Examples of track use M. Floyd K. Palamartchouk Massachusetts Institute of Technology Newcastle University GAMIT-GLOBK course University of Bristol, UK.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Track Short Course: Track Introduction and Commands Lecture 01 Thomas Herring, MIT Room A
Advertisements

Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | A | Cambridge MA V F.
Basics of GPS processing workflow
GPS measurements in the field M. Floyd K. Palamartchouk Massachusetts Institute of Technology Newcastle University GAMIT-GLOBK course University of Bristol,
GPS data from receiver to processing input
Generating velocity solutions with globk
A quick GPS Primer (assumed knowledge on the course!) Observables Error sources Analysis approaches Ambiguities If only it were this easy…
Survey-mode measurements and analysis M. Floyd K. Palamartchouk Massachusetts Institute of Technology Newcastle University GAMIT-GLOBK course University.
Effects of azimuthal multipath heterogeneity and hardware changes on GPS coordinate time series Sibylle Goebell, Matt King
Limits of static processing in a dynamic environment Matt King, Newcastle University, UK.
“Real-time” Transient Detection Algorithms Dr. Kang Hyeun Ji, Thomas Herring MIT.
Generating time series with glred
Network Strain Filter and its applications on GPS data Matt Wei, Jeff McGuire WHOI September 10, 2011.
SOPAC's Instantaneous Global Plate Motion Model: Yehuda Bock, Linette Prawirodirdjo, Peng Fang, Paul Jamason, Shimon Wdowinski (TAU, UMiami) Scripps Orbit.
03/18/05OSU GAMIT/GLOBK1 TRACK: GAMIT Kinematic GPS processing module
Track Introduction and Commands Thomas Herring, MIT Room A
Izmir GAMIT/GLOBK Workshop Introduction Thomas Herring, MIT
Generating time series with glred
RESOLVING FOCAL DEPTH WITH A NEAR FIELD SINGLE STATION IN SPARSE SEISMIC NETWORK Sidao Ni, State Key Laboratory of Geodesy and Earth’s Dynamics, Institute.
Disaster Mitigation and Management Organization
GPS: “Where goeth thou” Thomas Herring With results from Jen Alltop: Geosystems Thesis Katy Quinn: Almost graduated Ph.D
Surveying with the Global Positioning System Phase Observable.
09/24/2008Unavco Track Intro1 TRACK: GAMIT Kinematic GPS processing module
A Geodesist’s View of the Ionosphere Gerald L. Mader National Geodetic Survey Silver Spring, MD.
Utility programs and scripts T. A. Herring R. W. King M. A. Floyd Massachusetts Institute of Technology GPS Data Processing and Analysis with GAMIT/GLOBK/TRACK.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 24 Prof. Thomas Herring Room ;
Dealing with earthquakes and other non-linear motions T. A. Herring R. W. King M. A. Floyd Massachusetts Institute of Technology GPS Data Processing and.
Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F
Data weighting, and dealing with earthquakes and other non-linear motions M. Floyd K. Palamartchouk Massachusetts Institute of Technology Newcastle University.
Challenges and Opportunities in GPS Vertical Measurements “One-sided” geometry increases vertical uncertainties relative to horizontal (~3:1) so longer.
Short-session Static and Kinematic Processing Short-session static: GAMIT processing, sessions 1-3 hours long Kinematic: TRACK processing, coordinates.
Survey-mode measurements and analysis T. A. Herring R.W. King M. A. Floyd Massachusetts Institute of Technology GPS Data Processing and Analysis with GAMIT/GLOBK/TRACK.
How does InSAR work? Gareth Funning University of California, Riverside.
Kinematic processing with track Tutorial 03 and 04 Thomas Herring
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 09 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Track Short Course: Track Examples Thomas Herring, MIT Room A
Challenges and Opportunities in GPS Vertical Measurements “One-sided” geometry increases vertical uncertainties relative to horizontal and makes the vertical.
Modeling Errors in GPS Vertical Estimates Signal propagation effects –Signal scattering ( antenna phase center/multipath ) –Atmospheric delay ( parameterization,
Aug 6, 2002APSG Irkutsk Contemporary Horizontal and Vertical Deformation of the Tien Shan Thomas Herring, Bradford H. Hager, Brendan Meade, Massachusetts.
2002/05/07ACES Workshop Spatio-temporal slip distribution around the Japanese Islands deduced from Geodetic Data Takeshi Sagiya Geographical Survey Institute.
Southern California Earthquake Center The Community Geodetic Model (CGM) Jessica Murray, U.S. Geological Survey (SCEC4) Rowena Lohman, Cornell University.
Fault Plane Solution Focal Mechanism.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Menlo Park GPS data processing and archiving J.L. Svarc, J.R. Murray, Fred Pollitz, Scott Haefner,
Track Introduction and Commands Lecture 03 Thomas Herring, MIT Room A
Track Introduction and Commands Lecture 07 Thomas Herring, MIT Room A
Errors in Positioning Matt King, Newcastle University, UK.
Limits of static processing in a dynamic environment Matt King, Newcastle University, UK.
09/24/2008Unavco Track Intro1 TRACK: GAMIT Kinematic GPS processing module R King overview from longer T Herring.
Limits of static processing in a dynamic environment Matt King, Newcastle University, UK.
Utility programs and scripts
Dealing with earthquakes and other non-linear motions
Dealing with earthquakes and other non-linear motions
Utility programs and scripts
Kinematic processing with track Tutorial 3
Basics of processing workflow for GAMIT/GLOBK
Utility programs and scripts
GLOBK Velocity Solutions
Basics of GPS processing workflow
Introduction to and basics of processing with TRACK
Kinematic Data Processing
Track Output Interpretation
Track Output Interpretation
Utility programs and scripts
Utility programs and scripts
Introduction to and basics of processing with track
M. A. Floyd Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
Basics of processing workflow for GAMIT/GLOBK
M. A. Floyd Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
Introduction to and basics of processing with track
Basics of processing workflow for GAMIT/GLOBK
Presentation transcript:

Examples of track use M. Floyd K. Palamartchouk Massachusetts Institute of Technology Newcastle University GAMIT-GLOBK course University of Bristol, UK 12–16 January 2015 Material from R. King, T. Herring, M. Floyd (MIT) and S. McClusky (now ANU)

Outline Kinematic examples 1.GPS seismology 2.Roving GPS 3.Rapid deformation Static examples 4.Short-static occupations 5.Deciphering interference Remember the rule-of-thumb for proportional errors: ε BL ~ ε SV × BL/h SV

Example 1: GPS seismology Examine the short baseline MIT results: Look at this example in more detail later April 4, 2010 El-Mayor Cucapah earthquake in Baja California: 5-Hz results. Look later at long baseline processing for these sites. Track results are generated in two steps: – First solution uses zero process noise except during time of earthquake (long baseline solution) – Final results generated with fixed ambiguities from first solution read in (-a option). – Long baseline ambiguity resolution with stochastic site coordinates needs LC estimate which can noisy due to stochastics.

Coseismic offsets Offsets based on 2-days before and after earthquake. Two days used is reduce leakage of postseismic motions. Red Star is epicenter; blue circle is 60 km (15-20 seconds surface wave speed)

Zoom around border Sites near the epicenter. Blue circle is 60 km radius Displacement s P mm P mm P mm … P491 9 mm

High-rate GPS site download High rate data from these sites downloaded after event. Most sites are 5-Hz; more distant sites are 1- Hz. Reference site for high rate positioning 1Hz reference site

Sites in coseismic region Sites shown have 5-Hz data for 3- days before and after the earthquake Examine sequence of sites along US/Mexico border and North

P496

P494

P500

P066

P473

P742

Surface wave arrival at P725 P725 is ~600 km from epicenter. This signal common to sites is the arrival at the “reference site”

Example 2: Roving GPS (from England et al., 2013) Disclaimer: This example was not processed using TRACK because the kinematic equipment was single-frequency, i.e. L1-only, and TRACK requires dual-frequency data

Example 3: Rapid deformation (from Ryder et al., 2012) Two earthquakes within 15 minutes of one another InSAR shows cumulative deformation but no way to separate events Epoch-by-epoch (rather than batch) GPS processing may help... Ryder et al. (2012), Figure 1

Example 3: First run Key TRACK commands: site_stats iloc lemu navi timedep_procns iloc lemu navi iloc lemu navi Second run (updated apr): site_stats iloc lemu navi timedep_procns iloc lemu navi iloc lemu navi site_pos...

Example 3: Final run Key TRACK commands: site_stats iloc lemu navi #timedep_procns # iloc # lemu # navi # iloc # lemu # navi ambin_file

Example 4: Short-static occupations Short spans of data (e.g. 30 minutes) may be processed with GAMIT Risk of all data being removed during cleaning (AUTCLN) if not high quality TRACK may be used in “short-static” approach with fixed, continuously recording and well positioned base site Long session base site with accurate a priori coordinate calculated using GAMIT Rover

Example 4: Short-static occupations

Sometimes, this happens… m N N Photographs courtesy of Gareth Funning (University of California, Riverside)

Example 5: Deciphering interference First TRACK run with Re-run teqc with “-e” option to truncate RINEX file at epoch of disturbance so as not to propagate bad data 19:36 local time Setup

Example 5: A complex example 20:34 local time m 07:21 local time ~ 9 hrs ???

sh_plot_track Reads track “NEU”, “DHU” or “XYZ” output file May add plot to view evolution of atmospheric delay

sh_kml Script for converting several formats of result into KML format for viewing in Google Earth – glist (may also be used with time slider) – “.org”-file / “.vel”-file – track “GEOD”-format output file

References England, P. C., R. T. Walker, B. Fu and M. A. Floyd (2013), A bound on the viscosity of the Tibetan crust from the horizontality of palaeolake shorelines, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 375, 44–56, doi: /j.epsl doi: /j.epsl Ryder, I., A. Rietbrock, K. Kelson, R. Bürgmann, M. Floyd, A. Socquet, C. Vigny and D. Carrizo (2012), Large extensional aftershocks in the continental forearc triggered by the 2010 Maule earthquake, Chile, Geophys. J. Int., 188, 879–890, doi: /j X xdoi: /j X x

goo.gl/CoqQZ0