PCEP Extensions for Segment Routing draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-01

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
71st IETF Philadelphia, March 2008 ERO Extensions for Path Key draft-bradford-ccamp-path-key-ero-01.txt Richard Bradford : JP Vasseur.
Advertisements

Extensions to the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) for Point-to-Multipoint Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-05.txt.
Requirement and protocol for WSON and non-WSON interoperability CCAMP WG, IETF 81th, Quebec City, Canada draft-shimazaki-ccamp-wson-interoperability-00.
© 2010 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. 1 Segment Routing Clarence Filsfils – Distinguished Engineer Christian Martin –
Óscar González de Dios PCE, the magic component of Segment Routing Telefónica I+D.
1 Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) presented by: chitralekha tamrakar (B.S.E.) divya krit tamrakar (B.S.E.) Rashmi shrivastava(B.S.E.) prakriti.
Signaling & Routing Extension for Links with Variable Discrete Bandwidth draft-long-ccamp-rsvp-te-availability-03 draft-long-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-02.
1 Multi Protocol Label Switching Presented by: Petros Ioannou Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, UCY.
Segment Routing with IPv6 Eric Vyncke Distinguished Engineer – Cisco Systems September, 2014 Leveraging IPv6 extension header for traffic.
Draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-01 draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-ospfv3-extension- 02 IETF 88, November 3-8, 2013 P. Psenak, S.Previdi,
BGP Link-State extensions for Segment Routing
1 IETF-81, MPLS WG, Quebec City, Canada, July, 2011 draft-ali-mpls-inter-domain-p2mp-rsvp-te-lsp-06.txt MPLS WG IETF-81 Quebec City, Canada July, 2011.
PCE-based Computation for Inter-domain P2MP LSP draft-zhao-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures-00.txt Quintin Zhao, Huawei Technology David Amzallag,
Draft-torvi-mpls-rsvp-ingress-protection-00IETF 84 MPLS: 30 July Ingress Protection for RSVP-TE p2p and p2mp LSPs draft-torvi-mpls-rsvp-ingress-protection-00.
© 2009 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Public Presentation_ID 1 Upstream mapping in Echo Request draft-ankur-mpls-upstream-mapping-00 Ankur.
© 2009 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Public Presentation_ID 1 BGP Diagnostic Message draft-raszuk-bgp-diagnostic-message-00 Robert Raszuk,
Draft-li-mpls-proxy-te-lsp-01IETF 90 MPLS1 Proxy MPLS Traffic Engineering Label Switched Path(LSP) draft-li-mpls-proxy-te-lsp-01 Zhenbin Li, Xinzong Zeng.
Draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-07 draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initated-lsp-03 Stateful PCE - update Ina Minei Ed Crabbe Jan Medved Robert Varga Siva Sivabalan.
MULTI-PROTOCOL LABEL SWITCHING By: By: YASHWANT.V YASHWANT.V ROLL NO:20 ROLL NO:20.
Connecting SPRING Islands over IP Networks draft-xu-spring-islands-connection-over-ip-00 Xiaohu Xu (Huawei) Siva Sivabalan (Cisco) IETF89,
Draft-chen-rtgwg-resource-management-yang-00IETF 94 RTGWG1 PCE-initiated IP Tunnel draft-chen-pce-pce-initiated-ip-tunnel-00 Xia Chen, Zhenbin Li(Huawei)
Draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-ospf-extension-03 draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-ospfv3-extension-00 IETF 88, November 3-8, 2013 P. Psenak, S.Previdi,
Segment Routing IETF 87 Clarence Filsfils – 1 C. Filsfils, S. Previdi, A. Bashandy, B. Decraene, S. Litkowski, M. Horneffer, I. Milojevic,
Stateful PCE Extensions for Data Plane Switchover and Balancing draft-tanaka-pce-stateful-pce-data-ctrl-00 July, 2013 Yosuke Tanaka, Yuji Kamite NTT Communications,
Segment Routing: An Architecture build with SDN in mind and addressing the evolving network requirements Brian Meaney Cisco SP Consulting Team.
Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Routing algorithms provide support for performance goals – Distributed and dynamic React to congestion Load balance.
Extensions to Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) for Hierarchical Path Computation Elements (PCE) PCE WG, IETF 86th draft-zhang-pce-hierarchy-extensions-03.
Segment Routing Traffic Engineering
Stateful PCE – LSP initiation draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp Ed Crabbe Ina Minei, Siva Sivabalan Robert Varga.
PCEP extensions for GMPLS CCAMP WG, IETF 79th, Beijing, China draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-01 Cyril Margaria Nokia Siemens Networks Oscar González.
1 RSVP-TE Path Diversity using Exclude Routes draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-diversity-03.txt Zafar Ali Cisco Systems George SwallowCisco Systems Clarence Filsfils.
Konstantin agouros Omkar deshpande
BGP extensions for Path Computation Element (PCE) Discovery in a BGP/MPLS IP-VPN draft-kumaki-pce-bgp-disco-attribute-03.txt Kenji Kumaki KDDI R&D Labs,
Connecting MPLS-SPRING Islands over IP Networks
Residence Time Measurement draft-mirsky-mpls-residence-time-02
Jean-Philippe Vasseur – Cisco Systems Raymond Zhang - Infonet
OpenDaylight BGP Use-Cases
RSVP-TE Extensions for Associated Co-routed Bidirectional Label Switched Paths (LSPs) draft-gandhishah-teas-assoc-corouted-bidir-01 Author list: Rakesh.
MPLS LSP Instant Install draft-saad-mpls-lsp-instant-install-00
PCEP Extensions For Transporting Traffic Engineering (TE) Data
Use Cases for Using PCE to act as a Central Controller (PCECC) Component draft-zhao-teas-pce-central-controller-use-cases-00.txt 95th Buenos Aires.
PCEP Extension for Native IP ietf
Explicitly advertising the TE protocols enabled on links in OSPF
Explicitly advertising the TE protocols enabled on links in ISIS
P. Psenak, S.Previdi, C. Filsfils – Cisco W. Henderickx – Nokia
CHAPTER 8 Network Management
N. Kumar, C. Pignataro, F. Iqbal, Z. Ali (Presenter) - Cisco Systems
Greg Mirsky Jeff Tantsura Mach Chen Ilya Varlashkin
ISIS extensions for SRv6 draft-bashandy-isis-srv6-extensions-02
Separating Routing Planes using Segment Routing draft-gulkohegde-spring-separating-routing-planes-using-sr-00 IETF 98 – Chicago, USA Shraddha Hegde
ISIS extensions for SRv6 draft-bashandy-isis-srv6-extensions-00
IETF South Korea PCEP Link-State extensions for Segment Routing draft-li-pce-pcep-ls-sr-extension-01 Zhenbin Li (Huawei) Xia Chen (Huawei) Nan.
BFD Directed Return Path draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed-07
DetNet Information Model Consideration
draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-01
draft-gandhi-pce-pm-07
SRv6 BGP based overlay services draft-dawra-bess-srv6-services-00
draft-guichard-sfc-nsh-sr-02
draft-liu-pim-mofrr-tilfa-00
draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-policy-00
ISIS extensions for SRv6 draft-bashandy-isis-srv6-extensions-03
draft-bashandy-isis-srv6-extensions-04
Standard Representation Of Domain Sequence
Supporting Flexible Algorithm Prefix SIDs in LSP Ping/Traceroute
PCEP extensions for GMPLS
Time-to-Live TLV for LSP-Ping draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-ttl-tlv-01 Sami Boutros Siva Sivabalan George Swallow Vishwas.
Unified Source Routing Instructions using MPLS Label Stack draft-xu-mpls-unified-source-routing-instruction-04 Xiaohu Xu (Huawei) Ahmed Bashandy (Cisco)
IETF105 IS-IS V6/MT Deployment Considerations draft-chunduri-lsr-isis-mt-deployment-cons-02 Uma Chunduri [Futurewei] Jeff Tantsura [Apstra] Shraddha Hegde.
draft-ali-spring-srv6-oam-01.txt SRv6 OAM
Inter-AS OAM for SR Networks IETF 105, Montreal
Presentation transcript:

PCEP Extensions for Segment Routing draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-01 PCEP Extensions for Segment Routing draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-01.txt IETF 92 Jeff Tantsura (Ericsson) - Presenter Edward Crabbe (Independent) Robert Raszuk (NTT) Victor Lopez (Telefonica) Wim Henderickx (Alcatel-Lucent) Siva Sivabalan, Jan Medved, Clarence Filsfils (Cisco) March 25, 2015

Segment Routing Background Segment Routing (SR) enables a head-end node to select path for traffic without using signaling protocol (e.g., RSVP-TE). Operates with any data-plane (including MPLS) that support forwarding operation based on a list of Segment Identifiers (SID) A SR path can be derived manually or more intelligently via Stateful/Stateless PCE.

SR: PCE Models External Stateful or Stateless PCE Router based Stateful or Stateless PCE PCEP session PCE PCEP session PCE PCC SR Network PCC SR Network

SR: LSP Initiation Model PCC-initiated LSP PCE-initiated LSP Application initiated LSP PCE PCE PCC initiated LSP PCE PCE PCC PCC

SR-PCE-CAPABILITY TLV   0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type=TBD | Length=4 | | Reserved | Flags | MSD | Optional TLV exchanged via OPEN message. Max. Segment Depth (MSD): maximum number of SIDs that a PCC is capable of imposing on a packet.

SR-ERO Sub-Object Segment ID (SID): Nodal Adjacency Identifier (NAI):   0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |L| Type=TBD | Length=4 | ST | Flags |F|S|C|M| | SID | // NAI (variable) //   Segment ID (SID): can be an MPLS label entry. Nodal Adjacency Identifier (NAI): identifies node or adjacency associated with SID. Can be in various formats; IPv4 node ID, IPv4 adjacency, etc. Segment Type (ST): Identifies the type of NAI associated with SID.

SR-RRO Sub-Object Fields have the same meaning as SR-ERO sub-object   0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type=TBD | Length=4 | ST | Flags |F|S| | SID | // NAI (variable) //   Fields have the same meaning as SR-ERO sub-object

PATH-SETUP-TYPE PATH-SETUP-TYPE field in an OPTIONAL TLV defined in “draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-.txt”. This draft defines a new PATH-SETUP-TYPE (value = 1) for “Segment Routed Traffic Engineering LSP”

Conclusions This draft proposes simple extensions to carry SR path information over PCEP sessions. First presented at IETF 88. 3 or 4 implementations exist Would like to request for last call.

Thank You !