Engaging Faculty and Students in Talking about Teaching and Learning (Informed by Assessment Data) Karl A. Smith Civil Engineering - University of Minnesota.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Laurie Richlin conceives of university teaching on a continuum: Unreflective, rote teaching, doing only what was done to us Reflective teaching, using.
Advertisements

Confirming Student Learning: Using Assessment Techniques in the Classroom Douglas R. Davenport Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Truman State University.
ASSESSMENT 101 Preparing Future Faculty (PFF) Workshop Spring 2011 Facilitators: Dr. Kara Penfield, Director of Academic Assessment; Isis Artze-Vega, PFF.
Student Focus Groups UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY COLLEGE OF PHARMACY 1 Formative Evaluation Using Student Focus Groups Heidi M. Anderson, Ph.D. University of.
CAT: The Minute Paper Instructions: Please answer each question in one or two sentences. 1) What was the most useful or meaningful thing you learned during.
Team 6 Lesson 3 Gary J Brumbelow Matt DeMonbrun Elias Lopez Rita Martin.
Assessing Students in Cooperative Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Technological Leadership Institute/ STEM Education Center/
How Do You Know That Your Students Are Learning? 2012 Curators’ Teaching Summit Nov. 12, 2012 – Session 3.
Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities
Guidelines and Methods for Assessing Student Learning Karen Bauer, Institutional Research & Planning, Undergraduate Studies; Gabriele Bauer, CTE.
Assisting Peers to Provide W orthwhile Feedback UC Merced SATAL Program.
Engaging Faculty and Students in Talking about Teaching and Learning (Informed by Assessment Data) Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University.
Group Seminar Field Instruction Model.  1. Delivery of consistent competency based field instruction and augmented case supervision.  2. Provision of.
Providing Constructive Feedback
Basic Skills and Career and Technical Education Lin Marelick & Valerie Carrigan August 11 & 13, 2008 BSI August Institute.
Peer-Led Team Learning: A Model for Enhancing Student Learning Claire Berardini & Glenn Miller Third Annual Faculty Institute Pace University.
Design and Implementation of Pedagogies of Engagement
Cooperative Learning Session 1 Karl A. Smith Civil Engineering University of Minnesota Eastern Michigan University.
Assessing Students in Team-Based Learning
1 Teaching for Learning: Using Active Learning Strategies & Cooperative Student Groups to Promote Learning in Lecture Classes – Session 4 Karl Smith Civil.
IB Diploma Program Exams – Semester Report Cards
1 Problem-Based Cooperative Learning Karl Smith Civil Engineering Estimation Exercise.
Best Practices IIEngineering Engineering Education1 use active learning.
Introduction to teaching and assessing so students will learn more using learner-centered teaching Phyllis Blumberg Warm-up activity How can instructor’s.
Pedagogies of Engagement (Cooperative Learning) and Assessment – Overview – Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering -
Health Career Recruitment and Retention Service-Based Learning.
Formative Assessment.
“Knowledge” Do Now: As a teacher, what does this statement make think about or feel: “He Who Can Does He Who cannot Teaches” George Bernard Shaw.
Universal Design for Learning in the College Classroom Abstract This Faculty Learning Community (FLC) integrated components of Universal Design for Learning.
NISD Summer Professional Development Update September 14, 2015.
Learners’ Attitudes and Perceptions of Online Instruction Presented by: Dr. Karen S. Ivers Dr. JoAnn Carter-Wells Dr. Joyce Lee California State University.
Strategies to Establish a Scientific Discourse Community Kaatje Kraft at Mesa Community College What is a Scientific Discourse Community? A scientific.
An Introduction to Principles of Supplemental Instruction (SI)
NESCent Postdoc Professional Development Series on Effective Teaching and Learning Session 5 – Student Involvement: Cooperative Learning, Learning Communities.
Teaching in a Web-Based Distance Learning Environment: An Evaluation Summary Based on Four Courses Charles Graham, Joni M. Craner, Byung-ro Lim, & Kursat.
Learner-Centered Teaching In Engineering/Technology Classrooms Steven A. Freeman Iowa State University Center for Excellence in Learning and Teaching.
EdTPA Teacher Performance Assessment. Planning Task Selecting lesson objectives Planning 3-5 days of instruction (lessons, assessments, materials) Alignment.
Engaging Faculty and Students in Talking about Teaching and Learning (Informed by Assessment Data) Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University.
TEACHING AND LEARNING What you need to know School of Computing and Mathematics.
Instructional Strategies Teacher Knowledge, Understanding, and Abilities The online teacher knows and understands the techniques and applications of online.
Evidence-Based Teaching: Evaluative Strategies ED B MARCH 13, 2012 Dr. Anne Belcher, Dr. Linda Adamson, Instructors.
Identifying Assessments
Engaging Students Through Active and Cooperative Learning Karl A. Smith Civil Engineering - University of Minnesota
Engaging Faculty and Students in Talking about Teaching and Learning (Informed by Assessment Data) Karl A. Smith Civil Engineering - University of Minnesota.
Formative Assessment. Fink’s Integrated Course Design.
Peer Coaching for Effective Professional Learning.
CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUES Departmental Workshop Wayne State University English Department January 11, 2012.
Learning Assessment Techniques
Design and Implementation of Pedagogies of Engagement
Brigham Young University
University of Minnesota – Duluth
Design and Implementation of Pedagogies of Engagement
A Classroom Action Research Tool
Karl A. Smith Civil Engineering - University of Minnesota
The paper is more a project report rather than experiment.
EDU 675Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
EDU 675 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com
EDU 675 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
California State University – Dominguez Hills
Welcome to the overview session for the Iowa Core Curriculum
National Academy of Engineering Frontiers of Engineering Education
Design and Implementation of Pedagogies of Engagement
Changing Instructional Strategies and the Role of the Principal
National Academy of Engineering Frontiers of Engineering Education
Design and Implementation of Pedagogies of Engagement
Design and Implementation of Pedagogies of Engagement
Design & Implementation of Problem-Based Cooperative Learning
Design and Implementation of Pedagogies of Engagement
Design and Implementation of Pedagogies of Engagement
Presentation transcript:

Engaging Faculty and Students in Talking about Teaching and Learning (Informed by Assessment Data) Karl A. Smith Civil Engineering - University of Minnesota Problem-Based Learning and Curriculum Development Southern Alberta Institute of Technology

2 Assessment Data Knowledge Probe Classroom Assessment (minute paper) Mid-Term Review Student Management Team SGID & Peer Review

3 Knowledge Probe Example from MOT 8221 What would you like to know about the students in your courses?

4

5 PMQ1 PMIQ2 KMQ3 LeadershipQ4 EngSysQ5 IE/ORQ6 Mod/SimQ7 CASQ8 MgmtSciQ9 6 SigmaQ10 MOT 8221 – Spring 2005

6 SpreadQ1 PMQ2 StatQ3 Mod/SimQ4 DBQ5 ProgQ6 MOT 8221 – Spring 2005

7

8 PMQ1 KMQ2 PMIQ3 EngSysQ4 IE/ORQ5 Mod/SimQ6 MgmtSciQ7 6 SigmaQ8

9 SpreadsheetQ1 PMQ2 StatQ3 Mod/SimQ4 DBQ5 ProgQ6

10 Knowledge Probe What would you like to know about the students in your courses?

11 Assessment Data Knowledge Probe Classroom Assessment (minute paper) Mid-Term Review Student Management Team Peer Review

12 Minute Paper What was the most useful or meaningful thing you learned during this session? What question(s) remain uppermost in your mind as we end this session? What was the “muddiest” point in this session? Give an example or application Explain in your own words... Angelo, T.A. & Cross, K.P Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

13 Session Summary (Minute Paper) Reflect on the session: 1. Most interesting, valuable, useful thing you learned. 2. Question/Topic/Issue you would like to have addressed. 3. Comments, suggestions, etc 4.Pace: Too slow Too fast 5.Relevance: Little Lots 6.Format: Ugh Ah

14 Q4 – Pace: Too slow Too fast Q5 – Relevance: Little Lots Q6 – Format: Ugh Ah MOT Spring Session 1

15 Session 1 Comments Most interesting – fast paced tower build exercise (cited by 10 or more); Engineering approach exercise Team efforts, Love the team building; plus/delta good Inquiry exercise – good at reinforcing the group dynamics; Practical application of constructive controversy; controversy exercise, also new teams PM is more than software Useful information that can be brought back to me company to use Not addressed – scope creep; recipe for PM; little more on external factors; internal vs. external PM; formal PM life cycle Questions – Is project management a science or an art? How most companies do PM? Suggestion – A little less reading, please Format – nice balance of theory, background and some practice; class very interactive and interesting; wild first class, ugh, firehose! Great first class

16 Q4 – Pace: Too slow Too fast Q5 – Relevance: Little Lots MOT Spring Session 2

17 Q4 – Pace: Too slow Too fast Q5 – Relevance: Little Lots Q6 – Format: Ugh Ah MOT Spring Session 1

18 Q4 – Pace: Too slow Too fast Q5 – Relevance: Little Lots Q6 – Format: Ugh Ah Mn/DOT Essential Skills for Project Managers May 2, 2005

19 Assessment Data Knowledge Probe Classroom Assessment (minute paper) Mid-Term Review Student Management Team Peer Review

20 Mid-Term Review

21

22 MOT 8221 Mid- Semester Review

23 Assessment Data Knowledge Probe Classroom Assessment (minute paper) Mid-Term Review Student Management Team Peer Review

24 Student Management Team A student management team will be used in this course to operationalize Total Quality Management principles. The attributes of student management teams are described below, and the operation of the team is based on shared responsibility: Students, in conjunction with their instructor, are responsible for the success of any course. As student managers, your special responsibility is to monitor this course through your own experience, to receive comments from other students, to work as a team with your instructor on a regular basis, and to make recommendations to the instructor about how this course can be improved. (Nuhfer, ).

25 Attributes of Student Management Teams students plus teaching team. Students have a managerial role and assume responsibility for the success of the class. Students meet weekly; professor attends every other week. Meetings generally last about one hour. Meet away from classroom and professor's office. Maintain log or journal of suggestions, actions and progress. May focus on the professor or on the content. Utilize group dynamics approach of TQM.

Chapter 8: Student Management Teams: The Heretic’s Path to Teaching Success by Edward B. Nuhfer Wm. Campbell & Karl Smith. New Paradigms for College Teaching. Interaction Books, 1997.

27 Students as Co-Designers Graduate TAs participating as members of the teaching team Undergraduate TAs (near peers) as members of the teaching team

Maximum Effectiveness in Large Classroom Environments Smith & Kampf 9/29/2004 Approaches to Cooperative Learning in CE 4101W & 4102W Informal – Book Ends Formal Task Groups – projects in class and outside Cooperative Base Groups (Cohort Groups) Student Management Team

Maximum Effectiveness in Large Classroom Environments Smith & Kampf 9/29/2004 Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom Informal Cooperative Learning Groups Formal Cooperative Learning Groups Cooperative Base Groups

Maximum Effectiveness in Large Classroom Environments Smith & Kampf 9/29/2004 Book Ends on a Class Session

Cooperative Learning Task Groups Perkins, David King Arthur's Round Table: How collaborative conversations create smart organizations. NY: Wiley.

Maximum Effectiveness in Large Classroom Environments Smith & Kampf 9/29/2004 WebCT Peer Review & Feedback Students work in Base Groups WebCT provides private message areas for each group Opportunity to use the Model-Practice Feedback Loop Feedback to whole group rather than individuals –More information –More models and feedback to help students

Maximum Effectiveness in Large Classroom Environments Smith & Kampf 9/29/2004 WebCT Discussion Area

Maximum Effectiveness in Large Classroom Environments Smith & Kampf 9/29/2004 Feedback Posting Sample

Maximum Effectiveness in Large Classroom Environments Smith & Kampf 9/29/2004 Detailed Feedback to the Group

Maximum Effectiveness in Large Classroom Environments Smith & Kampf 9/29/2004 Model-Practice-Feedback Loop Cooper and Robinson [18] surveyed the literature in higher education and found that “...the model-practice-feedback loop is among the most powerful instructional strategies available to teachers at all levels.” –teacher modeling –student practice with multiple opportunities –descriptive feedback on the quality of their performance

Maximum Effectiveness in Large Classroom Environments Smith & Kampf 9/29/2004 Successes & Challenges Incorporating formal cooperative groups with the peer review process offered the students: – access to more examples of writing – access to comments on both their own papers and those of their group members Students need more explicit connections between the writing for class and the writing they will be doing in the workplace. –Summer 2004 we incorporated an interview assignment to help students make this connection

38 Assessment Data Knowledge Probe Classroom Assessment (minute paper) Mid-Term Review Student Management Team SGID & Peer Review

39

40

41 The biggest and most long-lasting reforms of undergraduate education will come when individual faculty or small groups of instructors adopt the view of themselves as reformers within their immediate sphere of influence, the classes they teach every day. K. Patricia Cross

42 It could well be that faculty members of the twenty-first century college or university will find it necessary to set aside their roles as teachers and instead become designers of learning experiences, processes, and environments. James Duderstadt, 1999