.
Global Climate Change: Past and Future Le Moyne College Syracuse, New York February 3, 2006 Department of Meteorology and Earth and Environmental Systems.
U.S. Climate Change Science Program & Climate Change Technology Program Updates NOAA Science Advisory Board Meeting July 14, 2004 James R. Mahoney, Ph.D.
CarboEurope: The Big Research Lines Annette Freibauer Ivan Janssens.
A comparison of recent model- and inventory- based estimates of the continental-scale carbon balance of North America A. David McGuire USGS / University.
A Modeling and Synthesis Thematic Data Center for the North American Carbon Program Robert B. Cook 1, Yaxing Wei 1, W. Mac Post 1, Peter E. Thornton 1,
PPAI Decadal Prediction/Predictability/Variability –Reviewed the WGCM/WGSIP Decadal Prediction Experiment –Reviewed/Revised Decadal WG Prospectus Reviewed.
US Program Overview Scott Denning, Chair NACP Science Steering Group.
Interagency Ocean Observation Committee The Integrated Coastal & Ocean Observing System Act of 2009  Interagency Ocean Observing Committee  Lead Federal.
Metrics and MODIS Diane Wickland December, Biology/Biogeochemistry/Ecosystems/Carbon Science Questions: How are global ecosystems changing? (Question.
Model-data intercomparison for NACP Yiqi Luo and James Randerson.
North American Carbon Program Data Management Planning Workshop January 25 – 27, 2005 New Orleans, LA Sponsored by the Carbon Cycle Interagency Working.
Anna M. Michalak Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space Sciences University of Michigan Reconciling.
NAME SWG th Annual NOAA Climate Diagnostics and Prediction Workshop State College, Pennsylvania Oct. 28, 2005.
Surprises in the anthropogenic carbon budget Why OCB is so important! Jorge Sarmiento Princeton University Co-lead author of the US Carbon Cycle Science.
North American Carbon Program 4 th All-Investigator Meeting Albuquerque, NM February 4 th – 7 th, 2013 Overview of Meeting Agenda Deborah Huntzinger Co-Chair.
Ocean Carbon and Biogeochemistry Scoping Workshop on Terrestrial and Coastal Carbon Fluxes and Exchanges in the Gulf of Mexico May 6-8, 2008 St. Petersburg,
1 Co-ordinator: Detlef Schulze (MPI for Biogeochemistry) Component Leaders: Riccardo Valentini, Philippe Ciais, Han Dolman, Martin Heimann, John Grace.
North American Carbon Program
GFDL Climate Model Status and Plans for Product Generation
CARBON CYCLE Presented By: Stefanie Spayd Janet Fang.
Research on Climate Change on Water, including Natural Hazards Contribution to SSG discussions and science-policy interfacing Philippe QUEVAUVILLER European.
Presentation transcript:

The North American Carbon Program: An Overview for AmeriFlux investigators Kenneth Davis The Pennsylvania State University Co-chair, NACP Science Steering Group 2011 AmeriFlux Meeting and 3 rd NACP All-Investigators’ Meeting 1 February, 2011, New Orleans, LA

Origins: The North American Carbon Program (NACP)

Documents, groups, programs in approximate order of origin USGCRP – U.S. Global Change Research Plan CCIWG - Carbon Cycle Interagency Working Group U.S. Carbon Cycle Science Plan (CCSP) - Sarmiento and Wofsy, 1999 CC SSG - Carbon Cycle Science Steering Group OCB SSC – Ocean Carbon and Biogeochemistry Science Steering Committee North American Carbon Program (NACP) plan, Harriss, Wofsy et al., NACP SSG – NACP Science Steering Group Ocean Carbon and Climate Program (OCCP) NACP Science Implementation Strategy (SIS) - Denning et al., 2005 NACP Midcontinent Intensive (MCI) Science Plan - Ogle et al., 2006 CarboNA – U.S., Mexican and Canadian collaborative effort CCSWG - Carbon Cycle Science Working Group – currently preparing a new draft of the U.S. Carbon Cycle Science Plan Web sites for more information: - North American Carbon Program web site - U.S. Carbon Cycle science web site

US Carbon Cycle Science Plan Goals, Quantify and understand the Northern Hemisphere terrestrial carbon sink. 2.Quantify and understand the uptake of anthropogenic CO 2 in the ocean. 3.Determine the impacts of past and current land use on the carbon budget. 4.Provide greatly improved projections of future atmospheric concentrations of CO 2. 5.Develop the scientific basis for societal decisions about management of CO 2 and the carbon cycle. Origin of the NACP Sarmiento and Wofsy, 1999

1.Develop quantitative scientific knowledge, robust observations, and models to determine the emissions and uptake of CO 2, CH 4, and CO, the changes in carbon stocks, and the factors regulating these processes for North America and adjacent ocean basins. 2.Develop the scientific basis to implement full carbon accounting on regional and continental scales. 3.Support long-term quantitative measurements of sources and sinks of atmospheric CO 2 and CH 4, and develop forecasts for future trends. NACP Goals NACP Plan, 2002

NACP Questions 1.What is the carbon balance of North America and adjacent oceans? What are the geographic patterns of fluxes of CO 2, CH 4, and CO? How is the balance changing over time? (“Diagnosis”) 2.What processes control the sources and sinks of CO 2, CH 4, and CO, and how do the controls change with time? (“Attribution”) 3.Are there potential surprises (could sources increase or sinks disappear)? (“Prediction”) 4.How can we enhance and manage long-lived carbon sinks ("sequestration"), and provide resources to support decision makers? (“Decision support”) Denning et al, NACP Science Implementation Strategy

Operational Phase of the NACP The NACP Plan called for an operational phase of NACP in which the observational and analysis infrastructure would be available, as a “legacy” to “produce periodic, reliable estimates of net sources and sinks for CO 2, CO, and CH 4 and of changes in carbon stocks.”

A (flux tower PIs) guide to the NACP

The NACP is largely stone soup 1.A plan was developed. 2.Agencies adopted portions of that plan. 3.Funds were devoted to requests for proposals that accomplished subsets of that portion of the message (sometimes calling out NACP explicitly, other times not). 4.People meet and talk to coordinate work, report progress and make additional recommendations (e.g. here, science steering groups, conferences and workshops). 5.New folks get entrained. 6.Plans get revised and updated. 7.Go back to (2) and repeat. You can have a significant impact on the development of the NACP.

NACP Approach following the NACP SIS, 2005 Observations Observations & Experiments  Science Results  Estimates-Uncertainties Predictive Models Experiments Diagnostic Models Model-Data Fusion Dynamic Maps Decision Support diagnosis prediction attribution

NACP Structures NACP Office NACP Data Policy NACP Science Steering Group None of these are sources of research funds. They exist to facilitate progress on the NACP Plan and Implementation Strategy, and those are in support of the US Carbon Cycle Science Plan. They are supported by the Carbon Cycle Interagency Working Group (CCIWG). Data management is distributed. There is no NACP data center. The MAST-DC (Modeling and Synthesis Thematic Data Center) exists to support synthesis efforts.

Who is the NACP? Lists of NACP investigators and projects is maintained by the NACP Office (Griffith et al). Anyone can join the NACP. Any funded investigator can request that his/her project be affiliated with the NACP. Some program managers may require that your project be affiliated with the NACP, and will “report you,” when funded, to the NACP Office. In this way, the NACP investigators and projects lists have been developed. The NACP Office, SSG and the CCIWG try to foster a cohesive NACP investigators’ community.

What are some current NACP activities? (syntheses) NACP synthesis projects + Regional + Site-Level + Non-CO 2 Greenhouse Gases + Coastal + Disturbance + MCI (Midcontinent Intensive regional study) + MsTMIP (Multi-scale Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project) Info on all can be found at Most of these are “volunteer” activities with modest funding to bring together existing NACP products and investigations. Two are more “fully funded” syntheses projects. New activities are emerging. Check out the “side meetings” at this gathering. Some activities are certainly missing from this list. Let us know.

How can I join or create a synthesis project or intensive? Contact the coordinators of an existing synthesis activity to contribute. Suggest new NACP activities if you see a need. Watch for calls for proposals that invite NACP research ideas.

The future of the NACP

A new US Carbon Cycle Science Plan is in preparation! A draft is available for review. Review comments are due by 15 February. See Marching orders for the next decade.