Electrons on Liquid Helium

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quantum Information Processing with Semiconductors Martin Eberl, TU Munich JASS 2008, St. Petersburg.
Advertisements

Single Electron Devices Single-electron Transistors
Superconducting qubits
Quantum Computer Implementations
Quantum Physics ISAT 241 Analytical Methods III Fall 2003 David J. Lawrence.
Quantum computing hardware.
Boris Altshuler Columbia University Anderson Localization against Adiabatic Quantum Computation Hari Krovi, Jérémie Roland NEC Laboratories America.
Coulomb Interaction in quantum structures - Effects of
Qubits Using Single Electrons Over a Dielectric John Goodkind Physics Department University of California, San Diego Collaborators: Manyam Pilla, Xinchang.
Quantum Computing with Trapped Ion Hyperfine Qubits.
LPS Quantum computing lunchtime seminar Friday Oct. 22, 1999.
Helium Nikki Meshkat Physics 138.
Laterally confined Semiconductor Quantum dots Martin Ebner and Christoph Faigle.
Pre-requisites for quantum computation Collection of two-state quantum systems (qubits) Operations which manipulate isolated qubits or pairs of qubits.
Quantum Entanglement of Rb Atoms Using Cold Collisions ( 韓殿君 ) Dian-Jiun Han Physics Department Chung Cheng University.
Universal Optical Operations in Quantum Information Processing Wei-Min Zhang ( Physics Dept, NCKU )
Josephson Junctions, What are they?
Image courtesy of Keith Schwab.
Single-shot read-out of an individual electron spin in a quantum dot J. M. Elzerman, R. Hanson, L. H. Willems van Beveren, B. Witkamp, L. M. K. Vandersypen,
“Quantum computation with quantum dots and terahertz cavity quantum electrodynamics” Sherwin, et al. Phys. Rev A. 60, 3508 (1999) Norm Moulton LPS.
Semiconductors n D*n If T>0
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME Xiangning Luo EE 698A Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Notre Dame Superconducting Devices for Quantum Computation.
Quantum Dots and Spin Based Quantum Computing Matt Dietrich 2/2/2007 University of Washington.
Image courtesy of Keith Schwab.
Quantum Computation Using Optical Lattices Ben Zaks Victor Acosta Physics 191 Prof. Whaley UC-Berkeley.
Maxwell’s Equations; Magnetism of Matter


Plan of the talk: Neutrons on a surface of liquid helium. 1.Introduction and motivation. Experiments with neutrons and their energy levels in the gravitational.
Superconducting Qubits Kyle Garton Physics C191 Fall 2009.
IWCE, Purdue, Oct , 2004 Seungwon Lee Exchange Coupling in Si-Quantum-Dot-Based Quantum Computer Seungwon Lee 1, Paul von Allmen 1, Susan N. Coppersmith.
Quantum Devices (or, How to Build Your Own Quantum Computer)
1 Belfast Jan 2003 Large Detuning Scheme for Spin-Based fullerene Quantum Computation Mang Feng and Jason Twamley Department of Mathematical Physics National.
From Bits to Qubits Wayne Viers and Josh Lamkins
Superconductivity III: Theoretical Understanding Physics 355.
Power Dissipation Bounds and Models for Quantum-dot Cellular Automata Circuits Saket Srivastava*, Sudeep Sarkar # and Sanjukta Bhanja* * Electrical Engineering,
Quantum computation: Why, what, and how I.Qubitology and quantum circuits II.Quantum algorithms III. Physical implementations Carlton M. Caves University.
Single spin detection Maksym Sladkov Top master nanoscience symposium June 23, 2005.
Implementation of Quantum Computing Ethan Brown Devin Harper With emphasis on the Kane quantum computer.
Note! The following is excerpted from a lecture found on-line. The original author is Professor Peter Y. Yu Department of Physics University of California.
110/24/2015 Applied Physics Lecture 5  Electrostatics Electrical energy potential difference and electric potential potential energy of charged conductors.
Coherent excitation of Rydberg atoms on an atom chip
Anatoli Polkovnikov Krishnendu Sengupta Subir Sachdev Steve Girvin Dynamics of Mott insulators in strong potential gradients Transparencies online at
Michael Browne 11/26/2007.
Two Level Systems and Kondo-like traps as possible sources of decoherence in superconducting qubits Lara Faoro and Lev Ioffe Rutgers University (USA)
Entanglement for two qubits interacting with a thermal field Mikhail Mastyugin The XXII International Workshop High Energy Physics and Quantum Field Theory.
Gang Shu  Basic concepts  QC with Optical Driven Excitens  Spin-based QDQC with Optical Methods  Conclusions.
Seung Hyun Park Hyperfine Mapping of Donor Wave Function Deformations in Si:P based Quantum Devices Seung Hyun Park Advisors: Prof. Gerhard Klimeck Prof.
The Nature of Light: Its Wave Nature Light is a form of made of perpendicular waves, one for the electric field and one for the magnetic field All electromagnetic.
Condensed States of Matter: Liquids and Solids Chapter 14
Large scale quantum computing in silicon with imprecise qubit couplings ArXiv : (2015)
Single Electron Transistor (SET)
1 Quantum Computation with coupled quantum dots. 2 Two sides of a coin Two different polarization of a photon Alignment of a nuclear spin in a uniform.
Charge pumping in mesoscopic systems coupled to a superconducting lead
SUPERCONDUCTORS mobile electrons in conducting material move through lattice of atoms or ions that vibrate (thermal motion) when conductor is cooled down.
Adiabatic quantum computer (AQC) Andrii Rudavskyi Supervisor: prof. Petra Rudolf.
Technology of terahertz quantum dot detectors and their applications V Antonov Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Russia Royal Holloway University.
The Extraordinary Properties of Water. Water three A water molecule (H 2 O), is made up of three atoms --- one oxygen and two hydrogen. H H O.
Suggestion for Optical Implementation of Hadamard Gate Amir Feizpour Physics Department Sharif University of Technology.
Superconductivity, Josephson Junctions, and squids
Rydberg atoms part 1 Tobias Thiele.
TC, U. Dorner, P. Zoller C. Williams, P. Julienne
The Electromagnetic Spectrum
Coherent interactions at a distance provide a powerful tool for quantum simulation and computation. The most common approach to realize an effective long-distance.
General Physics (PHY 2140) Lecture 5 Electrostatics Electrical energy
General Physics (PHY 2140) Lecture 33 Modern Physics Atomic Physics
Electron Spin Qubits on Liquid Helium
all Cooper pairs must behave in the same way
Strong Coupling of a Spin Ensemble to a Superconducting Resonator
Quantum Computing Andrew Krumbach Carolyn Camara
Presentation transcript:

Electrons on Liquid Helium

The D-Wave “Orion” chip The Orion system is a hardware accelerator designed to solve a particular NP-complete problem called the two dimensional Ising model in a magnetic field. It is built around a 16- qubit superconducting adiabatic quantum computer processor. The system is designed to be used in concert with a conventional front end for any application that requires the solution of an NP-complete problem. (from Geordie Rose’s blog dwave.wordpress.com) Is this a quantumcomputer?

The D-Wave “Orion” chip is supposed to perform adiabatic quantum computation. Standard QC is a sequence of unitary operations involving many energy levels, superpositions and entanglement. Adiabatic QC works by keeping the system near the (instantaneous) ground state of the Hamiltonian, which varies slowly (adiabatically) with time. V Corato et al., proceedings of 7th European Conference on Applied Superconductivity (2006)

Electrons are weakly attracted by the image charge (  = for LHe); the 1-D image potential along z is: -∑/z, where ∑ = (  -1)e 2 /4(  +1) They are prevented from penetrating helium surface by a high (~ 1eV) barrier. Bound states in this potential in 1-D look like hydrogen: E n = −R/n 2 (n = 1, 2,...), R = ∑ 2 m/2 ħ 2 Rydberg energy is about 8K, and the effective Bohr radius is about 8 nm. Electrons on Helium

Electrons on Helium - 2 Liquid helium film must be cooled down to mK temperatures in order to reduce the vapor pressure (which would otherwise wreak havoc with among the electrons) It is well known that below about 2.2 K He-4 turns superfluid. At few mK it is pure He II. These features are crucial for the QC proposal with electrons on LHe. The main source of noise (heating) for the electrons trapped on the surface is the ripplons.

“Quantum Computing with Electrons Floating on Liquid Helium” P. M. Platzman, M. I. Dykman, Science 284 pp – 1969 (1999). The original proposal The qubit is formed by the two lowest energy states of the trapped electron. Given R = 8K = 170 GHz, the n = 1 and the n = 2 levels are split by about 125 GHz. Presence of electric fields from bias electrodes introduces Stark shift of the levels. Single qubit operations are performed by applying microwaves at the Stark-shifted frequency. Expected Rabi frequencies of the order of hundreds of MHz

Patterned bottom electrodes Electrons on surface of LHe of thickness d (typically about 1 micron) will form a 2-D solid with lattice constant approximately equal to d. (This is because the Coulomb energy e 2 /d is of the order 20 K >> k b T at 10 mK). In order to control the locations of the electrons, as well as to be able to individually address each qubits, the bottom electrode of the capacitor is patterned. This also provides confinement in the plane of the LHe film. Electrons can be physically raised and lowered by controlling the voltages on the patterned electrodes.

Two-qubit gates Two-qubit gates via dipole-dipole interaction (similar to the liquid state NMR QC). For a dipole moment (er), the interaction energy between qubits separated by distance d is (er) 2 /d 3. At 1 micron separation the interaction energy is estimated to be about 10 MHz. The frequency of the coupling is qubit state-dependent (because (er) is state-dependent). This forms the basis of the quantum logic gates like the CNOT gate. However, it is strongly distance-dependent. Thus, interactions are limited to nearest neighbors.

The readout “In order to read out the wave function at some time t f, when the computation is completed, we apply a reverse field E + to the capacitor...” Qubit readout relies on state-dependent electron tunneling when a reversed bias field is applied to the capacitor. This tunneling readout scheme is similar to the readout of superconducting flux qubits. In this proposal, a multi-channel plate detector is envisioned. An SET can be used, too. Problems: reading out the whole system at once; need to detect single electrons reliably

Current state-of-the-art

Planar structures with SET readout Mike Lea, Royal Holloway University of London Surface tension in the channel defined LHe depth; control electrodes on the bottom define individual traps. The readout is performed by a SET at the end of the channel. The electrons are ionized first if they are in the higher energy state, then read out one by one.

Phil Platzman (Lucent) and John Goodkind (UC San Diego) Trapping and controlling individual e - Developing a cold-cathode source of electrons. Microfabricated pattern of micron-sized pillars to trap individual electrons Readout by ionizing the upper state electrons and using bolometry ~2 mm above the surface

Spin-based qubits with EoH Spin qubit coherence times are longer; may be better suited for QC than the motion states (charge qubit). Spins coupled mapping on motion states, then performing dipole-dipole gates as in the original proposal Steve Lyon (Princeton)

Conclusions.... A “neat” and certainly very unique approach Builds on ideas from the superconducting qubits, trapped ions, quantum dots The experiment is harder than theory. Some theoretical predictions unrealistic.